Why is a supposedly "unamerican" woman the only lawmaker supporting the 1st amendment?

lmao the subhumans are big mad

Attached: smug.jpg (2000x1001, 110K)

hey Tyrone

chants
right wing death squads

choose one

Iran shills should be garrotted.

Bitch prays to the wrong god

She means free speech for commies. We get two years of "gasoleeeeeen stations and restaronts" and republican congressmen getting shot playing baseball and people being beat up over hats. Then one Trump rally chanting "send her back" and now the commies hate the dangerous rhetoric.

Don't kid yourself, she doesn't support free speech; she just hates Israel. She'd be one of the first Congresswomen to support a ban on "hate speech" or on drawings of Muhammad if she had the opportunity, she doesn't truly believe in our ideals and the founding principles of this country.

But yeah, the bill banning boycotts against Israel is a joke.

C) poor white trash all killed by opiate overdose

Zio-shills should get something slower and more painful.

Ackshually, it's quite literally the same god. The god of moses.

>if she had the opportunity
she has the opportunity. right now.
she's a congressperson. that's their job.
instead she advanced a bill to affirm Americans' right to boycott.

Anyone who wants to silence her is a fucking faggot. I don't like her stances either, but watching right wing commentators try to justify 'send her back' cries after she was critical of America is quite interesting after they rallied for 'free speech' when they were the ones being silenced. Either you believe in absolute free speech, whether you like what's being said or not, or you don't. If you want to silence criticism move to China.

Confusion.

The Democrats are all against the 1st amendment.

A lot of people suddenly turn against the 1st Amendment when it's ideas they don't like that are being silenced.

Attached: 1563513929891.png (643x501, 389K)

Except the Republicans are not trying to pass hate speech legislation and the Democrats are.

oh no no no!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Anti-Boycott_Act

Not the Republican party themselves, that's true. I do agree the Democrats are worse in that sense. But people that were previously all about free speech now want to silence Omar and others just because they don't like what they said.

"Some of its cosponsors include Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida), Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine), Senator Charles Schumer (D-New York), and Senator Cory Booker (D-New Jersey).[4]"

how does it feel knowing Ilhan Omar is the last stand of free speech and you're working to undermine her?

>I do agree the Democrats are worse in that sense
It has 58 cosponsors in the Senate (42 Republicans, 15 Democrats, 1 Independent),[3] and 292 cosponsors in the House (216 Republicans, 76 Democrats).[3]

so republicans are quite literally worse.

>When you support someone who wants your genocide

Dude. I get it: memes and it's funny, and shit. But this woman, and these people hate christians

When obongo was president, any criticism of him or his tranny spouse made you racist and unamerican. How soon you liberal retards forget.

How does Jow Forums rationalize Ilhan Omar calling out Israel and AIPAC, while Trump goes after her with bullshit accusations of anti-Semitism?

>Free speech
She's advancing her group interests. She can't even comprehend free speech. Take your false dialectic and shove it up your ass, kikes and niggers both get it

>Jow Forums
>rationalise
i'm pretty sure that requires an IQ higher than 80.
Jow Forums likes chanting.

oh, and also pictures of people smiling.

Attached: index.jpg (296x170, 6K)

This is something I could get behind, her anti American rhetoric I cannot

>her anti American rhetoric I cannot
what did she say that was anti American?

Good op on ATS right now.
This fucking cunt is a terrorist, her dad was a known terrorist.
It's coming out now.
She's fucking done dudes.

Lose weight.

But banning "hate speech" is ok.
Nah, you're a cunt

she never tried to ban hate speech.
she's never said anything of the sort and you know it.
nice strawman, migaboomer.

This has been the plan all along anything of merit she proposes will be ignored and discarded in favor of more smears and faux outrage from her detractors. Both sides rely heavily on empty and divisive rhetoric while marching in lockstep most often to America's detriment.

She is fucking anti-american trash, hopefully someone will put a bullet in it's head soon.

Attached: 8081d4683170a1fd09dc7abd13de142d88b3b921a570623d84a2f5b9a3b64af1.jpg (433x500, 141K)

this is me waiting for Jow Forumsthe_donald faggots to list a single anti-american thing she's ever done or said.

Attached: still-waiting-skeleton.jpg (320x320, 16K)

You have the 1st Amendment you don’t need anything else fucktards

You'd be amazed how often Jews try to get together to neuter or kill it.

Because it's obviously self-interested behavior. Notice you don't see her calling for the end of desegregation in line with freedom of association.

Where's her bill calling for an end to desegregation, workplace diversity quotas, protecting freedom of association, an end to affirmative action? Where did she author a bill in support of free speech on campus? Bitch doesn't give a shit about free speech or freedom of association - all she cares about is sticking it to Israel.

>all she cares about is sticking it to Israel.
you say that like it's a bad thing.

breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/26/jack-dorsey-called-ilhan-omar-promised-to-crack-down-on-hate-speech/

She tried to abuse her political power to get a Trump tweet about her removed because it's "hate speech".

People should be allowed to boycott Israel, but let's stop pretending she's doing it for the sake of protecting the first amendment. That's a lie.

>twitter made a decision
>somehow this is her fault
nice try, JIDF.
she didn't ask them to do shit.

>let's stop pretending she's doing it for the sake of protecting the first amendment.
considering that 58 senators and 292 congresspeople wanted to make boycotting israel illegal, any port in a storm, nigger.

Read the article, nigger.
>During their conversation, [Dorsey] emphasized that death threats, incitement to violence, and hateful conduct are not allowed on Twitter. We’ve significantly invested in technology to proactively surface this type of content and will continue to focus on reducing the burden on the individual being targeted. Our team has also consistently been in touch with Rep. Omar’s office.

She called nigger Jack repeatedly in an attempt to get his tweet removed.

>She called nigger Jack repeatedly in an attempt to get his tweet removed.
that's a creative interpretation.
but it doesn't say that in the article.
a Breitbart article.

That's all well and good, but that still not does equate to her being pro-First Amendment. All that means is they aren't pro-First Amendment either.

washingtonexaminer.com/news/jack-dorsey-to-ilhan-omar-twitter-wont-remove-trump-tweet-that-sparked-death-threats
washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/04/25/twitter-ceo-jack-dorsey-called-rep-ilhan-omar-after-trumps-tweet-sparked-flood-death-threats/?utm_term=.4b63776cf9d0

>that still not does equate to her being pro-First Amendment
segregation and shit isn't free speech, nigger.
choosing not to buy certain goods and services is.
sorry she doesn't agree with your retarded white trash interpretation of the constitution.

Because muzzies want to be able to shitpost about gassing kikes too.

boycots aren't free speech though, you are implying it's a simple statement 'we're not going to buy something' when in reality they are a group of radical leftists with sticks and pipes outside a library or a store screaming at you for violating whatever they're trying to boycot.

we have them all the time in my country, enjoy your 'free speech'.

>segregation isn't free speech
You should try reading the first amendment, retard. It's not just about free speech, but freedom of association as well.

>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

paywalled; didn't read.
even so, an anonymous source?
washington post is clearly zionist territory.

>freedom of association isn't protected by the 1A

Wew lad

peacably assemble != separate drinking fountains for blacks, you inbred hick.

>nothing is real
Fuck off, retard.

segregation isn't free association though.
it's laws keeping people out of places.
hillbillies who think they understand the law are cute.

Not sure what the problem with her is. Anyone that names the jew is my friend. Trump certainly won't and doesn't and isn't.

>strawman
The opposite of forced segregation is not forced desegregation - it's to let people decide on their own who can enter their establishments.

Congress shall make no law .... abridging the freedom of speech
>make a law condemning Trump's tweet

i'll acknowledge that "segregation" is kind of an imprecise term, and can be applied to two things:
>laws preventing certain people from living certain places or doing certain things
200% NOT free speech, should not be protected
>businesses refusing service to certain people
i actually agree with you that this IS speech, and should be protected.

but honestly, in the context of history, i understand why the nuance was lost

>>make a law condemning Trump's tweet
200% brainlet-tier FAKE NEWS.

This argument is fucking retarded on both sides.

nope. that thing the passed is absolutely anti freedom of speech.

>i m a centrist and above it all
Come up with a better argument or gtfo faggot.

She is not the hero we want. But the hero we deserve.

Attached: Ilhan Benjamins.png (465x339, 39K)

>freedom of assembly
>make me a cake, bigot!

>Shilling a Brother Fucker
Thanks! Have a Tub

Attached: TUB.jpg (780x438, 66K)

sloppy job, share blue.

It clearly isn't, mutt.
If it was most of your politicians would be in prison by now.

>Bottom

Attached: 20190716-A10002_Twitter.png (913x1192, 542K)

Attached: S20190719_T100002_Twitter.png (839x969, 153K)

see

No. But I see why you're so retarded. user made a point about how criticizing Israel is a legit legal issue now. By her going against it, it helps support free speech. You're retardedly fixated on her motivation which is non sequitur to his argument, which actually is pretty retarded too. You both should just end yourself for being low IQ fucks just filling up space on this board.

BASED + HIGH ENERGY

I hate rap..
It's the most repugnant form of "art" that burger-land ever produced.

The founding fathers did not design the constitution with the anticipation that some muslim nigger bitch from somalia will seat in the House.

ehlen ve sehlen misr-bro :D

No one actually supports of speech.
If they have a chance to silence their opponents, they will take it.
Politicians only moan about muh freedom of speech when it suits them.

She's not who she says she is.

She is here illegally.

Her voice as a member of Congress is void.

Soon.

The constitution is dead. Everybody knows it. We are all just pretending otherwise. Fuck niggers, fuck commies.

Again, she has motivated and hypocritical reasoning. Trying to suggest that she should be supported for her pro-free speech views is ridiculous. If OP had said she should be supported for her anti-Israel views, that would be fine. It's obvious to anyone with a functioning brain that she's no friend of the first amendment; just whatever benefits her and her mudshit clan.

>of speech
Freedom of speech*

fuck off qnigger.
go back to Jow Forumsthe_donald

Attached: 2bj3qw.jpg (512x288, 36K)

This guy gets it.

You are retarded. These women try to silence people every second of their life. You do not support free speech by suppressing one side and promoting another side. In fact, that is exactly working against free speech.

Israel is not our problem right now. Trump uses Jews to fight against Dems, and it is brilliant.

The irony here is that your ancestors went through the trouble of creating a highly robust political system that's meant to minimize internal conflicts and increase individual liberaties only to have that very system highjacked by the kikes and used to crush Whites.

Any time someone speaks against them they call it "hate speech" or "racism" in an attempt to get them to shut up. They only care about their own speech.

>Why is a supposedly "unamerican" woman the only lawmaker supporting the 1st amendment?

Will she be pro first amendment if Islam was mocked and criticized?

>stating something this obvious
no shit.
but when the politicians aren't all working together, you get something approaching actual free speech, because a good compromise leaves everyone equally unhappy.

what we have now, is one incredibly powerful group (Israel), dominating the landscape, and threatening to actually crack down on it.
Ilhan is the only voice in congress standing up to them.

If you don't like her, you are a zogbot.
Don't like it? Tough. Try not being a zogbot.

It's like the enemy of my enemy is my friend all of a sudden. Glad you guys now are on the same page against me. Let it be an illustrative lesson.