Capitalism always results in an efficient allocation of resour-

>literal communism utopia of playing video games and giving everyone an equal chance
>hurr durr he won a prize so it's capitalism

One post by a fucking leaf

I saw that and it is.

This man is a master entertainer that facilities the dissemination of consumer information via commercials

Hayek
Smith
Von Mises
Rothbard
Rand
Hoppe
Burke
Reagan
Greenspan
.. and so on, and so on.

.. and on another note; do you believe the sentence to be wrong? "Capitalism always results in an efficient allocation of resources".

>allocation of resources

No. Capitalism only operates on supply and demand.

Have you ever thought the reason why you're such a loser is because you're not in demand? Because it's the truth.

How could thing I don't like happen? We really need to shut it down.

decentralized Capitalism encourages redundancy. centralized Capitalism favors efficiency by removing "redundancy".

you can probably shape Capitalism in all kinds of ways the make it do all kinds of things.

>3 million dollars
>Buys a desk
What a fucking legend.

Attached: 1435787596883.png (714x444, 377K)

>Capitalism always results in an efficient allocation of resour-

Ummmm Capitalism doesnt allocate resources. Its just a free market, where people are free to do what they will with the money they have earned.

You want to allocate resources, so join Venezuela, or the USSR in the 1950s. Problem with you moronic leftists is that you cant think. in that kind of system ALL THE POWER resides in who decides what gets allocated and to whom. It is totalitariansim.

dumb fuck leaf like yourself fails to think paste the surface level of basic situations. Lemme guess, you're like 22 years old? And love Trudeau?

Attached: xyzbZ2w.gif (245x245, 755K)

What's wrong is that someone got millions for playing a shitty video game, not a good or great video game.

Attached: too much bros.jpg (736x410, 84K)

>always
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.

communism death toll:
100M
result in long term, Russia and China still racially pure

Capitialism death toll: entire white race
destruction of all european culture,
globohomo race mixing corporations pushing jew media shti everywhere,
and the "capitalism" american president, trump vowing to legalize sodomy in all nations on the globe.

Attached: 1562416301762.jpg (601x601, 13K)

>Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
>Only a sith
>ONLY.

nice deflection, burger.
>Capitalism only operates on supply and demand.
.. that's the point, and that is exactly why Capitalism is doomed to continue in it's boom-bust cycle until a new depression hits and a world war follows.
>durrr ur just a loser hurrr kekekek
sorry, no. I have a nice job and a good life, no complaints.

the sith are capitalists, duh.
that's the joke, duh.

Provide a metric of efficiency

Based zoomie

Apparently that young man did something people value. Good for him.

>only bad people believe in objective reality
wtf im a sith lord now

Yes. Simply because it should say free market, not capitalism. Those two terms are not synonymous nor interchangeable.

>get rewarded for being good a video game
>some Canadian commie want to take it away from you

Fuck you.

Stop believing government propaganda. Depressions are caused by government action, they are not a natural phenomenon of free markets. Fags like you would blame the 2008 financial crises on markets and ignore all the regulations, policies, and government precedents that caused it. Read a book.

depends what you mean with "free marked"? Mutualism or anarcho-capitalism?
tinfoil unfolds, opinion discarded.

>leafs are mad non-terrorist are getting money
sorry we like to reward the best even if its for a shitty game

>STOP MAKING MONEY THAT IM NOT MAKING

Attached: anger_child.jpg (600x399, 61K)

>we like to reward the best
true, you do.. they're not called God's Chosen People for no reason. Shalom.

>whining because some kid made bank while you're poor and worthless

Lmao

This. Its gonna be funny when they're all the first to lose.

>still poor and lonely

Maybe the next post you make on Jow Forums will fix your sad life

> 3 millon dollars
> planing to buy a new desk
That's gonna be a big desk.

Good for him.

>18 years old girls makes videos of herself going to parties and becomes a millionaire
>48 years old miner gets laid off and loses his home

cleary she worked much harder and she deserves it

>Being a parasitic degenerate is OKAY as long as you do it LEGALLY

Attached: important_message.gif (1000x546, 412K)

Explain to me why you deserve things just because you work hard.

>Capitalism allocates resources
Why are leafs so retarded? Is it something in the water?

so you accept that capitalism is not fair, good

Do you know of a more efficient way of deciding a Fortnite winner? Capitalism is the most efficient way of distributing the resources of those who want to know who is best at Fortnite. Regardless of how petty you or I think a Fortnite obsession is, there are people who are willing to pay to see who is best. If you are not interested it doesn't cost you anything. On the other hand, if the government wanted to do the same, there would be a group of people in power who would decide, based on how much their cut would be.

Dude after playing a weekend of counterstrike with maybe 1 fucking win out of 15 match's you have no fucking clue how frustrating it is to play with loud obnoxious faggots for 14 hours straight and lose every fucking match because some fucking INTJ/P can't follow OPSEC and will fucking blow up comms with assinine bullshit about drugs memes or how they got shot in the head because they don't know what a fucking shift key is but can't stop speaking in all caps autism

Fortnite is an asset swap of PUBG run by a Rothschild. Change my mind.

This was the phase that made me hate the Jedi and want to go full Neocrusader on all force using scum

>my dad's tax dollars go to the Hebrews and I have no argument
stay mad, burgermutt.

Anyone with a real job

It is pure capitalism. People who like Fortnite create a demand for a tournament in order to see who is best. The winner receives a reward for being the best. Nobody's taxes went to pay the winner. Only the people who created the demand for Fortnite champion paid.

money is the allocation of power and money is accumulated with the centralization of power

capitalism is a system that depends on the monopoly of money to control

the central bank is a result of centralization of power. those who accumulated the most money have power to centralize it

simple as

You should talk to my indonesian and guatemalan friend or his parents about how great unrestricted capitalism is.

The late and great George Carlin said: “The American Dream – because you have to be asleep to believe it”.

I always am amazed on how some people in the us are actually extreme apologists for the stupidest behaviors

Just take a look at how vehemently conservatives will defend lower taxes for billionaires worshipping them and shitting on the poor workers and try to pass that as conservative on the simple concept that he "must have worked for it". Nigga nobody works for billions worth of income.

if you arent personally printing money, then you are NOT making money

you are MERELY COLLECTING money

the only people making money are in the central banks

the bankers allocate the printed money to their connected network of privileged oligarchs

privileged oligarchs then buy slaves with the free money printed by their banker buddies

this welfare is called TRICKLE DOWN

the financial system itself doesn't serve humanity's best interests. It's a con game that you've helped perpetuate and perfect, but it's still a con game (and even you've been conned), and it's still going to come crashing down as technology advances

The actual currencies in our universe are:
Material resources
Energy
Labor

Within our solar system both material resources and energy are so abundant, they might as well be free.

If you have ever downloaded intellectual property illegally, you cannot in good faith claim to be a capitalist.

I already day trade, I trade labor for money. KEK

You know why useless investors in this thread hate UBI so much? Because they don't work for money, they are given money and when somebody else is given money in form of UBI they see that as a threat to their existence. The last thing a boss wants you to experience is the same success story he experienced, that being given free money, since they know nobody works then and they need somebody to build them houses and suck their dicks. UBI is great solution to capitalism, we should all be given money so we all become elites and then we can ask ourselves if bosses really do work

UBI is not my experiment at all, UBI has zero things to do with Socialism anyway. UBI is a capitalistic model to battle automatization of your favorite Hollywood future economy of Star Trek/Wars. Socialism doesn't works for money at all, they work for production. You are handing out money and that money value is decided by the market and banks, it has no value on its own. The market isn't alive, it's as value as people in charge made it value to be. Diamonds are valued a sammich in Africa, when those diamonds touch the hand of Jew in Netherlands they gain 10000 more value. There's no competition or lalala bullshit alive market price index, there's only certain people inflating the shit. Lets do UBI, lets see Jabba the Hutt needs to survive, he would need probably around 1000000 euro, he has hookers after all. UBI should pay for expenses.

I have always felt the 1% are creating an oligarchy in which their system sells the illusion of hard work, capitalism and democracy. I see no difference between George, Charles, David, Bill or good old Warren.

amerisharts have the mental state of 5 yr olds. they can wallow in their own filth and shit, as long as they are given toys to play with

that's why they prefer smartphones, dragon dildos and hate free quality healthcare and education

capitalism is a disease and needs to be euthanized

Capitalism wins
If you want to be able to earn a stable living by working, you are a communist, and deserve death

Stop whining and get back to work, and fuck you for wanting a paycheck. You'll get what you get

Peasants need to know their place. Capitalism rose out of the ashes of monarchies and feudalism. Your boss replaced your feudal lord. It's a new skin on an old game. Accept it.

How THE FUCK do people hold up being modern day serfs for Shekelstein and draining their bodies and minds in a 9 to 5 job without RWDS?

When White people were a majority in the US, the Jews took care to promote individualist/libertarian philosophy (Rand/Rothbard/Mises) among them, so as to render their political activism on cultural matters entirely irrelevant. The only thing that the Jews needed White people to do was pull up their bootstraps and wageslave, and so they got White people to idealize capitalism and be critical of state power. At the exact same time, however, they encouraged non-White people and their liberal cosmopolitan vanguard to achieve complete cultural hegemony over the United States by seizing the power of the bureaucratic state and using it to enrich themselves and erode the foundations of traditional society.

Capitalism is an Anglo meme from a period when they had seemingly unlimited resources. Because the popular culture is dominated by the Anglos capitalism actually is over rated. In reality outside of the British Empire and the USA no one really believed in it and no one gives a flying shit about crapitalism

capitalism is about gettig paid. since no one is paying me to shill for crapitalism, then i wont promote your crapitalism for free. since doing free shit and giving you free support goes against crapitalism, i flush you with a bag a shit

>t. increasingly nervous sharter

Capitalism by it's definition is incompatible with any culture other then pure consumerism.

>money is the allocation of power and money is accumulated with the centralization of power
Money is a means of exchange for work. You work in an occupation, you don't have to accept payment in whatever you produce or in barter for what someone else produces. You get money to buy something you want from someone who works to produce what you want. You don't want it? You don't buy it, and you keep your money.

Yes, UBI would be an investment, it's basically the same shit if it wasn't being 10 million dollars short in money. Please sempai, i want to be great capitalistic builder, give me UBI, i want to be the job creator, i will create growth and import 3 million Africans, Do you want economic growth or not? If yes, i am awaiting my investment money today. I will become economic genius, i will be such a good job creator and builder of economy i will order construction of smallest apartments you ever seen and give every worker place to stay for lowest salary you have ever seen, i will inject GMO burgers directly through my private pipeline in my private apartments, it will happen all in sleep, we can even build a robotic ejaculation arms for your penises and vaginas. I will be great provider, job creator and best builder. I will work 12 hours per day with my teams, brainstorming my newest expansions and GMO food for my little cattle. I am so smart, seriously, i am self-made.

Free riding is one of the oldest problems in economics. free riding is parasitism
The biggest free riders in the financial system are bank executives such as Jamie Dimon, the CEO of J.P. Morgan
guaranteed by the “too big to fail” policy of the Federal Reserve. The big banks can engage in swap and other derivative contracts “off the books” without providing adequate capital for the market risk involved
Interest rates were held near zero for years by the Fed to help the banks earn profits by not passing the benefits of low rates along to their borrowers

A passive investor is a parasite. The passive investor simply buys an index fund, sits back and enjoys the show. Since markets mostly go up, the passive investor mostly makes money but contributes nothing to price discovery.

No culture
No happiness
No religion
about 5 people actually benefit from it

it's total shit mate

capitalism is sociopathy manifested in economy.

This faction fight was between New Deal nationalists led by FDR vs those imperialists represented by Churchill who wished to use the crisis of the war to establish a revived British Empire strengthened by American muscle. FDR’s New Dealers were characterized by their total adherence to the belief that the plague of colonialism had to be undone and a new age of long term development of great infrastructure projects had to characterize the community of sovereign nations for the coming century. These patriots believed in the internationalization of the New Deal, were committed to working with Russia as natural allies of America and profoundly distrusted the British.

Every boss on this planet starts with UBI from bank. What's expensive? No such thing as expensive. It's just a question who gives the orders, the one with bigger UBI

>They literally don't have to do anything for the money
Yes, exactly like every boss in capitalistic country
I get UBI and i employ food workers by buying their food, exactly what bosses do. I create growth by buying bricks, by buying food. Exactly what bosses do

What is expensive? Illogical word in world where debt doesn't matters. What's expensive is building skyscrapers for billions so that Jews and niggers can work inside, producing financial numbers in Microsoft computer and block my sun

Yes i am living in 2019 where a boss gets 1 million UBI from bank to hire food workers, most of financial sector doesn't even has companies, they hire foreigner companies. A welfare recipient is better for economy than a economic financial genius who deals with foreigner companies. A welfare recipient normie aka boss will buy food from locals, that is direct GDP creation locally.

pffft capitalism is much bestest
who needs a job, healthcare, a place to live when you can ask you parents for $1000 to buy a brand new made in china jewphone 3000?

>goyim demand an Anarcho-Capitalist McDonald's oligarchy

leads to the most ruthless motherfuckers realizing the only way to win is rig the system and get government to help others along with that person to rig it creating duopoly where a cartel is the whole provider for x monopolized good

The system concentrates into fewer and fewer hands as everyone gets poorer and poorer.

wealth of the super-rich does not trickle down to improve the economy, but it instead tends to be amassed and sheltered in tax havens with a negative effect on the tax bases of the home economy.

>"I'll sell these goods and services at values higher than their actual cost of production"

Weekly Reminder, Profit is unethical. It's exploitative at best

If housing rent was controlled, and lowered, the GDP would increase. It would mean more consumption of goods and services

Rents do not produce anything, they don't add to the GDP

In most cases, income from buy to let properties go to landlords who won't spend most of the money, it will never enter the economy

For the finance and investment industry it's very bad that boomers and other individuals invest their money in properties rather than in stocks, bonds etc

In reality, property investments are more risky than stocks.

Corporate monopolies exist because of subsidies. Google, Amazon you name it. Jeff Bezos is the biggest welfare queen in existence. Libertarians hate this and see the free market as a natural fix to the problem of power simply falling into the hands of a few. This idea that this is what capitalism only is is such an out of date meme. It’s also hypocritical to bitch about private monopolies while wanting state monopolies

It’s also hypocritical for leftist to cheer on corporate monopolies for shilling progressive values by silencing and deplatforming conservatives, or banks ending the accounts of right wingers.

Ugh, shut up and be a good slave. Be grateful you can serve a superiour man that is WASP.

They'll just be given weighed scores. Tim Sweeney's cash can't last forever though.

>You know why useless investors in this thread hate UBI so much
Because, unless you have worked for your income, your UBI is coming out of the labor of someone who actually worked for it.

A draft will not work for the USA

last time the draft was established america was majority white. the country wasn't full of illegals who hated whited people and openly expressed their hatred. the young white males still believed the future was bright for america and their families, which meant they still believed in the American dream and would die fighting for it. Americans still believed politicians were actually good and for the American people. the economy was better, and people could afford to live off lower wages

let's fast forward to today. America is full of illegals who burn flags and blame white people for everything. politicians are openly corrupt and vote against the American people every time. it's almost impossible to live comfortably off the wages 90% of people make. white demographics are in such a decline that it's obvious the country is lost to 3rd world niggers thanks to politicians. the stock market is in a steady decline, matching 2008. politicians openly call for the removal of white people's rights, the biggest being banning guns. most young white people do not trust the government and do not want to be apart of today's main stream society because it's overrun with niggers

let's be honest guys. the majority of whites aren't going to enlist. we have nothing to fight for anymore. we would be fighting for the destruction of our country. we would rather fight a civil war than a war for the jews. the niggers and spics ARE NOT going to fight for this country period, that's obvious

imo, the draft will never work. you can't draft a people that doesn't trust, or hates the country they live in. the jews will have to find another way to get goys to fight for them. the goys they have now are just the status quo of "stupid cattle", that doesn't mean they have enough cattle to fight a huge war.

In 2002, 50% of U.S. adults said real estate was the best investment
percentage of Americans who invest in the stock market -- 55%

He said person. Not a pedophile.

Nice list, now post audio.

Capitalism embodies all 7 sins
>pride: when has a company ever admitted its wrong and suffered for it? A company with a shit past will only acknowledge it if there's money to be made from it
>envy: we re-release the same products every year and peer pressure makes us by them so we keep up with the Jones
>lust: Jeffery Epstein
>greed: under capitalism this is not a sin
>wrath: it's only okay when the strong use it against the weak
>sloth: you must work in a capitalist society to survive but are not entitled to a job but please buy these drugs and use your money on recreation
>gluttony: capitalism is the main driver of climate change, at least we have plastic water bottles
The whole point of circumcision is to transmit the spirit of the devil/Saturn/Yahweh into the child through the open wound from the rabbi

capitalism is open to exploitation by greedy people
greed consumes heritage and tradition. much of our cultural heritage has been sold off/eradicated to make space for consumerist/globalist substitutes which generate more money for a select group of individuals.

It is true for everything - middle ground is destroyed, either poor as fuck pleb, or rich fuck. Corporative capitalism did it

Add to this the stereotype of developer coding at work and working at home, with no live outside hackathons and meetups and middle jobs are fucked even harder
You get either retard code monkeys with SO-driven development, or code-gods that work 14 hours per day, do a work of three man and get 10% salary increase with some (((shares))).

We buy things to show off to our friends and family

We buy things to make the neighbor feel like a poorfag

We buy things to feel superior to others on the streets ,

How is this healthy? why do we keep doing this?

Its like if we decided that the main objective of life its to make the person next to feel worthless

mg.co.za/article/2016-12-22-00-the-age-of-humanism-is-ending/

My recent trip to the USA was an eye-opener - poverty has never been so visible on the street, and it feels the income-inequality debate is bursting out. No wonder populists are calling for the rich to be taxed till the eye’s pop. But the US needs to do two things – create a fair tax and equality system, and fix what’s broken in its society and economy

The classical models of modern states suppose its role is to provide these indivisible services like law and order, defence and care. All citizens share in the benefits of membership, with the basis the strong should protect the weak. We’ve seen the care function morph into the emergence of education, pensions, healthcare and social services - which are as major costs states now bear. There is the inbuilt reluctance of these who don’t need such services to pay for them. Why should a rich man pay to make the poor comfortable? Because, if you don’t… eventually they will eat you. Simple as – it’s the cost of membership.

>MY GEE DEE PEE pee pee IS BIGGER THEN YOURS
Meanwhile you're living in a cuckshed paying off the new car for the rest of your life, while also having to dodge rampaging niggers every time poos, mexica or Algeria wins a football match
What are you gonna do when the bubble bursts again like in 2008?

Landlords don't contribute anything to the economy. They don't produce anything

They increase recession risks with their highly risky speculative activities. The lower the quality of life of the middle class who will spend less on goods and services, consumption falls, gdp falls

This is why the rental market should be controlled or buy to let activities discouraged through legislation. If individuals want to invest, they should invest in space colonization

>Take pride in doing blue collar slave labor for mediocre pay 7 days a week because it's "manly" and "rugged"
>Come home from work and find wife in bed with your capitalist millionaire boss

The days of the one farmer and his family are long, long, long gone. The whole business is ran by Big Agriculture like he said. Also just like all corporations that can profit from it, they abuse these quasi-legal and totally illegal people as much as possible. If they were legalized, they'd just make sure more illegals are imported

We would not have this illegal problem if we did one simple thing, enforced the fucking laws against these companies that employ these illegals. You start slapping enormous, crippling fines on these corporations and illegal immigration dries up over night

We won't do that though because our politicians are corrupt and bought off. It's as simple as that. It's as easy as that. It will never happen because of corruption.

capitalism is the ultimate cuckoldry

I cannot think or comprehend of anything more cucked than capitalism. Honestly, think about it rationally. You are manufacturing, packeting, advertising and selling a product or service for your whole life for a company solely so it can go and its profit gets taken by another man. All the hard work you did for your boss - not sleeping to get to work on time, having to come in sick, having to choose between food or clothes so you didn't ask for a raise, complimenting him, obeying his orders. All of it has one simple result: the profit is enjoyed by shareholders who will spend it on useless shit

You're the perfect employee? Great. Who benefits? If you're lucky, a random man who had nothing to do with the way the product was made, who saves the money on offshore accounts. He gets to spend those dollars every night. He gets the benefits of the product's quality that came from the way you made it

As a man under capitalism, you are LITERALLY dedicating your life simply to make money for another man to enjoy. It is the ULTIMATE AND FINAL cuck. Think about it logically

All capitalist countries are on "life" support as well. Its called public debt.

>If you want to be able to earn a stable living by working, you are a communist
You give a new definition to communism. It used to be that communists thought anything a working person earns belongs to everyone, to the whole commune. Now you say that if a person wants to earn a living for himself and his family he is a communist? Please explain.

dumbfuck leaf, whats new

the better question is why is much of the rest of the world rich

well the rest of the world is rich because they sold their souls to infinite growth

the capitalist system grantees infinite economic growth in exchange for sacrifice of principles

you be like america, you accept infinite populations from the world, they give up their culture and identity over time, they become mindless consumers and the population grows exponentially and the economy grows with it

eastern europe is still very uch ingrained its identity, it doesn't welcome immigration so its economy doesnt grow exponentially

its as simple as that, the third world are nithing but strategic positioning as well as "human farms" you take stragiegic positions and you exploit the human farms for more humans to fuel infinite growth

welcome to the late 20th/21st century

YOU SELL YOUR SOUL AND THE SOUL OF YOUR NATION FOR POWER

thats how it works

capitalism consumes consumers, it is a cannibalistic system based on consumption

these systems allow disproportionate wealth/power and exploitation

a system where no person or group has disproportionate wealth or power is justifiable

like a wealth cap of 1 million dollars

2018’s valuation records are astounding in that they show the S&P 500 to be more fundamentally over-valued than it was at the prior two historic stock market valuation peaks in 1929 and 2000, bona fide speculative manias

The Economic Policy Institute, a Washington D.C. think tank, estimates that America’s top-earning 1% took in 22% of all national income. The organization said in 1928, 23.9% of the country’s income went to the top 1%

crescat.net/wp-content/uploads/Bear-Market-Rally-Sets-Up-Opportunity-For-Crescat-Strategies.pdf

zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-26/you-cant-stop-cycle-next-few-years-will-change-everything

The greatest minds of our generation are busy trying to get people to click more banner ads.

CEO
>attends meme meetings all day, has PA or secretary cuck to do the boring bits, only works at a "strategic" level
>boasts of how much work time he clocks
Wagie
>is forced into being overly specialized, actually has to work at an operational level, clocks full-time even when work load is less
>porky tells him to widen skillset not to be redundant and fired

Dear Mr. Banker, Have you seen this video about how smartphones are used to groom people to accept slavery, as they are doing in China, and what your role is going to be in FinTech’s Banking 4.0 or otherwise become obsolete? I imagine you will go along with the snakes who tell everyone the only way to survive is to help build this system when they say, “learn to code”. youtu.be/VbOv_ClA7j0

capitalism has always been enmeshed with the government. Capitalism has more to do with the financing of industry oligarchs by transfer of capital from central banks to cronies, than it has to do with free exchange.

Bartering is a pre-capital practice that's probably been around since before agriculture, but its ultimately conflated by Rayntard an-cons as being the essense of capitalism

Capital not only finances industry, but it also finances the government. Capital finances the government through industry because factories have to make the weapons and surveillance equipment the military uses. Capital is an appendage of the state and the state becomes an appendage of capital

>We buy things to show off to our friends and family
>We buy things to make the neighbor feel like a poorfag
>We buy things to feel superior to others on the streets ,
>How is this healthy? why do we keep doing this?
>Its like if we decided that the main objective of life its to make the person next to feel worthless
Who the fuck is We? Speak for yourself, user, and quit pontificating.

actually poland took millions of immigrants

Whats inefficient about this?
Its $30 million for an advertising campaign that will end up on every major news outlet.

>everything people willingly spend their money that they earned on that I don't like proves capitalism is bad REEEEEEEEEEEE
Simmer down, commie, you'll get your crust of bread soon enough.

Attached: 1537317383184.jpg (600x800, 77K)

>The days of the one farmer and his family are long, long, long gone. The whole business is ran by Big Agriculture like he said. Also just like all corporations that can profit from it, they abuse these quasi-legal and totally illegal people as much as possible. If they were legalized, they'd just make sure more illegals are imported
>We would not have this illegal problem if we did one simple thing, enforced the fucking laws against these companies that employ these illegals. You start slapping enormous, crippling fines on these corporations and illegal immigration dries up over night
>We won't do that though because our politicians are corrupt and bought off. It's as simple as that. It's as easy as that. It will never happen because of corruption.
You sound like a disillusioned high school graduate who found out that you have to start from the bottom and exhibit some competency in order to progress, while having neither a clue nor a marketable skill.

Imagine being this detatched from reality.

Let's accept for a moment that CEOs are truly worth what they are paid: a thousand times more than the average employee. This implies that CEOs are paid based on fair markets prices: it is really the market that determines how much they are paid. Let's just accept those things as true for a thought experiment

Now imagine a CEO's job is split into a thousand pieces. Each of those pieces is delivered to an average employee working an eight hour shift. You fully employ these people doing nothing else but 1/1000th of the previous CEO's responsibilities each, in something like an assembly line. Even if the CEO's job is impossibly difficult, and only the best minds of the world could handle it all at once, surely an average person could handle just 1/1000th of the job

This new system being an assembly line, and knowing what we know about assembly lines, the workers might even get more efficient, doing the work of two CEOs. You could probably assign clients their very own employee, have five people making contacts at conferences instead of just one, have a hundred people working on collaborations with other companies, etc. The business would become more efficient. Or, each of the employees could all work for ten hours a week, and you could pay them less. Or, you could fire all the below-average performers, that is, exactly half of them, and redistribute their work to the remaining above-average performers, and save on the payroll

So, if both of our original assumptions are true, why do businesses not eliminate their CEO positions and redistribute their work to 1000 people? It would be better for the business in every way -- they either get a more efficient business or more money. But no businesses do this. So there must be a flaw in our original assumption. It simply MUST be true that CEOs are not worth what they are paid, and therefore the market does not really determine the pay of CEOs.

Ya finna ding-dong diddly wanna take a stunner bub? Meet me in the ring and I'll cut a ding-dong diddly based promo on your charisma void ass.

>allocation
>distribution
who do you cucks think you're fooling?

>CEO
>>attends meme meetings all day, has PA or secretary cuck to do the boring bits, only works at a "strategic" level
>>boasts of how much work time he clocks
>Wagie
>>is forced into being overly specialized, actually has to work at an operational level, clocks full-time even when work load is less
>>porky tells him to widen skillset not to be redundant and fired
Worked my whole life since I was nine years old, beginning in the cotton fields of Oklahoma. Retired a millionaire at age 55. Don't give a fuck about, and never have given a fuck about, any corporate hierarchy. Realized at an early age that the best way to earn money for the things that I want and need is to work for it. It never made any difference to me how much someone else made for their work. I only cared about what I could get for my work. In my experience, the people who resented someone else's wealth were the people who could not earn as much as they desired.

Money is workflow control. A Jew bank giving more money to there friends means they control what is produced. No such thing as customer choice or competition ever existed under the blue sky. The boss who gets money from bank is the boss who hires and we see how much they fail and force population, not even debt matters, as long as you work for them and produce their shit they want. Absolutely no choice for people. Yes, money cycles back to bank, so bank can decide what is produced by giving loans and for those loans bosses hire you to destroy yourself and you nod your head

You will use money as long as banks exist. The only thing banks and their bosses want is to control the workflow. Those little cab drivers don't matter when bigger things overrun them, which will still use money. You will probably use money even when nobody will need to work and robots do all the work, you will still take money and pay, robots will pay robots, just in case banks need to shift the workflow by converting stuff to money. Money is your dog collar, stuff being valued in money is your bank boss' control over your lives

You work for boss, who got money from bank to produce niglets. That's why boss got money, they need you to destroy yourself
Alternative to this would be collective asking people what they need and we would simply work to produce it. Of course you have a delusion that you have a choice, when you see different labels, actually all those choices aren't really choice, all produced by banks giving bosses money and instructing that. You picking between 2 or 5 Zion sponsored candidates isn't a choice. A choice is an order what is created. Choices are made by banks and bosses, you just work in your little bubble they created, pick choices in that bubble and bend over to niggers and Jews.

That kid took something he was good at, that people wanted to see, and got paid for it.

Sounds good to me

For all of you free-market oriented people on the verge of near civil anarchy out there, are you just okay with the fact that corporations would use complete freedom to manipulate the market itself, for instance a water company not selling water to businesses nearby so they can't create a competing water service or even set up camp to start?

Are you okay with the fact that television companies may have the power to select the commercials of certain companies to not be played on the air, to avoid helping out the competition, some of which may be competing television companies, if the free market is fully allowed?

Are you okay with the fact that the free market would imply pharmaceutical companies are allowed to make market decisions to reduce the supply of a certain type of medication to increase how much money people are willing to pay, instead of mass producing it to the point where everyone can be cured? Why aren't they producing more? It's simple chemicals. The free market lets them charge us tons for medical care when the knowledge of their medicine should be public domain, and you will say "but then there would be no demand for working in medical research since it doesn't pay shit" and to that one can easily respond "which is why the government uses tax dollars to fund the pharmaceutical sector while maintaining even stricter ethical standards from them" and everything is fixed, but that's not the free market, yet it would clearly be better?

In conclusion you free market shills who argue against communism are full of shit. It's obvious that in many sectors with inelastic demand, the market cannot be free and instead must be dominated into production that meets all minimum standards required by humanity

theres a cotton waiting to be picked with your name on it

The US is the worst supreme power the world has ever known. In 50 years of US hegemony, the traditions and cultures across the world which have survived thousands of years have been destroyed

Our culture promotes gluttony, hedonism, excess, greed, the pollution of bloodlines, the destruction of tradition, culture and meaning

Our people are sick of body and mind, our cities are worthless sprawls of one-off housing where people don't even know their neighbors, our society is so fractured and our people so untrusting of one another that we cannot agree to implement basic social safety nets, even where they would benefit everybody in the country and save us billions collectively. Even the food we eat is poisonous, loaded with artificial additives, high fructose corn syrup, and loaded with calories to make you fat, diabetic, lethargic and unhappy

Our government has been co-opted by an oligarchy of Jews and the ultra-rich, and our imperial forays into other parts of the world have left those regions devastated, hating us enough to blow themselves up just to hurt us. The British Empire was shitty in many many ways but at least they built infrastructure, and took responsibility for social order in the areas they colonized. The US literally destroys whatever regime pissed them off, and then declares "democracy" leaving the people of that country to fend for themselves once the US gets bored and pulls it's troops out 2-3 years later

We gained supremacy by default because every other country was wrecked post-war and we had enough of a population mass to boom economically selling our goods to the rest of the world whose manufacturing was destroyed. We never had the social cohesion or willpower to consciously seize supremacy. Just imagine if Hitler had risen with the population, geography and resources of the United States

I can't think of a single reason any country would look at America today and wish to emulate them.

>I do not personally value this thing and the fact that others do and the market directs money toward this thing is evidence that the free market doesnt work

Imagine being so self-absorbed that you actually think that reality should be shaped around your preferences. Jesus wept.

Attached: 1563149387372.gif (320x240, 2.87M)

you are retarded because you don't actually understand why. the whole reason it will always be the most efficient is because efficiency leads to more profit. When a government runs something it's not trying to profit, infact the government is probably trying to save money. But instead of saving money by being more efficient they do it by cutting costs like lowering the number of employees.

It really comes down to the fact that people that run companies in the private sector are geniuses with 20-30 years experience in that very specific industry, versus a career politician that's never really worked a day in their life outside politics.

Think about it this way, imagine the government as a large scale business like Google or Verizon or something. Do you think Google and Verizon still run dos based operating systems on their computers and rely on hard paper fax for most things? No. You know where you'll still find that stuff common place in 2019 tho? Any government office

Yes, "always" makes it far too absolute a statement

Athletes have earned money for thousands of years

I thought the same way when I was in high school. The infantile need for someone to take care of me is eventually presented with the cold reality that there is no government or supreme parent who will right all the wrongs in the world.

all of capitalism is gross mismanagement and misallocation of resources. the 1% disproportionately own 90% of resources, while bottom 90% struggle to get shelter, healthcare, education, and rely on wageslaving and food stamps for food.

during the boom of the ponzi cycle, capitalism is hailed as efficient and managed, the systemic and endemic inefficiency of capitalism is exposed during the bust of the ponzi cycle, when a few businesses become scapegoats for the systemic inefficiencies and failures of capitalism.

the failure of the ponzi cycle is blamed on a few scapegoats and then refueled with stimulus, subsidies, bailouts, expansionary easy money policies (QE, ZIRP) to reflate the ponzi

>capitalism
>efficient
kek

>built to hold 300,000 people
>building has a 50% vacancy rate during business hours
>building has a 100% vacancy rate from 7pm-6am
>the occupied part of the building remains vacant for 70% of the year
>meanwhile trillions of dollars are wasted to heat and maintain this building
>meanwhile millions of people are homeless

pic rel
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/One_World_Trade_Center_cropped2.jpg

>all of capitalism is gross mismanagement and misallocation of resources. the 1% disproportionately own 90% of resources, while bottom 90% struggle to get shelter, healthcare, education, and rely on wageslaving and food stamps for food
So you say without any evidence. Tell me how your ideal system would be better.

America is "trickle-down" welfare, where elite are lavished with the most welfare while the goyim fight for the leftover crumbs

USSR was national socialist, where the wealth of the nation was distributed evenly for all goyim to enjoy

The welfare philosophy that had prevailed in Washington since 1921, that the object of government was to provide prosperity/welfare for those who lived at the top of the economic pyramid, in the belief that prosperity would somehow trickle down to the bottom of the heap and benefit goyim

the rich pissing on the poor

wealth of the super-rich does not trickle down to improve the economy, but it instead tends to be amassed and sheltered in tax havens with a negative effect on the tax bases of the home economy.

Capitalism is welfare for rich Jews. The fact that a relatively small number of goys are able to get rich in the capitalist economy is simply a byproduct. Capitalism is the notion that the bottom half of your race/nation deserves to live insecure shit lives while we send $38,000,000,000 to Israel.

Endless trillions of UBI for already rich:
bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-tax-plan-consequences/

"Trickle-Down Economics" are a load of absolute garbage, and giving overwhelming financial breaks to the most wealthy financiers and "captains of industry" rather than consumers is directly against the interest of the American people. There is always going to be some sort of government involvement, our nation simply favors dirty money over class mobility and free competition (which often requires regulation to attain else it turns into a racket/monopoly which is terrible for everyone)

the thing is it shouldn even be named capitalism
it's more a buffet than anything...
true capitalism as never been tested
maybe before 1900 and central banking but even then
capitalism is like communism just ideas stopped by human nature

>the 1% disproportionately own 90% of resources, while bottom 90% struggle to get shelter, healthcare, education, and rely on wageslaving and food stamps for food.

The bottom 90% should legitimately be killed off. They're a waste of oxygen, food, water, etc.
I do not care about them. Their suffering means nothing to me. They will die and rot away without ever possessing souls.
The top 1% are the same.

I do not care about the rich or the poor. Both classes are TRASH.

Attached: 1563162199382.png (2000x2177, 3.02M)

E-sports are a more organic form of entertainment than the contrived shit the Jews throw out on television or the capeshit in the movie theaters.

so how's the misandry going fren

>capitalism
>efficiency

>brainlet believing the meme

what efficiency? capitalism is the most wasteful, inefficient system ever to exist!

For all its vaunted efficiency, capitalism has foisted wasteful inequality and environmental ruin on us.

What's efficiency got to do with capitalism? The short answer is little or nothing. Economic and social collapses in Detroit, Chicago, NYC, Buffalo, San Fran, Filly, Cleveland and many other US cities did not happen because production was inefficient there. Efficiency problems did not cause the longer-term socioeconomic declines troubling the US and western Europe.

There's nothing efficient about wasting entire cities and turning them to rot. There's nothing efficient about practicing planned obsolescence while suppressing technologies. There's nothing efficient about corporate-created sprawling, suburban cluster fucks. There's nothing efficient about a Throw-Away Society. There's nothing efficient about destroying public transportation systems and forcing the entire nation to waste 5hrs a day communting on a gas guzzler addicted to oil.

What's so productive about the hi-tech ponzi (Grinder, Twatter, Fuckbook etc...)?
What's so efficient about creating hundreds of Geocities clones and reinventing the wheel (Friendster, Myspace, Hi5, Facebook, Vkontakt)?

planned obsolescence as wasteful and an inefficient use of resources
Over half of the goods produced today is either lost, wasted or discarded as a result of inefficiency in the capitalist-managed food chain.

Capitalism is a HUGE misallocation of resources that only creates waste and inefficiency. Instead of curing cancer and colonizing space, why not just create more bogus hi-tech ponzis like Grinder, Twatter, Fuckbook....

crisismagazine.com/2016/crony-capitalism-inefficient-unjust-and-corrupting
tni.org/en/article/waste-and-capitalism
newstatesman.com/society/2008/08/waste-supercapitalism-policy