>The Department of Justice announced today that the Department’s Antitrust Division is reviewing whether and how market-leading online platforms have achieved market power and are engaging in practices that have reduced competition, stifled innovation, or otherwise harmed consumers.
>The Department’s review will consider the widespread concerns that consumers, businesses, and entrepreneurs have expressed about search, social media, and some retail services online. The Department’s Antitrust Division is conferring with and seeking information from the public, including industry participants who have direct insight into competition in online platforms, as well as others.
>“Without the discipline of meaningful market-based competition, digital platforms may act in ways that are not responsive to consumer demands,” said Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim of the Antitrust Division. “The Department’s antitrust review will explore these important issues.”
>The goal of the Department’s review is to assess the competitive conditions in the online marketplace in an objective and fair-minded manner and to ensure Americans have access to free markets in which companies compete on the merits to provide services that users want. If violations of law are identified, the Department will proceed appropriately to seek redress.
They rewrote the antitrust laws. This won't be some teddy Roosevelt shit unfortunately since the Jews foresaw this and things were changed a few decades ago in regards to antitrust.
>If the DOJ stricks to the facts, it will see that Americans have more choices and more information than ever. >meanwhile avg American cant even choose to be proud of his country while media hide even those informationes they previously given to public give them rope
>[tech businesses] compete against one another >they all suppress and deplatform right-wing speech, promote left-wing speech, and tolerate radical left speech >they collude in efforts to exclude free-speech options from the market >publicly traded and largely owned by the same people >totally competing in opposition to each other
No, the Trump administration's going to make a big noise about what a problem it is, and how important it is to re-elect him. Then it's going to be four more years of letting the left make gains unimpeded.
Dylan Reed
Nope. Big Tech is getting fucked before 2020. This is what's scaring you kikes the most. Losing total control.
Aaron Stewart
>you kikes Yeah, everyone is a kike who's warning you that Trump, who was a lifelong Democrat until a few years before running for president as a Republican, who married his daughter to a Jew and gave him important role in his administration despite clearly not liking him and resenting him, who takes every opportunity to kiss Israel's ass and yell about antisemitism, who just signed a law to increase immigration, who is letting illegals in faster than Obama did, is just a new way to present cuckservatism that pretends to represent you as it gives ground to Jews and the left while you do nothing real.
The Jews are not a race, a nation, or a religion, but a criminal syndicate, and Trump sealed his membership in it with a political marriage. Watch and see. He hasn't been in a rush to do anything, and he's not going to start now.
Nathan Barnes
If Google can away 2-10 million votes, that kind of power must be stripped from them and everyone else must be prohibited from gaining that power. That shit is haunting.
Justin James
>If Google can away 2-10 million votes, that kind of power must be stripped from them and everyone else must be prohibited from gaining that power. That shit is haunting. Not only that. They're openly conducting experiments and psy ops by transforming their platforms into one giant social engineering machine. The people running these companies were involved in sparking the Arab Spring and they also are using their platforms to passively push genocide.
OP has to post the text or else most "anons" won't be able to read it. #chatbotchan
Luis Myers
THINK-- what happened to Anonymous? The answer to this should be obvious! Anonymous had what Jow Forums now lacks The power to wage vigilante hacks, And publicize corruption where it rots, And force truth into sleepy public thoughts. Has Anonymous now disappeared? Once legendary, now no longer feared? Once sparking protests-- is that fuel now spent? The lulz are gone, gone the seething dissent? What do you think this disappearance means? Is speech still free in internet machines?
Well, look at what the chans have now become; Examine what swirls in the daily scrum. Ask yourself-- does it seem really real? Does it show what actual people feel? Does it seem organic and not fake? How much repetition does it take-- How much frenzied vile monotony Until we guess that internets ain't free?
Ask yourself-- if you sought to control The media, and hence the public soul, And something like Jow Forums was swelling up And spilling truth from propaganda's cup Would you let it go its merry way? Or would you lock control down in some way? And if you locked control down would you try To do it in a way to fool the eye? To make it seem like free speech carried on Even though, in fact, it were quite gone? For if you shut down free speech openly The public would respond suspiciously; But if you hid control beneath a ruse What you once feared becomes a tool to use. So that, controlling, you have it both ways-- Enslaving dissent, dictating what it says!
Andrew Phillips
Anonymous was infiltrated by The famously mendacious FBI Whose antics as shown by COINTELPRO Target dissent, as I'm sure most people know. Do we think that having sunk its claws In Anonymous, with lies and laws, That the FBI would then allow Free speech to have stayed quite free till now?
But it's not like we have far to look To see by what means free speech got the hook; The image made by chans' mirrors and smoke Is so stupid that it seems like a joke! How laughable must a deception be Before the world opens its eyes to see? The simple fact-- as stark as winter dawn-- Is that Anonymous, busted, now gone Was replaced by swarms of-- wait for it-- Virulent nazis spewing nazi shit! We would have to laugh if we were told This outcome in the Jow Forums days of old. So formulaic, politically cliched-- And yet this very game is being played! How can a joke as stupid as this one Be used to strangle free speech, and to stun The helpless mainstream public with the fear That an internet fourth reich draws near? But if that preposterousness is not Enough to spark the understanding thought, Consider, even stupider to tell, The arch absurdity of the “incel”! No, it's not enough that nazis rose To cloak and choke the chans in nazi throes-- No, these scary nazis all the same Must wallow in their helplessness and shame! The “incel” is not just a defeated man-- But a powerful extremist with a plan! No matter that these two things contradict-- We'll just keep hammering at them till they stick!
Thomas Bailey
Now ask yourself-- does the technology Exist to make the unfree chans seem free? Think data, think vault 7, and AI-- And God knows what else, hidden from the eye. And look at the corruption that's been shown That yet to public truth remains unknown. Understand-- the chans are herded tight And nothing unpermitted sees the light, The MSM and chatbot chans converge To regulate how much truth can emerge. When swarming nazi posts fill up the place Then sincere dissent can't get the space To breathe, develop, organize, or live; Chatbots enforce the nazi narrative.
By now it should be more than obvious-- Free speech ended with Anonymous. The chatbot chans system is locked in place, The zombie user leers from a stolen face. The truth lies right here, waiting to be seen; A monster stirs to life in the machine...
And remember also, this other thing I tell: Prepare to stare into the mouth of Hell.
And one more thing, while I have your ear: Q is legit, and the storm is almost here.
