Why shouldn’t the EU build up a separate army from the EU states?
Any EU citizen could join if they get through the selection criteria. The general purpose would be wars in countries not complying with EU sanctions. It could consist of up to 1 million troops, several thousand military airplanes, several aircraft carrier groups and many frigates and destroyers and of course special forces. The EU Commission would be in charge but for longer wars would need authorization from the EU Council.
We know what you're up to kraut. The third time isn't a charm.
SPBP
Oi you sheep shagging cunt, what the hell are you doing, they have internet in Wales?
EU sanctions coming your way, limey.
EU is a marxist ZOGed oligarchy, why would anyone willingly fight for it?
Come on kraut,you can't be trusted to even have mail service let alone army.
Who said anything about "willingly"?
Don’t call me that... I swear, one more time mutt
>be german
>started 2 world war
>now wants an "EU Army"
Nice try, kraut
fpbp
>Why shouldn’t the EU build up a separate army from the EU states?
Members of the European Union can't find a consensus on even the simplest, trivial, mundane issues. Common foreign policy doesn't exist, and we are talking here about a common army. This is an absurd. In addition, knowing the EU, the creation of a European army will also create a gigantic office and administrative apparatus that absorbs billions of euros each year and the army will employ pacifists, sociologists and experts on gender identit.
You faggits can't afford 2% GDP for NATO. How are you going to fund a whole separate military?
>knowing the EU, the creation of a European army will also create a gigantic office and administrative apparatus that absorbs billions of euros each year and the army will employ pacifists, sociologists and experts on gender identit.
the best part of knowing what EU really is
>Why shouldn’t the EU build up a separate army from the EU states?
Because you won't fund it. Now fuck off.
Shut the fuck up, enculé de boches ! EU gonna destroy herself with the Deutsch Bank fiasco, Angela gonna shake shake shake
We’ll get it too.
Plus this. But I reject the pic related. NATO and the Navy of the United States is the guarantor of the longest lasting peace in world history. The UN has never been the guarantor it's only a meaningless, figural inatitution.
We can afford it actually, we just dont want to
The EU will fund it, no problem. The UK owes us, e.g. 400bn euros, a sum easily useable for several years of EU army ops.
it's not separate, it's instead of.
>NATO and the Navy of the United States is the guarantor of the longest lasting peace in world history.
You mean guearantor of ZOG?
Pretty sure EU army will pop up soon
/thread
who the hell do you think you are?
Go browse your Stormfront.
You can go rape and traffick kids in brown countries without an international military to help you.
everything about this is a bad idea.
First of all, you wouldn't get funding for that insanely expensive project, as it's separated from the member states armed forces.
Then, authorization from the EU council for "longer wars", while the commission have power to start the smaller ones, just means the commission will drag the EU into wars the council doesn't really want to, but have to join after the commission dragged them into a quagmire.
Then there's the whole recruitment process. People who become soldiers, don't want to join the EU army, they want to join their respective nation's armies.
So the entire thing wouldn't have money, soldiers, legitimacy, or any coherent strategy. And it would piss off enough rural european with hunting rifles enough so they'd start taking casualties if they went on leave in uniform.
Id much rather join and fight for a great united european army, than some impoverished joke mini army
But of course i have a utopian idea where the army serves the interests of Europeans and kicks subhuman shitskins back to where they belong, the current european politics are garbage and trash and id rather kill the politicians than fight for them.
I'd gladly join and fight in any colonial/hegemonic expansion wars too. But again the army has to serve European interests.
Defienitly
Would prefer EU army instead of nato tbqh
if they tried to have an army that could contend with america's or china's they'd be totally bankrupted. since they can't compete, why try? better to play to their strengths: talking and writing and making cheese and wine and beer. let men of action keep the watch.
cuz the EU is a faggotfest overrun by the sand niggers
Because you idiots allow people like the woman who ruined your military to become head of the European commission. You lack the institutional knowledge anymore to even build such a system and most all you lack the political will to make something more than a theoretical white paper.
Based and redpilled
So basically, you want a military that Germany will be alone to control but that will also be mostly funded by other countries?
Get fucked kike.
Only the people in the EU army could vote.
yes and the UK owes you like 2 trillion if they would ask for ww2 repayment, germans are the dirty of europe, morally, and should not get ANOTHER chance ever, churchill was right
rotterdam draai wel zonder de duitse tiet hoor...
>eu army
fighting for refugees, lgbt, democracy, israel and globalization
Good luck with that Fritz
>the UK owes you like 2 trillion
Pretty sure that the UK destroyed way more assets in our cities during ww2. I guess they owe us beyond 20 trillion euros in value... but our beautiful cities will never will be back as they were, so the destruction can be costed as invaluable.
as part of peace treaty schwein
Bump. Time to drive the mutts out of the fatherland.
Not again, Hans.
>And the third time it happened everyone decided it would be better to just take them off the map