Central banks

There is literally nothing wrong with having a central bank. Prove me wrong.

Attached: maxresdefault5.jpg (1280x720, 77K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=X8vNU_HgnZU
youtube.com/watch?v=ziw8GwipQCE
redicecreations.com/specialreports/taxesandcrown.html
archive.fo/omyOn
thoughtco.com/us-constitution-16th-amendment-4165999
archive.fo/8CDdJ
senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Senate_Passes_the_Federal_Reserve_Act.htm
famguardian.org/subjects/LawAndGovt/LegalEthics/Corruption/USGovtBankrupt.htm
archive.fo/5C7Zh
educationcenter2000.com/HJR_192_73rdCongress.html
archive.fo/XI2LI
youtube.com/watch?v=OFu_ied9fNM
youtube.com/watch?v=o--FmUXHPKE
youtube.com/watch?v=iBGKPGT3Y1k
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_for_International_Settlements
youtube.com/watch?v=gs6shIbQnxg
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

is the hero fun to play?
I kinda want to buy it

With a central bank and you get this

Attached: Untitled-1.jpg (957x1349, 602K)

The Smash neckbeards say he's OP af so I'm assuming yes.

Central banks are a neverending debt slave machine. Hitler had the right idea

I believe banks should be torn down. If you can't have your own money in your own hands. Then you truly deserve to lose it at the banks.

The Federal Reserve is a private entity. This is like having Monsanto in charge of the Department of Agriculture.

Attached: Federal reserve Monopoly money.jpg (480x357, 165K)

No nation should place the printing of their money into the hands of a private banking cartel.

Nice try kike. The crown council of the 13 is a group of powerful families hiding secrets from mankind, while leading us all according to the designs of their secret agendas.

Prove why having an independent central bank is bad.

Because to print money you have to take out a loan from the bank which instantly acquires interest. It places the banking cartel in a position where they profit off things like war because during war the gov takes loans at interest from the banks to pay for it.

A gov could simply control it themselves and not owe any interest on their own money when they want to print more of it without having their economy controlled by a system designed to profit off war and that will work to make sure nations go to war in order to take out loans.

Go here for your shitty thread.

cool, I'll try to catch a few gameplays on twitch before buying it just to be sure

Just lurk some more and read about many topics from history, biology to math, hopefully you are still young enougn to increase your IQ potential if you do so. Maybe after a year or two you will get the unbiased anwer by yourself.

That would lead to major abuse in the wrong hands like in Hungary
So you can't articulate why?

>Hitler had the right idea
what the fuck do you mean ? he signed the central bank agreement
you don't even care you're here to listen to yourself
you will fart in your own mouth the whole fucking thread anyway

Attached: 1492685195302.jpg (2004x2720, 1.5M)

>That would lead to major abuse
ya because it's really not what's already happening RIGHT
>like in Hungary
ho come on you can't even articulate why you think it's good and we're not even talking private fractional banking or the stupid unregulated monster called the (((trade))) market
you're full of shit you know it

I can assure you that if the Treasury or Congress got a hold on a non-independent central bank they would never perform the right monetary policy because of constant bickering and the USD would die overnight.

>I can assure you that if the Treasury or Congress got a hold on a non-independent central bank they would never perform the right monetary policy because of constant bickering and the USD would die overnight.
ho ya you can assure that because your dad work at nintendo ? fuck off retard there's not a single benefit to private central banking and unregulated market but corruption and nepotism just fuck off
if it was all public anyone could investigate what's happening and corruption wouldn be that easy
are you a trust fund kid who try to rationalize his unworthiness ?

I want to audit the Fed but that doesn't mean I want it gone and you haven't said anything of substance as to why it's bad other than "it's bad because I said so."

read the creature from jekyll island and come back

Why can't you all just tell me why it's bad? You're all just saying it's bad because someone else said it was bad.

>You're all just saying it's bad because someone else said it was bad.
thats exactly what you do tho
you dismiss everything just saying it's good without providing any argument as to why you think so
it's pretty obvious to anyone in the rat race why it's bad just look at any inflation chart

I did say: A central bank controlled by Congress as shown in Hungary, Zimbabwe, and Argentina led to massive hyperinflation and I know for a fact considering how deadlocked my policymakers are they would let the USD die than help it

...

a national central bank is called a treasury and it lends money with 0% interest to states.
a private central bank is what the federal reserve is and it needs birth certificates before it can lend money to the government with interest.
retard

Attached: BankenClan.png (1680x2975, 770K)

Attached: Timeline.png (1920x2099, 3.82M)

Attached: Roth.png (1864x3744, 2.62M)

i mean nationalizing central bank is not corruption proof, the population still have to act like a check and balance
all your example are just bad they just show corruption and not a failed attempt at nationalized central banking
the stability in our economy is fake anyway it's always the working class who pay the bill and fake money being created that's a direct result of private banking and wouldn happen in a nationalized system unless corruption but it would be much more easier to investigate than it is today, they can basically do anything they want and they're doing it

Attached: Birth Certificate Slavery 1.png (1649x4070, 365K)

if any of that was true, the whole system would be unenforceable because it's all set up and maintained by contract fraud.

no. noone cares about them is what the deal is. and to even keep them running they pervert all of natures laws. which makes humans go extinct. You can't pervert part of it then claim we still have to go along with everything.

>the whole system would be unenforceable because it's all set up and maintained by contract fraud.
but they're pretty much doing it tho

that means they are all going to jail.

You are retarded. We enforce this system by making people feel bad for not being a wagie or working for cash. We enslave ourselve because ((they)) created a system that exploits our physiological.

no they're not those peoples are way over any kind of justice
did you ever seen one of this ultra riches in court ?
never will you

>no they're not those peoples are way over any kind of justice

I'm sort of talking about the military kind of justice.

they are. every birth equals more money being printed, and everyone knows it. thats what corrupts nature, thats what is corruting natures, order. thats why they want more (((refugees))) and claim they help the economy.
youtube.com/watch?v=X8vNU_HgnZU

>I'm sort of talking about the military kind of justice.
You mean the one they own ? The military industrial complex is corrupted to the bones like the politicians don't kid yourself no one gonna save you.

>There is literally nothing wrong with having a central bank. Prove me wrong.
Faggot

Centralized power means total control over it, which means jews owns you.

Retard.

So, let me get this straight...

You are saying that the IMF holds ownership papers on every single American...

As in, All Americans are certified SLAVES, owned by a very invade-able and extremely bomb-able group of people in a few small buildings?

As in, a few really wealthy people are secretly claiming to own every single citizen of the largest military power in the world?

Agreed

Because they can trigger total economic collapse at their whim.

>You mean the one they own ?

they don't own it... We do.

What are they going to do, confiscate our military?

>i r slave?
ill show you in someone elses words
youtube.com/watch?v=ziw8GwipQCE

>What are they going to do, confiscate our military?
ya like the population own the government
it's been a long time since they didn been remembered

Sadly it's all true, yes everything is a fraud and it's because no one fought back.
>in 1783 the American colonies were incorporated when king george of france signed the Crown Temple States incorporation contract and they became property of the bong freemason faggots.
redicecreations.com/specialreports/taxesandcrown.html
archive.fo/omyOn
>In 1909 - 1913 the 16 amendment (income tax) was never ratified by government, only approved by the supreme court which has no power to ratify anything.
thoughtco.com/us-constitution-16th-amendment-4165999
archive.fo/8CDdJ
>The Federal Reserve Act was signed in 1913 even though it was unconstitutional since it privatized the printing of money.
senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Senate_Passes_the_Federal_Reserve_Act.htm
>In 1933 the government was bankrupted by the Federal Reserve investors and Roosevelt signed the Emergency Banking Act which dissolved government.
famguardian.org/subjects/LawAndGovt/LegalEthics/Corruption/USGovtBankrupt.htm
archive.fo/5C7Zh
>House Joint Resolution 192 of the 73rd congress voted to end the gold standard.
educationcenter2000.com/HJR_192_73rdCongress.html
archive.fo/XI2LI
Every agency that exists today is there to protect this fraudulent system from the people, not the other way around.
Now you might understand why Henry Ford said what he did, img related, and because you're in disbelief is proof that the system made sure you stayed ignorant of it all.

Attached: Henry Ford - banking.jpg (400x495, 31K)

and who are they going to send to reposess our military, exactly?

Attached: id like to see you try.gif (245x250, 595K)

yea uh want paid military boy? do you think the military has any obligation to the united states of america?

>implying Monsanto isn't in control of the department of agriculture

How many hours do you think the crayon eaters will work without getting paid?
Imagine all the enraged dependapotamuses.

Yes, that was completely unintentional! :^)

>there's nothing wrong, goyim. Prove me wrong.

Attached: 1539017778159.gif (345x258, 2.52M)

In FFA mode or casuals. In 1v1s his attacks slow and can be shut down by any competent player. Yes there are webms are him getting his buffs off then getting two crits and killing someone at 0%, but for every one time that happens, there are a hundred times he's gimped and eventually killed by someone who rushes him down. Overall though he is fun.

>our military
hey blind and oblivious faggot
the money, government and military aren't yours

Fractional reserve lending means that loans create new money in the system. This means a period of credit expansion, a boom, which is followed by a bust when the loans need to be repaid, ie when the debt load is too high and banks become insolvent. Central banking protects banks so that they can never become insolvent. They attempt to create an endless credit expansion. The low interest rates lead to malinvestment. It leads to a wastage of capital, which reduces living standards across the board. People who have access to new money have an advantage, but we are now so deep in this credit expansion that new money is a very small fraction of what it was worth decades ago when the expansion started. This all exacerbates inequality. What it comes down to is Central banking protects the wealth of the already wealthy by propping up asset prices. At the same time making assets unaffordable for the majority people.

>yea uh want paid military boy?

Paid in a worthless fiat currency of another nation?

Or paid in a US backed currency that they can buy land, pay bills with, buy food with, etc...

It doesn't matter what some monetary institution says is valuable or not... We grow our own food, and our money will buy it.

We don't NEED other nations, their trade, or their worthless paper.

Monetary policy is nonsense. It's like children trying to repair and maintain a supercomputer. Any decision they make will be arbitrary, and it is guaranteed that they will screw something up every time they touch anything.

The best system is decentralized, competing private banks operating under 100% reserves, issuing notes backed by precious metals and always redeemable in specie. This kills the single greatest weapon of the Jew.

You mean like when Lincoln made the Greenbacks? Or Hitler made his own currency? Or like Irans economy that has survived the most severe sanctions in history?

The bottom line is its being abused far more by banks. The government would provide more transparency via FOIA and control via elections/lobbying pressure to control monetary policy.

>We don't NEED other nations, their trade
Do you have any idea how much modern prosperity is due to global trade? If you want total autarky, you get North Korea. Trade means both parties are better off after the exchange than before. This is why it's been done since man lived in caves.

central banks that arent fronts for criminal conspiracies to control a nation's wealth are fine, but one like that has literally never existed.

>military
go look up and see who the military owes its allegiance to. you won't find america in there. the only lawful defense we got is the militia and the president calling on them to come defend the country. which worked in 1776 and i dont see why it wouldnt work now.
(((military-industrial-complex)))
youtube.com/watch?v=OFu_ied9fNM

Kek he’s actually fat fucking trash but so fun to just mess around with friends while spamming down b

>Do you have any idea how much modern prosperity is due to global trade?

pretty much the entirety of the worlds prosperity is due to global trade.

Except for Americas. We are barely integrated into the global economy and global trade, everyone else NEEDS it to survive.

Watch this video:

youtube.com/watch?v=o--FmUXHPKE

This, Threads over.

Attached: this2.gif (319x144, 950K)

>You mean like when Lincoln made the Greenbacks? Or Hitler made his own currency? Or like Irans economy that has survived the most severe sanctions in history?
These are examples of government unity. To create unity in this country's government is impossible.

Why not allow the executive to elect heads of the national bank and have congress ratify them, like they do with the SC?

>$3 trillion imports, $2.5 trillion exports, ~$20 trillion GDP
>We are barely integrated into the global economy and global trade
I wouldn't call that "barely integrated". Cutting off trade wouldn't tank the economy immediately, but it would certainly suffer. Especially when it comes to the infinite number of cheap manufactured goods coming from China.

its the same reason why stealing and slavery are wrong.
Central banks provide no value added service but derive value out of the market. When new money is created it is created from debt. Every dollar has a twin anti-dollar at the federal reserve, but we also owe interest. For the most part all we pay is the interest (like paying the minimum balance on your credit card). That money doesn't get annihilated with the anti-dollar. It gets payed as dividends to the private owners of the federal reserve. Money that's their to spend and use.

It's an institution which has been tacitly endowed with the authority to just make money from nothing and they are then payed for doing it. The money they have didnt come from investing into a wealth creating endeavor. There's no substance behind it, but all the stuff they buy does. They extract real value from the market without putting any in. It comes from somewhere, and that somewhere is your bank account whenever the value of the dollar goes down.

So far you're only retort is that "well the government would abuse it" without any proof or historical examples of this and the few sources out there in recent history show the opposite. The bottom line is that the levels of abuse already are astronomical and nothing the gov could do could top what the fed is doing by fueling 70 years of wars for profit at an incalculable price both financially and in human suffering. 7 trillion alone in the middle east in the last 20 years.

The first step in ending the profit motivation for war is taking the control away from banks who make a payday every time military expenses increase.

>The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that interest payments will continue to grow rapidly, rising from $389 billion in fiscal year 2019 (the current fiscal year) to $914 billion in 2028. Overall, net interest costs will total nearly $7 trillion over the next decade

this is JUST interest on loans the US gov had to take from the private banking industry just to print its own currency. The US economy is being bled dry via interest paid to private banking that profit off the absolute worst elements of human nature.

>Why not allow the executive to elect heads of the national bank and have congress ratify them, like they do with the SC?
That's already the process.

>no standard except based on a concept
trust. without a standard that is something physical, it can and 100% guaranttee it will be sold out to the highest buyer. whoever will pay them off. same as they do now. only legit currency is one with a standard that is some object.

which also bring up the topic of physics and how they are lying to teh whole world about it to everyone.
tldr flat earth
youtube.com/watch?v=iBGKPGT3Y1k

>So far you're only retort is that "well the government would abuse it" without any proof or historical examples
I have provided examples: Hungary, Zimbabwe, and Argentina.

other words
counterfiet money
organized crime.

Attached: counterfiet_dollar.jpg (738x1024, 160K)

Those currencies were fiat and their governments used inflation to pay off their debts because the interest payments were becoming ruinous.
A national bank for the U.S. that is non-private would need to create a currency backed by something, whether it be gold, silver, or oil.
It would also require a much more conservative approach to spending, instead of constantly running deficits year after year.

how this works is it legitizes everything, and runs teh crooks and schemers and mob crime bosses out of business attempting to shut it down.

>Do you have any idea how much modern prosperity is due to global trade
what a good fucking joke to say
global trading brought us some big success like the China slave nation who pump up waste and cheap always broken crap wow how great it is
it brought us the pajeet IT able to do everything and nothing at the same time !
wow
it destroyed the farming business and turned it into a corporate monster
why don't you love globohomo user ?

>global trade
slaves?

Attached: slavesforsale.png (584x347, 314K)

Hungary and Argentina have a central bank part of the BIS network and Zimbabwe is African and cannot be compared to western civilization.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_for_International_Settlements

It doesn't even have to be something like metal.
You could make a currency based on distilled water if you wanted.

>I wouldn't call that "barely integrated"

the USA is the least integrated economy into the global market of any other country on the planet.

If we stopped trading with the rest of the world, we would barely even feel it.

Most of our trade is with mexico and canada, and we are now producing more oil than we can use, and are net exporters of light sweet crude.

You'll notice that our imports and exports are close to parity, in dollar amounts, meaning that if we cut off trade completely, it wont effect our "foreign account deficit", and local markets can absorb ALL of that extra trade.

Backing away from global trade would actually be GOOD for our economy, and national security, due to the outsourcing of labor and manufacturing to countries with what basically amounts to slave labor.

That money will stay here, and make americans wealthier (well, keep americans at least as wealthy as they currently are), as opposed to these other nations sucking the lifeblood out of our economy.

What's stoping Trump from sending in the Marine's and arresting the entire Federal Reserve board tomorrow? It's within his Constitutional authority to do so if they threaten the economy.

Attached: 1563966791464.jpg (1242x1244, 141K)

why would the size of the military matter? We've had presidents resist central banks before. Andrew jackson had an(two?) assassination attempt, and JFK was actually assassinated. The military isnt being sent to bomb US soil because it's not an available option, and those with this capability are, almost exclusively, not inclined to do it anyways.

gee kike seems like u put a lot of THOT into it
>not inclined
jfk assassination (conspiracy the governemnt will call you if you question it). false flag

>Yo cuz, we heard you were going to audit us, so we changed the interest rate and destroyed the entire global economy in under 5 minutes :DDD

>The military isnt being sent to bomb US soil

The FRB isn't on US soil... it's on it's own soil, remember?

the real sinister point of all of this is that they don't have to threaten the government with bankruptcy or repossession. The whole government is comprised of their sycophantic devotees. Who are there expressly to get a chance to join their club.

the United States is the least integrated country to the global economy in the world.

If the global economy tanked, we'd be fine.

>Who are there expressly to get a chance to join their club.

and they are trying to assasinate epstein.