Socialism: sure, it’s good on paper, but in practice it usually fails due to US invasion or CIA-backed coup...

Socialism: sure, it’s good on paper, but in practice it usually fails due to US invasion or CIA-backed coup. Stupid commies.

Attached: 6360F840-D829-4D47-9B68-FEEDD81B7B48.jpg (1401x1338, 220K)

Socialism fails because most people are
egotistical and only really care about themselves feeling important. The average normie does not really give two shits about humanity and that is why socialism does not work.

See china or russia

socialism fails in the face of capitalism because it can't full utilize the benefits of a credit based monetary system.
capitalism will eventually fail because credit systems are a deal with the devil.

This aint it,chief,commies in ussr ,or rather man-eaters,still got to power,its not outside world that keeps it from happening

End -goal of Marsizm/Socialism/Communism is total happiness,equality,where everyone in the world just does creative things,art,poetry and all this,

This a dream,an illusion,people are not the same,and as long it is that way,there wont be an equlity,and thus they dream of ideal ,utopian world,that aint happening,also i'd bet my fucking kidney that most(95%) "communist/socialist/marxist havent worked a single day in their life

Thats what makes "commies" stupid,

Also,dont waste time on this bullshit,go build a stong family

>China
>when you decide to delay worker democracy for 100 years in favor of centrally-planned capitalism

Attached: B33AA951-A955-4211-B991-AA05A4F2B265.jpg (249x314, 18K)

and we all will be waiting for that day

Deng it

Socialism takes what capitalism creates. Isn't it just so moral to forcely take other peoples money and give it to who you think deserves it? If you're a social democrat who supports a social democracy then you can have a valid debate. But if you're a communist or socialist supporter then you're only arguing with stupidity and theories.

fpbp
socialism fails because it is based in a fallacy
a group of people working to together towards a common goal, and from which they will all benefit equally, WILL NOT PUT THE SAME FUCKING EFFORT, from there on, inequality is bred

we get better as a whole from the inequality and competition
heat and pressure make diamond, fuck socialism

>muh fallacy fallacy
Abrahamic religions have worked, and still work, for near 4000 years and those are based on a fallacy too.

That’s not what socialism is about. Marx believed that each person would be motivated to work for the good of society, because the fact that society would no longer compel them to work would result in work becoming something people do for enjoyment, each person being encouraged to develop their particular talents.

If work wasn’t by-and-large shitty wage slavery spent sucking up to a piss-ass manager, we all might enjoy it more.

you're barking up the wrong food chain moron

>usually fails due to US invasion or CIA-backed coup
Like the USSR? Damn that CIA plant Stalin

>having this much faith in the shit heads and niggers that work those jobs to do it without a manager

Attached: dedinside .jpg (612x920, 48K)

No proof/citations = slide thread.

Sage that shit, gentlemen.

That isn't capitalism it's cronyism.

“crony capitalism” is the ancap’s “no true Scotsman”

is this b8, m8?
if you want to talk about how capitalism always evolves into cronyism, and then feudalism, that's a different issue.
Credit is the mechanism that leads to cronyism.
If you want a credit system that doesn't lead to it, you need to regulate the market.
When you regulate the market, you start to socialize the pros and cons of a credit system.
When you socialize the system, then it's not capitalism anymore, now is it?

CIA WENT ROGUE AND IS A RIGHT WING CARTEL MAFIA

It's not even good on paper, because it involves forcing other people.

>capitalism
>doesn’t force people to work, by societal coercion or other means

>is this b8, m8?
>if you want to talk about how capitalism always evolves into cronyism, and then feudalism, that's a different issue.
So would you say the system is a corporate feudalism?
>Credit is the mechanism that leads to cronyism.
That's why we need the gold backed currency back.
>If you want a credit system that doesn't lead to it, you need to regulate the market.
The free market doesn't mean the government has zero involvement. It has minimum involvement with certain things.
>When you regulate the market, you start to socialize the pros and cons of a credit system.
Maybe so.
>When you socialize the system, then it's not capitalism anymore, now is it?
No which was my original point?

I wonder how many times Fox News has accused Venezuelans of eating their zoo animals. HOW MANY ZOOS DO THEY HAVE?

Attached: ef62d66c52970505f6542d5bd26f04e3.png (200x188, 6K)

What??

Attached: shinelightontruth.jpg (900x1200, 447K)

Attached: DziGVQnXgAI5689.jpg (900x1200, 363K)

The USSR fell.

Are you such a fucking retard that you don't understand the difference between repeating an anecdote versus every mention claiming to be a new occurrence of the event?