Interfaith mixing - Christians and Muslims

Can someone explain why people think it is not ok for Christians to say they should only mix with other Christians or with atheists/agnostics? Muslims are an entirely different religion, this would be bound to lead to massive conflicts in a marriage... unless a Muslim gives up his religion... or the Christian does.

Attached: PF_19.10.23_easternWesternEurope_featured.png (640x360, 84K)

Christianity and Islam are more similar than Judaism and Christianity.

Or Christianity and atheism...

False. Islam and Judaism are both war religions that support pedophilia and eye for an eye.
Christianity has more in common with Buddhism.
>t.read all three

Christians did the same for centuries. But that's not even the point... Islam recognize Jesus, unlike Judaism and Buddhism.

Muslims are ciminals and should be wiped off the face of the earth of Scandinavia and Europe.

>Islam recognize Jesus, unlike Judaism and Buddhism.
recognition doesn't mean shit if the promoted "values" of islam are 75% the opposite

> Spain
What? But what about the Reconquista. I thought this was the basis of the national myth.

>Islam recognize Jesus
They only recognize that he was a man who lived, a prophet.

It's like starting a religion saying "there is no God, but we recognize Christians think there is a God". Kind of not very compatible.

Well when a person receives Christ they are born again and become a new creation. There is a spiritual regeneration. All other views are false and leave the person with the same old unregenerate person just with a new worldview. So it’s like cats and dogs.

Recognition means everything if you have to live in the same family. Look up at what the Talmud teaches about Jesus, Mary etc...

>entirely different religion
Islam, Christianity and Judaism are mostly the same religion, just varying in the degree of respecting what their scripture says (with muslims respecting it the most and christians the least, which is why christians generally are decent people).

Unless a religion states the Christ is the son of God, they are commiting blasphemy.

>Islam, Christianity and Judaism are mostly the same religion, just varying in the degree of respecting what their scripture says

Tennis, cricket and football are mostly the same sport, just varying in the size of the ball and the way to kick/hit it...

Except he even says "Sons", so your point is invalid.?

Classic virtue signalling.

>Completely ignoring the fact that Jesus is the central figure in the end of times islamic escatology, literally the one that will slay the anti-Christ and bring the eternal reign of God on earth

That's not correct according to Islam but he Khalifa always accepted the people who worshipped Jesus as God.

>Jesus is the central figure

Well, to be honest, there is lots of weird stuff in the Quran. They put children's stories in there, made up names, copied over half of the Old Testament and some distorted version of the New Testament. Lots of magical creatures and illogical plots.

There is a reason the Quran has no sources agreeing with each other and no indication of a historic document that points to it being written between 612 and 632... but all historical evidence points to it being written and compiled over a longer period of time in the 700s and early 800s with lots of stories and things being included, then discarded, then aligned, then modified, then again discarded... eventually the Quran used today was agreed upon from like 50-60 different Qurans in the early 20th century in Egypt. The reason they choose that version was because it was kind of nice to print. There are Muslims in Yemen who still use a different version.

>or with atheists/agnostics?
but that's not ok and it's even stated in the Bible. It's not particularly forbidden, but it's clearly stated as a bad thing to do.

There are 30+ original manuscripts and none agree, they have vast differences. Most differences are of the kind where a passage has "allah" speaking in first person and the other manuscript interjects a 3rd person endorsement of a particular descendant of Mohammed as the proper leader. They were all obviously edited and none legit.

That's a talinkg point of some western scholars hostile to Islam, but even the most ancients fragments of the Koran cointains no significant differences from the Uthman version.

It's very simple, goy. White women can intermarry, Muslim women don't. in any case, the nonmuslim partner converts and problem solved.

In addition, 1/5th of the Koran is literally gibberish, untranslatable garbled alphabet salad. Sometimes it's in the middle of a book, sometimes several verses in a row. English translation just puts a [it is a mystery known to God] as a placeholder but leaves out the length, lest anyone realize how dumb it is....and those 30+ manuscript all have different versions of the gibberish too.

>and those 30+ manuscript all have different versions of the gibberish too.
The only differences are minor edits regarding some letters, related to the change of arabic becoming more and more a "witten" language with the passing of time, and stylistics choices.

> People with the least contact with Muslims have the highest tolerance level.

Wew, I wonder how long it will last

Because religions can coexist?

To be fair, Judaism was founded by a bunch of slaves and Islam was founded by tribesman trying to unite their peninsula through conquest. Its not surprising that they both have elements of their historical context throughout

>Jordan