>What do Create Memes, spread Memes, attack the narrative. Join AfD or IB or Einprozent; counter subversion. Get Jow Forums and train any kind of matrial arts. Get a job. Spread flyers and stickers. Discuss politics with people; call attention to the Unrecht.
>>I make no point about "wether or not imigration is a good thing or not" >Then why did you bring all those examples up in the first place?It is pointless. To show that there are also positive aspects for ones nation. >>believe that immigration is inherently evil. >Yes i do, what i believe is that populations of homo sapiens have been seperated for thousands of years and thus developed different characteristics including intelligence and group preference thus making multiculturalism/multuiracialism impossible and each race/ethnic group should have a segregated homeland of their own. Yeah we all know how shitty the Switzerland and Luxembourg are with these evil multicultural societies. Or is this some kind of projection because you hate your shithole country which is the result of immigration. >because he can integrate, negro will never and plus he would confuse the native population into thinking that the average representative of set population is just as smart as him, thus normalising mass imigration. Let me guess: you never met one in real life? >Yes, because i base my viewpoints more on data while you do not.everything i am talking about you can look up yourself. No I am the one basing my views on data while you're the one using anecdotes. Just Kidding. This is a political debate at some point you have to make some axioms which aren't backed by data.
Adam Miller
>no struggle exists No, that'd lead to over-population. The Struggle is Life.
>the results aren't This is correct; it does not refute, what I stated, however.
>muh worldview No, it is correct. As long as Life exist, that long has life preserved itself. The existence of Life is the evidence for the Life's self-preservative nature.
>'advantage' No, this is too materialistic. If aliens erase humans for their God, then humans proved themselves to be a disadvantage in the aliens' opinion.
>disadvantage or advantage Someone, who hides, has no advantage from the reason for his hiding. Someone, who hides effectively, has no disadvantage from the reason for his hiding. Thus: Ignoring.
>antsM Most ants are being left alone; (disregarding recent evironmental effects, originating from human societies.)
>Unlikely Well, that's a "Streitfrage"; however, I believe there are "realms", not perceivable to humans; unknown Life might dwell in those "realms". This Life might be knowing about humans. This is speculation.
>Slavery Slavery might be both a symbiotic and a parasitic realtionship. Either production or destruction of the enslaved.
>positive or negative or without consequences for humankind Still a bit vague, but that might be valid.
>>no struggle exists >No, that'd lead to over-population. The Struggle is Life. On earth that might be the case but because we know nothing about alien life it could be entirely different. Maybe they stop reproducing at some point or form a symbiosis with other life that creates it's own resources. >>the results aren't >>'advantage' >No, this is too materialistic. If aliens erase humans for their God, then humans proved themselves to be a disadvantage in the aliens' opinion. I would say they could perceive us as advantage because they have new victims for their rituals. They could also see us as good slaves. They could kill us because they think that this would lead us to heaven. The categories 'advantage' and 'disadvantages' are very poorly chosen especially with the proposed results. >>disadvantage or advantage >Someone, who hides effectively, has no disadvantage from the reason for his hiding. Hiding implies that they would have to cut their freedom in some aspects. Like they couldn't send radiowaves in the space because they would have to fear to be discovered. Like humans have an disadvantage if they have to hide from the state for example.
Luis Sullivan
>To show that there are also positive aspects for ones nation. For what?Imigration right?Or multiculturalism/multiracialism?You lost this point dude, you should of not brought up those anecdotes and you know it. >Yeah we all know how shitty the Switzerland and Luxembourg are with these evil multicultural societies. Or is this some kind of projection because you hate your shithole country which is the result of immigration. Look at belgium, they are split in 2 sides both vote for their own group not for the whole nation, the reson why those countries are rich is more because of average IQ's of the population not the fact that they are multicultural.But not multiracial.
AGAIN
this is a fucking anecdote, i can bring up Brazzil and tell you that look how fucking poor is brazzil it's a shithole therefore mutliruclutralism is a bad idea case closet, but i myself think that this is a damb fucking argument but this kind of shit is what YOU use, and you call ME a dunning-kruger victim???Your a fucking imbecile. >Let me guess: you never met one in real life? Have seen 2 in my life but this is not an argument, i have seen enough data to conclude that allowing these people enter MY country is a bad idea.
Tyler Hernandez
Imbicile and a psudo-intellectual who calls other dumn and thinks he is smarter than everyone else because he has read few books in he's life, FUCK and these people are also aroggant as fuck.
>Imbicile and a psudo-intellectual who calls other dumn and thinks he is smarter than everyone else because he has read few books in he's life, FUCK and these people are also aroggant as fuck. worse are the ones who only read some excerpts and the summaries as well as "approved interpretations" and then act like they are experts on it...
My est friends sprays liquid out of 2 holes and he don't want to die alone so I found my work tomorrow. No sex tomorrow for me.
Ethan Clark
>>To show that there are also positive aspects for ones nation. >For what?Imigration right?Or multiculturalism/multiracialism?You lost this point dude, you should of not brought up those anecdotes and you know it. So not even arguments against my 'anecdotes' while at the same time providing neither 'anecdotes' (which meaning you apparently doesn't know) or 'hard facts'. >this is a fucking anecdote, i can bring up Brazzil and tell you that look how fucking poor is brazzil it's a shithole therefore mutliruclutralism is a bad idea case closet, but i myself think that this is a damb fucking argument Switzerland and Luxembourg are examples (not anecdotes) that multicultural societies CAN (not must) function very well while you believe that every kind of immigration or multicultural society is inherently bad which doesn't even make sense in the hindsight that more or less every nation are results of it. >and you call ME a dunning-kruger victim???Your a fucking imbecile. I know that i simply cannot withstand your hard facts and comprehensive knowledge on this topic which arises not from personal experience or lame stuff like actual books but from the 'truth facts'-info graphics which you saw yesterday in a pol thread and forgot to save.
Robert Bailey
>Imbicile and a psudo-intellectual who calls other dumn and thinks he is smarter than everyone else because he has read few books in he's life, FUCK and these people are also aroggant as fuck. Does it hurt that much that you in fact didn't read a book?
