What does Jow Forums think of this book...

What does Jow Forums think of this book? I've been thinking about giving a read but I would like to hear some thoughts about it

Attached: 41aUzdxfdmL._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (333x499, 25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=icAjo9VXKZU
ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2018/04/24/the-jewish-question-an-empirical-examiniation/
marcuse.faculty.history.ucsb.edu/classes/33d/projects/protzion/DelaCruzProtocolsMain.htm
bitchute.com/video/mgPz2Nyamko9/
youtube.com/watch?v=QpMdj7MfJSk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>wants to read something
>doesnt read it
yeah get your opinions from low IQ individuals instead. Maybe try reading it and forming your own opinions smooth brain

I prefer the protocols of zion if you really want to know what the kikes are all about.

Never read it, but I think he gave a free copy away with every Ford he sold.

>the protocols of zion
Why? It's a known plagiarism and makes you look like a retard conspiracy theorist when you cite it.

Henry Ford's subsidiaries logistically supported Nazi Germany knowing full well what would happen. Other industrialists supported the USSR by sending them machining tools and raw material.

The US supported both sides of the war, and Hitler was a servant of the Jews to the utmost. Collectivism is NOT the answer, but rather confederation between like minded individualists.

Fine example of pre Jewish Takeover of US Society (PJTOUSS) literature.

Even if thats the case, it is a starting point. Read the original version then.

>It's a known plagiarism
Not is isn't you retard. Jew owned academia citing "its a plagiarism" doesn't make it so.

How about sticking with something that is factual and not bullshit?

It's a straight up plagiarism from a short story called The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu. You're dumbfuck kike tool

That book provides a very accurate definition of the NWO no matter who originally wrote it.
Here's an audiobook youtube.com/watch?v=icAjo9VXKZU
Also make sure to read 200 years together by Solchenitzyn

>That book provides a very accurate definition of the NWO no matter who originally wrote it.
You can think whatever you want about it, but you need to present it as it actually is. I think The Camp Of The Saints is exactly what's happening across the world, but there's no use in representing it as a factual event, rather a piece of fiction on the topic of subhuman migration.

Guess who pushed the "The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" was the precursor to the protocal theory. (((Norman Cohn)))). You dumb fucking kike retard.

Apparently he backed out a libel lawsuit because he couldnt prove everything was true or just didnt want to bother. In order to defend against a libel lawsuit, you have to prove that what you said was true.

You can go break it down line for line you dumb fucking nigger. Funny how the Protocols are still on jewtube but something like Sean Last's "An Empirical Examination of the Jewish Question" was removed. Really gets the noggin joggin. Oh well, don't think about it and keep listening to Dr. Duke, dipshit.

>rather a piece of fiction
unfortunately that piece of fiction is becoming reality. That's why this book is so widely recommended. Everybody should read it at least once

Even if that were the case, the Jews clearly liked it enough to make it their playbook

>Funny how the Protocols are still on jewtube
So great opportunity to listen to the audiobook then

Break it down line for line for me, because I've read both, and the comparison isn't remotely there. Cohn, in traditional jewish fashion, makes the most absurd leaps in his connection of the two documents. I'm 100% you haven't read them and are just parotting "you can compare them line for line" because you trust literal jews. Cohn was an actually ww2 anti-nazi agent you fucking simpleton.

I'm just saying present it as what it is, a fictionalized dramatization of kikery. You're better off reading this
ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2018/04/24/the-jewish-question-an-empirical-examiniation/

I'm sure it appears that way to your low IQ self.

I've already read it. It used to be on a single infograph here.

>because you trust literal jews.
David Duke and Cultured Thug have the same position on this as me, you're a lying sack of shit

Attached: finance-2.jpg (579x258, 38K)

It’s a great book. You’ll be amazed by how much of what Ford says about Jews is still relevant 100 years later. (((Their))) subversive nature hasn’t changed one bit.

>individualism within a collective
That's literally what the Germans did, retard

Also For My Legionnaires does a better job talking about kike subversion by the press because he posts actual newspaper clippings being subversive

yeah this stuff and Elders of Zion are what turned me off from the JQ a decade ago. I ignored the issue until Trump was up for election and I saw before my very eyes how they behaved and started going back and reading more serious stuff.

Ford is a truly great man but this is a topic that requires nuance and education and he had no time for either. In a way he ended up doing them a favor.

Read MacDonald instead OP and others.

>David Duke
Trusting the (((KKK)))
>Cultured Thug
Literally who? Even if these two faggots were shinning examples of national socialist scholarship, how does them agreeing with you make me a liar? Now I know you haven't read both documents, and are taking their word for it.

>Hitler was a servant of the Jews to the utmost
Fucking kill yoursled
>Collectivism is NOT the answer
Yes it is you boomer piece of shit.
> like minded individualists.
Nope. It's a racial group you civnat faggot retard.

Are these not contained in the documents?
marcuse.faculty.history.ucsb.edu/classes/33d/projects/protzion/DelaCruzProtocolsMain.htm

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-07-08 at 1.28.50 PM.png (666x642, 233K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-07-08 at 1.29.00 PM.png (626x551, 207K)

>For My Legionnaires
For My Legionaries. Also good book. Here's the Audio version:
bitchute.com/video/mgPz2Nyamko9/

you're going to have to come up with a catchier acronym

>B.J.
>Before Jews

But so many points in time have been fucked be jews.
BJTA (Before Jewish Takeover of America)

How about Pre-K literature?
K = Kike

Attached: D955D313-5A4E-475E-A793-CD9260A1E094.jpg (601x790, 211K)

this, maybe just read a few reviews and a few video essays on it on YouTube like a low IQ goy.

youtube.com/watch?v=QpMdj7MfJSk