We all know how the original "It's Okay To Be White" campaign went: exactly as predicted. The media blew a gasket covering the "racist, bigoted White Supremacist" slogan; the Buzzfeeds of the world tripped over themselves producing glossy media expressing how absolutely evil it was to suggest that it's okay to be a certain skin color. They made it absolutely clear: IT'S NOT OKAY TO BE WHITE.
So, now it's time for Round 2. The same message, the same format, with a simple negation. "It's Not Okay To Be White."
What will the left and the media's reaction be this time? My predictions:
• First and foremost, they'll go to the source, which is this thread, and declare it a smoking gun that proves the campaign is in fact a product of Neo-Nazi White Supremacist Racists, because it started here.
• Then we'll have the Buzzfeed approach: "NOBODY is saying it's not okay to be white. What we're saying is that white people benefit from a system of codified, entrenched White Supremacy that dates back to their callous slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, KKK, and these systems persist to this day and continue to disenfranchise and oppress POC."
• My favorite reaction is the white normie, confronted with a dilemma in his mind: does he side with a statement of overt racism that signals him out as "not okay?" When he imagines who created the poster/slogan, does he envision a radical transfemme POC who is justifiably lashing out against the machine of White Supremacist Oppression? If he rejects the slogan "It's Not Okay To Be White," does this mean that he is in fact embracing the opposite, which is that "It's Okay To Be White?"
Either way, the end result is the same: leftist infighting, which is one of our best bets to waking normal whites up to the fact that their governments and institutions not only don't care about them, but are in fact celebrating their demise.
Get posting, goys.
