Post your best
Salt Mining Time
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
mobile.twitter.com
twitter.com
qrd on the hearing so far, i'm at work and can't watch it
This, what's up
“This has been a disaster for the Democrats and a disaster for the reputation of Robert Mueller.” Chris Wallace
THINK-- what happened to Anonymous?
The answer to this should be obvious!
Anonymous had what Jow Forums now lacks
The power to wage vigilante hacks,
And publicize corruption where it rots,
And force truth into sleepy public thoughts.
Has Anonymous now disappeared?
Once legendary, now no longer feared?
Once sparking protests-- is that fuel now spent?
The lulz are gone, gone the seething dissent?
What do you think this disappearance means?
Is speech still free in internet machines?
Well, look at what the chans have now become;
Examine what swirls in the daily scrum.
Ask yourself-- does it seem really real?
Does it show what actual people feel?
Does it seem organic and not fake?
How much repetition does it take--
How much frenzied vile monotony
Until we guess that internets ain't free?
Ask yourself-- if you sought to control
The media, and hence the public soul,
And something like Jow Forums was swelling up
And spilling truth from propaganda's cup
Would you let it go its merry way?
Or would you lock control down in some way?
And if you locked control down would you try
To do it in a way to fool the eye?
To make it seem like free speech carried on
Even though, in fact, it were quite gone?
For if you shut down free speech openly
The public would respond suspiciously;
But if you hid control beneath a ruse
What you once feared becomes a tool to use.
So that, controlling, you have it both ways--
Enslaving dissent, dictating what it says!
Anonymous was infiltrated by
The famously mendacious FBI
Whose antics as shown by COINTELPRO
Target dissent, as I'm sure most people know.
Do we think that having sunk its claws
Into Anonymous, with lies and laws,
That the FBI would then allow
Free speech to have stayed quite free till now?
But it's not like we have far to look
To see by what means free speech got the hook;
The image made by chans' mirrors and smoke
Is so stupid it seems to be a joke!
How laughable must a deception be
Before the world opens its eyes to see?
The simple fact-- as stark as winter dawn--
Is that Anonymous, busted, now gone
Was replaced by swarms of-- wait for it--
Virulent nazis spewing nazi shit!
We would have to laugh if we were told
This outcome in the Jow Forums days of old.
So formulaic, politically cliched--
And yet this very game is being played!
How can a joke as stupid as this one
Be used to strangle free speech, and to stun
The helpless mainstream public with the fear
That an internet fourth reich draws near?
But if that preposterousness is not
Enough to spark the understanding thought,
Consider, even stupider to tell,
The arch absurdity of the “incel”!
No, it's not enough that nazis rose
To cloak and choke the chans in nazi throes--
No, these scary nazis all the same
Must wallow in their helplessness and shame!
The “incel” is not just a defeated man--
But a powerful extremist with a plan!
No matter that these two things contradict--
We'll just keep hammering at them till they stick!
Now ask yourself-- does the technology
Exist to make the unfree chans seem free?
Think data, think vault 7, and AI--
And God knows what else, hidden from the eye.
And look at the corruption that's been shown
That yet to public truth remains unknown.
Understand-- the chans are herded tight
And nothing unpermitted sees the light,
The MSM and Chatbot Chans converge
To regulate how much truth can emerge.
When swarming nazi posts fill up the place
Then actual dissent can't get the space
To breathe, develop, organize, or live;
The chatbots force the nazi narrative.
But it's not just “incel nazi” swarms
Faking behind outward human forms--
The chatbots aim to keep all things in hand
And keep narrative rolling out as planned.
One objective that's not hard to see
Is unrelenting negativity.
Demoralizing, soul-hollowing tropes;
One bot's vicious, while the other mopes;
Bots promoting suicide to us--
Think about what pure evil that is!
And every possible way to divide
Is used to keep the chaos multiplied.
“Hate threads” for all known identities
Create an atmosphere like a disease.
AI apes the worst of our past posts
And pours them out in hordes of hateful ghosts.
And so the chans, within, drive us away
While on the outside, dictate what “we” say.
The public, for example, thinks the chans
Supported Trump due to his “nazi plans”;
But on the chans much more than half the spew
Hates Trump because he fails to hate “the Jew”!
While on the other side, the pro-Trump bots
Are emulated utter idiots!
By now it should be more than obvious--
Free speech ended with Anonymous.
The Chatbot Chans system is locked in place,
The zombie user leers from a stolen face.
The truth lies right here, waiting to be seen;
A monster stirs to life in the machine...
And remember also, this other thing I tell:
Prepare to stare into the mouth of Hell.
And one more thing, while I have your ear:
Q is legit, and the storm is almost here.
Kek
Trey Gowdy on Democrats' Robert Mueller hearing: "The Democrats wanted this to fuel their impeachment narrative and I'll bet you if they could cancel this afternoon's [House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence] hearing they would"
So, is drumphf impeached for sure next week this time?
>plz notice me america senpai
brazilian shitskins are pathetic
>i'm at work and can't watch it
what kind of dumb mcjob do you do pablo?
Im not going to talk about that.
How quick the shill bots got fired up
watched the whole thing, was pure cringe; dont blame the shills desu
Even though the hearing didn't go their way, you still have to admit what the deepstate did over the past 3 years was kind of genius. They knew they were going down. CNN then hired them all as paid contributers making millions to pay for the lawyers they are going to need. Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Clapper, etc. They turned 35 million in tax payer dollars into billions for their legal defense. Genius.
They're evil, not stupid
>cnn
Oof
good point
The thing to pay attention to is:
>Republicans strictly sticking to what was investigated
>Democrats speculating externally to the investigation
>Second half of the report was invalidated from the start
>Wording of the democrats was meant to confuse him to have a freudian slip outside of his introduction about what he would not comment on.
>Twitter
>literally who
Oy vey
In short, it was a huge nothingburger. The Dems basically read sentences from the report and asked Mueller "is that correct?" Otherwise he pretty much refused to say anything of substance and pretended not to hear or understand a lot of the questions. CNN has a hardon for charging Trump with obstruction after he leaves office now, that's the biggest thing they could glom on to from all these hours of testimony. The fact that if he were actually guilty they could charge him right now isn't getting a lot of traction, unsurprisingly. It was, like everything else having to do with Mueller or muh russia, a complete shitshow for the Dems that makes them look petty and grasping.
Liveleak has taught me enough about Brazilians to know that he is either a robber who uses a poorly machined firearm to pistol whip some poor bastard after he jumps off the back of a moped of course riding nuts to butts. Or he’s the off duty police officer who will shoot the aforementioned robber.
Checked
poo bringing the bantz
mobile.twitter.com
The thing to pay attention to is this hearing about foreign meddling in our elections was held before the House Judiciary Committee. There are 41 members of the House Judiciary committee. At least 5 of them are Jews: Jamie Raskin, Jerry Nadler, Steve Cohen, Ted Deutch, and David Cicilline. Despite making up only 1.4% of the population of the United States, they make up 12.2% of the House Judiciary Committee. That's 871% representation. Isn't it strange that a hearing about foreign interference in our election has this much over representation from a group that interferes in our elections very publicly?