what are some scientisfic experiments that would be immoral but would give us huge progress and achievements?
What are some scientisfic experiments that would be immoral but would give us huge progress and achievements?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
Sex with ur mum
seeing how many cocks you could fit in your mouth
Even if there was happening right now, we wouldn't know because of amount of slide threads like this one.
CRISPR shit the chinks are working on. They created hyper intelligent babies that are immune to aids.
download all the tesla papers available and knock yourself out. basically everything you need.
Stem cell research. Would cure a lot of shit.
Sex with OP's mum isn't a huge achievement when every one has done it.
How high do you have to hang a nigger for him to die.
i'l start and say it would be makeing women pregant with brain dead babies so we could use babies for organs
OP status: fukken rekt
True
Honestly this. Don't be surprised when in 20 years you start to see Genetically designed and superior in every way chinks. CRISPR is the way of the future, but the west is too afraid to touch it.
Agreed. The user talking about what the Chinese are doing with genetically edited babies has a good point as well.
The fact you’re Swedish kinda ruins it considering ur mum is probably riding somali bbc as we speak. Should have used a memeflag
and you're still somehow 25yo virgin
most of the shit that the nazis/chinese did/are doing. Its amazing how much progress you can make when you realise ethics comitties are a roadblock
This along with human cloning. You'd have an endless supply of test subjects.
Thanks Christians
fuck christians
Take this to another level and you could have an incredible force, military or labor.
Pretty much all kinds of human experimentation.
says the dutch whose mom gets spitroasted by maghrebis as we speak
Eugenics
Setting up 20-30 replica systems of enemy countries in your own country. Testing subversion methods.
any gene therapies or stem cell research could be sped up massively if you just didn't give a fuck about the people you were testing the shit out on. That's the first example that comes to mind; but to echo the other guy, yea, basically all forms of human experimentation.
how about death sentence prisoners?
i never understood why eugenics was a bad thing. any arguements against it faggots?
Let the chunks do the hard work and the mutations then when they have it perfected just swoop in and steal it off them. Fuck the chinks
It's not immoral, but actual eugenics as described by early eugenicist's like Francis Galton.
No matter what the government is influencing birthing practices--so we aught to consider how to influence births in a positive way.
youtu.be
not the worst play honestly
only fair, they've been stealing our shit for the past century or so
They've been doing it to us all this time. Fair is fair.
Stem Cells are amazing. Gibson used them to save his old as fuck father.
Every shit government policy can classify as eugenics.
"Let's poison water to kill the idiots, lol only idiots dont test their water!"
Eugenics is the stupidest fucking idea in existence.
Chinese are lucky because theyre overpopulated to fuck, so the sheer economic value of a human is like .0000001 cent translated to dollars. They don't need to fuck around with prisoners because most Chi-lives are already worthless to them
And eugenics in and of itself isn't bad, but its based on shitty science that doesn't really work out the way they think it will, which is why Hitler was a massive retard. Mutations can happen regardless of how "cleaned up" the gene pool is
Cutting people apart and seeing which bits of the body are needed to 1) live, 2) live for a duration, 3) maintain intellect, 4) keep certain senses.
link?
dosing kids with LSD to see if it gives them superpowers
oh wait you already did that
One word: Turks
The CIA already did that with Cubans in Florida
Not immoral but probably not gonna fly with the powers that be, but:
>test to see how much better off the world would be without niggers and kikes.
It heavily depends on what who doing the eugenics sees as ideal and that could be the total opposite of what you want out of it.
how is sterilizing people with horrible genetical diseases to not reproduce and not give same disease to child a bad idea? it's not about removing stupid people , it's about saving children from suffering because their parents were to autistic to understand consequences of having child
yeah i know what moral relativism is but i don't think anyone thinks that 70iq is better then 130iq or having genetical disease is better then being healthy.
Cull everyone with IQ below 100. Focus on scientific advancements without care for morals and public opinion, repeat until space age.
it just doesn't work out that way, gene editing tech has a way higher probability of "cleaning up" the gene pool and would need to be consistently applied to new babies....mutations can happen in any lineage
practically any kind of manipulation of the human body with a live subject
as an example permanently vivisected humans kept alive in that state would be absolute gold for anatomy research
Some bleeding heart liberal billionaire might want to support a eugenics program too breed propensity to prefer people of your own race out the genepool.
The owner of some retail conglomerate could support a eugenics program that increasing the ammount of low iq impulsive people, as they are more likely to buy his good. This is already happening with the welfare system.
*That increases
People don’t want to die off we have humanity
ohhhh. thanks user i understand it now
The eugenic argument is the one that really break liberals minds because they'd have to admit that we aren't all made equal just to prove that it's bad. So their only retort is that it's bad because le ebil hitler and more bs arguments that involves metal gymnastic and appeal to emotions.
Don't take me as saying that eugenics is bad, just that you need to ensure that the people in charge of it are the right people.
You don't know what is best for survival, you can barely survive yourself. So just shut the fuck up.
he said immoral studies, not weekend activities brother
All such experiments are done away from the public eyes.
Common, niggers, american elites start wars in dozens different countries, sign deals with known terrorist supporters who blew up their twin towers and then go Eipstein private island to rape and kill children in celebration of it all just for shits and giggles, but you think they would stop before human experiments, that could bring them even more power, because it's "unethical"?
Lol, get real, faggots. I bet there are dozens black sites all over the world where all sorts of sick shit is going on.
My bad maghrebis are your area of expertise, the Dutch are more into turks
CRISPR gene editing of babies.
Nice grill, Jeff.
redirecting all traffic from facebook to Jow Forums
Trick question, if it gives us huge progress and achievements then it’s not immoral to perform the experiment.
Genotype targeting bioweapons.
Eugenics applied toward progress rather than profit.
A study where you had a cohort of children given something like 1ug LSD/kg every three days for their whole lives.
Designing gene-targetted viral weaponry.
They'll just kill their fuckups. Bug people aren't capable of empathy.
I see you too are a man of culture, like me. BACTERIAL CULTURE!