What can Europe do to get one of these bad boys?

Europe needs to get back on the world stage - in a big freaking way. We gotta have powerful military assets. Carriers are wonderful, and can put pressure on evil countries.

P.S. ramps are wonderful on steam/diesel powered carriers

Attached: AB2097A4-ECC8-4037-BB54-F84C04303520.jpg (2200x1080, 297K)

>kraut rearming
omg it's happening again

You're outdated Germany, took you too long to rearm, China is already building aircraft carriers, in some years it might have a bigger fleet than America.

Plus Russia is now a military ally of China

MANY years. So far the 1 carrier they built is trash. Unless it was a calculated PR stunt to fool the west when it had to be pulled by a fucking tug boat when it broke down. Also any carrier with a ramp is shit.

Build one.

It's a good point. Britain could manufacture these carriers minus the sensitive uk tech and sell them to minor European nations who can't afford the R&D

Lmfaooo muh ramp

Pozzed up negrified europe needs to take care of itself first, i say this as an american who feels the same way about his country.

>steam/diesel powered carriers
>ever

China only has 1 aircraft carrier and 1 under construction.

The carrier they have is an old Russian/Sovjet one which they bought via middle men on the pretense to use it as a swimming casino and hotel.

If the carrier is in trouble, it can send smoke signals. Can your carriers send massive smoke signals??

>Europe needs to get back on the world stage
Yeah, but you decided babysitting shitskins instead.

we need a leader

>"Europe"

Nice try kraut

you cant afford it tho you gotta pay for all them economic migrants kek

Why do helicopters need a ramp?

>a ramp
kek.

Attached: 1508682561086.webm (1280x720, 2.1M)

Buy an old one from Russia, reverse engineer it, improve on the design in conjunction with espionage to steal modern designs from the US and UK, then build one. All in all it should only take 10 years and maybe $20B. Good luck.

We have a leader, her name is Ursula.

Attached: 01D2ECC2-426C-41BC-9544-5AB11A521F56.jpg (760x380, 35K)

women leaders....

Them economic migrants will man the aircraft carrier groups. We need 20,000 per group, so we can do 30 carrier groups at least with all the doctors and engineers.

Why Eternal anglos are building carrier incompatible with their own aircrafts.

>China is already building aircraft carriers
you leave out the fact their new carrier isn't even up to the standards of the Forrestal-class in the 1950s
lol

you know damn well..

Attached: Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1984-097-36,_Flugzeugträger_'Graf_Zeppelin'_nach_Stapellauf.jpg (800x448, 37K)

i seriously doubt they would join up for that lol

Sorry Fritz, but you only exist to serve Israel.

Attached: GermanyJews.jpg (997x571, 161K)

Those alliances are formed and dissolved in the blink of an eye.

Why do we need them? We have airports.

stop giving money to niggers.

It's a cool ship but carriers are obsolete in a modern large scale war. Will be sunk biggly and tremendously fast.

>join up

hahahha, you are funny

Attached: 725A666A-5A43-4EAF-8920-6A1316667863.jpg (461x346, 155K)

Yeah, because European aircraft carriers aren’t important for Israel.

We have one of these.

With modern communications why the fuck would that be relevant

looks retarded

Attached: nimitz class.jpg (4288x2848, 758K)

We're still waiting for you to get your shit together and hand over the F35s.

You know what to do - as the eternal Anglo, you must sacrifice everything - your non-existant empire, your values, your way of life, everything to keep the Germans from having anything nice.

I support Deutschland rearming.

Attached: 1561513020085.jpg (245x183, 13K)

If the Europeans wanted then they could absolutely build blue water navies capable of significant force projection. Of course, the robust European welfare state limits the amount of money that could be spent on armaments. Britain and France in particular could each float four aircraft carriers of the Queen Elizabeth or Charles de Gaulle class along with the requisite support vessels necessary to maintain their operations.

But they won't.

And unfortunately it's probably going to be necessary in the coming decades with the realities of global energy flows. Some European nations are going to have to interface with their former colonies to acquire the energy supplies necessary to keep their economies afloat.

The €U is the only reason in the world on why no war was started worldwide in over 9000 years (apart from the Yougoslavian war and the Lybian war, that were caused by €U, but we don't talk about that).
Building a navy is a waste of money, war is over forever, all thanks to €U, instead, we must invest all our resource to import and feed more 'fugees, they are our greatest asset for the future of €U

Attached: 1527160277850.jpg (720x491, 31K)

>italy’s city-states stop waging war to each other and the country becomes irrelevant after unification
>europe’s countries stop waging war to each other and become irrelevant with the EU

yeah, i see a pattern

troll thread

Russia is officially a military ally to China? I just looked this up and am finding nothing to support it

Progress stems from competition. Killing it resulted in stagnation.
We have two of these.

Have you tried building one?

You're autistic, aren't you?

>a fucking ramp