Racial superiority depends on the circumstances, not the genes

Racial superiority depends on the circumstances, not the genes

Attached: Muh masterrace 1.jpg (1284x1258, 256K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tollense_valley_battlefield
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldowan
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

apparently rome isn't in europe

>saged. go fuck a goat Haim

Attached: israel-is-occupying-palestine7.png (589x760, 150K)

You are wrong, racial intelligence is an evolved trait dependent on the harshness of the environment. The size of buildings is dependent on population density.

Attached: 1506913797297.jpg (245x200, 17K)

>tfw those inferior wh*tetoids somehow dominated the entire hyper-advanced colored world

Attached: nick-young-confused-face-300x256-nqlyaa.jpg (800x450, 18K)

/thread

'bc' does not have an 'e' at the end of it, heathen.

Ugh learn the new terms. Before Christ is now outdated and offensive as well.

White civilization 1000bce

Attached: 2.jpg (680x382, 145K)

*blocks your path*

Attached: palace-of-Knossos[1].jpg (984x505, 87K)

>egypt is African, implying nignog civ
>jewish just top kekitty
>european one conveniently omits Greek and Roman
You dont belong there Tyrone.

>minoans
>white
Shitskin greek detected

europe yes but not germ*nic

Get the appropriate loicense for it and gas yourself Moshe.

It the genes and all negroid/abbo gene carries are subhumans. Our archetecture is far more glorious, sandnigger

The North was always spiritually superior. The only reason you derive a superiority for "you" is superficiality. Civilisation is always faster and smoother with the technique, but at the cost of creativity and spirit (insight).


The North is always more archaic with ancient cultures and therefore marked as the originator and preserver. Superficial civilisation and fancy hedonistic plebs are not a sign of "superiority". That is like saying Arabs and Chinese are superior because of this fancy Hong Kong / Dubai fetish for superficial skyscrapers and artificial lights everywhere. Inventions that came from Europeans, the originators who live much more humble.
Those imitating civilizations create the highest density of godlessness, envy and greed. Like rome became also a mixed mutt-society that had to be fertilized with better genetic material from the north constantly, so the empires could hold.

Most of you just look at a statue and think you have some prove for "superiority", while this is actually the prove that you guys have the exact same mindset as niggers who think they are superior just by putting on some bling-bling and wave with money in a lambo.

Attached: subhumanity.png (580x5424, 1.85M)

"""""""white"""""""""

Consider suicide you double digit IQ arab in denial

So you use a bad picture from Europe .. just one, as an example and mostly made up examples from other civilizations? Good job little buddy.

Also why don't you use rome or the great germanic civilizations as an example? A that's righjt, because ytou are a biased piece of shit.

Also where is the african 1000 BCE? :D

What circumstances do blacks need to be superior?

The germanics sacked rome several times, fucking moron.

>rome isn't european
fuck off lmao

>rome
>1000 BC

>and became more widely used in the mid-19th century by Jewish religious scholars.
From wiki on BCE.
Every fucking time

Bullshit. By that logic the difficult places to live in like the Amazon or the Himalayas would be chimpanzee tier (Africa). Yet South and mesoamerica had high culture, and so did places like Nepal, Tibet and so forth.

Genes are everything. This is why under white rule you have Rhodesia and under nigger rule you have Zimbabwe.

Also it's true Western Europe was tribal while Rome was... well, Rome. That makes the achievements of the white race that more shockingly swift and collosal.

I didn't know they had cameras in 1000BC

ah yeah, 753 BC, sorry. Shit! Such a difference

Europeans created classical music, OP's argument is invalid.

(its both)

Doesn’t this only prove how much advanced Europeans are? If they had a late start yet colonized and took over all of these civilizations, it shows supremacy

Do you know what Rome would've looked like in 753 BC?

We easily conquered the world also, because we are superior.

white civilization 1000bce

Much of Europe was uninhabited at the time, Minoans eventually became Greeks/Tojans, who sailed east and became Romans who killed almost all other Europeans and make up a huge proportion of modern European DNA. You, in England, have more old Roman DNA than Modern Rome, which was conquered by arabs.

Attached: gettyimages-89162642-2048x2048.jpg (2048x1386, 1.8M)

Also ancient Egypt was not "African", technically it would fall under the "Arab Civilization" category

Attached: 1504234670309.png (1580x1397, 317K)

>b-but we were originators and sheeit, muh humility, muh degeneracy free society.
Personally a white supremacy LARPer but This is some heavy coping.

Minoans are literally swarthoid Anatolian farmers with 0 aryan admixture

>Good job little buddy.
SEETHING

Attached: Download (4).jpg (228x221, 11K)

Do you know the history of the world and how superior Europeans are in every way possible? The only people who are on the same level are koreans and japanese.

They are one in the same. Genes are developed through circumstances

Arabnigger, cry more.

>pyramids
>african

>native american pyramids
>1000 BCE

>mesophotamian civilization looking like in fan fic

>jewish temples looking like in fan fic

>chinese civilization
maybe

>native americans 1000 BCE
LEL

Picking northern Europe as an example, the region which was populated last. Compare it to Greece and Rome next time.

The European tribes had vast amounts of space and resources. They had no reason to coalesce into population dense areas so they never increased their technologies for various things like building, farming or food storage. As population density increases, not every family/tribe can have their own piece of the rich resource pie. They fight amongst each other and eventually one integrates into the other or is eliminated, population centres increase around central authorities, new jobs arise as food production/storage increases, and with it comes more ideas and time spent working on them.

People looking into the past realities as if it is equivalent to modern realities aren't too smart. All that matters is the present reality. In the present, European innovation, work ethic, and civility, have led to their domination of almost all aspects of modern technologies and industry. They have sustained their dominance for the past 500 years or so on the world stage and have been steadily improving for the last 1000 years or so. Compare that too the dirt/stone piling civilizations that all hit the wall and stopped being relevant. Is it genes? Probably. Something to do with the Europeans ability to be rational and civil with one another.

Chick with their tits out, that’s a civilization I can get behind.

>The only people who are on the same level are koreans and japanese.
Cringe, they were nothing until Anglos gave them civilisation

...

That's Med civilization. Why are subhuman barbarians trying to take credit for it?

One of the largest battlefields of the Bronze Age world is in Germany

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tollense_valley_battlefield

>subhuman
Whites have invented infinitely more than Greeks ever did in the space of 300 years

The literal subhunan talks. You were literally the last race to create a civilization. Of course none of us wants to associate with you.

Minoans were displaced by Greeks that invaded from the north during the Bronze Age civilization collapse. To them you were snow niggers.

>Where is the African
Imagine having to compare your ancestors civilization with Africans...... Subhuman barbarians=savages. The ancient Greeks were right savages (niggers) and barbarians (you) are the same thing.

We took civilisation to heights you could never dream of at an exponential rate
Greek "inventions" are mundane abstractions that every civilisation had, muh poetry, muh philosophy
Once we had civilisation, greece was left in the dust

>population increases and more subhumans come with it
>strong men seek open space free from subhumans
>repeat until no more open space and the whole planet is covered in subhumans
Dumb Greek, pay debts.

>Greece and Rome.
But we are not barbarians, subhuman.

Rome had a predominantly nordic ruling class you pelasgian shitskin
Most of the emperors had light hair and eyes, stop appropriating white civilisation

>Whites
You should check the surnames of those "whites", subhuman.

That's a sage from me dawg

Notice how Egypt is used as the example of 'African Civilization', but it wasn't sub-saharan africans who built it. Egypt is on the continent of Africa, but they were a middle eastern race and civilization, NOT niggers. There was a very short time after a slave revolt when the Nubians (blacks) had control of Egypt, but under their rule things immediately went to shit and stayed that way until the Arabs took back control.

Romans were Italics and etruscans neither ethnic group was related to ethnic Greeks. The concept of “meds” is a relatively new cultural phenomena.

Except DNA tests confirmed the continuity from Minoans to Myceneans to modern day Greeks, subhuman. You were considered subhuman barbarians for a long time after the Minoans too.

Newton
Watt
Jenner
Faraday
Shakespeare
Maxwell
Boyle
Hooke

nah you're just a shitskin

Im surprised you dont have a maymay flag on.

If Euro civilization was just mud huts up until 1000 BC, then that means white people have come farther in a shorter period of time, meanwhile, if you subscribe to the out of Africa theory, niggers had a 40k year head start on us and are STILL worse off.

Attached: 1558888087983.jpg (1342x564, 292K)

Not it didn't lol. Imagine being so subhuman that you have to act like niggers who claim civilizations that had nothing to do with them. You are literally differently colored niggers.

>Colored
>advanced
kek

>implying G*rmanic niggers are European

No they don't, not with minoans

circumstance forms genes over a long period, you idiot

DNA tests also confirm that Greeks are more Turk then relatives to ancient Greeks. No one ever left the Greek peninsula they would just get raped by the new occupants. Look for your closest genetic relative in the world. Is it in Turkey or Italy?

8 whole names! Wow! You should look more into it and check their phenotypes too. Newton was also a huge Greekboo.

Fuck off, Gypsy

>race is skin deep
See

what if the ancient cities of europe are buried beneath the modern ones? Crazy I know

The lack of self awareness from a modern Greek claiming both Roman and Ancient Greek civilization while disparaging others is funny but sad.

Where did you get that? Let me guess! A barbarian site with no academic merit, just like the places niggers get their information. Check out actual academic sources, subhuman.

Whites had nothing until the Moors came and taught them civilization

Attached: 1488167445508.png (679x593, 206K)

Why do you look Turkish?

[citation needed]

Ah, finally, Tyrone
Ahem...
WE

Attached: 1557254555454s.jpg (125x113, 2K)

Yes they do, yes with Minoans. Read for yourself, subhuman.
Show me the test that came to that conclusion.

The type of stone tool depicted in your picture is one to two million years old where as nigger picture used depicts 3500 years ago, lol

can't tell if salty kike or nigger
but just in case

Attached: whew.webm (800x800, 2.46M)

Attached: 1561596429801.png (536x593, 130K)

then we landed on the moon, while you still pranced around the desert barefoot, which you do to this day

NOOOOO
MUH ANCESTORS

Wait...I'm white and not a low iq nigger. All good.

>You look Turkish.
>Sources: I said so.
>Sources2: Pictures of non-Greeks living in Greece.
We had the population exchange a lot of non-Greeks have been living here for 100 years now.
Also, you said you have DNA tests that show genetic relations. Show me one such test.
And since we are talking out of our ass- Why do Germanics look Slavic?

Research true history

Attached: first_european_3.jpg (416x649, 66K)

>"a two thousand years ago"
classic niggers

What do you want me to say? That we are barbarians? We clearly aren't. Should I say that barbarians are or ever were considered equals? That would be lying. I'm not claiming any Roman history (other than some of Byzantium) that belongs to the Italians. I just don't like subhumans using our achievements to validate their sense of superiority.

>a literal black haired, brown eyed shitskin
>calling someone subhuman

That's all wrong on all sides.
>it goes in all fields lads

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldowan
Mode 1 stone tools, found in europe and africa both, used by homos that came before sapiens

Showing a hwhite with stone tool would be mode 4 neandtherals and homo sapiens in europe

I know youre just baiting and shit posting but if someones dumb enough to make it up then someones dumb enough to believe it

You are subhumans, though. Even Aristotle whose's dick you suck called you subhumans. Look it up he said the Greeks were an ideal people because of their medium skintone. While black savages and pale barbarians seemed unable to create a functioning society.

We had the original society. Your ancestors stole that knowledge from us

Attached: 1500139333673.jpg (1024x1074, 64K)

[Citation needed]

Germanics don't look Slavic, Slavs look like a mixture of Germanics and Mongoloids

Attached: 1553907095793.jpg (1010x435, 159K)

Hans, is that why Germany is the most cucked nation in the world, always kissing Israeli ass and letting a million + illegals flood into the Deutschland?

Attached: GermanyJews.jpg (997x571, 161K)

Those pyramids were also build by r1b members so fake faggot