Faggot source means your argument is homofagual and gay as fuck.
The Iran deal was fucking retarded. That Obama and Kerry love it should clue you in on how bad it was.
Brayden Smith
Iran was in charge of the inspections...
Would you trust any restaurant inspection record if one you had to tell them when the inspection was happening and two they didnt let you look at the whole place? That is how fucking dumb the agreement is.
That slate says it met inspections without explaining that the inspections are bullshit is yet again proof of gay source.
Benjamin Clark
He's obviously critiquing Trump's Iran policy, he's not actually discussing the book.
>fag, gay, homofagual Ad hominem. >That Obama and Kerry love it should clue you in on how bad it was. Yet another ad hominem. >Iran was in charge of the inspections... Nope, the International Atomic Energy Agency was in charge of inspections. iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iran/iaea-and-iran-iaea-reports
Jason Bell
No, the amount of campaign money Trump gets from Israeli casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson explains our Iran policy.
Sheldon tells his bitch what to do, Trump obeyed every time.
Gavin Ortiz
>t. mad shitskin get fucked pajeet. nobody gives a fuck what you think about it.
Aiden Morris
Fuck off, sandniggers. I hope Trump nukes every square inch of Iran.
Elijah Thompson
Great argument. It's bad because its bad. Let me guess you listen go Hannity and Mark Levin and other conservative radio Jews who want US to fight Iran for Israel. Boomer fucking clown and obvious as fuck MIGA reddit refugee.
Grayson Collins
But Iran broke the deal while Obama was still President retard.
James Richardson
So brave. Fat fuck boomer
Austin Thomas
Did you hear that on Hannity? Because it's not true, reddit cancer MIGA Qtard zioshill, gross old fuck
Charles Rogers
He proved the earlier deal was insane by doing what he did. Just like the Clinton - North Korea deal was insane. Given who wields power in America both technocratic bean counting solutions would be overthrown the minute the right whisper reached the right ear. In both cases you need a different sort of relationship for any agreement to hold. If Trump pantomimes an eight-year hissy fit of a delay or succeeds in building a real foundation in either case it's a win. The real victory would be any sort of agreement with either nation backed by a Vietnam-tier normalization in relations. It's harder to row against mutual benefit than mutual suspicion. The only losing scenario is a war and if that happens I'll eat my words.
Anthony Butler
>But Iran broke the deal while Obama was still President retard. Um, no. You have no idea what you're talking about. None. Stop pretending you do.
>Literally not in the book. Wow, you figured that out all by yourself?
>Iran was in charge of the inspections... Oh Jesus. Just when I thought you people couldn't possibly be any less informed...
Alexander Rogers
You sound absolutely insane. The MIGA influx from reddit has been disastrous and pulling out if the Iran deal has made it impossible for the US to negotiate with any adversarial nation at least until Trump is gone. Why the fuck would anyone trust us. No serious person advocated for reneging on the deal. Only hardcore zionists who want war with Iran and sure enough we're on war footing now.
Elijah Miller
I am not insane. I'm a gen-xer who lived through that era and frankly, you sound naive. Like you just clap your hands and things happen. Why would any party trust anyone in these letter of the law agreements? The only thing that sticks is a change in the characteristic of the relationship. That's why Trump's approach in North Korea is better than the 90s deal. It might not work, but the other way could not work, and didn't. Same with the Iran deal. The parties with the power to veto it were not happy with it and would, either through Trump or someone else.
Did you think we were on a war footing with North Korea in 2017?
Bentley Walker
Hey rabbi watchya slidin?
Angel Peterson
Trump has no intention of ping to war with Iran. Nethanyaho doesn’t want it either. This is just for the JCOS and the CIA. The purpose of threatening this war is to flex the media war machine and train Americans to be obedient to the media. Tucker is being positioned as a rational alternative, boosting his credibility. I may have explained this crudely but this is exactly what is going on. NO war, all games.
Owen Bell
It’s only through crisis by which you can stand to reshape someone.
