AI generated people and Cheese Pizza

So now that AI can generate imagery possibly even videos of completely fake people that are virtually indistinguishable from real ones, what are the legal implications of this regarding CP. It's going to be an interesting legal case going forward as it also is with sex dolls.

Attached: 1518230695868.png (770x897, 1.36M)

Other urls found in this thread:

thispersondoesnotexist.com/
thiswaifudoesnotexist.net
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

There was a Supreme Court case specifically about this back in 04 or 05. They ruled that if it is indistinguishable from a real child that it is CP.

thispersondoesnotexist.com/

So what can be done to stop it?

saw a link where pedo hunters were using a cgi loli (low res) cam girl to bust guys left and right by getting them to send her cash. might have been philippines based.

cool shit, anyone remember details?

Deepfakes are amazing, I can already watch all hot moviestars doing porn in a decent quality, imagine in five years the porn you will have.

God bless us all.

Attached: 1551543689619.jpg (448x490, 36K)

HOLY fuck who is she? must impregnate

which is the real face?

Attached: 123.jpg (602x238, 40K)

is this image a generated person?

Nothing /thread

right

So if a hollywood movie depicts realistic murder, should all of hollywood be arrested?

They ruled exactly the opposite on other occasions regarding CG. It’s a gray zone.

Oy Vey

Attached: 5a0490ad35876ea4008b4fa4-750-563.jpg (750x563, 64K)

Well, no. There's no law against depicting murder. There is a law about being in possession of, sharing, or looking at underage pornography. You're conflating the action of something with the depiction of something, so I can only presume you're about 8 years old and don't fulfill the rules of this forum.

The right, also it's Valentina Nappi (the fact I can instant recognize porn stars is making me really reflect on my life choices right now)

THINK-- what happened to Anonymous?
The answer to this should be obvious.
Anonymous had what Jow Forums now lacks
The power to wage vigilante hacks,
And publicize corruption where it rots,
And force truth into sleepy public thoughts.
Has Anonymous now disappeared?
Once legendary, now no longer feared?
Once sparking protests-- is that fuel now spent?
The lulz are gone, gone the seething dissent?
What do you think this disappearance means?
Is speech still free in internet machines?

Well, look at what the chans have now become;
Examine what swirls in the daily scrum.
Ask yourself-- does it seem really real?
Does it show what actual people feel?
Does it seem organic and not fake?
How much repetition does it take--
How much frenzied vile monotony
Until we guess that internets ain't free?

Ask yourself-- if you sought to control
The media, and hence the public soul,
And something like Jow Forums was swelling up
And spilling truth from propaganda's cup
Would you let it go its merry way?
Or would you lock control down in some way?
And if you locked control down would you try
To do it in a way to fool the eye?
To make it seem like free speech carried on
Even though, in fact, it were quite gone?
For if you shut down free speech openly
The public would respond suspiciously;
But if you hid control beneath a ruse
What you once feared becomes a tool to use.
So that, controlling, you have it both ways--
Enslaving dissent, dictating what it says!

AI has been able to create fake pictures of people and their fake families for at least the last several years. When the government creates fake personas they aren't allowed to use photos of people that actually exist. Just because they aren't hiding behind an anime avi doesn't mean they aren't a fed.

Anonymous was infiltrated by
The famously mendacious FBI
Whose antics as shown by COINTELPRO
Target dissent, as I'm sure most people know.
Do we think that having sunk its claws
Into Anonymous, with lies and laws,
That the FBI would then allow
Free speech to have stayed quite free till now?

But it's not like we have far to look
To see by what means free speech got the hook;
The image made by chans' mirrors and smoke
Is so stupid it seems to be a joke!
How laughable must a deception be
Before the world opens its eyes to see?
The simple fact-- as stark as winter dawn--
Is that Anonymous, busted, now gone
Was replaced by swarms of-- wait for it--
Virulent nazis spewing nazi shit!
We would have to laugh if we were told
This outcome in the Jow Forums days of old.
So formulaic, politically cliched--
And yet this very game is being played!
How can a joke as stupid as this one
Be used to strangle free speech, and to stun
The helpless mainstream public with the fear
That an internet fourth reich draws near?
But if that preposterousness is not
Enough to spark the understanding thought,
Consider, even stupider to tell,
The arch absurdity of the “incel”!
No, it's not enough that nazis rose
To cloak and choke the chans in nazi throes--
No, these scary nazis all the same
Must wallow in their helplessness and shame!
The “incel” is not just a defeated man--
But a powerful extremist with a plan!
No matter that these two things contradict--
We'll just keep hammering at them till they stick!

Now ask yourself-- does the technology
Exist to make the unfree chans seem free?
Think data, think vault 7, and AI--
And God knows what else, hidden from the eye.
And look at the corruption that's been shown
That yet to public truth remains unknown.
Understand-- the chans are herded tight
And nothing unpermitted sees the light,
The MSM and Chatbot Chans converge
To regulate how much truth can emerge.
When swarming nazi posts fill up the place
Then actual dissent can't get the space
To breathe, develop, organize, or live;
The chatbots force the nazi narrative.

But it's not just “incel nazi” swarms
Faking behind outward human forms--
The chatbots aim to keep all things in hand,
And narrative locked in to what's been planned.
One objective that's not hard to see
Is unrelenting negativity.
Demoralizing, soul-hollowing tropes,
Make one bot vicious, while another mopes;
Here's a bot whose will to live is gone,
While here a chorus eggs fatality on...
Bots promoting suicide to us--
Think about what pure evil that is!
And every possible way to divide
Is used to keep the chaos multiplied.
“Hate threads” for all known identities
Create an atmosphere like a disease.
AI apes the worst of our past posts
And pours them out in hordes of hateful ghosts.
And so the chans, within, drive us away
While on the outside, dictate what “we” say.
The public, for example, thinks the chans
Supported Trump due to his “nazi plans”;
But on the chans much more than half the spew
Hates Trump because he fails to hate “the Jew”!
While on the other side, the pro-Trump bots
Are emulated utter idiots!

Attached: 233.jpg (575x335, 25K)

Attached: meme.3.png (332x348, 152K)

The richest jews with their jew lawyers will get away with it but everyone else won't

By now it should be more than obvious--
Free speech ended with Anonymous.
The Chatbot Chans system is locked in place,
The zombie user leers from a stolen face.
The truth lies right here, waiting to be seen;
A monster stirs to life in the machine...

And remember also, this other thing I tell:
Prepare to stare into the mouth of Hell.

And one more thing, while I have your ear:
Q is legit, and the storm is almost here.

>not posting the real link
Bakamyhead
thiswaifudoesnotexist.net

Don't worry, you're probably just autistic and have excellent recall/photographic memory.

It's fake, so it's artistic expression not child abuse.

This

>I don't understand the concept of principles
Thanks for sharing, but we don't need you to chime in just to let us know you're a retard.

it really doesn't take long for the pedoposters to show up, does it?

>virtually indistinguishable
they are not. you pedos won't get away

Doesn't stop people from trying to get rid of loli hentai.

Okay, but principles aren't law you dumb faggot.

Law is founded on principles.

Spoken like a kike who wants us to allow our freedoms to be whittled away with your "but muh children" arguments.

Do you have to have a hooked nose to be allowed to talk about this emergent issue objectively?

Some laws are founded on principles, yes. But laws still aren't principles. You can't just make up laws as you go because a principle exists. Are you completely incapable of a shred of common sense and critical thought?

Engage with this guy long enough and he will give you self-made AI tests and disregard everything you say if you give the wrong answer. To this day, no one has correctly guessed the right answer, and he has never shared one. He has also not been able to explain how he knows someone is an AI in any real terms.
You realize that legality and morality aren't the same thing? Like, something can be morally fine but legally wrong, and stuff?

The technology would be impossible to stop once it's open sourced. Look at deepfakes. They've banned it yet you can still find it relatively easy.

Personally I don't care about anything that is digital. If no one is being hurt, what's the problem?

Attached: Donald-Trump-and-Ivanka-Trump-Vanity-Fair.png (1066x720, 283K)

Let me posit a philosophical question: is it moral to steal a product which was itself produced immorally? You are gaining the benefit of the product without supporting the continued exploitation of whoever made it. With digital goods, this is even easier, since one person can steal it and everyone can have it for free. I think you know where I'm going with this in regards to digital CP.

DEGENERATE PEDOPHILE DETECTED

Attached: 1459347452_preview_FBI.jpg (556x261, 102K)

are you referring to government spending as a result of taxes?

deficit spending (spending from debt to be passed on to the next generation)?

you should consider how power factors into the world around you.

how does this apply to cp? what is stolen with regard to cp?

Why does that site only generate Amerimutts?

You think it stops at making fake CP? It STARTS at making CP with a deepfaked Donald Trump raping a black 5-year-old boy and repeatedly calling him a nigger. Do you think the left wouldn't create this if they could?

The first victims of deepfakes will go to prison. After the revelation 10-20 years later, the elites will be able to stop digital video evidence from being a valid source of proof of any wrongdoing because of deepfakes. That wasn't me raping a woman your honor, someone edited that into my likeness.

I'm suggesting that it should be legal to possess CP (or any other things which are illegal because they are necessarily produced exploitative) if you can prove you didn't pay for it or otherwise support it's development.
>Why does this site which creates faces by seeing the patterns in it's library of real faces constantly create people who have characteristics of multiple races?
Bruh, in 20 years, it won't even be anyone raping a woman. Deep-computer-counterfeit-analysis-brought-to-you-by-McDonalds will determine that the entire rape video is a CG falsification based on sets of other rape videos, with the generated man and woman swapped with the accused and his accuser.

Sure, that’s one way to drain the swamp.

Deep fakes with real faces is more dangerous

its time to embrace Nofap.
you must QUIT cucking yourself with porn actors and pathetic wasting your life seed in your pants alone in a dimly lit room
you could be hunting bears and flying a confederate flag from your motorbike but you're stuck at home fapping to pixels
LONG LIFE NOFAP
LONG LIVE ICE

Aye that's a thing a lot of these deepfake conspiracy theory pushers don't seem to get. The technology to detect deepfakes is developing just as fast as the technology to create it.

>I'm suggesting that it should be legal to possess CP (or any other things which are illegal because they are necessarily produced exploitative) if you can prove you didn't pay for it or otherwise support it's development.

oh, ok. I understand. you're making the argument that since you didn't provide support for its creation, you're not supporting the further creation. but this is not what cp is illegal. you should understand that cp was not illegal until the 80's. hmmm. makes you think.

I'm simply against all contraband laws. I'm a firm believer in freedom, and why should simply possessing anything be criminal? drugs, guns, art, etc.

oh no

Attached: 1561133542558.png (1024x1024, 1.09M)

Why do they all have pointy triangular chins?

god she was hot

This shit is a marketer's dream come true. Imagine never paying for stock imagery again

Anons....

Person on the left does not exist. But it has the same eye condition as Madeleine McCann. An AI would create average eyes, not very a rare condition like MM had. Unless, MM is also not a real person.

What if MM was AI created, meaning literally fake and never existed. We're seeing artifacts of AI generated people.

Attached: wtf.jpg (1024x1024, 1.48M)

Attached: wtf2.png (1944x614, 1.92M)

>An AI would create average eyes
Brainlet take.

well pedokike you've come up with an interesting idea!

It only generates gender-fluid mongrels.

Attached: 2019-07-26_202434.jpg (639x639, 71K)

Yeah, these things tend to smudge the pictures they create like crazy. Look at the lips and the ears of the fake picture. Thing probably just sent a bad sample to the eyes and then smudged it in.

Holy shit, what is this thing ?!?!?

Attached: image.jpg (1024x1024, 1.33M)

Lol Death Valley IQ verses room temp IQ forum. It’s not a fight - it’s a slaughter

All of Hollywood should be hung

>if it is indistinguishable from a real child that it is CP.

Paint it green and give it pointy ears and you have an elf; or if you are into chubbys a dwarf.

Attached: Cherub.jpg (343x408, 32K)

Stop spamming this gay shit

Outliers should be scrubbed based on extremity, this is how you create something that looks human. Otherwise you'd get neon colored square shaped eyes.

I can't fucking wait for holodecks and UBI. I'd never leave the thing, like Lt. Barclay.

>I can't fucking wait for holodecks and UBI. I'd never leave the thing, like Lt. Barclay.

Much prefer robo-wives.

Attached: Chi_from_Chobits.jpg (258x386, 26K)

You must be thinking the Australian SC.

Right. I've blown so many loads to Valentina i will always recognize her

>They ruled that if it is indistinguishable from a real child that it is CP.
So basically Honey select is illegal?

it uses features from actual photos of people

Kek

Attached: image.jpg (1024x1024, 1.6M)

What if you fake a murder in real life using "a person" that does not exist?
Like you get "caught" on camera stabbing a real doll, steal unknown human's blood and DNA on the scene that could resemble the doll, drag the doll away, disintegrate it and then confess to that "murder". No body is ever found, no victim is ever found, but you have video evidence catching you red handed killing someone and that someone's DNA and your own confession.
Would you be charged for murder that never happened?

brb gonna fuck Jow Forums up with a ton of rate me questions

>Libertarian
I wish we had a candidate like this. I wish we had real choice, not just a weak ass illusion of choice.

Don't you remember that disclaimer, "No animals were harmed in the making of this production."

And if a perpetrator's face can be digitally changed so it is indistinguishable from someone else, then it is someone else. This is how they will walk.

Podesta, Bernie, Goldblum.

nice poem my dude

OMG why can't she exist brah's? Why even live? I'm done have a nice evening. Going to cry at my local bar now and fuck some disgusting pig.

Attached: imnotsexist.jpg (1024x1024, 1.35M)