UHH ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT THE FINANCIAL, CULTURAL, TECHNOLOGICAL...

UHH ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT THE FINANCIAL, CULTURAL, TECHNOLOGICAL, AND DEMOGRAPHIC CENTERS OF THE COUNTRY SHOULD ELECT THE PRESIDENT? BUT WHAT ABOUT THE FENT ADDICTS AND FARMERS OF RURAL AMERICA???!

Attached: 4289tj8.jpg (640x723, 39K)

Cities don't make food, cities consume food.
The people who make the food should elect the president. Thats what the founding fathers envisioned. They would have been disgusted by the modern fag cities that have sprung up across the US

Shouldn’t the image be a hick and not some guy with glasses

Oh great and wise guru, forgive me for my unworthiness.

>If you harvest wheat and kill cows you should be given the keys to our democracy

Attached: D508F7EE-ADF8-4D38-B3B5-1F2447052C0F.jpg (480x480, 21K)

Sois love progressives though, the picture doesn't make sense with your comment.

Just want to say:

Jow Forums always repeats this meme that the electoral college exists to keep power in the hands of the weaker states, but that's a lie.

It's to keep power out of the hands of the pleb population.
Senators vote for president because pleb retards like OP are too stupid to pick a good one.

>The people who make the food should elect the president

Attached: FB5EB6C3-12F7-48CE-A477-72254647E85D.png (625x773, 143K)

Get a load of this shill, he doesn't even understand the soi wojack and how to use it. Everybody point and laugh.

Attached: 1532538818806.png (257x278, 124K)

>if you type up spreadsheets and create powerpoints you should be given the keys to our democracy

Um, there's no argument here, 110 IQ.

this

Better than
>if you artificially create value by guessing how much some random shit will be worth some time in the future you should control our REPUBLIC

It's not a feelings argument. The point is if the urban centers can politically dominate the rest of the country that has policy implications that translate into an abusive, parasitic relationship between the cities and the suburban/rural area rather than a balance of give/take. Urban gives more tax revenue/business, rural gives food and energy. Not about this muh fee fees bs

>the multitude should elect their leaders

Attached: 1522261994214.jpg (555x445, 36K)

I would say that the ideal solution is that the ultra degenerate Jews, homosexuals, and their various legions of imported shitskins should break away from the normal white demographic that founded the United States, who in turn should break away from them.
The problem is, everyone knows that the manifestly evil former group is unwilling to abide such a thing happening.
You think about it and it seems they could have everything they want
>massive infinite shitskin immigration with full state benefits for all comers
>post birth abortion
>all metaphysical religion outlawed
You would think they would want this so that they could stand on their side of the wall and laugh at all the backward thinking white people while they stand in the glorious gay automated space communism that they can finally realize.
The biggest problem isn't that we know it wouldn't go down that way for obvious reasons. The real problem is that they know it as well but pretend not to.

Attached: 1562647624830.png (409x409, 192K)

>electing leaders

Attached: 1539252333705.png (645x773, 12K)

The financial, cultural, technological and demographic centers of the country should be fucking nuked, so should where zion don is staying. the fent addics exist because of you and only the farmers should exist

How the fuck does applying the principle one person one vote mean that you’ve been handed the keys to democracy. It’s called fairness

Explain how electoral affirmative action for Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania is better than an equal system

>The point is if the urban centers can politically dominate the rest of the country that has policy implications that translate into an abusive, parasitic relationship between the cities and the suburban/rural area rather than a balance of give/take
Funny how this does not seem to happen anywhere else.
>Inb4 “yes it does durr”

Who else would

Attached: 6103EE3C-D950-4DF4-81BF-14EB406FF9ED.jpg (500x502, 28K)

No, the founding fathers envisioned people who were capable of grasping advanced scholarly topics in addition to being responsible with firearms to be the only ones who could vote

>We should let the niggers decide how to run the country
Die scum.

Enjoy your starvation

They absolutely should, you complete retard. They’re more important than 90 percent of cityfaggots.

Why are conservacucks so communistic?

Nah, democracy is merely oligarchy, the media being what the people believe, while the politicians being promoted by the media. The media mainly being Jewish people, control the United States.

Attached: F9A695CB-B4A5-45C0-A97B-9824F75864F1.jpg (898x701, 120K)

>Funny how this does not seem to happen elsewhere

It's simple democracy (mob rule) 101. Just look at the democratic debates. Democracy ultimately devolves into who can promise more to the voters. When they are promising even handed and just governance this is fine, but when they are promising lavish spending programs and privileged/preferential treatment in governance, it's toxic for the polity. In a system where cities decide the president, the most viable platform for a candidate will be the one which is appealing to city voters. So not only do you have the inherently vote bribing nature of democracy, but the actual ability to use the entire non-urban population as pay pigs in perpetuity because they've lost their political say. What it would be, in effect, is a system akin a oligarchy where the "the capital" lives well with the finest amendments while the rest of the districts struggle to barely get by. Shit, it's similar to a colonial system where the colonies (whose inhabitants are viewed as backwards and superstitious) are plundered for the enriching of the capital and its inhabitants.

A literal commie, yikes.

I'm 100% anti democracy and anti communist. Just pointing out the parasitic and toxic nature of democracy.

>Funny how this does not seem to happen anywhere else.
Does the last 250 years of European history just not exist or something?

>financial
rich jews fucking the world over
>cultural
garbage
>technological
the industrial revolution was a mistake
>demographic
shitskins on welfare
now go back to led dit you worthless faggot

Bosting a red pill

Attached: 1548782144029.jpg (1124x1238, 349K)

>UHH ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT THE FINANCIAL, CULTURAL, TECHNOLOGICAL, AND DEMOGRAPHIC CENTERS OF THE COUNTRY SHOULD ELECT THE PRESIDENT? BUT WHAT ABOUT THE FENT ADDICTS AND FARMERS OF RURAL AMERICA???!

Are you implying not everyone should vote? How bigoted of you

The reason you dumbasses shouldn't be allowed to vote on behalf of everyone else is because you have this massive superiority complex in the first place. You think you can tell a farmer how to farm, a trucker how to drive, a soldier how to serve. You know nothing about the people you are shitting on and you don't deserve the right to decide what's best for them.

Fucking based user. It's not your damn right to dictate the country because of your superiority complex. People should be able to have a platform regardless if they're rural or not.