VARNASHRAMA DHARMA

>The concave earth is the correct model.

According to the VEDAS , the BHU MANDALA is shaped as a CENTRAL UNIVERSAL LOTUS FLOWER. It dissects our universe in half. And divides the universe into 7 lower and 7 upper planetary systems.

Our little earth we stand on is shaped like a LOTUS PETAL and is part of Bhu Mandala which is the major universal Lotus Flower.

That being said, since a lotus petal is concave I could relate to your model. But nevertheless we are very limited in fully realizing these models since they are multidimensional.

Attached: F9D680E9-2EE8-45FF-9541-FDB0CC07933B.jpg (2560x1920, 2.75M)

Fuck off nig white Aristotle calculated Earth's radius already in 350 BC

MOUNT MERU or SUMMER resembles the pericarp of the LOTUS FLOWER. Just like a Lotus has a golden seedpod in the very center so Mount Sumeru resembles a shining golden mountain !

Attached: 1D20EBDB-6D24-4B4B-87CD-BFA50F488E6D.png (602x399, 436K)

That was Eratosthenes actually

Well my fault, but thats not the point

Yeah I get you. He managed to calculate the circumference within a margin of about 10 per cent which was amazing considering he just measured shadow lengths

What are his calculations ?

What’s the circumference according to ancient Greeks ?

Ma lads !

Think about this for a moment ,

The word POLE

what kinds of connotations this word brings into your mind ?

Wikipedia has an account on it. He compared shadow lengths of the two pyramids whose distance is known as well the relative north south latitude. This coupled with the correct assumption that the sun is relatively a point compared to its distance from earth allowed him to calculate it

Ah correction he didn't use pyramids but Essentially an obelisk at a place where the sun rays were perpendicular to the surface

See. My point is that our earth is a globe . If we were not a globe but flat , the pole star would be straight up above our heads.

Attached: 079C5DD7-6E16-4485-9C5B-180F128401F9.jpg (1535x1794, 427K)

THE HOLE UNIVERSE ROTATES AROUND THE POLE

This

Attached: maxresdefault (1).jpg (1280x720, 45K)

All the stars and planets are rotating SYMMETRICALLY in their orbits around the pole

And the base of that pole is our solar system or the Ecliptic !

This ma lads, nails it for the flattards !

This argument , they can not defeat .

Your hole rotates around my stick

SYMMETRICALLY on rectangular orbit

THE WHOLE UNIVERSE ROTATES AROUND THE POLE

The true theory is that whole universe rotates around the /pol

Bump

Lads, I’m so excited about this ! I just started thinking about the universe .

Are you drunk or something?

Flattards they have this stupid argument that earth FEELS flat so it must be flat ! Can you believe that stupid ? It feels flat to them ?

Son. I so high right now you won’t believe

Lol. It feels flat to them ! :)

Earth IS flat on human level (100-200 meters around). It is a globe on the global scale. Well that last sentence sounds stupid.

You see. The flatters will say it is an optical illusion that sun rises up under an angle in the morning , travels high up in the sky and descends under an angle and sets ! To them all that is an optical illusion !

Flatters say the sun is rotating above flat earth and they use an example of street light poles getting smaller and smaller in the distance.

But the sun from its rise till its setting is always the same size !

The sun doesn’t not start rising up from the east like some tiny bulb of light !

Then it gets bigger and bigger as it rises full up in the sky at noon.

And then getting smaller and smaller again till it sets !

The real problem is that if Earth were flat you would be able to see Himalayas from anywhere if you are high enough, but in reality you can't see anything further than the horizon, which is the lenght where your sight becomes tangent to the curvature of Earth.

All this is a visual proof that my feelings are better than yours , flattards !

It really does feel to me that the sun is rising at an angle and orbits the earth on the ecliptic plane .

You shouldn't seriously debate flatearth it is more a kind of trolling not a believeable idea.

True. But I need this as a therapy

>The real problem is that if Earth were flat you would be able to see Himalayas from anywhere

This idea crossed my mind a month ago
It does make sense

With a strong enough telescope if I point it toward Himalayas I could literally see it from anywhere on the flat earth model “

Attached: B35C34D0-6182-4AC3-8C8F-DC241B43C4DC.jpg (2000x2500, 1.01M)

Flat Earth is two-dimensional thinking.
Earth is three-dimensional thinking.
To believe even in absence of evidence that three's the limit would be short-sighted, perhaps even one-dimensional.

Slavs being the true Aryans.

>even their spoken language is 70% identical to Sanskrt