Rome

That video is brutal as fuck

You're not a nigger if you can compete with the military might of Rome.

There has never been an equivalent to this between Europeans and Africans, and there never will be. Niggers have never defeated anyone in combat, except for other niggers.

Arabs wrote historical records about how bad you smelled and how disgusting your habits were. Niggers.

Attached: smug46645.jpg (1920x1080, 184K)

>I’m a complete retard
>I live in a country that wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for Germans but we should have gotten rid of them

Are you an inferior shitskin by any chance

>proves how nigger tier your race really is even though you lie in a first world country that shitskins like me are desperate to live in

Yes totally really
The kikes had to use all of their pawns against us and we still put up a fight that will be remembered
Everyone else was defeated from the inside

Attached: nazi_propaganda_poster.jpg (320x445, 37K)

Attached: 1362579961064.png (686x671, 146K)

Why did all of the Romans in the show look like Celto-Germans from Britannia?

The Germans didn't have access to the Mediterranean, of course they were the niggers of their time.

You didnt defeat them because you were superior. You beat them because they put to much trust in you. Like I said you shifty krauts are like jews

>not the jews
>not the jews
>not the jews
>not the jews
>not the jews
>not the jews
Why yes, good goy, it was the Germans that destroyed the Roman Empire and not our subversive kikes Saul of Tarsus and Constantine

Nigger what?? They carved a path through Europe until they were stopped in France by Charles Martell

Your country wouldn't exist either and there would be no need for it you fucking retard. Rome would have been 1000x better.

Google about the battle of Arminius against his brother
The Germanics in Roman ranks oftenwere abducted as children to fight for Rome

Romans were white retard, not like the brown apes living in italy now, they are the result of muslims

The Kikes were fucking raped by the Roman's. What are you smoking nigger. It was the barbarians that freed them.

Why are you getting buttblasted mutt, did you judt find out you ate 4% italian?

Lmao yes? And? No one is disputing that Rome's power was supreme. Even so, they did not manage to crush the barbarians, who were not only far less organized, but like some have pointed out, far less well-equipped. But they were clever and strong, and resisted in the end.

Compare this to anything that has happened in Africa and there is a stark difference. Also compare the aftermath. Europeans adapted to, capitalized upon, and improved Rome's knowledge.

Because they weren't at war with all of them. Rome was allied with many Gauls and Caesar was personally allied with many of them.

You dumb fags are the ones that freed them!

they possibly were, rome recruited legions from all over its subjugated territories

They would have if Constantine didn't go senile and dunk himself in a wood tub and consider himself Christian

>better for humanity.
European tribal systems were much kinder to the average man than mednigger slave civilization. An elderly homosexual peadophile in a toga could just seize your farm 'for the empire' by drafting some cuck law and his african auxillaries will come and enforce his degeneracy on you.

Read Roma Contra Judaea.
Kikes got gassed multiple times so they switched tactics to subversion. By recruiting amongst slaves (read: mutts and syriacs) and women, they created an anti-white egalitarian cult so powerful that eventually the power structure itself was corrupted (Constantine's mother (((Helena))) was a Christian from Palestine)
Once they got control over imperial bureaucracy, they proceeded to burn the Museion of the Library of Alexandria and destroy/shut down all forms of goyim knowledge across the Empire. This, in combination with the (((church)))'s increasing corruption and blatant misuse of imperial funds made the West's economy so weak and it's bureaucratic administration so unwieldy that collapse was the logical conclusion. Do you really think it's any coincidence that the Empire fell, but the holdings of the (((Catholic Church))) stayed intact and even expanded?

Yep, Romans were such cucks that they got destroyed by a bunch of a unarmed guys. Why even hype those masdive faggots? Romans were weak and perished as they should, just like your pussy "nation" will in a decade ir two, screencap this, Mutt

Why didn't America just genocide all the Spic savages?

Attached: 1562502400045.jpg (2000x3008, 680K)

Hey guys let's participate in a thread that aims at dividing whites

I wonder who could be behind this

>this is now a zero two thread

Attached: 6hbsvbp0f3531.jpg (800x1564, 120K)

>shut down all forms of goyim knowledge
the first proto-university was founded in constantinople, the pandidakterion
>the Empire fell
it survived for 1000 years as a christian culture, and was killed by (((Venetians))) and islam

They had no clue back then, they were expelled from Germany / German states many times later

The legionnaires??

Because they were morons

I wouldn't be bragging if I were you Swede.

And that bit them in the ass

>the first proto-university was founded in constantinople, the pandidakterion
The Pandidakterion was a theological school for almost half a millennium. Don't bullshit me. It doesn't hold a candle to the beacon that was Alexandria.
>but muh Library of Constantinople
Burned not 30 years after its founding. For all practical purposes, the proto-bolshevik inquisition by the (((state authorities))) destroyed Rome from the inside.
>it survived for 1000 years as a christian culture, and was killed by (((Venetians))) and islam
The East could afford the financial hit of the religious bureaucracy. Even then, was the East worthwhile? Compared to the glory of antiquity, did the ERE really contribute anything? No, they burned their greatest scholars and their writings all the way until Plethon lectured to the Florentines and his disciples (including Bessarion) started the Renaissance. The East was contemptible. And I say this as a Byzantophile that fully understands the consequences of Odoacer sending Zeno the Imperial Standard.

still mad that we won? lol

Attached: slide_3.jpg (960x600, 151K)

>the Pandidakterion was a theological school for almost half a millennium
nope. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Constantinople
"The university maintained an active philosophical tradition of Platonism and Aristotelianism, with the former being the longest unbroken Platonic school, running for close to two millennia until the 15th century."
>was the East worthwhile?
up until the crusades, the east was the focus of christendom and the romano-germanic kingdoms in the west. constantinople was the greatest metropolis of that age. it was the bulwark of classical greek culture that held the arabs and turks back in the east nearly a millenia. without its existence, western europe would have never appeared out of the ashes

>White Gaul's and German's were the original niggers
>gauls were niggers

100% bait. Gauls were great craftsmen, introducing soap made from animal fats, barrels and chainmail to rome.

Thats not what good christians do.

>chainmail

They also started to get romanized quite quickly, Gauls who spoke Latin and dressed and behaved like Romans started to appear while Caesar still lived.

Huh so much shills and anti whites in one threat. We should allways have an anti german threat so you kerp out of the rest of pol. Short reminder that the romans use history fore the sole purpose of roman propaganda and nothing else

It would be a shame if you lost a few legions in a dark forest beyond the Rhine

The patricians, including Caesar and his family. They don't look Roman at all

what looks roman?
i know italians who could pass off as anglos if you just look at their face

So this is the power of burger education.

Attached: Seax.jpg (757x1059, 97K)

Wtf man

We are litterally one of the most unchanged DNA group in Europe in like 2 thousand years.
Only Langobards did some changes and only in Northern Italy

Romans were anyone that wanted to be roman. Niggers, chinks, anglos, celts, greek, jews, arabs, turks, koreans basically anyone.

>be an "empire" that for 700 years ruled upon Mediterranean Sea
>since ~160 A.D. Civil Wars are an usual things
>manpower costantly declining
>cultural differences spawn periodically revolts
>monotheistic religions fight inside the empire, against native pagan religions and with heresies of themselves
>the seats of power are nevralgic sites of corruption
>the enemies keep continuous pressure upon the limes since 60 A.D.

The Roman Empire lived too much, considering his condition

Nigger wut? Do you have a mirror?

They practiced human sacrifice

You needed to gain the citizenship
Probably the disaster was when Caracalla gave the Citizenship to everyone: no more military cursus for gaining it, everyone was a citizenship and it destroyied the Roman Citizen.
Fortunately the Italians were already done.

I have and without doubt i'm not black.but i have not to be influenced by yuor racial things.
Damned Americans and their racial system

Everyone did it in those times: only Romans and some Greeks disliked it and not always.

even romans would sacrifice captives during the triumph

Rome was so god damn based. Its incomprehendable what they achieved and the eras it aged through

And this is why i wrote "and not always"
Do you prefer the Cartagineses and their usual sacrifices of children?

It'easy: Roman "Law and Order" and the people nearly them was or savages or who appreciated what Rome could offer

>Niggers have never defeated anyone in combat, except for other niggers
True, that.

Attached: Get rekt, Italy.jpg (2592x1944, 1.25M)

kek

Wait wait

That war was like 3 vs 1

Russia sent to Ethiope military experts and weapons, a lot of weapons.
Even England did its part, because disliked the Italian colonial interests.
Ethiopians were even a lot, thanks to Ethiope being one of the few cases in Africa of a semisolid Kingdom that endured for millenias.

We were with less weapons, with a minor experience with african warfare and with only a small expeditionary force: the disaster was sure.

When you see the 1936 Conquest of Ethiope, you see a more real war 1vs1 between an African Kingdom and an European Nation.

Was he a traitor?

What do you expect?
That i don't show you the errors in your way of thinking?

You even lost battles against the Natives

And Rome was Sacked by Gauls

And China met devastations against a horde of horses' feticists

We can continue for days: it's normal that sometimes battles go in strange ways, but we have to see why this happens.

Annnnd here come the excuses, right on schedule. Look up the Christmas offensive of 15 December 1935 – 20 January 1936; the Ethiopians had rolled the Italians back and retaken Dembeguina and Tekeze. Only the use of poison gas enabled the Italians to scrape out a win, pretty much the only win of Il Douche's entire misbegotten reign.

>"The university maintained an active philosophical tradition of Platonism and Aristotelianism, with the former being the longest unbroken Platonic school, running for close to two millennia until the 15th century."
Platonism was officially discouraged by the church. Neoplatonists such as Damascius and his disciples, as well as Psellos, Italus and Chlorus were persecuted by the church and got largely memoryholed, along with their writings. Many, like Plethon's Nomoi, were deliberately burned per Leviticus commandments. This wasn't aberrant behavior by the way, many early Christians did the same to both pagan writings (Alexandria) AND their refutations to prevent any record of them from slipping through at all in a counter-intellectual damnatio memoriae.

because of the Magic Potion.

>up until the crusades, the east was the focus of christianity
The butcher and usurper Charlemagne changed that not a century after the collapse of the Exarchate of Ravenna.
>and the romano-germanic kingdoms in the west
Again, only until Charlemagne. It could even be argued that the earlier Gothic Wars shattered any western loyalties to Constantinople. >constantinople was the greatest metropolis of that age. it was the bulwark of classical greek culture
You mean it hoarded it. Like the Vatican today, it was kept under lock and key and close supervision. There's a reason that the Renaissance started when Byzantine scholars fled West in the 15th century. All the great Greek cultural achievements were preserved but were also kept hostage by the Imperial authorities. Any discussion outside of established pseudo-Aristotelian orthodoxy was punishable by censorship, exile and death.
>that held the arabs and turks back in the east nearly a millenia.
And they did a commendable job. It's a shame the West focused on butchering Saxons, Prussians, Lithuanians, etc and playing in the sandbox instead of taking back Spain.
>without its existence, western europe would have never appeared out of the ashes
Western Europe would have never been in ashes to begin with if it wasn't purposefully sabotaged by the iconoclastic and fundamentalist Christian cultural revolution.

Everyone has know about the Jews because they did the same shit back then

He annexed Albania tbf

Because Arminius and many other based niggers cucked the midget monkeys.

Based and dacianpilled

Checked.
We wuz Dacians 'n shiet!

>back to back world war champs!
more like rothschild lapdog chumps you fucking boomer

man the romans were fucked. their city was adorned with penises and they allowed adulterers to be punished via public humiliation by getting raped by the husband of the adulterated wife
tl;dr
>rome was gay as fuck

Holy shit this is the first educated opinion about Rome I've read here. I like the Republic a lot more, that's when -anyone- you can name from the Romans lived. Besides that, after the Julio-Claudian dynasty, it was all ogre.

Rome was kinda gay but honestly the only thing they did wrong was not conquer and latinize everyone

You say this only because you don't know Caton the Censor, Sir.
Romans suffered Greek influence too much but it helped for ruling upon them.

The Romans were too tollerant and only in few cases they latinized well, like in actual Romania and in few cities across the Mediterranean Sea.

Exactly my point. Can you imagine where the world would be if the Romans were just a little more xenophobic and had latinized most of their holdings?

Oh they tried, but were ousted by the germanic king Arminius.
youtube.com/watch?v=OjIb80LvzTQ

As well the later empire's military relied almost completely on german mercenaries. The few competent Romans like Aetius were raise by germans as hostages.

Genocide is easier than integration

desu I blame it on a combination of Christianity which destroyed Rome's martial values, and frankly just a century of bad luck during the 200s ad.

I was trying to be realistic, even the Romans didn't have the demographic might to replace the whole Mediterranean that quickly

I think you're right in that assessment, frankly the Romans would've been better off without Christianity. Although if they had managed to get to the level of fervor that the crusades managed Rome may have benefited from it

DELETE THIS!!!

is that the US invasion of Italy?

It's a complicated thing and probably we can talk about it for days but in Italy we say one thing:
"Roman Empire did not disappear: It only changed job"

They didn't just have the kikes in a chokehold, they wiped the kikes out. The Roman Empire(s) annihilated the Hebrews, modern "Jews" are Khazars that converted to Judaism en masse years after the genocide.

Attached: Arch_Titus,_Forum_Romanum,_Rome,_Italy.jpg (1200x1113, 319K)

Hitler didnt kill enough of you

Ho riso

Lol they tried multiple times but failed because the germanic tribes were too powerful, look up the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest 3 germanic tribes killed 1/8 of the entire roman army

Germanic people are the greatest warriors in history. After the roman empire fell apart and split into the west roman empire and the east roman empire, the entire west roman empire was conquered by different germanic tribes.

All of italy was conquered by the Ostrogoths, France (back then Gaul) was conquered by the Franks, Britain was conquered by the Anglos and the Saxons, Spain was conquered by the Visigoths, North Africa was conquered by the Vandals

Caesar's "De Bello Gallico" of course had a pro-Roman bias, but in the first book, he took a jab at Roman culture. He said the Helvetians were far from civilization and therefore hardened. Romans were exposed to imports he said "effeminated" people. You can have a great civilization, but it can still turn to shit just from everyone becoming spoiled.

look at ancient china, most ahead and rekt by infighting and mongols and other subhumans. Rome same. Its just destiny to get destroyed by lesser humans,.