Viable fusion in just 6 and 1/2 years

scientificamerican.com/article/worlds-largest-nuclear-fusion-experiment-clears-milestone/

article posted to scientific American

states, "A multination project to build a fusion reactor cleared a milestone yesterday and is now 6 ½ years away from “First Plasma,” officials announced."

also
"The entire project is now 65% complete, the officials said."

so in the next 6 1/2 years, no one has to rely on the sand niggers , or renewable jews, us could become completely independent from these forces,

tho don't like multination suggests (((un))) involvement.

>but (((they))) just use fusion as a way to bait money from goys
what area is most of the liquid oil located either in sandnigger or areas controlled by (((them)))

>what about other renewables such as solar, or wind .
those are bust for one wind power has almost made several bird species extinct where they have been put in. For another, it would bankrupt 90% percent of the world's governments to put in and maintain. (((who))) would gain?

solar while becoming affordable only works when the sun is out (no shit), and we literally do not have the surface area including the entire planet to produce enough to become sustainable

Attached: download.jpg (282x179, 21K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=1Y6Cli2odss&t=
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toshiba_4S
cfs.energy/
ctfusion.net/
universetoday.com/115411/fusion-energy-always-50-years-away-now-just-5-according-to-lockheed-martin/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_the_Sky
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Eh

why eh

>mfw I actually quoted some engineered valves for ITAR in it's early stages of manufacture
They gave it to the Frenchies.

westinghouse has had LFTR reactors available since 1969, we don't use them because they don't create weapons for her majesty's nuke business

>>what about other renewables such as solar, or wind .
you will never get the energy it took to build the solar panels back out of them

youtube.com/watch?v=1Y6Cli2odss&t=

I wonder why (((they)) don't use them

thx for the info

Ha, I'm a fusion scientist and I can tell you ITER ain't being close to shit. They are already nearly two decades behind and if anything tumultuous US and European politics will keep funding strangled.

Sad thing is that there's no fundamental physical reason why it won't perform as expected, none that we know of. The heat flux width to the divertor is still an open question but the Alcator C mod scalings show it should be fine.

ITER is such an ineffective solution compared to the option of building a test reactor in an Apollo style US program. My personal theory is that Reagan specifically approved funding to ITER over such a program to say to the fusion community "see we're working in the reactor" while actually kneecapping the domestic effort. Thanks to ITER the US fusion program barely has any fucking money.

Gambling is for suckers but if I were a betting man I'd actually say private fusion will happen before ITER gets it. My money would be on Commonwealth Fusion Systems, since they have the MIT fusion program backing their science. CTFusion and General Fusion are also looking good, as is Tokamak Energy in the UK

do you think they might go down the fusion route for the Mars missions