Catholicucks

I for once agree with OP. We burn pagans too.
t. chad Hussite

Attached: 641f2621d5479dc56b1c890c8d0f9c91.jpg (736x558, 131K)

>He says as he lives in a country where the capital is literally Rome to this day

Attached: 1557333413454.gif (978x827, 1.29M)

>Neo-pagan
>Roman-tick
>Wiccan Whore-shipper
>Goetic Demon's Slave
>Tribal-Tard
>INCESTral practice
>Mongrals
>Goat Fuckers

For Worshiping Heretical Idols, Preforming Sorcery & Magic (lmao), Enacting in Sexual Morality, Breaking everyone of the Ten Commandments, Denying the Holiness & Divinity of Christ Before the congregation, and countless other atrocities against the

Please assume the position for the blood eagle of your people. If your survive this trial you enact on others for 7 days you will have proved the power of your BARBARIC GODS. If not, you will be hung on the highest rampart as a reminder to you fellow Heathens

Attached: blood-eagle.jpg (900x600, 90K)

Anyone who says this outs themselves as knowing nothing on the subject.
Or they are so deafened by the need to continue their narrative they ignore reality.

Attached: Authari King of Lombards.jpg (251x302, 22K)

This is the mentality pagans used to to kill Martyrs

Bohemians = gypsies. Hussitism is good though.

I prefer to avoid bluepills, thanks.

Sack of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade:

>The Greeks pushed enormous projectiles onto the enemy siege engines, shattering many of them. A serious hindrance to the crusaders was bad weather conditions. Wind blew from the shore and prevented most of the ships from drawing close enough to the walls to launch an assault. Only five of the Greek towers were actually engaged and none of these could be secured; by mid-afternoon it was evident that the attack had failed.

>The clergy discussed the situation amongst themselves and settled upon the message they wished to spread through the demoralized army. They had to convince the men that the events of April 9 were not God's judgment on a sinful enterprise: the campaign, they argued, was righteous and with proper belief it would succeed. The concept of God testing the determination of the crusaders through temporary setbacks was a familiar means for the clergy to explain failure in the course of a campaign.

>The clergy's message was designed to reassure and encourage the crusaders. Their argument that the attack on Constantinople was spiritual revolved around two themes. First, the Greeks were traitors and murderers since they had killed their rightful lord, Alexius IV. The churchmen used inflammatory language and claimed that "the Greeks were worse than the Jews", and they invoked the authority of God and the pope to take action.

>Although Innocent III had again demanded that they not attack, the papal letter was suppressed by the clergy, and the crusaders prepared for their own attack, while the Venetians attacked from the sea. Alexius V's army stayed in the city to fight, along with the imperial bodyguard, the Varangians, but Alexius V himself fled during the night.

Attached: die.jpg (183x210, 4K)

>he says as he posts from a country whose government was loosely modeled after the (pagan) Roman Republic.

Yeah in the same way that Detroit is still Motor City of the World but you don't see me sucking off and acting like De Henry LaFord III do you

>love they enemy!
>peace on earth!
>also you must die in horrifically violent and painful ways if you disagree with my Semitic desert cult
hmmm

being This Mad will not save your dying way of life unfortunately

Constantine adopted Christianity so the church would back him politically. European Christianity was and is a political tool.

>so the church would back him
So the "institution" that had been constantly and repeatedly hunted down and massacred was so powerful it was worth an Emperor turning the whole social and legal system on it's head? When he and the other emperor were both Christian sympathizers?
And that his mother had been a christian already.

More like it got an extension at the cost of Europes future