Uuuh...i...i can't get into that

>uuuh...i...i can't get into that..
>unfortunately i cannot answer that..
>I dont...know
>generally true, i think, yes...
>that...thats in my report i think
>eeh...uh...eh...well...eh..hmm..in fact..well, exuse me i dont know.

What a disaster. Dems on absolute damage control.

Attached: 34634q523463425.jpg (1360x765, 180K)

He looks reanimated from the dead.

did you go outside in sweden and poll that? so internet damage control. good.

Look at that Jewess smiling and nodding behind him.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-07-24-09-30-31~2.png (720x291, 28K)

Attached: h03CF8EE5.jpg (500x375, 45K)

could you remind me of that citation?

could you please repeat the question?

based & whatpilled

I DO NOT RECALL

Isn't the irony here that they were sweating that bald guy incessantly for no real reason?
>IM AXING DA QUESTCHUNS

>would you be willing to read the first sentence?
and that would start with?
>the first one
what?
>can you read the first sentence?
I'd be willing to let you read it

tfw mueller was your boss

Attached: strzok_shadow-1024x582-1.png (1024x582, 650K)

He basically is.

His career was over. He is just an emiritas clown they dug out of the mothballs to fix his name to the report to give it the illusion of credibility. This geezer didn't actually do any work. All of the work was done by Weissman and his hatchetmen.

CHEATERS THAT LOST

Attached: 1521473409089.jpg (1920x1080, 657K)

OVER HERE MR. DIRECTOR
>eh!

Damn Mueller sounds almost senile.

IF.IF.IF.IF.IF.IF.IF.IF.IF.IF

That's because he's a special investigator, not a prosecutor. He cannot answer certain questions. He's asking for repeats because the members are trying to corner him into answering one way, so to avoid improper conduct he either says refer to the report or asks to restate to be sure he can answer correctly.

R Tom McClintock is killing him holy shit. How could anyone take this Mueller guy seriously?

What do you have to say about misrepresenting evidence?
>what was the question

Go suck some nigger cock, svede scum. I can't wait to see your shithole country turning into islamic state and your vile people getting raped, tortured, mutilated and genocided. In fact, when the party starts i might join the muslims and slaughter as many of your people as possible. Not joking. You are dead, hurri cocksucker.

>That's because he's a special investigator, not a prosecutor
Mueller was a Special Prosecutor, holy shit the left is retarded

...... i......uh.....
[Sharts]

It's not just yes. It's generally yes.

>democrat friends work in for an easy win
I CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT

He basically doesnt wanna talk about anything that isnt implying obstruction

...can you read it out loud for everybody?
>....I would be happy to have you read it

Is mueller functionally blind?

Ho ho ho, he he he, Muller the NPC.

He's already established that the investigation was baseless and biased, any conclusions it draws are completely irrelevant.

Attached: Phoenix wright objection.jpg (550x404, 112K)

>I would have to look at it more closely before I could say I agreed with it

the whole thing is just a smokescreen for the fact that seth rich found out hillary was defrauding the dnc primary to rob bernie, decided to use his dnc access to copy hillary and podesta's emails and leak them to the world which caused him to get assassinated by the state
i'm sure if they were to ever acknowledge him, they would call him a russian agent

>I'M SORRY, WHAT?

He needs a hearing aid. What a tool.

They've decided he's a liability so they've been using the phylactery to drain his life force to keep Ginsberg's shambling corpse animated.

>HOW MANY TIMES I WHAT?
...
>I DO NOT HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THAT FIGURE

Is he pretending to act like that though?

Attached: idonotknow.png (1492x828, 1.33M)

>can the director answer the question?
>no. no he can't! time's up!

Is that correct?
>I'm aware of that

It wouldn't be surprising.
Doesn't everyone do that when they're questioned by congress under oath?

>what?
It's from page 127, volume II
>if it's from the report then I support it

mr. mueller
MR. MUELLER I'M OVER HERE
>what?
>ken star did what?
>I'm not familiar with that.

>i-it-it’s o-over f-f-for tru-

Attached: A464EAE2-8331-49EB-BBCC-197548A6723A.png (633x772, 17K)

WELL LES TAWLK ABOU LIES
YO Y'ALL WITNSSES LIED DIDNS'T DEY

if only you knew how bad things really are

Attached: ROBERT MUELLER if only you know how bad things really are.png (741x797, 558K)

>w-w-w-wuh well I uh... I-I uh... I understand that it's, uh, in the report
>a-a-a-and I support that it's in the report

in b4
>sorry, can you repeat that?

oy vey not andrew weissman

SHUT IT DOWN
END THE HEARING

Neuroscientists on Reddit proved that he has Parkinson's dementia. He had no idea what he was saying.

>i-i-it's uhh.... i-if it's in the r-r-report uh... then i support it.

thank you mr. mueller
...OVER HERE!

Politicians need to start being held accountable. This guy has no idea what was going on with his own investigation.

Did Russia's meddling do anything?
>that wasn't uh... under our purview

You interviewed Christopher Steele, is that correct?
>I'm not going to get in to that

top fucking kek I'm going to have to listen to NPR today

Notice none of the Dems running for President wanted to be part of this train wreck hearing.

>could you repeat that?
>what?
>could you say that again?
>said by whom?
>I don't know anything about that.

Mr. Mueller, you have...
...on the far right, sir...
Mr. Mueller...

this reminds me of going to see my senile grandfather when i was kid

Same as whit bill Clinton then?

Attached: bill.jpg (272x185, 7K)

You agree with your report, right?
>true
And it doesn't recommend impeachment, correct?
>I uh-uh uhhhh I'm not going to talk about that

lawl

I'd like to refer you to the report

all these democrats sucking his cock now is so hilarious.

>you were appointed FBI director a week before 9/11, correct?
>you protected the country, correct?
>everybody wanted to keep you around, correct?

>I'll refer you to the letter
>if that's what the letter says
>I can't speak to that
>I'll stand by what the letter says
>I'm not going to go into that
>I believe the letter speaks to that

Attached: 0dd068a36796e2a22f662864268e8768958e135fb6b3bd9b0bbb81940879d414.jpg (416x416, 52K)

For the non-lawyers in the room, what did you mean by that?
>I'm not going to comment on that

That's not within my purview.

That is correct.

>Your letter shows you left out this bit of quote that is exculpatory, why is that?
>I'll have to refer you to the letter
Oh you

Attached: whos-your-president-24754450.png (500x530, 152K)