First allow me to be clear. I am saying this as a gun owner and avid hunter...

Here's a better 2nd amendment if we do it again
>The security of the nation and it's people, and the protection of their rights being of paramount importance, the rights of the individual shall not be infringed in any manner. Any weapon that is lawfully used in war shall be freely owned by any free citizen of the nation. >Further, should a citizen be unable to afford a weapon, he shall be provided with one or military grade by the nation and trained in its use to defend himself and his nation.

>as a gun owner
Post gun and tomestamp.
Banning semi auto and full-auto guns would put us at a disadvantage if the government attempted to take over. And by your logic all black people are criminals because most criminals are black. Same for terrorists and Muslims. But leftists dont have standards, they only have double standards. You people view others as demographic monoliths, not individuals.
Fpbp.

>take away our God given rights
>thinking you won't be taken out in the ensuing war
lol

Attached: 1556896903572.jpg (853x953, 105K)

>85% of gun crimes committed by black males 16-35
>90% of murders with guns commited by black males 16-35

Any mother fucker that says everyone shouldn't have guns because of niggers is a nigger.

>No gun or clip can hold more than 6 Gorillion bullets.

When leftists say "guns" they mean "niggers."

Attached: klykstystst.png (513x463, 97K)

>forced to comply
How did that work out in 1776 faggot

Checked

>I am saying this as a...
Dropped

Kill all Jewish and israeli children

Attached: 24463b_2370763.jpg (1235x1173, 175K)

Nice try faggot.
Die.

shut the fuck up you fucking failure of a human. immediately take whatever cuckold firearms you have and end your pathetic onion swilling life.

Attached: 1561176037768.gif (342x239, 981K)

I know this is a troll, but this video is golden

youtu.be/rhBwHiLcTG8

there's just too much retardation and false premises in this post, and for that reason i'm out

Yeah.... NO!

>hello fellow gun owners

Attached: aiportraits_1563507384.jpg (512x512, 15K)

>da left are the REEEL racists! we need guns if the government takes over
Uh, Cletus, I have some news for you. The Government has always been in control. They are in charge of us and need to pass laws for our safety. If they ever become tyrannical we don't need guns, we're a Democracy. We can just vote them out in the next election.
As I said in my post, mere civilians should not have access to military grade weapons.

Nope

Attached: Gun Grabbers BTFO by the Founding Fathers.jpg (514x1262, 632K)

Lol. You are a retard and a poor bait.
>Forced to comply
Good thing I lost all my guns in a boat accident. Damn shame really.

Attached: 1562523789113.jpg (1042x1042, 138K)

>we're a democracy
you are a dumb faggot nigger. we have a constitutional federal republic, because democracy has never worked anywhere in the history of the world because of retards like you.

We already have government run nigger storage facilities. They're called prisons.

Yes, the Jewmerican founding freemasons said that a well regulated muh-litia can carry arms to ovethrow a tyrannical gobment. But it doesn't matter. My view on guns isn't dictated by a bunch of freemasons. Sell your garb and buy a sword, that shall be the whole of it.

>I am saying this as a gun owner and avid hunter
>No gun or clip can hold more than 6 bullets
>clip
You own zero guns. The entire rest of your unconstitutional bullshit post can now be discarded.

Attached: images (5).jpg (183x275, 9K)

This is to distract from the Epstein stuff. Sage in all threads

Attached: slidethreads.jpg (1156x2031, 1.1M)

Are you really stupid enough to think a tyrannical government would voluntarily step down because a bunch of people voted on it? Would Hitler or Stalin do that?
>da left are the REEEL racists!
Not an argument. You just repeated what I said back to me. You know I'm right. If you want to judge all men by the actions of some, apply those same rules to everybody (i.e. blacks and Muslims). But I know ypu won't because double standards are the only standards of the left.

The first post brought suspicion. This one confirms OP is a kike. Gas yourself.

Please pillow yourself you geriatric parasite generation

why would someone make bait this obvious?
why would someone take bait this obvious?

fuck it: white people are niggers and deserve to be exterminated by Jews, who are the rightful owners of the world. give me (You)s, you dumb fucking lemmings.

They don't know they be like this, but they do.

You’re definitely not a gun owner or avid hunter, or else you wouldn’t post something so idiotic.
>need women’s permission
chop your balls off before we do it for you, you worthless fucking boomer.
See you on the the Night of the Ropes

Attached: FDDAA5FD-EA88-4627-A8B9-6E0E42940FF5.jpg (732x688, 484K)

Citizens' guns overrule execute orders.

>It won't be up to you.
>We can just vote them out
So only democracy when you agree with it

We will see an execute order to gas the jews long before we ever see an execute order to disarm Americans.

>my fellow gun owners
lol

First president to overrule the 2nd with an executive order will have her and her family/friends lynched on the white house lawn.

States have laws that can override federal gun grabbing laws, it's already agreed that our states national guard and police force wouldn't even go door to door. Lest of all of this, of there happened to be another civil war with states rights vs federal rights; the favor of the war would be overwhelmingly in conservative and gun owners corners. Even studied by the US government, 85% of the military would side with what would be considered the rebels in this case(the right). You are completely foolish.

Inalienable rights cannot be rescinded by mob rule, aka democracy.

>Full semi automatic
what nigger?

In a full blown civil war the military would side with the right, the EPA would side with the left.

Exactly

> I am saying this as a gun owner and avid hunter
No you're not.
And there's nothing wrong with the 2nd Amendment. It serves us just fine the way it is.
Liberal chunk of shit. You know if you assholes had any real intelligence or real arguments you wouldn't have to be disingenuous all the time.

Attached: 1520144941965.jpg (242x242, 11K)

This is easily the dumbest thing I've ever read. I laughed way too hard for you to have tried so hard writing it. Look son, go read more philosophy. Eventually you'll understand why it originally was all weapons, and should be all weapons. Even Hitler's germans were allowed any weapon they wanted and including tanks, but guess what, nobody bought tanks or artillery. Those niggers only bought K98s.

Tl;dr you're a shill or a coward who hasn't done the required reading

hey
kys

Attached: 1563456637853.png (680x680, 247K)

Fuck off

>First allow me to be clear. I am saying this as a gun owner and avid hunter. It's time we make a New Second Amendment that reads as follows:
you can't change the bill of rights, you can only offer people to submit those rights

we need a national rifle training class for people so they can't ever claim they were not aware of how dangerous firearms are,

they are vital to being American and thus won't be going anywhere

Same fag copypasta

Top kek OP left to apply butthurt cream because he can't refute logic

>• One’s guns must be stored at one of 50 Government run gun storage facilities, each located in every State's capital city.
hey dude, even the feds can't manage to comply with us Army regulations regarding storage of munitions, if they can't take the time to give a piss why should anyone else bother? you think they enjoy burning money or something?

Glowie! There you are!
Wondered when you were going to show up.

I am generally against gun control however I believe in some gun regs for example I think people should be vetted before they own a gun. Cause right now in America tons of communist groups antifa members and black nationalists are legally buying arms and that is an abuse of the second amendment.

>Glowie
You mean jewie

>tons of communist groups antifa members and black nationalists are legally buying arms
having guns does not mean you know how to use them

It's not a glownigger it's a troll. There's a difference.
Glowniggers want to get your information and stats from the board, occasionally posting discords and groups to join
Trolls and shitposters post the same copypasta that mods never delete because board quality is a myth
Shills activily push an idea or product, or outrage of a product, action, or idea to increase it's visibility
Know your boardfags, and remember to never bump a shitpost.

Don't spare police, Jewish or leftist children or females.

Attached: 1560738136172.png (684x1110, 408K)

Go back to Australia, NZ, or whatever repressive socialist cesspool you came here from.
You want less gun violence take them away from PoC, and Democrats.

They know how to use them dude. I've seen communist gun clubs on Instagram training

I know the vaseline would help but, potassium chlorate is friction/shock/spark sensitive. Better thread those end caps on behind some major protection.

STOP REPLYING TO BAIT THREADS FAGGOTS, JUST HIDE AND REPORT THEM
This is unsurprisingly copypasta. Sauce: a kikebook post by big fat faggot Michael Moore from 2 years ago
cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/michael-moores-gun-control-amendment-discriminates-against-all-males-including

Attached: 1516138491419.png (490x802, 119K)

throw down one of these 'world newspapers.' And on such oc-
casions I sometimes picked up the Volksblatt, which, to be sure,
seemed to me much smaller, but in these matters somewhat
more appetizing. I was not in agreement with the sharp anti-
Semitic tone, but from time to time I read arguments which gave
me some food for thought.

At all events, these occasions slowly made me acquainted with
the man and the movement, which in those days guided Vienna's
destinies: Dr. Karl Lueger * and the Christian Social Party.

When I arrived in Vienna, I was hostile to both of them.

The man and the movement seemed 'reactionary' in my eyes.

My common sense of justice, however, forced me to change this
judgment in proportion as I had occasion to become acquainted
with the man and his work; and slowly my fair judgment turned
to unconcealed admiration. Today, more than ever, I regard this
man as the greatest German mayor of all times.

How many of my basic principles were upset by this change
in my attitude toward the Christian Social movement!

My views with regard to anti-Semitism thus succumbed to the
passage of time, and this was my greatest transformation of all.

It cost me the greatest inner soul struggles, and only after
months of battle between my reason and my sentiments did my
reason begin to emerge victorious. Two years later, my senti-
ment had followed my reason, and from then on became its most
loyal guardian and sentinel.

At the time of this bitter struggle between spiritual education
and cold reason, the visual instruction of the Vienna streets
had performed invaluable services. There came a time when I no
longer, as in the first days, wandered blindly through the mighty
city; now with open eyes I saw not only the buildings but also
the people.

Once, as I was strolling through the Inner City, I suddenly
encountered an apparition in a black caftan and black hair locks.
Is this a Jew? was my first thought.

For, to be sure, they had not looked like that in Linz. I ob-
served the man furtively and cautiously, but the longer I stared
at this foreign face, scrutinizing feature for feature, the more my
first question assumed a new form:

Is this a German?

As always in such cases, I now began to try to relieve my
doubts by books. For a few hellers I bought the first anti-Semitic
pamphlets of my life. Unfortunately, they all proceeded from
the supposition that in principle the reader knew or even under-
stood the Jewish question to a certain degree. Besides, the tone
for the most part was such that doubts again arose in me, due in
part to the dull and amazingly unscientific arguments favoring
the thesis.

I relapsed for weeks at a time, once even for months.

The whole thing seemed to me so monstrous, the accusations
so boundless, that, tormented by the fear of doing injustice, I
again became anxious and uncertain.

Yet I could no longer very well doubt that the objects of my
study were not Germans of a special religion, but a people in them-
selves; for since I had begun to concern myself with this question
and to take cognizance of the Jews, Vienna appeared to me in a
different light than before. Wherever I went, I began to see Jews,
and the more I saw, the more sharply they became distinguished
in my eyes from the rest of humanity. Particularly the Inner
City and the districts north of the Danube Canal swarmed
with a people which even outwardly had lost all resemblance to
Germans.

And whatever doubts I may still have nourished were finally
dispelled by the attitude of a portion of the Jews themselves.

Among them there was a great movement, quite extensive in
Vienna, which came out sharply in confirmation

proved this viewpoint, while the great majority condemned and
inwardly rejected such a formulation. But when examined more
closely, this appearance dissolved itself into an unsavory vapor
of pretexts advanced for mere reasons of expedience, not to say
lies. For the so-called liberal Jews did not reject the Zionists as
non-Jews, but only as Jews with an impractical, perhaps even
dangerous, way of publicly avowing their Jewishness.

Intrinsically they remained unalterably of one piece.

In a short time this apparent struggle between Zionistic and
liberal Jews disgusted me; for it was false -through and through,
founded on lies and scarcely in keeping with the moral elevation
.and purity always claimed by this people.

The cleanliness of this people, moral and otherwise, I must say,
is a point in itself. By their very exterior you could tell that these
were no lovers of water, and, to your distress, you often knew it
with your «yes closed. Later I often grew sick to my stomach
from the smell of these caftan-wearers. Added to this, there was
their unclean dress and their generally unheroic appearance.

All this could scarcely be called very attractive; but it became
positively repulsive when, in addition to their physical uncleanli-
ness, you discovered the moral stains on this 'chosen people.'

In a -short time I was made more thoughtful than ever by my
slowly rising insight into the type of activity carried on by the
Jews in certain fields.

Was there any form of 'filth or profligacy, particularly in cultu-
ral life, without at least one Jew involved in it?

If you cut even cautiously into such an abscess, you found, like
a maggot m a rotting body, often dazzled by the sudden light —
a kike! 1

What had to be reckoned heavily against the Jews in my eyes
was when I became acquainted with their activity in the press,
art, literature, and the theater. All the unctuous reassurances

the names of the men behind the horrible trash they advertised,
to make you hard for a long time to come. This was pestilence,
spiritual pestilence, worse than the Black Death of olden times,
and the people was being infected with it! It goes without saying
that the lower the intellectual level of one of these art manu-
facturers, the more unlimited his fertility will be, and the
scoundrel ends up like a garbage separator, splashing his filth in
the face of humanity. And bear in mind that there is no limit to
their number; bear in mind that for one Goethe Nature easily
can foist on the world ten thousand of these scribblers who poison
men's souls like germ-carriers of the worse sort, on their fellow
men.

It was terrible, but not to be overlooked, that precisely the
Jew, in tremendous numbers, seemed chosen by Nature for this
shameful calling.

Is this why the Jews are called the 'chosen people'?

I now began to examine carefully the names of all the creators
of unclean products in public artistic life. The result was less and
less favorable for my previous attitude toward the Jews. Regard-
less how my sentiment might resist, my reason was forced to draw
its conclusions.

The fact that nine tenths of all literary filth, artistic trash, and
theatrical idiocy can be set to the account of a people, constituting
hardly one hundredth of all the country's inhabitants, could
simply not be talked away; it was the plain truth.

And I now began to examine my beloved 'world press' from
this point of view.

And the deeper I probed, the more the object of my former
admiration shriveled. The style became more and more unbear-
able; I could not help rejecting the content as inwardly shallow
and banal; the objectivity of exposition now seemed to me more
akin to lies than honest truth; and the writers were — Jews.

A thousand things which I had hardly seen before now struck
my notice, and others, which had previously

the lofty tone in which it answered attacks and its method of
killing them with silence now revealed itself to me as a trick as
clever as it was treacherous; the transfigured raptures of their
theatrical critics were always directed at Jewish writers, and their
disapproval never struck anyone but Germans. The gentle pin-
pricks against William II revealed its methods by their persist-
ency, and so did its commendation of French culture and civiliza-
tion. The trashy content of the short story now appeared to me
as outright indecency, and in the language I detected the accents
of a foreign people; the sense of the whole thing was so obviously
hostile to Germanism that this could only have been intentional.

But who had an interest in this?

Was all this a mere accident?

Gradually I became uncertain.

The development was accelerated by insights which I gained
into a number of other matters. I am referring to the general view of
ethics and morals which was quite openly exhibited by a large part
of the Jews, and the practical application of which could be seen.

Here again the streets provided an object lesson of a sort
which was sometimes positively evil.

The relation of the Jews to prostitution and, even more, to the
white-slave traffic, could be studied in Vienna as perhaps in no
other city of Western Europe, with the possible exception of the
southern French ports. If you walked at night through the streets
and alleys of Leopoldstadt, 1 at every step you witnessed pro-
ceedings which remained concealed from the majority of the
German people until the War gave the soldiers on the eastern
front occasion to see similar things, or, better expressed, forced
them to see them.

When thus for the first time I recognized the Jew as the cold-
hearted, shameless, and calculating director of this revolting vice
traffic in the scum of the big city, a cold shudder ran down my
back.

But then a flame flared up within me. I no longer avoided dis-
cussion of the Jewish question; no, now I sought it. And when I
learned to look for the Jew in all branches of cultural and artistic
life and its various manifestations, I suddenly encountered him
in a place where I would least have expected to find him.

When I recognized the Jew as the leader of the Social Democ-
racy, the scales dropped from my eyes. A long soul struggle had
reached its conclusion.

Even in my daily relations with my fellow workers, I ob-
served the amazing adaptability with which they adopted dif-
ferent positions on the same question, sometimes within an in-
terval of a few days, sometimes in only a few hours. It was hard
for me to understand how people who, when spoken to alone,
■possessed some sensible opinions, suddenly lost them as soon as
they came under the influence of the masses. It was often enough
to make one despair. When, after hours of argument, I was con-
vinced that now at last I had broken the ice or cleared up some
absurdity, and was beginning to rejoice at my success, on the next
day to my disgust I had to begin all over again; it had all been in
vain. Like an eternal pendulum their opinions seemed to swing
back again and again to the old madness.

All this I could understand: that they were dissatisfied with
their lot and cursed the Fate which often struck them so harshly;
that they hated the employers who seemed to them the heartless
bailiffs of Fate; that they cursed the authorities who in their eyes
were without feeling for their situation; that they demonstrated
against food; prices and carried their demands into the streets:
this much could be understood without recourse to reason. But
what inevitably remained incomprehensible was the boundless
hatred they heaped upon their own nationality, despising its
greatness, besmirching its history, and dragging its great men
into the gutter.

for days or at most weeks. If later you met the man you thought
you had converted, he was just the same as before.
His old unnatural state had regained full possession of him.
I gradually became aware that the Social Democratic press was
directed predominantly by Jews; yet I did not attribute any
special significance to this circumstance, since conditions were
exactly the same in the other papers. Yet one fact seemed con-
spicuous: there was not one paper with Jews working on it which
could have been regarded as truly national, according to my educa-
tion and way of thinking.

I swallowed my disgust and tried to read this type of Marxist
press production, but my revulsion became so unlimited in so
doing that I endeavored to become more closely acquainted with
the men who manufactured these compendiums of knavery.

From the publisher down, they were all Jews.

I took all the Social Democratic pamphlets I could lay hands
on and sought the names of their authors: Jews. I noted the
names of the leaders; by far the greatest part were likewise mem-
bers of the 'chosen people,' whether they were representatives
in the Reichsrat or trade-union secretaries, the heads of organiza-
tions or street agitators. It was always the same gruesome pic-
ture. The names of the Austerlitzes, Davids, Adlers, Ellenbogens,
etc., will remain forever graven in my memory. One thing had
grown clear to me: the party with whose petty representatives I
had been carrying on the most violent struggle for months was, as
to leadership, almost exclusively in the hands of a foreign people;
for, to my deep and joyful satisfaction, I had at last come to the
conclusion that the Jew was no German.

Only now did I become thoroughly acquainted with the se-
ducer of our people.

A single year of my sojourn in Vienna had sufficed to imbue
me with the conviction that no worker could be so stubborn that

he would not in the end succumb to better knowledge and better
explanations. Slowly I had become an expert in their own doc-
trine and used it as a weapon in the struggle for my own profound
conviction.

Success almost always favored my side.

The great masses could be saved, if only with the gravest
sacrifice in time and patience.

But a Jew could never be parted from his opinions.

At that time I was still childish enough to try to make the
madness of their doctrine clear to them; in my little circle I talked
my tongue sore and my throat hoarse, thinking I would in-
evitably succeed in convincing them how ruinous their Marxist
madness was; but what I accomplished was often the opposite.
It seemed as though their increased understanding of the destruc-
tive effects of Social Democratic theories and their results only
reinforced their determination.

The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their
dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary,
and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves
simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not
to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a
hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they im-
mediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again
attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what
you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of
these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which
divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next
moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these
fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he
couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken
you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the
next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day
before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at

Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.

I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their
tongues or their virtuosity at lying.

Gradually I began to hate them.

All this had but one good side: that in proportion as the real
leaders or at least the disseminators of Social Democracy came
within my vision, my love for my people inevitably grew. For
who, in view of the diabolical craftiness of these seducers, could
damn the luckless victims? How hard it was, even for me, to get
the better of this race of dialectical liars ! And how futile was such
success in dealing with people who twist the truth in your mouth,
who without so much as a blush disavow the word they have just
spoken, and in the very next minute take credit for it after
all.

No. The better acquainted I became with the Jew, the more
forgiving I inevitably became toward the worker.

In my eyes the gravest fault was no longer with him, but with
all those who did not regard it as worth the trouble to have mercy
on him, with iron righteousness giving the son of the people his
just deserts, and standing the seducer and corrupter up against
the wall.

Inspired by the experience of daily life, I now began to track
down the sources of the Marxist doctrine. Its effects had become
clear to me in individual cases; each day its success was apparent
to my attentive eyes, and, with some exercise of my imagination,
I was able to picture the consequences. The only remaining
question was whether the result of their action in its ultimate
form had existed in the mind's eye of the creators, or whether
they themselves were the victims of an error.

I felt that both were possible.

In the one case it was the duty of every thinking man to force
himself to the forefront of the ill-starred movement, thus perhaps
averting catastrophe; in the other, however, the original founders
of this plague of the nations must have been veritable devils; for

must ultimately result in the collapse of human civilization and
the consequent devastation of the world.

In this case the only remaining hope was struggle, struggle
with all the weapons which the human spirit, reason, and will
can devise, regardless on which side of the scale Fate should lay
its blessing.

Thus I began to make myself familiar with the founders of this
doctrine, in order to study the foundations of the movement. If
I reached my goal more quickly than at first I had perhaps ven-
tured to believe, it was thanks to my newly acquired, though at
that time not very profound, knowledge of the Jewish question.
This alone enabled me to draw a practical comparison between
the reality and the theoretical flim-flam of the founding fathers
of Social Democracy, since it taught me to understand the lan-
guage of the Jewish people, who speak in order to conceal or at
least to veil their thoughts; their real aim is not therefore to be
found in the lines themselves, but slumbers well concealed be-
tween them.

For me this was the time of the greatest spiritual upheaval I
have ever had to go through.

I had ceased to be a weak-kneed cosmopolitan and become an
anti-Semite.

Just once more — and this was the last time — fearful, op-
pressive thoughts came to me in profound anguish.

When over long periods of human history I scrutinized the
activity of the Jewish people, suddenly there rose up in me the
fearful question whether inscrutable Destiny, perhaps for reasons
unknown to us poor mortals, did not with eternal and immutable
resolve, desire the final victory of this little nation.

Was it possible that the earth had been promised as a reward
to this people which lives only for this earth?

Have we an objectiveright to struggle for our self-preservation,
or is this justified only subjectively within ourselves?