You cannot be pro gun and pro Trump at this point.
He has said he wants social media to look for 'warning signs' if someone is mentally unwell. That means if you post edgy shit online, or anything the cops or big tech don't like, then the cops can take your guns without any due process.
If you support the 2nd amendment then you cannot support Trump. It is a direct contradiction to support this gun grabbing leftist.
where does the clip go??
on the top (well, since you hold handguns sideways to fire them it's on the side really)
>shooting random people is a 2nd amendment right
Not even in the same ballpark user. I've extremely pro gun but the fact is most people who comit shootings like this are on antidepressants. It should be monitored.
Man, i hate that straw man, too. I have no idea how we got here, but boy, we can kick that straw man some more if you want
>Monitoring social media
>Supporting disarming people based on shit they post online
That violates the 1st amendment and 2nd amendment.
Yeah, instead of electing Trump, who will put another pick on the Supreme Court when RBG finally dies, let's elect the anti-America party's candidate so we can not only lose RBG's seat, but we can also have semi auto bans, confiscation, magazine limits, registration, and firearm licenses.
Trump's legacy will not be his legislative accomplishments. By a 10:1 margin, his legacy will be making 2 SCOTUS picks and dropping the fucking hammer on appellate court nominations. We are flipping circuit courts that have been blue for eons.
Hopefully they name it the patriot act.
>let's elect the anti-America party's
Supporting red flag laws is Anti American.
Obama was weaker on gun control than Trump is. How stupid can you be?
True.
Bummer never b& anything...
>That violates the 1st amendment and 2nd amendment.
Bro, those have been literally torn to shreds for almost 15-20 years. Where you alive when 9/11 happened?
Wake me up when Mitch McConnell actually allows a vote on the Senate floor for it. Until then, it's just Trump blathering shit that he has no intention of stumping for. He did the same thing about suppressors and then did absolutely nothing. I don't care what he says. I care what he signs.
Jack Dorsey from Twitter and his little Indian Sidekick will now be determining who in America gets full Constitutional Rights, bow down to your new masters you white male incels, the Left is going to have 3rd World StreetShitters monitoring your every move on their Twitter.
The only other option would be to support the Socialists....No thanks.
>Obama was weaker on gun control than Trump is
its always a memeflag makes these stupid fucking posts
likely because behind that flag is a non-american, probably a fucking leaf, who doesnt have a fucking clue what the fuck goes on in america
I lost all my alleged guns in a tragic boating accident years ago. Very sad. Trump 2020!
Yes.
The patriot act tore up the 4th amendment specifically too.
Point being Trump is Merkel.
Red flag laws have gone up massively under Trump's regime and he just did a speech today talking about how social media needs to monitor people for what they post online so they can take the guns away early if the person is considered a threat.
That is a massive expansion of red flag laws, in collusion with big tech companies that you should already know about.
You let the government take your kids and sell them into sex slavery or adopted by gay pedos but you won't let the gov take your guns?
This is the only plausible explanation. The attempts were made after Sandy Hook. Congressional republicans stopped it from happening. It was not for a lack of effort. It was for a lack of congressional support. I'm glad I'm not the only one noticing these retards.
I never thought I would actually be looking to Mitch McConnell for any form of salvation. But here we are.
>I never thought I would actually be looking to Mitch McConnell for any form of salvation. But here we are.
Strange times indeed.
>Chkd
Yeah whoopdido there goes America.
Goodbye space, goodbye white race.
Goodbye cruel world, so long suckers.
>That violates the 1st amendment and 2nd amendment.
Take the guns first, due process second
die in a hole degenerate
You are correct. Anyone saying "I love guns as much as the next guy, BUT" can hang from a fucking rope.
>Shall NOT be infringed
Didn't say anything about whether a bunch of kike psychiatrists and psychologists think you're mentally ill for wrongthink.
>be leftist psychologists/psychiatrists, want guns gone
>write bullshit peer reviewed papers declaring anyone who wants to own guns must be mentally disturbed
>classify the act of wanting to own a firearm as a catch-22 reason why nobody can own one
>path to destroying the 2nd amendment without repealing it
"Oh we'll always have our guns though, they still need to CONFISCATE THEM!" you might say. This is a long game. The democrats set about destroying our country's demographics for their own use in 1964 and it's just now on the brink of yielding them a majority forever, or forcing republicans to adopt leftist platforms to compete for votes and remain relevant in elections. You whittle away gun ownership slowly, and it won't be so much of a struggle to confiscate them when the time comes 50 years from now.
If you support disarming anyone for a subjective reason which can be conjured up by kikes, you're fucking retarded and deserve your fate when the gun grabbers come to fondle your balls.
So long as he's picking SCOTUS judges i don't give a shit what he says. The buck stops with the highest court in the land.