The Missing 13th amendment

correct

In the edition of the Laws of the U.S. before referred to, there is an amendment printed as article 13, prohibiting citizens from accepting titles of nobility or honor, or presents, offices, &c.; from foreign nations. But, by a message of the president of the United States of the 4th of February, 1818, in answer to a resolution of the house of representatives, it appears that this amendment had been ratified only by 12 states, and therefore had not been adopted. See Vol. IV of the printed papers of the 1st session of the 15th congress, No. 76." In 1854, a similar note appeared in the Oregon Statutes. Both notes refer to the Laws of the United States, 1st vol. p. 73 (or 74).

Earlier in that book
>There has been some difficulty in ascertaining whether the amendment proposed, which is stated as the thirteenth, has or has not been adopted by a sufficient number of the state legislatures. .... It has been considered best, however, to publish the proposed amendment in its proper place, as if it had been adopted, with this explanation, to prevent misconception.

Several later books left out this notice

It wasn't the 13th amendment. It was a PROPOSED amendment, but it wasn't ratified.

constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-case-of-the-missing-13th-amendment-to-the-constitution

There have been a handful of amendments that weren't ratified:

usconstitution.net/constamfail.html

They certainly aren't going to teach it to our kids in school. As they real in the fringes of the internet any history other than the (((official))) history will be punishable by jail time. I firmly believe this

Attached: calischool.jpg (516x767, 65K)

4th of February, 1818
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Monroe

founders.archives.gov/index.xqy?q=illuminati&s=1211211111&sa=&r=1&sr=

What if someone was granted citizenship to a European country due to their parents being born there and then coming to America before 1965?

you can also find this in older school text books.

Bump for nuclear if true, and I suggest we try to get our hands on old copies to see for ourselves.

Corwin Amendment is still alive and can get approved by the states.

It would make "domestic institutions" not subject to federal law. It would be a great way to eliminate all the federal mandates about abortion-rights, faggot-rights, same-sex-marriage rights, miscegenation rights, etc. States could regulate the domestic affairs of their own citizens and outlaw whatever nonsense they wanted to outlaw. It doesn't mention "slavery" so there is no reason why states have to interpret it that way. It was ratified by a couple of states already back in 1861 - just needs a few more states.

>No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.

This is the most important thread on Jow Forums right now, maybe ever.

Americans and other Westerners were lied to about things like pic related & it'a how the elites stay rich and powerful, and how we stay poor and powerless.

Anyone think they’re also not teaching kids cursive anymore so they can’t read the constitution to know their rights?

This.

Yep. Want more legit info? Look for interviews between Vyzygoth and the Informer. You will be angry after listening to their discussions.

Just wait til you find out about the Bar associations and The City of London and how our court systems really work.

It is part of the plan.

nice find. get this to the top of twitter
#13thAmendment

How many states ratified it?

didn't mean to respond to you, just a general question

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_of_Nobility_Clause

Dumbass

Mostly because of niggers.

How does it work?

You’re barely in the rabbit hole if you never saw this one before.

Do we need this? The Title of Nobility/Emoluments Clause in the constitution says the same thing. Article I, Section 10.

I thought the pic was taken from the constitution when I read it.
“No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

Of the 18 states at the time, 12 are known to have ratified (out of 13 needed) before the War of 1812 threw the US into chaos.

web.archive.org/web/20180331150327/http://www.w3f.com/patriots/13/13th-01.html
Tells the story, and makes the argument that Virginia did indeed become the 13th state to ratify the amendment in 1819.

Most people don’t know this. I believe it is required reading to read the constitution and their amendments. But especially for a redpilled user.

it's not an amendment it's an article and obama broke that clause when he sat as UN Security Council chairman, TWICE, once for the Iran nuclear proliferation talks and the other time to give away ICANN (internet domain registry) to a NGO which adopted EU's hate-speech laws and censored any right-wing and conservative people.

Bump

That's a surely welcome side-effect. But they don't teach cursive because that way kids grow up more dumb and "learning disabilities" prevalence skyrockets.

nepotism on a grand scale, basically.

bump

Cursive should be taught by parents anyway. It's a good thing it's out of the public schools now future niggers will never be able to read and decipher it.

bump

Woke, I remember discussing the Crown Corporation here a couple years ago, the shills were very angry in those threads...

>Future

Attached: image.jpg (225x225, 8K)

Jow Forums doesnt need source's. We are a board of truth and peace.

>providing sources which will just be ignored by shills
Not providing sources is the true redpill, any real user will research something for himself before drawing any conclusions.

No just blindly trust every happening and thing on pol. Life is much more interesting that way.

This archive is an excellent resource for investigating these matters.

patriotgamesblog.wordpress.com/2013/04/03/atg-press-archive-the-informer/

"consent of congress"
obviously dual loyal jews in congress consented to the dual loyalty jews being in congress

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_of_Nobility_Clause
actually it's this
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titles_of_Nobility_Amendment
dumbass