It's been hard to cope Jow Forums I wonder how you will spin this, disagreeing with her makes you a literal kike

Stock buybacks are not a ponzi scheme. They increase earnings per share and thus the value for remaining shareholders.

Obviously those shareholders are glad to reward such CEOs.

except if you agree you are retarded.

you saying eveyone is either a jew or a retard?

>a broken clock can be right twice a day
Then why do the majority of her positions sound like this one?

I agree

I am really sure Google shareholders were crying about a 25 billion buyback that sent shares up 11%

Exactly, Brazil and most South America and Europe banned IP on medication, so we have generic alternatives for pennies on the original

He's kind of our mascot at this point. What he represents is something important.

She's not right

The only significant reason drugs are expensive is because it costs several hundreds million dollars to research and develop a single medicine.

Prescriptions in other countries can be cheaper because insurance regulations. Insurance also maintains high prices in the US because we pay for our own health insurance. Blaming it on the CEO big corp boodey man is fucking retarded but it works on the lowest common denominator of people because they lack critical thought

Attached: 1564072650978.jpg (951x1024, 130K)

>a company should spend money to figure out how to sell its products for less

I can see her bartending degree really paying off.

dont forget she wants to raid every 401k that people plan to retire from to pay off student loans.
So now she wants to fuck eveyone over who owns pharma stock on top of that.

These commie scum are just looking to loot money wherever they can find it.

They're probably confusing pol for highroad boomers.

Except it's not even close to true.

b8

>Omar is right about Israel.
No she's not. She says Israel has a right to exist which it doesn't.

This.

She does nothing but harp on the rich for being greedy. Are you retarded?

The other solution is to let Bootleg Chemicals United brew the same medicine, cutting all the legal corners, and eke out a third-worlder profit and force big pharma to slash prices or get undercut out of business.
But that would be out of the interest of lobbyists.

not good enough just more of the same kikery placating whites.

>disagreeing with her
Congress doesn't need to do anything.
The problem, is the federal reserve and the price of money.

It's not the research that costs. It's the idea that drugs must be perfectly safe, and always effective. If they are not, they'll be sued into Oblivion.

Then they must pay millions upon millions for elaborate studies to prove effectiveness and safety. Even for orphan illnesses that would never be cost effective. Even for generics that are effectively the same drug that was already certified.

She's one of the most pro-illegals, anti-ICE people in congress

>Buying your own stocks

Attached: 1563654216331.jpg (550x422, 35K)

Many would argue that the FDA does more harm than good when it keeps obviously safe drugs from getting produced in sold for years, just because of bureaucracy

>own the company
>announce you're outsourcing labor
>stock value rises
>sell stocks
>company loses value
>quit
>become CEO elsewhere

>The only significant reason drugs are expensive is because it costs several hundreds million dollars to research and develop a single medicine.
This is total bullshit. Pharma companies steal their research from universities and use patent laws to make money. That's why whever a drug goes off patent, the pharma companies push for a new treatment protocol for whatever that drug addressed.

I don't know, dude.
Since the photo-op vs the fence, I stopped caring that she might be an honest human being wanting to do right.

see
Then go suck some more cocks

This, enemy of my enemy doesn't necessarily = friend and in this case AOC and Omar are not friends.

More due to patent trolling desu. Suppose a CEO charges a high price for a drug to pump the stock price. Usually the drug is fairly trivial to manufacture. So why doesn't another manufacturer undercut them? Too bad, it's patented.
>but it's been patented for 40 years now.
>umm goy that's the left handed isomer, do you even understand chemistry?

a quick look at the financial statements of pharmaceutical companies easily disproves her shitty logic.

>Socialist despite background of wealth
>comes off as a blithering idiot if you listen with any attention or skepticism
>aiming for a career in politics
Something here screams evil power-monger

The FDA has a role to fill, but it's bloated well beyond that role, like almost every federal agency.

The FDA should be used to police obvious bullshit like cutting flour with sawdust to gain a market advantage. Or obvious snake oil antics. Maybe even serve as an arbiter of truth, providing oversight for studies to prove effectiveness of something a company is trying to sell. But it has gone well beyond that.

Odd how these newly elected whores seem to care more about being put in the national spotlight by saying stupid shit, rather than addressing the problems in the districts they were elected to represent.

EXPLAIN: Why should it be illegal for a company to buy back its own stock?

Being right once doesnt make her not be retarded.

We've been talking about this for years.
She brings up same issue, is she supposed to get a prize?
Trust, that what she brings to the table will be communism.

Same with Bernie a few years ago.
Brought up actual problems that weren't being addressed and then offered up
Multi-trillion dollar Commie monstrosities.

>Then go suck some more cocks
Holy fuck you're truly stupid. All that's required for a drug safety pass by FDA is like one study with a handful of participants. You clearly have no fucking idea how pharma works.

so you're telling me CEO of company buys their own stock, to increase demand and price? Then when demand is high sells them again until demand drops to buy them again?

>so you're telling me CEO of company buys their own stock
Many CEOs get stock options as part of their compensation package.

>one study with a handful
And how many years? 12? What are the fees with all of that?

She’s a retard who doesn’t understand stocks

Yea I know that, but isn't this about corp money used to buy stock? for the corp obviously.

Shut up and go be good enough, then, you fucking zero.

>hey goy
>you aren't allowed to own your own company
Wat?

i don't know a single leftist Spaniard that would there come to Jow Forums to steer the pot

i call shill

Attached: basementdwellerfedora.jpg (479x720, 47K)

What a retard. US pharmaceutical companies and their R&D support the entire fucking world. Cheap, lazy fucks get gibs all the time from US pharmaceutical companies. This stupid Socialist should shut the fuck up about what she doesn't know about.

>thinks that the cost of synthesizing the chemical is what sets the price of a drug
This is why an 80 IQ spic is useless for this kind of thing. The drugs that have a ridiculous price tag are the ones that ones that a single company has the legal right to make. That pill doesn't cost $100 because 10mg of x substance costs $95 to synthesize. It costs $100 because the company has estimated that they will make the most profit at that price. They can choose their price to optimally milk the public if there's no competition.

The first step to fixing this problem is to remove the Jewish control over our government. Without this no legislation that drastically reduces the profits of enormous multinational corporations will be allowed to pass. Then you go after this ability to choose prices. Then you either allow competition(capitalist), legislate how much they're allowed to charge(socialist), or restructure how medical research and drug production in a way that ensure it is done to benefit the people(national socialist). Given only one of these systems will actually bother to remove Jewish control of these governments and allow this change in the first place, I know what one I choose.