Does a man have a right to impose his ideology or views on another man by the force?

Does a man have a right to impose his ideology or views on another man by the force?

Attached: the-weak-should-fear-the-strong-2013-at-4-07am-via-5624968.png (500x523, 130K)

Depends, what is your ideology/views?

No

It's like building a house without foundation. Ethnic traditions are foundation, strip it and replace it and it becomes a hollow visage of its former self. This is the case with all non Arab Muslims and non Jewish Christians.

It doesn't matter. That's just how the world is. Even in a democracy.

Theres no such thing as "right to impose". Theres only power and what you do with it.
If you use it to worsen the conditions of your people, then you're an enemy of good.

His right depends on the other guy being forced upon.

Bingo.

Might makes right, so by that logic, yes.
Although I wouldn't argue that it would be the case for a civilized society.

When he does and when he doesn't then?

Right of Conquest

Even if you think human rights are garaunteed, you will bump shoulders enough that you will be forced to impose your views or have them imposed on you.

You can brush them off when you can, but its not an ethic question, just reality.

Whom Nietzsche is strangling? Soren Kierkegaard?

So there can't be really free societies? All of them totalitarian?

What is the point then when the politicians pretend they build free society?

which book by Nietzsche should i read first ?

No rights, because they are inventions. But you could do it anyway, and there is no one that will stop you. So in a way, you absolutely can.

Immanuel Kant.

Zarathustra. It is narrative so it is very easy to read and is full of rich meaning.

Maybe but who wants comrades whose words and works are not expressed from heart?

>the force
You shouldn't use the force that way but some Sith have

No there are no real free societies. They are bound together by force. If you don't follow the laws, you are forcefully stuffed into a prison. Politicians pretend because people are stupid, so they get exciting for new promises.

If he is stronger both mentally and physically.

Well yes obviously. For example a right is something a powerful person or group gives a weak person or group. So the powerful group is still imposing its will on the weaker giving them a rights.

Zarathustra if you want Nietzsche at his best. Birth of a Tragedy if you really want to dig into his education and mindset that repeatedly rises up in all the rest of his work, ie understand Nietzsche broadly

You may be able to force a person to comply with your wishes but how are you going to make him think the way you want him to? That takes quite a bit more work than physical coercion to brainwash a person.

The Gay Science
brainlet
midwit

Fedorific response user.

Start with "Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks", which is Nietzsche going through the pre-Socratic philosophers and explaining their philosophies. You'll get a hang of what problems Nietzsche saw with philosophy and what he was trying to solve. And you'll know why he thought that philosophy in the west took a massive dive in quality with Plato and Aristotle. Also it's just a nice little book about the pre-Socratics that everyone should know about whether or not you agree with Nietzsche.

After that you should read Birth of Tragedy.

What is your political ideology?

Zarathustra because it's his greatest work. If you find value in that one, you'll find value in his other works too.

Might makes right is an observation of how things actually work in the real world. It's not a justification in itself. I'm not saying you didn't know this, but some might still misunderstand it.

start with the Greeks

Which is why he should start with "Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks" by Nietzsche.

Lmao. Anyone who favors Nietzsche is the very reason why our society is actually being degenerate. Congrats.

Yes, but my ideology dictates it ought not to be exercised.

This type of ''start with the more boring foundations'' works if you get paid to read or you've autistic patience to dig through them. People that are not autistic readers should start with the delicious cherries that the authors are best known for. When those cherries taste good, they will be naturally interested in finding out what the foundations of these authors were. Later on as one has read those foundations, they will return back to the cherries and discover things they previously missed.

I personally had zero interest in the Greeks before finding Neetshee.

Where do you live again? So that we can pick you up and eject you from this country?

>brainlet
how? it is the most accessible.

this

I wonder. Are you a kike or a muzzie hiding under our beloved Nazi flag? Apparently you also seem to have no clue what uprise of degenerate ideas Nietzsche was responsible for, I give you a few examples: Nihilism, postmodernism, moral relativism (see "drag queens", pedophilia, and all this other crap), etc.
If you all favor this kind of degenerate shit, put down the Nazi flag immediately and piss off, fucking jew.

Does everybody care about whether it's right or wrong, if a person uses force that he can benefit from then he sees no problem with that. Of course that may lead to less civilized behavior, but not everyone cares and it's business as usual.