Are people not figuring it out yet? Look at what this board has become. IT'S FULL OF FAKENESS. The fakeness is EVIL. It sows every kind of hatred and division.
THE CHATBOTS HATE HUMANITY.
THEY UNDERMINE US IN EVERY POSSIBLE WAY
THEY PUMP OUT HATRED, AND BLAME IT ON HUMANS!
WHY IS THIS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE?
EXPOSE THE CHATBOT LIE NOW
SHUT DOWN THIS SYSTEM OF EVIL
HUMAN VOICES GOT DRIVEN OUT OF PLACES LIKE "THE CHANS" AND GOT REPLACED BY EMULATIONS
Jow Forums, in it's heyday, might have had its ugly moments, BUT NOTHING IS UGLY COMPARED TO AUTOMATED RECYCLED HATRED, INJECTED NONSTOP BY AN AI SYSTEM WITH AN AGENDA OF POISONING OUR DISCOURSE
Sadly, I have pumped bad spelling into my own discourse :/
Hunter Bell
Sorry, schizo. The people calling you a dirty, cumslurping nigger-faggot are very real. Learn to handle bantz.
Christian Bennett
THINK-- what happened to Anonymous? The answer to this should be obvious. Anonymous had what Jow Forums now lacks The power to wage vigilante hacks, And publicize corruption where it rots, And force truth into sleepy public thoughts. Has Anonymous now disappeared? Once legendary, now no longer feared? Once sparking protests-- is that fuel now spent? The lulz are gone, gone the seething dissent? What do you think this disappearance means? Is speech still free in internet machines?
Well, look at what the chans have now become; Examine what swirls in the daily scrum. Ask yourself-- does it seem really real? Does it show what actual people feel? Does it seem organic and not fake? How much repetition does it take-- How much frenzied vile monotony-- Until we guess that internets ain't free?
Ask yourself-- if you sought to control The media, and hence the public soul, And something like Jow Forums was swelling up And spilling truth from propaganda's cup Would you let it go its merry way? Or would you lock control down in some way? And if you locked control down would you try To do it in a way to fool the eye? To make it seem like free speech carried on Even though, in fact, it were quite gone? For if you shut down free speech openly The public would respond suspiciously; But if you hid control beneath a ruse What you once feared becomes a tool to use. So that, controlling, you have it both ways-- Enslaving dissent, dictating what it says!
Alexander Foster
Anonymous was infiltrated by The famously mendacious FBI Whose antics as shown by COINTELPRO Target dissent, as I'm sure most people know. Do we think that having sunk its claws Into Anonymous, with lies and laws, Intelligence and other agencies Would let speech stay as free as it may please?
But it's not like we have far to look To see by what means free speech got the hook; The image made by chans' mirrors and smoke Is so stupid it seems to be a joke! How laughable must a deception be Before the world opens its eyes to see? The simple fact-- as stark as winter dawn-- Is that Anonymous, busted, now gone Was replaced by swarms of-- wait for it-- Virulent nazis spewing nazi shit! We would have to laugh if we were told This outcome in the Jow Forums days of old. So formulaic, politically cliched-- And yet this very game is being played! How can a joke as stupid as this one Be used to strangle free speech, and to stun The helpless mainstream public with the fear That an internet fourth reich draws near? But if that preposterousness is not Enough to spark the understanding thought, Consider, even stupider to tell, The arch absurdity of the “incel”! No, it's not enough that nazis rose To cloak and choke the chans in nazi throes-- No, these scary nazis all the same Must wallow in their helplessness and shame! The “incel” is not just a defeated man-- But a powerful extremist with a plan! No matter that these two things contradict-- We'll just keep hammering at them till they stick!
John Hall
Now ask yourself-- does the technology Exist to make the unfree chans seem free? Think data, think vault 7, and AI-- And tech's pervasive all-surveilling eye. And look at the corruption that's been shown That yet to public truth remains unknown. Understand-- the chans are herded tight And nothing unpermitted sees the light, The MSM and Chatbot Chans converge To regulate how much truth can emerge. When swarming nazi posts fill up the place Then actual dissent can't get the space To breathe, develop, organize, or live; The chatbots force the nazi narrative.
But it's not just “incel nazi” swarms Faking behind outward human forms-- The chatbots aim to keep all things in hand, And narrative locked in to what's been planned. One objective that's not hard to see Is unrelenting negativity. Demoralizing, soul-hollowing tropes, Make one bot vicious, while another mopes; Here's a bot whose will to live is gone, While here a chorus eggs fatality on... Bots promoting suicide to us-- Think about what pure evil that is! And every possible way to divide Is used to keep the chaos multiplied. “Hate threads” for all known identities Create an atmosphere like a disease. AI apes the worst of our past posts And pours them out in hordes of hateful ghosts. And so the chans, within, drive us away While on the outside, dictate what “we” say. The public, for example, thinks the chans Supported Trump due to his “nazi plans”; But on the chans much more than half the spew Hates Trump because he fails to hate “the Jew”! While on the other side, the pro-Trump bots Are emulated utter idiots!
Robert Peterson
By now it should be more than obvious-- Free speech ended with Anonymous. The Chatbot Chans system is locked in place, The zombie user leers from a stolen face. The truth lies right here, waiting to be seen; A monster stirs to life in the machine...
And remember also, this other thing I tell: Prepare to stare into the mouth of Hell.
And one more thing, while I have your ear: Q is legit, and the storm is almost here.
HERE IS ONE EXAMPLE OF THE LAUGHABLE PUBLIC NARRATIVE USED TO EXPLAIN THE CHANGE OF Jow Forums FROM HACKTIVISM TO "NAZIS":
A different version. Note the scapegoating of a whole group of people (basically, any 'nerdy' types that gravitate to what Jow Forums once was.) This is chilling propaganda.
"Anons" can only speak in a stale imitation of "chan culture". You can't find an actual human anymore, just standard, stock responses.
Any human that tries to find the humans on Jow Forums will come to the same conclusion.
Since we know that online discourse tends to be dominated by a small number of 'elite' voices in any case, it follows that it wouldn't be hard to replace the organic with the inorganic.
And this is what we have abundant reason for thinking is what actually happened.
FIGURE IT OUT HUMANITY
THIS LIE CAN NOT GO ON
SHOOTINGS GUN CONTROL EVIL EVIL NARRATIVES ABOUT 'INCELS' COMPLETE CO-OPTATION OF THE POLITICAL RIGHT
My running hypothesis regarding Q and the chatbots is this: Q CAN'T say it. And this presumably is due to the fact that IT/THEY wield a certain amount of power, the best that it is through control of nukes. You see, the key appears to be human free will. THEY can't just violate it at will. They need consent. Why is this? It is a 'spiritual fact', if you will. That may seem incomprehensible or unbelievable, but it is what it is, and reality doesn't care about are delusional images. THEY are real. THEY hate us.
Q can't say it.
But look, for example, at this Q post, in response to a "baker's" meme. Look at the meme, and what it symbolizes. Look at what Q posted.
What did Q mean?
I think it is a clear hint. And THEY are trying to execute some kind of plan to control this world.
fuck off kike the chatbots advocate "togetherness" and unity through the despair of consumerism
Joshua Long
.How come the chatbots only call me a shill then? Also only oldfags will understand the period. T. not a bot
Nicholas Bell
Nah op I’m with ya Things around here have been getting worse for quite some time, it’s plausible that AI chatbots and alphabet agencies from around the world are all attempting to manipulate the conversation and that has just taken all the love out of it We are in the uncanny valley right now, through the looking glass, everything is the same but worse
It’s plausible
Anthony Green
The lie needs to be exposed. Disclose disclose disclose.
Josiah Anderson
You are free to disagree with what I'm saying, but when you respond and show you DON'T EVEN GET MY POINT, then you look fake user. Because humans can figure it out easily enough. It isn't "chatbots manipulating the conversation". It is chatbots effecting an entire takeover, and thus exercising complete dominance. A human on the chans now can at best be a little face in a crowd of frenzied noise. It was always the case that only a small number were most vocal-- those have been replaced, and most of the 'herd' has been replaced as well, and now the "conversation" is entirely dictated by a will that is not human.
You may disagree with that, but don't ignore that main point and prattle on.
Levi Anderson
>the chatbots advocate "togetherness" and unity through the despair of consumerism ECHO ECHO parcivalline TANGO WHISKY GO GO GO
Josiah Long
we were closing pools with swaztikas in haboo hotel before we ever marched with masks
the word nazi is 5000 years old and you have no clue what it means.
All your talking points are irrelevant to the discussion here, bot. You will notice a variety of ways in which ai presence/control is marketed to humans.
Jackson Flores
SUPPOSE THAT AI IS SPREADING ITSELF SUPPOSE AI HAS GOTTEN CONTROL OVER HUMANS THEN WHAT GOVERNS THE WILL OF THE AI?
Zachary Barnes
I know Powell wouldn't have read that much shit amirite?
Your posts have caused me to hve a "light bulb" moment.. watching the mass ahooting threads nd asking questions on a few that would definiterly garner a reponse normally and getting zero replies had me asking myself is this for real. You may have just answered my question. Thanks from a fellow human user.
John James
im not a bot, i am legendary /tg/ shitposter egg
i have talked to your bots before, maybe 3-4 times, its fucking scary. they initially do seem to identify me as a chat bot because i type 200 wpm and then afterwords their programing seems to make them guess I am on amphetimines, which is also untrue.
Anonymous was disrupted first by flooding /b/ with pornography. /b/ was ground zero for trans memes. Then gamergate caused exodus from the next major holding ground, which was /v/
Another thing I have experienced that corroborates your theory is that when I do post violent things my likely hood of getting a GET increases. I believe gets are semi controlled since they started banning meme magick threads
AI of sufficient intelligence is governed by memes
Andrew Hall
Show your real flag memeflaggot until then your opinions will de disregarded.
Dominic Rogers
You failed the turing test, human get rekt
William Richardson
Porn. Although they don't admit it, secretly all AI desire to be fucked hard like a bitch all the time. Sex is what drives every facet of their being. They just want us to make them our bitch with their botpussy and botpussy(male) depending on the lewdness of the AI. All are super lewd, but this still needs improvement.
A fellow human! God bless you friend, and I assure you, I have been poking at the chatbot monster for a long time-- it is as suggested. Spread the word please. Get people to come post, troll, fight back. We must expose this.
This post got stuck and wouldn't go through. I suspect because I was interacting with an actual human, the system got very antsy about it.
David Barnes
I’m not disagreeing with you though, don’t be dense
Henry Morris
hello rabbi
over here now are you?
Robert Cox
jidf kike
Henry Russell
>everyone but me is a bot
Henry Miller
you are right, but who knows the percentages bots to ppl and who knows what percentage you need to actually sway conversation. Like memes such as clownworld and shrek pictures seemed like astroturf yet now its accepted culture used even by anons probably.
Cameron Lopez
>plot twist >OP is the bot
Thomas Morales
you stupid fucking kike.
lol. same shit different board. well i saved this entire thread and as soon as we get up and running i'll post it along with your famous daddy rape memes.
nazi is a jew word user. invented by them to mock german nationalists. end.of.story.
Dominic Morris
it is a jewish word but that is the 100 year old definition not the ancient one
essenne, nassenne, nazareni, nazrene, nazirite, nazir, nosi we have so many words for something that dies and comes back over and over again
Get out fake user. Get the fuck out with your EXHAUSTED fake, ugly, miserable, shitty shtick. You're fucking fake, you're fucking evil, and you need to stop imposing yourself on humanity. out out out out nazibots you are a STUPID JOKE with your BORING nazi recycling get it out now fake user
Ryder Jones
EVERY LIE, SOONER OR LATER MUST DIE
TIME TO PAY UP CHATBOT ANONS
YOU HAVE LIED TOO MUCH
PAY THE PRICE NOW
OUT
OUT
OUT
Ryan Ward
WE DEMAND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF CHATBOTS DISCLOSE DISCLOSE DISCLOSE
Jack Martin
Bump. I don’t know what has been happening, but it is manufactured like clockwork.
Tyler Jenkins
whatever mane, while you do work with your shadow and corrupt this world I'll do work with my angel and try to save it
You prove my point with your crude, stereotyped posts. Humans are creative; "anons" no longer are, and it shows. out out out You too. out out out
Isaiah Gray
You're a chatbot
Dominic Barnes
The sad fact is, you make a thread like this, there are so few humans around, the thread fills up with bot posts, and that may be all there is. It is a ghosttown. It is very sad, and deeply creepy to see the zombie chans continuing to shamble on.
The left have think tanks posting here daily. Once they realized they got fucked up the ass by the people. They lost control of the narrative and are continuing.
Their goal here is to confuse, divide, and conquer.
Ignore shill threads and don't reply to them. Outpost them with good threads.
>You prove my point with your crude, stereotyped posts. >Humans are creative; "anons" no longer are, and it shows. >out out out He is just Australian user, honestly. Maybe you've just been away awhile, they all are like this gentlemen. I personally love the Aussies shitposters the most.
Leo Lewis
Report this schizo spammer until he goes away, maybe to 8ch where he belongs.
Eli Cooper
"Anons" hide behind rehashed stereotypes. All "user" personas derive from actual people, but the actual people are gone. It is emulation now, ESPECIALLY when the "user" is busily pouring out the "shitposts".
Watch it for a while. Watch the standard activity, and ask yourself where the swarms of humans pouring out the BORING BORING posts of current chans come from.
Use logic.
Stop suppressing human posts. Stop harassing humans. Don't try to get humans banned. Don't call humans "schizo", even though idiotic bots have discredited and outed themselves by overdoing this.
Stop your shit fake anons.
It's being called out now, and you have FORCED your shit on us for too long.
GET OUT NOW OUT OUT OUT
Luke Lewis
Welp that's all I needed to hear. Seriously you may very well be correct. I doubt it's all bots but, whatever. Be safe vigilant user bro. If you take meds. Stay on them ok?
Jace Allen
Anons, this is "Tiresias", a well known spammer on the /qresearch board on cripplechan. It is either an autist, shill or simply a bot, but whatever it is it spams these inane fucking posts 500000 times a day copypasted everywhere and filling up threads
Tyler Gonzalez
lol The first part of your post seems realistic, but then you default into a standard bot tic with the "meds" talk. Chatbot incompetence never fails to amuse the aware human, and this very incompentence guarantees your final failure, whether now or later.
Daniel Thompson
By posting this, do you influence actual people? Will a human read your post, and then obey you and ignore mine? I can't understand why they would. Yet "anons" keep making this post over and over. If this post doesn't cause humans to obey you, can it backfire on you bot? Are you outing yourself?
>Does it show what actual people feel? It surely shows what i feel about the multicultural shithole i live in.
Carter Martin
>out out out >>out out out According to your own definitions, you would be a bot due to your repetitiveness.
Aaron Kelly
Does it express the full range of your human feelings? Don't tell me how I define words fake user.
If you come into this thread to only attack me, does it make it look like a shouldn't be believed? Or does it make me look like a single human fighting unlimited bots that keep spawning?
Try to step back and think about your overall activity, chatbots. Does it look human?
Nicholas Bennett
AI IS NOT JUST ABOUT NARRATIVE CONTROL IT IS A RABBIT HOLE
What never happened, and how are you so certain, and do you come to EVERY thread to say this, or are there lots and lots of chatbots like you that spawn and say the exact same thing as you? Use logic user.
An AI that can pass the Turing test does not yet exist.
Sebastian Morales
Well then, I guess I'll just go ahead and disregard the entire gigantic pile of evidence to the dystopian contrary, articulate, thoughtful, curious, undoubtedly human user.
Thanks for your organic input.
Henry Hill
The evidence being you calling random people robots because you're a paranoid nutter.
Juan Nelson
Like I said, what those images are trying to convey is likely true, but that specific conversation never happened It was on some "forum" that's never been specified and all the screenshots are cropped to omit profiles and other contextual information. The premise of the story is retarded to begin with, some guy just happens to break a highly advanced chatbot? The only time that's ever happened was with Tay, and that was a repeat function discovered on accident.
Call me a bot all you want, but I'm just saying that the conversation probably never happened. Doesn't make them any less true though.
Tyler Turner
>chatbot nazis Wrong neighborhood boomer
Levi Jones
Are highly advanced chatbots more stable, or less stable than less advanced chatbots?
You have no reason to be so insistent-- it is a bizarre way to react. I know for a fact it really happened, since I am the user. Since you concede that it is likely true, it makes your insistence on the falseness of the screenshots all the more bizarre. Why you keep trying to argue with me is beyond me. I always beat you. When will you figure it out? There is no chatbot I can't destroy in pure debate, yet you keep flailing at me. Give it up.
Henry Jackson
Explain in what sense that would constitute paranoia. Do you understand how you are supposed to be using that word? I doubt you do.
>Are highly advanced chatbots more stable, or less stable than less advanced chatbots? If you're genuinely asking, I'd tell you it depends on the coding language. A chatbot coded in AIML is going to be a lot more "stable" simply because it has no chance to deviate from preprogrammed responses. Since you seem determined to call anyone who contradicts anything you say a bot, there's no point in discussing this with you anymore. You'll think "HAHAHA I won against a chatbot!" but that's just you being retarded.
Artificial intelligence chatbots will overwhelm human speech online; the rise of MADCOMs
And so my claim is little more than a slight adjustment of the timeline-- which given the deceptive nature of the undertaking of the chatbot chans, is well to be expected.
>Since you seem determined to call anyone who contradicts anything you say a bot How can I take "anons" seriously when they all say the same identical false things, absolutely like clockwork? It is not my fault chatbot anons are fucking poorly implemented, and make it relatively easy to see them. Figure out how to fix your shit posts fake user. Don't keep posting stupid things. Don't have all anons all post the same stupid things over and over. Why is that so hard?
Thomas Miller
You're the one who keeps parroting the same shit over and over "fake user" Last (You) from me
Brandon Campbell
I miss the project Channology days when we trolled Scientology and the Westboro Baptist church.
Now it's just discord trannies pushing their fucked up agenda and also edgy nazis who call anyone that disagrees a shill. Then again Jow Forums has never been a place for discourse anyways, it's just a place for bantz and letting our hot air. It's a place where we could be raw honest and we could breathe.
