Slavery never happened (in America)

>1. The numbers don’t add up.

No one can agree how many slaves were in the United States. Some sources say 12 million. Some say 20 million, where half of them died. Another source says 20 million were brought to the United States, and not as corpses but as living slaves.

pbs.org/wnet/african-americans-many-rivers-to-cross/history/how-many-slaves-landed-in-the-us/

americanabolitionists.com/fact-sheet.html

history.com/topics/black-history/slavery

Let’s examine this. Slaves would reasonably be expensive. No one would let half of their stock die on the way to the Americas so we can assume that that’s a lie. Then there’s a discrepancy between 12 and 20 million. Let’s take the low estimate of 12 million slaves in America. Half of those slaves would had been women, if they existed at all. The fertility rate in 1960 in West Africa was 6.6 per woman.

data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=ZG

Now here is where the slavery argument really breaks down. Let’s lower that to 6 since the rate was climbing up to that point. Assuming each African woman has 6 children over the course of around 20 years, you’d have 36 million slaves in America within only 20 years. That’s already as many blacks as are in America today. There was no mass genocide of blacks. No one claims that. So where did all of the blacks go? Give it another generation and you have 108 million black people in the United States. Another generation? 324 million. Nearly the population of the United States today. At this rate, America should be vastly majority black yet they still remain a minority population. In fact, we would likely be the most populous nation on the planet by far barring any mass famine or genocide. Suspicious.

Attached: slaves.jpg (600x421, 95K)

>2. Stories about American slavery make no sense.

The first problem we come across with the slave narrative is that slaves in America were brought here to pick cotton. We don’t need 12 million slaves to pick cotton, nor 20, nor 36, nor 324 million. Even 1 million cotton-pickers is an outrageous number for a single market. Blacks weren’t gold miners, they weren’t builders, they weren’t claimed to be anything but cotton pickers. Does this make sense to you?

In the United States constitution we find ‘all men are created equal.’ Does this sound like a nation of slaves? I don’t think so. Go to google and you find countless black inventors (even if most of the inventions are cultural like styles of music) and famous figures throughout American history. You do not make history in chains on a cotton field.

Blacks have their own cuisine and culture. If they were slaves, they would have been completely assimilated by their masters over the supposed hundred years of servitude they endoured. Instead we see a unique subculture of African Americans that would not have risen if they were indeed slaves under white owners.

Nearly all stories about American slavery involve brutality on the end of white slave owners including lashing and lynching of their slaves. First off, lynching your property would make absolutely no sense as you are only losing assets with no gain. Physically and mentally damaging your slave gives no benefit to you and would only make your slaves miserable. These are boogeyman tales invented to make white Europeans seem psychopathic and irredeemable. It never happened.

Of course the first mention of slavery we ever get is when slavery had already been supposedly ‘abolished’ as if it ever existed in the first place. There are no records from the time when slavery supposedly took place that would support the idea that blacks were held in any sort of servitude. All quotes from major figures discussing slavery were written down decades later and could be easily fabricated. If you read the United States constitution, you will find that references to slavery and its ‘abolition’ were written post-abolition, of course. We do not have historical constitutions of the supposed slavery-period to support that there was ever an amendment that allowed for slavery pre-’abolition.’

Most black people in America have some white DNA in them. Most proponents of the slavery theory claims that they were raped by their masters. They also claim that blacks were enslaved because they were viewed as less than human by white southerners. By that logic, raping a slave would be like having sex with your dog, which we know wasn’t done as well. It seems much more likely that the DNA in modern African Americans originated from consensual, loving couples lost to history when the first black immigrants moved to America. This would be supported by black female-white male marriages having the lowest divorce rate in modern society.

The simplest one is just using simple logic. Imagine you’re a man, woman or child toiling away every day on a field, miserable because your slave master is a literal monster out of a fairy tale. You’re working on a cotton field in the 1800s. What’s stopping you from making a run for it? Seriously?

Who is pushing the slavery narrative and what do they gain? They gain a victim status and in this culture that gives them a foothold in our minds and our culture. They dominate us through guilt of an event that never occurred. Legal slavery in America is a myth debunked.

I didn't read any of those posts, but just like the holocaust, I don't care whether it happened or not. I don't give a shit about the "victims" and they probably deserved it anyways.

Attached: 1540657928143.jpg (190x250, 5K)

Wow what a fucking brainlet. The 6-12 million estimate is the amount of slaves taken FROM AFRICA, not to America, fucking idiot. Estimates for slaves taken by states that later formed the USA is 400-600k. You wrote all that shit when you could do a couple Google searches that would take around 1 minute.

>Slavery never happened (in America)
jewish damage control, kids.
jews owned the slave ships.

You're still assuming that slavery happened (it didn't). You ignore the rest of the argument and just bring up more slavery theory numbers. Using your numbers, by now there would still be a much higher African American population than there is today.

Slavery was real. I learned all about it in Holocaust class during circumcision appreciation week. To be fair, it wasn't a whole week because they cut it a bit short.

History is written by the victors, but not if the victors are us, goy.

I'm stopping with your first post because it's a bad argument. Why do you think female slaves would keep their same or even close to the same birthrates? If they were allowed to have children, those children could have been sold and shipped somewhere else, or done away with some other way. Also, birthrate of 6.6 doesn't mean 6.6 children survive to adulthood. Even if they kept their birthrates and the kids were given all the care that white children were, in those days there was still higher infant mortality than today. And then there is this So how do you respond?