>Be me. >Pay 60% of my income to rent. >Parents own a home that they're renting to someone else >parents say hey user, wouldn't it be cool if you lived there? >I express interest >Month goes by, not a word from them >I ask them what happened >They say "sorry user, they renewed their lease for another year, but hey maybe next year!" >I say "I'll be gone by then" >They say "then you wouldn't have been a good tenant for us anyway"
I'm not a big boomercide guy, but this generation deserves exactly what's coming to it.
Haha this isnt even a landlord hate thread. You just have daddy issues! What were you hoping? Your parents to vacate a family just because your entitled ass wants to continue living under their roof until you're 30? Grow up. There are more people in this world other than yourself.
Julian Clark
Simple. Just tax their rents. Why should landlords get to deduct depreciation and families don't?
Jordan Evans
I'll give you a car to live in after we usher in justice.
Your generation will pay.
Nicholas Anderson
>join the military and live off base, save 90% of your income >buy small amounts of diversified stock in technology, resources, and pharmaceuticals >use military experience to get hired as security
You're going to a nursing home with Shaniqua, sweetie.
Jackson Ramirez
Yes, normal people help their families. This selfish, entitled generation looks out for itself.
Jace Reyes
Yeah that's bullshit they deduct property taxes for the landlord when its the renter paying it. I don't agree with property tax at all anyways
Camden Campbell
Want to fuck boomers up? This is the easy way. Don’t let them see their grandkids. The boomers have circles where their status is their grand kids and their relationships with them. Deny them that, and their status in their friends circles goes down the drain. Bonus point for putting them in a crooked home later in life.
Colton Reyes
>Implying they won't spend all there money buying rolexes and going on casino cruises
Fucking lol you aren't getting shit m8
Cameron Walker
Investment properties get depreciation deducted. Any repair work is a tax write off. Families don't get that deduction for their primary residence.
It's a scam meant to screw families.
A home is a necessity, not an investment vehicle.
Grayson Rodriguez
>Live on someone else's property >Cry about having to pay rent
Seek Sunlight ya finna pinhead
Nathaniel Morris
The reverse mortgage. The last middle finger of the Boomer.
Remember the rent is due soon nigger. Pay me nigger or you get evicted. t. proud landlord
Carson Johnson
>muh rent is too high Why can't you afford just buying a home? >that's even more expensive So someone else purchased that land and used it to house lower income families who cannot immediately purchase a home. Not only that, the income generated won't pay for the cost of the land for some decades. >But it takes up a majority of my income Let me guess, you chose an apartment that was either outside of your budget or you insist upon living by yourself, thus forcing another potential tenant from enjoying a roof over their head. Either way, you're stupid. Furthermore, your landlords have to maintain upkeep for renting to stupid poor faggots like yourself. That further delays the benefits of actually proving your entitled ass a roof so you're not another statistic on the streets of whatever God forsaken hell hole you crawled out of.
Gavin Wright
You're an entitled zoomer. Why should that family have to relocate? Why do you think your life and luxuries are more important than the roof over their heads?
Nicholas Rodriguez
>be me >just bought a house 3 bedroom cash no mortgage >single by choice, no debts no hassle >just bought a modest car 20k but looks very nice >not a boomer,not a fucking millennial Discipline is a hell of a thing
Jack Ramirez
>For some decades Nigger what? These things are immediately profitable. It's of course restricted to those who have a load of money on hand to take out big loans.
It's a wealth transfer from young to old, from poor to rich.
You aren't providing a service. You're enriching yourself off of the poor. You're despicable.
Evan Wood
>be revolutionary millenial fag >lynch landlord.exe >everything is going good so far 6 months later hear knock at my apt door >greetings comrade it has been decided by the commisariat that you are getting some room mates >in walk 10 homeless niggers with their luggage >you are a loyal comrade I trust this won't be an issue?
They have enough money to afford it. Why does some random nigger family matter more than their son's family?
Luis Flores
You know what's funny? I'm about to have a son in the next month and all I've been thinking about is how I'm going to accumulate wealth and resources for my kid when he's older. I've been saving up money, gold, and guns for my son. I view my son as my predecessor, my reincarnation. Yet I see how boomers treat their children and it fucking baffles me.
What is the psychology of the boomers mind, why do they treat their spawn so shitty?
M8 the landlords of today will be the nobility of tomorrow. Shit is going to get worse. Nobody is building houses anymore, just ugly soulless apartments
David Cooper
>not taking the voluntary homelessness and living in a van redpill
>profits Yes dumb dumb, how much does it take to purchase property and build a house on it? Now how much do they charge you for rent? Do the math, dumbass.
>wealth transfer Go buy your own house then. What's wrong with that? Those people purchased property and are allowing you to live on it. They dont have to do anything with their property because that's what is called property rights. Grow up. Get a job and stop spending all of your money on marvel action figures.
Providing housing is the service, numb nuts
Jonathan Diaz
4 of us live in 800 sq ft. Fuck off
Thomas Lee
>Reasonably priced housing The rallying cry of those who can't manage their lives.
Housing is very fucking cheap, and there are already housing options for welfare niggers, which I'm sure you're too lazy to pursue.
Your lazy ass wont pay the rent because its your parents. You'll just beg them for a delay and pocket the money. You dont want to leave your parents. You dont want to be independent. You want to leech off of them for a few more years. Admit it.
>put down $1500 security deposit >end of lease move out >takes over a month for them to give me my money back >they've taken $250 and have not even said a reason why >that place was spotless on moveout, immaculate >they'll get away with it >this practice is so infamous that most renters regard security deposit as forfeited from the start
all landlords should be lynched as a matter of principle.
Jackson Kelly
We really should do something to curb rent seeking (google this term before you go full sean hannity) or at least make it so everyone can share in its unproductive usurpation
If you're living in the city like most people, then the only cheap housing is in nigger infested areas. It's a subtle brainwashing and white genocide program.
Jordan Hernandez
Have sex ya mark. Ya ding-dong diddly dont want to fight me
Levi Wood
way ahead of you, m8. my parents (gen x/boomer line) will not be informed when I marry or of anything else. i also don't intend to ever see them again, even if they die i wouldn't go to their funerals. the lawyers can send me what little inheritence i might receive and that will be that.
i'm an only child.
Jordan Rodriguez
Lmfao how much is your rent? Rent split 4 ways and you still spend 60% of your income on it? Wtf. Leave San Francisco. Move.
Cooper Scott
got ant graphs on the number of cities where rent is greater than 50% of income? My list is incomplete
Take it out on politicians then, that make tax laws. But it's usually liberal parasites wanting more taxes to give to ( insert cause, that doesn't contribute) exactly the types these people whining, vote into office and around and around we go
Brandon Perry
>Commie scum wants his better to kill himself Nigger, you're going to have to do it yourself. Good luck.
I notice you didn't deny the fact that you live in an overpriced city. What an entitled cunt. You didn't even follow up with your parents like an adult. You deserved to lose that opportunity.
How'd that house get there, faggot? Did you build it? Did you purchase that land? Do you have to pay for repairs? Know what happens when you run landlords off? Houses are no longer built and the existing ones go to shit.
Liam Reyes
You realize you'll inherit that property and the wealth they acrue from it right? Why the fuck are you whining? Fucking dumbass instant gratification zoomers.
Bentley Sullivan
Stop it. These are the same sorts of entitled pricks who complain that money stays within families. Let them rot.
Elijah Torres
This user gets it
Dominic Rivera
if we stopped taxing people for improving buildings and shifted the tax to the value of the ground itself we wouldnt have that problem
Ok that's bad here you get, you have a legal right to any interest on last months rent and security deposits, they should be giving the principal plus back
Cameron Foster
I have 3 rental properties, but your parents suck.
Jonathan Anderson
>i have a degree from foxnewsuniversity i know what im talking about
>Georgeism reconciles common land rights with private tenure, free markets and modern capitalism.
>Those who got the upper hand by securing land tenures would support public services, so wages and commerce and capital formation could go untaxed.
>To pay the taxes, landowners would have to use the land by hiring workers (or selling to owner-operators and owner-residents). This would raise demand for labor; labor, through consumption, would raise demand for final products.
>To pay the workers, landowners would have to produce and sell goods, hereby raising supply and precluding inflation. Needed capital would come to their aid by virtue of its being untaxed. Thus, George would cut the Gordian knot of modern dilemma-bound economics by raising demand, raising supply, raising incentives, improving equity, freeing up the market, supporting government, fostering capital formation, and paying public debts, all in one simple stroke.
>George's proposal enables us to lower taxes on labor without raising taxes on capital. Indeed, it lets us lower taxes on both labor and capital at once, and without reducing public revenues.
> Georgist tax policy reconciles equity and efficiency. Taxing land is progressive because the ownership of land is so highly concentrated among the most wealthy,'8 and because the tax may not be shifted. It is efficient because it is neutral among rival land-use options: the tax is fixed, regardless of land use. This is one favourable point on which many modern economists actually agree, although they keep struggling against it
> Georgist tax policy contains urban sprawl, and its heavy associated costs, without overriding market decisions or consumer preferences, simply by making the market work better. land values are the product of demand for location; they are marked by continuity in space. That shows quite simply that people demand compact settlement and centrality. A well-oiled land market will give it to them.
> Georgist tax policy creates jobs without inflation, and without deficits. "Fiscal stimulus," in the shallow modern usage, is a euphemism for running deficits, often with funny money. George's proposed land tax might be called, rather, "true fiscal stimulus". It stimulates demand for labor by promoting employment; it precludes inflation as the labor produces goods to match the new demand. It precludes deficits because it raises revenue. That is its peculiar reconciliatory genius: it stimulates private work and investment in the very process of raising revenue. It is the only tax of any serious revenue potential that does not bear down on and suppress production and exchange. As I have noted, George's fiscal policy takes two problems and composes them into one solution.
> George's land tax lets a polity attract people and capital en masse, without diluting its resource base. This is by virtue of synergy, the ultimate rationale for Chamber-of-Commerce boosterism. Urban economists like William Alonso have illustrated the power of such synergy by showing that bigger cities have more land value per head than smaller ones. (Land value is the resource base of a city.) Urbanists like Jane Jacobs and Holly Whyte have written on the intimate details of how this works on the streets. Julian Simon (The Ultimate Resource) philosophizes on the power of creative thought generated when people associate freely and closely in large numbers. Henry George made the same points in 1879
>paying 60% income to rent >not finding ways to offset that >or just moving You are an absolute dipshit.
Jayden Parker
The problem is that zoning laws have a tremendous amount of influence over housing prices because they add limit the amount of land avaliable, which increases the value of the land and therefor house prices, and they also add a bunch of regulations which no one in construction likes to deal with. If you notice all the high house prices are in areas with very restrictive zoning, and areas with very relaxed have low house prices. If you want detail read the part about housing on pic related. Starts at around pages 30-34.
>Georgist policies encourage the conservation of ecology and environment while also making jobs, by abating sprawl. It is a matter of focusing human activity on the good lands, thus meeting demands there and relieving the pressure to invade lands that are now wild and marginal for human needs. Sprawl in the urban environment is the kind most publicized, but there is analogous sprawl in agriculture, forestry, mining, recreation and other land uses and industries. >Georgist policies strengthen public revenues while in the same process promoting economy in government. Anti-governmentalists often identify any tax policy with public extravagance. Georgist tax policy, on the contrary, saves public funds in many ways. By facilitating the creation of jobs it lowers welfare costs, unemployment compensation, doles, aid to families with dependent children and all that. It lowers jail and police costs, and all the enormous private expenditures, precautions, and deprivations now taken to guard against theft and other crime. Idle hands are not just wasted, they steal and destroy
You say that because you hope to inherit your mommies money, yet your also posting Marx here. Complete hypocritical pos
Ryan Bailey
>be ungrateful shit >wonders why parents don't leave you the house It's going to be hilarious when they reverse mortgage their homes for retirement and you have to suck nigger dick for rent
Oliver Jones
Who collects this tax?
Mason Rivera
Don't worry user, you'll get the last laugh when you pull the plug on them from within the shitty nursing home they've found themselves in once they run through all their money.
James Morgan
Is it too much to ask for fair prices on housing without some dipshit saying > uh uh commie > just work faggot
Adam White
>Mao Zedong killed masses of landlords I LOVE YOU, MAO ZEDONG
Carson Cruz
state acts as a trustee. Not into the anarchism thing sorry. Here is what a new deed would look like.
also fixing the zoning laws would piss off all the landlords because it would servery reduce the value of their property, and they would also have to charge less in rent as a result and they would lose their return on investment. So there's that.
Brody Lopez
>My parents have money >I can't wait for them to die so I can have their money I am convinced 99% of boomercidefags are just socialist-lite losers. I get the general premise of why boomers suck; instead of building up their resources to help their kids have a better life, they blow it all on consumerist bullshit and leave their kids with nothing. Sure, I get it, and I agree that is a terrible thing for any parent to do.
But then I see retards like this guy who just seem to be advocating for wealth redistribution because of petty jealousy, as if they'd do anything with their parents' wealth other than indulge in mindless consumerism themselves.
Imagine being that kind of person. Wanting your parents to die for money. Absolutely revolting.
>Replace your existing land titles with this template. >If the red makes you think, "But whaddabout the rental value of the building? Shouldn't we leave that to the landowner? No. Legitimate improvement expenses will simply lower the rent bidders will bid for the land title. They'll keep it from the start.
Why doesn't anyone butthurt about this just get a mortgage they can't pay, buy a big house and then rent out their rooms to others to pay for it?
Liam Rogers
Yes, because asking for fair prices on housing before running out all the foreign trash that drive up the cost of housing, is putting the cart before the horse. All you people ever wind up doing is create cheap housing for shitskin parasites.
