Wasn't that was like his motherfucking campaign slogan? Isn't that right, knuckledicks? Yep. That's right. And now you are actually going to sit here and attempt to redirect the responsibility onto someone besides him, the guy with the 'drain the swamp' slogan? Nah brah. Not on my watch, not while I'm on the job, joker.
Explain in your own words how Donald Trump is a good president who is draining the swamp, and so unfortunately, 'I thought so' is nowhere remotely close to a valid response. It is a logical fallacy that is called a non-sequiter. You Donald Trump voters(all collectively containing to refuse to show how Trump is good, because they know they can't) really should familiarize yourself with terms like these, especially since you're entire political philosophy seems to hinge on logically fallacious bullshit.
Enough pretending that you're owning me. Right now. Right the motherfuck now. Explain. how. Donald. Trump. is. a. good. president. who. is. draining. the. swamp.
Right now, you are being directly challenged to make your case. And Literally, if you do not do it right now, you hereby automatically forfeit any potential right that you may have had to live in denial about not getting what you thought you voted for.
Automatically, against your will, no matter how much you don't like it, with your retardedly unjustified steadfast refusal to admit the truth having absolutely no merit or credibility in any way. By not making a case, you, by default agree without saying so, that the reason you can't admit basic, simple reality is because you foolishly invested your ego into Donald Trump and that it's the one and only thing keeping it together for you. You either make a case, or you wholeheartedly agree with the factual results that I have laid out for you.
You either argue or admit defeat. There is no third option and there is nothing that you can do to change it.
so /ptg/, was there any salt over mueller today or was the left/twitter/reddit already over it? Haven't seen anyone post any salt for the last several threads.
The reverse implication is that Trump campaign officials should not have built their messaging strategy against the leaked documents, which is clearly absurd.
I like to think they're too beaten down to be salty.
Zachary Murphy
DUDE COPS ARE SUPER AWARE AND CAN STOP EVERY BAD GUY
Daniel Reed
gotta seriously disagree with that. i already trade an absurd amount of my privacy for "security" it's increasingly apparent that the security being purchased isn't that of the citizens but of the government. if they cared about the safety of the people, we'd have much stronger immigration and border laws and a return of mandated segregation and either a culling or a prison state for places like chicago, detroit and baltimore
was just reading about his involvement in mossad operations and DOJ defrauding Americans in the 80s that led to our current shit state with social media invading everyone's privacy.
Jayden Russell
Oy vey goyim delete this
Cameron Perry
Donald Trump even retweeted some Michael Moron salt
A federal judge has chastised former special counsel Robert Mueller and Attorney General William P. Barr for stating that the Russian government was behind election year social media trolling when there is no evidence presented by prosecutors.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich culminated a secret legal battle between the Justice Department and the Russian firm Concord Management and Consulting LLC.
The judge this month began unsealing legal briefs and transcripts, which reveal that the release of Mr. Mueller’s 448-page report and Mr. Barr’s public statements triggered Concord attorney Eric A. Dubelier to seek contempt proceedings against both.
Mr. Dubelier said Mr. Mueller prejudiced a potential jury by stating that the Kremlin ran the social media campaign, which the federal government says Concord funded. That connection isn’t contained in the special counsel’s February 2018 indictment against Concord.
“That’s not alleged in the indictment primarily because there is no evidence to support that it was. There is none,” Mr. Dubelier told the judge at a closed May 28 hearing for which a transcript was just unsealed.
The conclusion at this stage means Russian President Vladimir Putin backed one major election intervention: his military intelligence hacking of Democratic Party computers and sending stolen materials to WikiLeaks for release.
But he might not have been involved in the parallel social media trolling, though U.S. media reported that it was part of a larger Kremlin conspiracy.
Judge Friedrich concurred that there was a lack of evidence.
>Mueller committed perjury again.
Leo Ortiz
The dems hate it too so I view that as par for the course - room for improvement.
