What are the best arguments against man made climate change?

in the 16th century probably 99% of scientists agreed the sun revolved around earth

In the 21st century the world realized they were right.

False equivalency

97% of scientists pander for funding. Climate change provides them that funding. So they skew results, cherrypick data, and ignore inconvenient facts

this

I wonder how it is in the states, in europe you can't open a newspaper without some kike opinion on taxing carbon and that we should 'do something'.
also those climate activists are hugely what you'd call far left to left wing extremists
what is their goal?

Average temperature for last 10000 years looks like rollercoaster.

When did liberals take over "the environment" as a political issue of the Left? Conservatives are the huntsmen, the rangers and the rugged outdoorsmen who should be the *most* concerned about the planet. The Right started the conservationist movement, and I really wish that we'd take it back.

Attached: China Redpill 3.jpg (700x8069, 1.74M)

Everyone with degree from US is enemy of free world and should be executed without trial.

Surely they could pander for funding from rich oil companies too

If you're a climate scientist in 2019 you can follow the scientific method and not get funding or you can be a global warming Lysenkoist and get funding. Which will you choose?

((Who)) own rich oil companies?
And with all that green hype can you show me example of rich oil company going bankrupt?

Imagine being so arrogant as to believe humans can effect the climate on a global scale while completely ignoring the gaint ball of fire in the sky that will one day literally engulf this entire planet. That takes a special person.

It's pure egoism.

Attached: climate change loonies.jpg (629x1024, 199K)

so a trace gas (CO2) literally less than 1/1000 of a percent of our atmosphere is driving climate change? It couldn't possibly be some other factors involved? The only explanation is humans are changing the climate and we need to be taxed so international corporations can outsource our pollution to third world countries without environmental protections?

Do you honestly think its the first world that is going to be a major pollutor in the coming century?

Don't you see that by regulating everything, by taxing everything because of a manufactured crisis is only going to make the problem worse as more manufacturing gets outsourced to places without ANY environmental controls?

washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/5/climate-change-whistleblower-alleges-noaa-manipula/
realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data-is-fake-data/
naturalnews.com/045695_global_warming_fabricated_data_scientific_fraud.html

"Anthropocentrism" is a better term for it. The scale of the universe seems to completely escape a lot of people, the giant ball of nuclear fusion that has given all life and energy we have to this planet hardly occurs to them.

Attached: 65_Myr_Climate_Change[1].png (650x397, 21K)

Man made climate change is just sheer human arrogance. It's the belief that humans can destroy Earth with our current technology. The fact is, we are NOTHING compared to nature. They also often bring up the extinction of species, implying that we have the power to pervert nature and prevent survival of the fittest; ~99% of Earth's species have gone extinct in it's lifetime. The most powerful nuclear weapon ever created, the Tsar Bomba, is nothing compared to the eruption of a super volcano. Earth has survived for 4.5 billion years and it has had starkly different climates throughout that time suitable for a range of different species to be successful.

The whole "climate change scare" is purely related to OUR (human) habitation and comfort. We can't stop it. We're just going to have to adapt to our environment, you know, do the thing that made us the dominant species on our planet?

Just remember that you are nothing compared to mother nature. You can't destroy her, because no matter what you do, once you're dead, 10,000 years will go by and Earth will recover and thrive. So respect nature. Trees need carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. What we don't need is plastic and human waste in our water. The biggest contributors to ACTUAL pollution are shitskins. Earth's beauty is not being tarnished by emissions (that (((they))) want to tax for endless money and to humiliate the goyim serfs), but rather by swarms of shitskins that shit in rivers, litter, and mindlessly destroy.

Im more concerned with plastics.

Attached: climate change denier.jpg (900x439, 175K)

Humans contribute to 4% of the Co2 in the air, Nature to the other 96%. Those 4% wont do shit till in some hundreds of years and till then we are already dead. Also we cant do shit about climate, same as you cant do shit about a Tornado or a Earthquake its Natural. You can try to regulate the Co2 emissions but even if we completely stop emitting Co2 it will get warmer since the earth has cycles of iceages and heatages. Like always its just a big money making scheme and mostly retarded kids/university students (people that never worked in their entire life, and want more taxes) buy into it.

Attached: 1562952399919s.jpg (226x249, 7K)

Thanks, capitalism

Tech causes climate change. With out text climate change does not exist or matter. Reverse tech.

I agree, but shitskins aren't the ones who pollute. It's the west. Jews tricked us into having every item sealed in 4 layers of cheap plastic.
I don't give a shit about this climate change but I'm not supporting dumping millions of tons of plastic waste into the ocean. You can't just say "duh shitskins" when you ship all your garbage to them for 10 rupees.

>shitskins aren't the ones who pollute
you are objectively wrong.
The most polluted rivers in the world are in shithole countries filled with shitskins

stop falling for big oil memes

>an active volcano in a 4 day span gives off more green house gases than we have as a species since the first campfire

This is definitely not true because volcano activity has fairly consistent over the past several thousand years, but the recent spike in CO2 ppm is a new thing. Your theory only works if all volcanoes since 1880 suddenly shot out more CO2 than they did in the past

>You can't just say "duh shitskins" when you ship all your garbage to them for 10 rupees
Sure we can. Especially when shitskin populations are perpetually increasing and dwarfing the white population. What do you think is going to happen as Western aid continues to prop up Africa until there are 4 billion of them? They're going to receive even more aid (in the form of both money and products; clothing, toys, food, electronics, etc., all requiring manufacturing, packaging, shipping). Coupled with the fact that it's the West that undertakes stringent recycling practices relative to the rest of the world, we can absolutely say it's the shitskins.

Also this

Africans don't actually pollute that much currently because they have no industry, the biggest polluters are currently Indians and Chinese. Americans aren't entirely blameless in this situation, it's their demand for retarded product that drives the Chinese industrial output.

Your local climate is man-made, everything except carbon dioxide affects it: deforestation, pollution, geoengineering, poor urban planning...

Solar activity affects it too, but it is obviously out of control.

nobody is arguing that the climate doesn't change.
the issue is whether we can change the climate with climate change taxes and regulations.
the answer is no.
There is no way we can change what is happening, and they admit this.
But the left doesn't care. They want to impose trillions in carbon taxes, fines, and regulations, just for the fun of it because they are power hungry and hate the industrialized modern world.

>all of the models have been incorrect with their predictions.
>CO2 is literally the lifeblood of, well, life on our planet
>man’s CO2 contribution to the atmosphere is .001% of the atmosphere.
and maybe just to keep to yourself:
>those behind CC hoax are literally a death cult hoping to prevent the revitalization of the earth via the release of non-bioavailable carbon.

But as their population increases over the next few decades, their rate of pollution will increase proportionally. And as China sets up a foothold for industry in Africa, pollution from the continent will surely increase. And yes, the West is of course partially to blame. As our demand dictates supply; but who really benefits from our current situation? The West has barely any manufacturing industry left as we traded it for cheap, inefficient, and highly contaminant third world practices.

Now we're just cash cows living in service-based economies, being told we're directly responsible for the climate apocalypse and being punished for it through taxes, while our potential enemies reinforce their manufacturing industries and shirk their responsibilities towards the environment while the climate mouthpieces conveniently ignore them.

Some of the scientist visited eppstein island. So they fucked children on camera, to give false data and analysis under blackmail.

Also, you may want to look at how bad the methodology is behind the "science".
"joannenova.com.au/2018/10/first-audit-of-global-temperature-data-finds-freezing-tropical-islands-boiling-towns-boats-on-land/
>principia-scientific.org/climate-bombshell-audit-exposes-ipcc-data-as-careless-and-amateur/
Only covered bu Breitbart.
>breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/07/damning-audit-climate-change-scare-based-on-unreliable-data/

Attached: perspective.jpg (386x951, 141K)

all climate change is caused by masturbating. But the news can't warn the people because the FCC won't let them use that word on air.

Attached: do.gif (500x200, 481K)

This

most shitskin countries don't have organized trash removal. Population is dumping trash into the rivers in indonesia and Philippines, which end up in the oceans. Most of the waste can be traced back to asian countries.

I've seen a documentary, I'll never forget the amount of trash they are dumping, its horrendous

You faggot who do should just burn.

oh wait - you are.

Lol that would be a quick way to end your carrier and reputation. Science isn't just some douche bags opinion.

What a fucking moron. Nothing is more stable than equatorial climate you have the same fucking weather all year round.
The extremes are felt in mid latitude climates.

Shouldn't you make up your mind AFTER hearing the good arguments for and against something?

Ask "What do our politicians suggest doing to stop it?" It's that simple. Point out that the first and ONLY solution that they
EVER come up with is 'tax the west into oblivion' because they don't care about the environment, they care about raising taxes and bringing about communism and are just using the climate as an excuse.
Tell them that China produces DOUBLE the carbon emissions that the US does, and that carbon taxes will just make western industry go to China, killing our jobs, creating an even larger trade deficit, and will have done NOTHING to stop climate change because while we have regulations here, China doesn't and the businesses that go overseas will pollute all they want over there.
Tell them that all the politicians who talk about stopping climate change by taxing us to death, but then don't say anything about China don't actually care about the planet, and are just shilling for a government cash grab.
The American left NEEDS climate change to be man made so they have an excuse to raise taxes, but Finland, which is an eco friendly country that is not paid off by big oil, did their own study showing that while climate change is real, it is NOT man made, and Japan, another eco friendly country, has confirmed their findings.

Sometimes I feel like I'm the only person in the country that doesn't know whether humans impact the climate or not. Everyone is always so certain about climate change.

And gays 'first they just want to be left alone in their bedrooms, then they'll be raping our kids' was a slippery slope fallacy, except that it came true.

That's exactly why I vote for a party that denies climate change. Our left refuses to build nuclear plants, yet they want to spend ridiculous amounts of money to reduce co2. While the climate deniers actually propose one of the more logical and affordable solutions to reduce our emission.

There isn't a single credible Finnish scientist who opposes climate change being man made.

Research cloud sending and patents on weather manipulation.
They gotta blame it on someone.

Why are you trying to raise awareness about something you don't know anything about yourself?

Cloud seeding**

Credible according to (((who)))? It was on GLOBAL news that Finnish scientists determined that climate change had more to do with cloud cover and solar output than human carbon emissions.

Put a bullet in your brain please.

Since the industrial revolution CO2 levels increased by 40% not 4%.

Even if you don't believe in global warming, you must be aware that we've been burning lots of oil and coal in the last century. What are the by-products of a combustion reaction? CO2 and water in the best case scenario. And where does it go? It doesn't just blow away into space, it stays in the atmosphere or gets captured by plants.

So either you don't believe we produce enough CO2 to change the weather, you don't believe increasing CO2 in a closed system will raise temperatures (greenhouse effect) or you agree that humans released enough CO2 to affect the weather.

It is summer.

Well if it was in GLOBAL NEWS then i'm sure you don't mind linking the actual scientific work or did the magazine man tell you this in your sleep?

Don't listen to what magazines tell you kid

Based
Save our game

Attached: cli sun edit.jpg (472x309, 46K)

of the total 100% Co2 in the Atmospehere Humans produce 4% and nature produces the other 96%. No one cares how much it has risen, at the moment we are responsible for 4% of the Co2 worldwide those 4% wont do jackshit

He didn't get the memo that CO2 stops heating past a certain PPM.

It's not like we can't or don't measure the suns energy output and account for that. How thick are you?

Is it tho? Its simply debunking the "most ppl agree therefore its true" fallacy

retarded

Great Global Warming Swindle

m.youtube.com/watch?v=52Mx0_8YEtg

Attached: 030E017E-35B2-4239-AAF1-9A986330245B.jpg (1576x1205, 469K)

Here's a Princeton physics prof saying we don't have enough CO2:
youtube.com/watch?v=U-9UlF8hkhs

>I'm trying to raise some awareness but always getting told I fell for big oil lies
Because you fell for big oil lies you fucking retard

The HadCrut4 dataset which makes up our temperature record is literally full of holes and is virtually useless. Not only is the science behind the warming shit, but our reference data is trash. We have NO IDEA what is going on and yet our whole current culture is based on it.

the largest greenhouse gas, by a huge margin (orders of magnitude) is evaporated ocean water.

Why would you argue with an idiot? Especially about their religion! Global warming is a faith-based system.

youtube.com/watch?v=ViY2J3LPgN4

Name one earth climate model that accounts for the effects of water vapor and the sun's output.

The earth has been both extremely hotter and extremely colder before, all without any cars or factories.