Jow Forums BTFO by Economics

It's a bad deal for men because they're aren't getting enough raise for the additional work they have to do helping women do their job.

>when supply goes up, demand increases

Attached: 1334989912368.png (665x598, 92K)

LOL HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA
Jow Forums BTFO, 2ND WAVE FEMINISM WINS AGAIN!

Women having money to spend means more demand yes.

Wages rise as debt inflation

destroy
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism
transition
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-stage_theory

Attached: 1564341860336s.jpg (125x101, 3K)

you cant just read headlines and start repeating it to other people. theyre there to get noticed and make money. you are better off ignoring them, or reading the studies/sources so you can laugh at their attempt to skew it and make money.

>Celebrating that women are being used to wageslave for corporations

Attached: 1551462970462.jpg (819x960, 125K)

Oh please fuck off with the retardation...
> Who was Cantillon?
Wages rise because the government and central banks create new debt, to push up inflation.
Each individual earns a smaller proportion of that money though the absolute numbers increase.

Yeah, because I can totally go back in June '96 whenever I want and do a validation poll to make sure that "sociological study" that took place back then hasn't been "faked"!

He's not wrong when he claims 75% aren't reproducible, you just don't understand what that means.

Also you dumb fuck sociology =/= social psychology

This.

The only occupations where females are useful are prostitution and stripping.

>posts article banner with no further info from politically heavily biased mediaorganisation
> haha they will crumble
im calling severe bait. because i refuse to believe that you are that fucking retarded. get saged,nigger

Attached: 1548137017323.png (817x443, 34K)

They don't have more money, though. They have an income now, but their boyfriends/spouses are earning less.

more men are needed to correct the mistakes made by these women

Every single fucking time.

it actually reduces the cost of labor by half, men became poorer as their labor value was cut in two. Thus you need two people working for the value of one before women entered the workforce. It definitely helps business keep wages low and profits high though. People still pay the same price in goods, so nobody won except the business owner class.

Women have money men used to have. there is no gain on the labour side, money is just moved. The gain is on the employer side.
Debt increases because the amount a household earns on a single salary is now insufficient. Or two wage earners are required to pay for what one used to be able to afford.
The value of the unit of labour has dropped... Which is why it was done in the first place.
Labour is the largest cost to business.

Nice reverse causative. When more rats enter the grain silo, there is more grain. If there are no rats there is no grain. Clearly rats cause grain.

and that's nothing to say of women wasting their best child-bearing and rearing years pushing paper.

Attached: 1367499884054.png (187x225, 2K)

or the fact that women don't date down, making more and more men worse martial picks than ever before in history, killing the family unit.

user, tats a doller

Don't help women.

This is the real crime.

yes because using the old common sense.

If am an employer. having 5 potential job candidates, vs 10 job candidates. If I consistantly keep getting 10 job candidates for each job posting. I am definitely going to raise the wage on said job. you know.....to ahhh i can't fucking pretend to be this stupid any longer.

that study is full of shit. And it's just to do damage control of what anyone with half a brain an two nickles already knows

The most stressful thing about any job is the women you work with.

Don't you know? Growth is everything.

Corporations need to continuously grow, as does the government. The world is already leveraged against future expectations of growth. If that growth doesn't come, it falls apart. That means your 401k will go down. You don't want that, do you? We need growth. It's the only thing that matters.

One way to provide growth is organic innovation. Absent that, increased consumption will do and the easiest way to increase consumption is to import new consumers. It's unrealistic to assume they will immediately get jobs, so the government will provide them with funds used for consumption. You don't want them to starve, do you? This will be paid for with increased federal borrowing and increased taxes on those working for corporations outside the small circle that this growth benefits.

Sacrifice everything for growth. Growth, like change, is good unto itself and needs no explanation.

>Seething and coping at the same time

Its also been confirmed that purchasing power raises when women join the workforce so you are wrong

Attached: 1553674796263.png (434x521, 43K)

>if it doesn't support my circlejerk it is fake
>if I add a triple parentheses to your post I win the argument

ah yes, money is the most important thing in this world ruled by satan
not having a righteous god fearing family is the endgame for these people... then a bullet as they commit suicide

B-but Schlomo Globalstein did a study saying the goyim have enough money!

Succinct. Checked. Based. Accurate. Is this the perfect post?

Hey, this guy gets it.

>twice the number of customers, even more considering how much women buy

>wages rise

never change Jow Forums this is the kind of logic i come to read
could not have said it better myself.

>When More Women Join the Workforce, Wages Rise - including for Men.

Yes, the few men at the top see increasing profits. There are more working aged men unemployed now than since the great depression.

>labor cost gets cut in half
>Suddenly goods and services cost a little less
>because your labor is worth less
Check your math

>When we print more money, everyone will be rich

This.

Labor is affected by supply and demand like anything else. At least it did when I was taking econ classes.

Your (faulty) 'logic' is irrelevant we are posting facts here sorry

Also, this.

Attached: source.png (720x330, 190K)

but when does any company reduce costs on goods.
if you make the parts cheaper for ownerjew. He's just going to pocket the extra. he's not going to lower the costs of his goods because it's cheaper to make

Fuck, thats' been going on for like forever.

Fuck off back to Sargonland , faggot .

(((Britbong))) shilling? IMAGINE MY SHOCK

Rare.

To increase sales. Take walmart. Are they just keeping everything super duper expensive, or have they taken slim profit margins in order to mass market a fuck ton of garbage to the lower class?

unfortunately the poster is form australia

>economics
>logic irrelevant
You must be a commie

Explains why wages have been flat since women entered the workforce.

Outside of serious competition there are no drops in prices. Most of the time companies will match competitors or price fix (it's what oil companies do). If there was true company competition prices would crash now and then across all markets (just because people try to out compete a rival), name one fucking consumer good that has become near free in recent years that was worth hundred previously. Competition in a global world isn't the game, it's labor exploitation and profit taking.

>a fucking leaf
Nothing wrong with being Australian. They are our greatest allies. Unlike a certain flora

Or to put it in response to OP pic. If supply increases but cost still goes up, it just means that demand went up faster. It is not that it is a blessing of 'more supply'.

but does purchasing power rise?

the answer is no

This

Again you are wrong, the evidence doesn't support your claims, no matter how you try to spin it, you are wrong.
>but muh logic!!!
Its wrong, you are over simplifying a complex subject you don't know anything about.

women have always been huge consumers though.

Attached: 7f03c1a631859b15f19ec1f692772381.jpg (380x500, 62K)

>name one consumer good that has become near free that was worth hundred previously
Electricity. Move on.

>be leftwing retard
>don’t understand anything
>claim Jow Forums btfo

Great thread

When more women enter the workforce more men become unemployed. Women should at the very least not be allowed anywhere near the hiring process of new employees

...

Women still had to eat before women's lib, moron. People make less than ever, own less than ever, save less than ever and have more debt than ever.

They say this shit was good for the economy, well who exactly is this economy good for?

I think you know.

It can, if the increased supply dropped prices of that supply that may increase demand at that price point.

take burger king for example
A quarter pounder is 5 dollars
they are constantly trying to find new suppliers that will make the buns for less
So if they pay 10 cents per bun, along comes a company that does it for 5 cents a bun.
DO YOU REALLY think that burger king is going to pass those savings onto you?!
NOPE....the burger is still going to be 5 dollars and owner jew or corporate jew pockets the extra 5 cents per bun, and stock holder jew get more money from dividends

>it’s another “faggot OP only posts a screen capped headline” episode

Dismissing an assertion as laughable without disproving or even acknowledging the argument it’s based on (no matter how fucktarded) is disingenuously leftist as fuck. Literal Daily Show formula.

Attached: 6536890B-FDE0-4DE8-A3F5-C48A18A4F12C.jpg (550x233, 17K)

>I’m a complete retard who can’t offer a counter argument

Fixed

Who gives a shit. Did it make anyone happier ..... NOPE

Can the results of this study be verified though?

lol. no.
WTF is telling you this shit.
Personal income as % of GDP as done nothing but fall. You are getting a smaller and smaller slice.

Attached: pic.jpg (510x295, 73K)

>people enter workforce creating demand more demand for jobs
>wages rise
Leftists are such fucking retards.

You should read about Australian electricity prices, top kek.

Attached: EnergyPrices[1].gif (700x482, 28K)

Oh shit!

>Giving women the right to work doubles the number of people looking for jobs while keeping the number of job positions available the same.
>This means, at a bare minimum, all wages are halved and it will be at least twice as hard for anyone looking for a job to actually secure one. What bringing women into the job market did was functionally the same as going to a foreign nation, picking out an equal number of foreigners to the total number of American citizens, and then bringing all of those foreigners in and dropping them off in America all at once. If somebody today proposed importing 300 million immigrants within one year, which is the modern day equivalent of what Feminism did to America in the early 20th century, they would be lynched, and rightfully so.
Repeal the 19th Amendment
repeal.io

Attached: supply-and-demand.jpg (622x449, 27K)

And if people stop buying?

Actual retard. Women didn't suddenly become consumers when they started working. They were already consumers. Now they just work for the privilege of having part of their spouse's income billed out in their name.

This is true, because their fuck ups cost so much that their bosses go out of their way to hire men and specialists, thus raising demand for men and specialists, which raises prices.
They then also raise women's wages to keep them quiet.

and so did the cost of living

The minimum wage in 1973 was $1.60. The minimum wage now is headed to $15. This is called progress.

What's it like to live in a tax haven for corrupt politicians and criminals?

>twice the number of customers
No.
Women were always the customers.
Men don't buy shit.
There is and has always been an ENORMOUS transfer of wealth from males to females in the Trillions of dollars, EVERY year.
Adverts are pointed at women, not men because women are the customers, and always have been.
> genderleadershipgroup.com/the-inclusionary-leadership-blog/210
Men earn money to attract women...
Women use that money to make purchases. This is everything from houses, cars, household furnishings, to groceries. Almost all spending decisions are and have always been driven by women.
There are no additional customers.

Do you know what a nickel and dime store is? It was a place where you could buy some junk for 5-10c. Candy bars, sodas, knick knacks. Know anywhere you can get anything for 10 cents? No? Progress.

This. So so, so, this.

nothing happens, most shit just stays on the shelf, user, or cleared on the grey market. Any "loss" is taken back as a tax break. Buying retail is literally you getting fucked.

Amanda (((Weinstein))). Every. Single. Fucking. Time.

If there was no tax break for taking a loss on sales you would actually see some real shit, a lot more businesses would fail and the turnover of goods would actually increase competitiveness.

Everyone used to house, clothe and feed a family of 5 on one non professional income. Women join workforce, now need 2 incomes. Wages have risen sure, but prices have risen more.

So please explain why personal income has been falling as a percentage of GDP for 60 years now.
Because if wages were rising in real terms, you would expect it to gain, not fall.

>what is inflation?

DUDE WOMEN AT WORK SICK
>t edile worker

(((Weinstein)))

Underrated. Chat bots really do run the chans

also, read about debeers nigga. Diamonds are worthless and the scarcity is gamed.