Christchurch body count

You know why Tarrant got such a high score in the first mosque he shot up? Because those dumbasses laid down in the corner and waited for him to pop every last one of them. There was a totally unobstructed exit out the back, so why the fuck would they have done that?

Attached: bodycount.jpg (474x261, 20K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bitchute.com/video/VRRZI8Pre7oa/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Sheep mentality, the one guy who stormed Tarrant just needed two extra people. I’m other words he should have organized a rush with the twenty plus individuals lying in the fucking circles.

people were already laying dead on the floor, it was a false flag mossad job. fuck the newfags on this board. GO HOME YOU KEKS!

Sloppy job Mossad

Truth, weakness.

they weren't already dead -- you could hear them and see them moving and reacting to being shot. they were trained by some "security consultant" to lay down on the ground in the event of an active shooter scenario. And I bet you money someone could find out who it was and tie them back to (((someone))).

sandy hook really happened

>the one guy who stormed Tarrant just needed two extra people.
Did you even watch the video? Buddy was running for the exit, but he picked the exit that Tarrant used to enter the mosque.

they're retarded low IQ muslims
mice and other animals do the same clumping when they're freaked out

Why did the mosque have no furniture?
Is this a sandnigger thing?

where are the exit wounds? are they just faking it?

Yeah he must’ve been like this is easy after he took down the only one who charged him.

Best chan bro
...save that shit for Q

prove it schizos and take your meds

Attached: 1562243104132.jpg (1024x1024, 123K)

That's actually a plausible possibility. How would one hypothetically go about finding that out?

>set up fake security company to train mosque goers on how to deal with shooters
>tell them to lay down on the ground like a bunch of sheep and hope he doesnt shoot you
>send in your shooters later and rack up huge body counts
that is so jewish that it's probably true.

It seemed like a fight or flight situation and he definitely chose fight as he knocked tarrant on the ground.

I chicken could have survived that shooting, literally sub-60 toilet-tier Heucows.

WOOPS

Attached: 1564883062298.webm (608x892, 621K)

>inb4 shutter speed
stfu

Attached: 1557593176614.webm (640x360, 2.72M)

>inb4 windshield was already shot!
You can see reflections, the windshield sticker and its shadow.

Attached: 1557593158383.webm (852x480, 2.98M)

Christchurch was fake as fuck and very poorly executed by crisis actors "Tarrant" included. Besides fumbling over the minutiae of whether or not he dropped the mag/the mag wasn't there bullshit, just ask yourself why the NZ government not only actively scrubbed the video from the net, but made having or sharing it punishable with jailtime and fines. Then they made all of their law-abiding citizens with semi-autos criminals almost overnight because their cunt former socialist youth party leader DJ PM said so with pre-made legislation. They even sent cops around to Kiwis homes to try to interrogate them about their political beliefs and whether or not they owned firearms. New Zealand is fucking pathetic no wonder all the globalist kikes want to set up shop there after they disarm the goyim.

The world is a stage, and spooks run the show. It's all hoaxes. But don't fret, there's at least the solace of knowing no innocent people were killed for your rights to be removed. Just watch the show, hand over your rights, and kiss the ring.

Attached: sorry.jpg (800x800, 755K)

>But don't fret, there's at least the solace of knowing no innocent people were killed for your rights to be removed.

Did you forget about 9-11 and millions of people killed in the Global War on Terror?

Its image compression artifacts not shutter speed

You can see the brass on the ground
You can even see some of the brass fall the whole way

Same perpetrator. Fuck kikes.

They lay out mats, kneel, and pray on the floor; yeah it wouldn’t have furniture.

this

mannequins don't have a fight or flight response.

bitchute.com/video/VRRZI8Pre7oa/

Attached: blood_bag_1563033657043.webm (1280x720, 1.86M)

these must be right. shills out in force.

I agree

Those are cops in civvies you moron. Your own webm says "they find it".

>muh windshield
You didn't even seen the original video, didn't you, faggot leaf? Pic related.

Attached: window.gif (593x1199, 572K)

they all got into nice pile and played dead within 15 seconds, which is all it took from the shooter to start shooting at the front door until he walks into that room.

and everyone is all sleeping and playing dead already. even the little kids

It's called compression, you can see cartridges grouping near the metal gate, idiot.

And you are a total braindead cripple too. It's obvious why, because they are still shitting pants from possible copycats. And rightly fucking so, because there were already two, which is unprecedented. If you wouldn't be small-minded faggot, you would see this.

Attached: Pills for shills.jpg (2500x2500, 3.39M)

>Those are cops in civvies you moron.
sure thing buddy

Attached: paddy wagons.jpg (800x599, 96K)

Then prove those are "shooters", cretin. That simple.

>blood bag with magical propulsion.
Kek, this doesn't exist, nor do existing blood bags work like that. Pic related. How can be someone this retarded and why is it always a fucking leaf?

No. See

Attached: WhatsApp_Image_2019031df5_at_12.55.04.jpg (576x1024, 134K)

I'm gonna flip the table - prove they're cops. you can't. you know what I think? I think those people in the room in the piles? They were already dead before Tarrant showed up

>>blood bag with magical propulsion.
>Kek, this doesn't exist, nor do existing blood bags work like that.
The squib failed to rupture the bag, and propelled it into the model's elbow, where it drained shortly thereafter.

>Pic related. How can be someone this retarded and why is it always a fucking leaf?
What is this pic supposed to prove?

Peter Thiel, who else?

This. In the thread about self defense shooting a sand nigger shot a nigger with a 9mm and there was blood fucking everywhere. A huge pool of it. I didnt see blood in the christchurch video.

>The squib failed to rupture the bag, and propelled it into the model's elbow, where it drained shortly thereafter.
This is not physically possible, you have absolutely no fucking idea you are talking about. Bags are taped to your body, they can't move on their own. And even if it would somehow get free, it won't travel as it does. Squibs can't propel this. Be honest to yourself, you are only saying this because the video told you so. If you would do the research, you would see what a bullshit it is. Also see >What is this pic supposed to prove?
That you have a corpse there, duh. But surely, they would allow civilians around the so called "mannequin" if it would be so fake, right. Idiot.

>prove they are police
Your webm implies it, reality implies it. Occam's razor. You claimed first that those are shooters, then you are carrying burden of the proof.
>they were already dead before Tarrant showed up.
Prove it. And stop ignoring my previous points like a little shill bitch.

see

>You know why Tarrant got such a high score in the first mosque he shot up?
Because he actually planned out his attack?

Glow harder nigger

Not an argument you braindead lousy nigger.

How come a third worlder with a ten year old flip phone can film a nigger getting blasted and you see the massive blood splatter from a hand gun but a video filmed im HD on a go pro you blame compression?
>glow harder nigger

>This is not physically possible
yes it is.

>Bags are taped to your body
tape can fail, people can neglect to tape.

>it won't travel as it does. Squibs can't propel this.
yes they can.

It's clearly a shiny plastic bag.

Your meme image is literally gaslighting the reader. This isn't even close to resembling any kind of wound. I've watched plenty of gore/liveleak videos where people get shot.

>what is a difference between a livestream and regular shooting of a video which is later uploaded in full quality?
>what is a difference between 5.56 over-penetrating as fuck from close distance and some shitty nine mil which fractures?
Gee I wonder, maybe it's magic or maybe you are a fucking moron.

No it is not. You are literally trying to tell me that something which isn't strong enough to move piece of cloth moved some roughly 300+ml of bloodbag.
>It's clearly a shiny plastic bag.
Yeah, which weights something. How strong you think squibs are you idiot? If they would be strong enough to move the bag so much it would hurt the "actor". Fucking hell get your facts straight.
>I'm an expert, I've seen the videos
Jesus, you fucking cretin.
>your meme image is literally gaslighting the reader
Let me fix that for you:
>your imagine is making points I can't refute, therefore I will write some vague retarded shit to make me look good
Kill yourself.

Does anyone else think the cone is very random. Who would have moved it?

You also ignore my whole point about civilians being let to the "mannequins" and being allowed to take photos.

>That you have a corpse there, duh. But surely, they would allow civilians around the so called "mannequin" if it would be so fake, right. Idiot.

You don't even understand the number of baseless assumptions you are making.

Any number of things could have happened between when the livestream happened and that photo was taken.

The cone is up throughout but tipped at 11:56

Stop bullshiting with vague useless crap. It's retarded and childish. The fact is, you are claiming it is either a mannequin or actor with a blood bag (let's ignore for a moment that is not physically possible). Now the photo was taken with obviously mourning person close to the victim (by your logic another actor) and taken probably by some random civie. If it would be fake, why the fuck would they allow civilians next to it? If it is fake, then why the fuck took photos when exactly the opposite is desirable? If they would be actors, then how would they do it with literally hundreds of civilians around? How someone wouldn't blew it? And why would they fake it, wouldn't be easier to just really shoot those people? Nigger you are not making sense, you are not making it at all. You know, I'm gonna say it. Take your fucking meds.

There was someone in one of the cars who run away when Tarrant went inside the mosque. Since the car was parked near the entryway, I guess that's your cause.

>you are an innocent bystander
>shooting happens
>you see dead and injured on the street
>you ran to help
>wow, it's a fake mannequin
>wow that person is completely okay, it is a fake blood
This is how easy is to blew it. This is how retarded your implications are.

you cant even tell different posters apart, idiot

Alright, so you cant prove it. Who would have thought.

>No it is not. You are literally trying to tell me that something which isn't strong enough to move piece of cloth moved some roughly 300+ml of bloodbag.
If you look closely you can see that "she" is somewhat propped up at an angle, the bag falls with gravity . It looks like the fabric that was containing it failed unexpectedly due to the squib, but the bag held out - until a second later when it ruptures.

you sound just like the shill in the boston bombing thread. playing hardcore defense

Jesus nigger, you are going full retard. So it held out or it ruptured? What ruptured it, if that squib failed as your webm claims? I won't even repeat my previous points, it's pointless.

Not an argument, you dumb spastic faggot.

It actually even looks like she popped it between her forearm and upper arm.

Further,

Why were there no bullet holes in the wall of the mosque during the shooting?
Why is there no blood spatter on the walls of the mosque during the shooting?
Why is there no dust in the room from bullets impacting the walls?
Why does the "muzzle blast" not affect anything in the mosque, i.e. papers hanging in the hallway?

are your the Christchurch defense force? is that your job?

unironically take your meds

can you answer these questions?

Why were there no bullet holes in the wall of the mosque during the shooting?
Why is there no blood spatter on the walls of the mosque during the shooting?
Why is there no dust in the room from bullets impacting the walls?
Why does the "muzzle blast" not affect anything in the mosque, i.e. papers hanging in the hallway?

Saint Tarrant for Prez 2020.

REMOVE KEBABS, CREATE JOBS!

Attached: Tarrant Kebab Remover.jpg (688x561, 88K)

Christchurch was a FF lie.
Where's the blood?
Where's the real actions of Muslims being shot at... and murdered...
Lying down defenseless? They went to Hell then according to the book they read a lot...

He just wanted to make it clean.

Attached: 1565033132725.jpg (1136x852, 330K)

Stop phone posting

Yeah, my first impression watching the footage was how "lifeless" everything was. I've watched a lot of graphic footage from the Ukraine conflict. Nobody acts like this in a life or death situation.

Sloppy job, Mossad.