Yes, The Constitution Allows Indictment of the President:

Who?

>notice me

yeah, not by the doj fuckhead

>Laurence Tribe
That’s all you need to know.

Twitter was invented to show the world how pathetic and stupid our leaders really are.

someone is mad about being duped into getting Mueller to admit obongo bush and clinton can be indicted for being pedos and having a role in 9/11

That guy is such a faggot.

Why would he? What other president has?

>why would he

All of Trumps accusers would be forever BTFO if he did this...IF he's innocent.

Unfortunately for us, we'll have to wait until after he leaves office for his trial.

Yeah, just like all those other presidents that were put on trial after leaving office. Nigger.

If Eric Swalwell didn't do anything wrong, why hasn't he made his computer harddrive, internet search history, email accounts and phone records publicly available? He shouldn't have anything to worry about if he obeys the laws, right?

meme it to the normieverse guys. bust out those twatter accounts

>Yes, The Constitution Allows Indictment of the President: lawfareblog.com/yes-constitution-allows-indictment-president
yeah, it is laid right out in the constitution. it's known as "impeachment". i dont care if trump was selling dope to kids if thats the case dont strike up a shitty as case but impeach the asshole.

i see why he already dropped out of the Presidential race

You probably won't believe me, but that's because we haven't had a president fuck up the way Trump has. He has left himself open to federal AND state prosecution on a number of things from before he was president and during his term.

Obviously he can pardon himself federally, but that doesn't do anything about the indictments that SDNY will file the minute he leaves office.

No it doesn't you god damned moron.
Executive branch derives 100% of it's power from the President. This means he would be effectively indicting himself. The only reason they wrote the rule is to keep up the illusion that DOJ is somehow independent of the President; it absolutely is not.

>This is what MIGApedes actually believe

Attached: breivik.gif (280x250, 2.58M)

How many people does it take to come up with all these elaborate stories? Where do I subscribe to the newsletter?

Read the paper, faggot. It's not long and "department of justice" and FBI aren't included.

Kek, it's like at the end of movies when the good guy has a gun pointed at the bad guy while a small propeller plane is running but not moving, and the bas guy says

>If ur so tough fight me like a man!

before he ends up getting thrown into the spinning propeller and turned into a red mist

>Where do I subscribe to the newsletter?

There's no newsletter, you already have a front row seat to all of this as an American citizen. It's up to you whether you pay attention or accept what you're seeing.

Mueller himself said this wasn't the reason. Lying faggot kike chinks.

youtu.be/XzOVxY7HRoY

I'm not mocking the paper, I'm mocking you for your opinion.

Constitution also allows the president to pardon himself :^)

You mean you actually invent all these wild works of fiction yourself? Why waste your time on Jow Forums all day instead of writing books?

>We're only trying to destroy you and your families life for defeating Hillary - so what are you fucking hiding?????

Who do leftists even think they are fooling at this point? They were just pissing themselves a few days ago in excitement over the idea they could at least go after him once he leaves office.
These people are sick. Evil. Twisted. The definition of corruption.

It's not an opinion, it's fact. DOJ doesn't have any power except that which the president delegates. This literally means DOJ cannot indict the president without the President authorizing it. Only trannies living in fantasy land would believe this means the president can be indicted by DOJ.

>Obviously he can pardon himself federally
You're a regular fucking Rhodes scholar!

The paper he refers to is the constitution.
And he means that the president is mentioned in the constitution whilst the FBI and DOJ isn't.
It means that ultimately their power comes from the president himself as the chief executive.

isn't this the fuck who threatened to use the military and nukes against gun owners.

Wait and see.

For federal crimes*

>why don’t you willingly prosecute yourself because the other two branches of government won’t impeach you bigot

>Imagine following nutjobs like Nuke'em Swalwell and Schiff (who repeatedly claimed to have incontrovertible evidence, yet never showed it).
I couldn't imagine anything worse, for my mental health.

yes

this.
We have a government already, lets not piss it away because some idiots scream a bunch.

have anybody ever wordplayed his name to swallowswell?

Attached: dc567y2-c5236632-994d-471b-9436-754e288f1f13.jpg (400x400, 23K)

>There's no newsletter, you already have a front row seat to all of this as an American citizen. It's up to you whether you pay attention or accept what you're seeing.
there is literally nothing. the Dems have been revved up by their media so badly that now even the Dems in Congress I think are "moving forward" (but not really) with impeachment only to please their base. you people have been bombarded with Trump being a racist and a liar and a criminal that nobody bothered to notice that nobody can actually produce specific examples of that.

keep in mind the Democrats insisted for 2-3 years that Trump was a Russian agent (and half of them still do) - ... and then once the Mueller report it became about obstruction of justice.

the funny thing is Andrew Weissman came up with the obstruction of justice nonsense, and Andrew Weissman FAMOUSLY had a case where he got a conviction on Arthur Andersen LLP (accounting firm for Enron) OVERTURNED 9-0 BY THE SUPREME COURT

so yes dems, please listen to the nonsense from the guy who had his obstruction of justice conviction overturned 9-0 by the SC.

>we haven't had a president fuck up the way Trump has. He has left himself open to federal AND state prosecution on a number of things from before he was president and during his term.

lmfao

Imagine believing this when Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Jackson, Nixon, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton have been Presidents

Further, imagine believing this after

>muh Russia turned out to be literally nothing
>muh obstruction of muh russia turned out to be literally nothing
>SDNY has closed its investigation of the Trump Organization, having laid a total of zero (0) charges against anyone and
>they had Michael Cohen, Trump's consigliere for a decade, the guy who paid off all the porn stars, who was there for the Mob deals, who should know where every single body is buried and every single skeleton is in which closet, that guy singing like a canary in hopes of minimizing his sentence, and what they got was one of the porn star payoffs was during a campaign, and so could possibly be argued was an undeclared campaign donation (from Trump to himself), which would be punishable by a small fine.

Like, how do you keep believing?

Attached: 1550572702949.jpg (720x643, 23K)

>I had to look to see what candidate this was because several are polling at 0%

Attached: 1562566507269.png (622x768, 472K)

Liberals: Make a law that allows legal rebellion.

>Lawfare
Goddamn you people are retarded. How much effort does it take for you to breathe? I'm guessing you are constantly thinking about maintaining breath because you retards cant put on original thought together. Sad!

>muh Russia turned out to be literally nothing
>muh obstruction of muh russia turned out to be literally nothing
>SDNY has closed its investigation of the Trump Organization, having laid a total of zero (0) charges against anyone and
>they had Michael Cohen, Trump's consigliere for a decade, the guy who paid off all the porn stars, who was there for the Mob deals, who should know where every single body is buried and every single skeleton is in which closet, that guy, singing like a canary in hopes of minimizing his sentence, and what they got was one of the porn star payoffs was during a campaign, and so could possibly be argued was an undeclared campaign donation (from Trump to himself), which would be punishable by a small fine.

Delusional leftists:

>Yes, The Constitution Allows Indictment of the President!

Indictment for what?

the indictment of the president is called impeachment

retarded fucking niggers baka

oh eric

Impeachment is what the house does. Then the senate holds a trial and if they indict then it results in removal from office. That's why, for instance, Billy Boy was impeached but just went right on being the president anyway because the senate failed to indict.

Smooth brained syndrome

>Eric Swallows Well

>If Trump is so guilty, why don't you impeach him?
If he's guilty all anyone would have to do is present clear, irrefutable evidence and the population would take care of the rest. He'd be forced to resign or be forcefully ousted.

>"If you didn't do anything wrong, you shouldn't have anything to worry about, right?
Ah, there's that phrase again, that phrase that ends up rationalizing and justifying a show trial

Lawfareblog is written by kikes aligned with HRC and Podesta, this has been proven

>If you're so innocent, why don't you make our soft coup a little easier, Dormand Drump?
Worth a shot.