Dutch talkshow: 3/4s of victims of terrorist attacks by whites

In the Dutch talkshow Jinek that's on TV every week day with ~1 million viewers (country has 17 million) this man says that: "3/4s of all victims of terrorist attacks are caused by whites, mostly right extremists. They often write them off as crazy, but there for sure is the thought of white supremacy behind it."

Jinek the presenter is a Clinton fan and Democrat, so biased? Yes. Either way, is it true what they're saying? I heard Trump also mentioning white supremacy. Does Jow Forums acknowledge it as a problem? I often read on Jow Forums that blacks commit more gun violence, but this is gang or drugs related etc, they're not terrorist attacks I thought? They're not out of racism.

Pic related:
>We exclude shootings stemming from more conventionally motivated crimes such as armed robbery or gang violence

Attached: AE75E4B7-AF31-4777-B114-4C68D33D804E.png (622x461, 51K)

>Pic related
Not only that, but the US was more white in 1982. Also, if you do the math, whites still are under represented even by current demographics breakdown.

>We exclude... gang violence.

Absolute

SOPHI
T
R
Y

Any source on that?

But gang violence doesn't bring fear into society, doesn't disrupt society? In general? And it kills other criminals.

>But gang violence doesn't bring fear into society, doesn't disrupt society?

wew

The average person is more feared of the recent shootings than gangs killing each other. Those gangs affect a small area and with the recent shootings people feel like it could happen anywhere at any time in the USA? They're also racially motivated unlike gang/drugs violence.

oh look, italy fell over and it's brain fell out

Thank you for demonstrating why he's on a Dutch talkshow and not in prison.

By their own numbers:
59 white
39 non white
3 unknown

58% confirmed white.
Also arabs are white in the states.

Here, divide by the population percentage in the mid point of this chart (4,13,13,70). That gives normalized values of:

Whites 0.84
Black 1.23
Latino 0.53
Asian 2.00

Probably also bullshit like they include Arabs into White category

Attached: Screen-Shot-2013-05-07-at-7.33.46-PM.png (440x283, 96K)

>Does Jow Forums acknowledge it as a problem?

I WISH IT WAS A PROBLEM!

>jews
>white

How is this relevant in Europe? Most of the terror attacks are caused by muslims and we all know that.

You should be scared you basedboy beta fucking cunt, fuck you and your biased retard-tier stats, everyone here knows the truth so we're just here to laugh at you retards.

And all the terrorist attacks against Christians and Jews in the middle east then?
I fucking hate Jinek

Not that necessary, but our news gets bombarded with USA related news.

I was merely asking how they got to the numbers and if they were correct. But probably Arabs in White category and USA was way whiter 10s of years ago. Calm your ass, incel.

Doesn't this prove whites commit disproportionately less? I suppose they rely on their audience being fucking stupid.

>we exclude gang violence
lel

also remember that thing that happened late 2001 that was a huge deal?

>"Number of mass shootings (as defined by number of fatalities regardless of intent of shooter, motive for shooting, willfulness of shooter, location of shooting, or relation between shooter and victims) (excluding terrorist actions that involved non-firearms fatalities regardless of whether there were firearms fatalties), in the United States between 1982 and June 2018 (excluding gang related, drug related, and organized crime related mass shootings) by shooter's race and ethnicity"
FTFY, Russian bot.

You're assuming that gang niggers can hit the broadside of a barn from the inside. No. Most mass shootings are niggers trying to do hood shit and accidentally hosing down a crowd of other niggers.