Give me your best, legitimate arguments on why gun control won’t work in america like it has in other countries

Give me your best, legitimate arguments on why gun control won’t work in america like it has in other countries

Attached: 5F2531F5-A5D5-4865-B37F-A92971690F63.jpg (828x642, 255K)

Other urls found in this thread:

fee.org/articles/the-myth-that-australias-gun-laws-reduced-gun-homicides/
web.archive.org/web/20190330220142/https://heartiste.wordpress.com/diversity-proximity-war-the-reference-list/
melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/downloads/working_paper_series/wp2008n17.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

we need to murder our government

We maintain a free speech with the ability to arm militias at any time.

How are we going to get half a billion guns off of the street?

Send only bachelors
You'll find out

There are already a shitload of guns in America.

It will. People just don't like it. None of them did a damn thing in California. My cousin kept a since illegal SKS but never takes it to the range out of fear of sheriff’s showing up at the range.

My personal take is that a licensing system wouldn’t prohibit you from buying a firearm. It would just keep out those that are clearly not fit for such a responsibility.

All of Latin America has tighter gun laws than us. It’s not guns, it’s race.

boomer spam. the government doesn’t get to take your guns. take your 2A wet dream back to fb gramps

Limiting the capacity of human nature will never work

You give them to blacks so they can protect themselves from white supremacists.
Also checked.

Attached: 32fsbo.jpg (500x500, 48K)

I bet most countries you can think of, it didn't actually work very well.
In the UK, murders, and even murders specifically with guns, went up.
fee.org/articles/the-myth-that-australias-gun-laws-reduced-gun-homicides/

Japan is one of the few major exceptions, but you should keep in mind that it banned guns and swords under the reign of a literal Imperial government that suppressed the fuck out of everyone in the process. Not to mention their attempts at banning weapons resulted in one of Japan's most serious rebellions in the industrial era (killed more than the Boshin War)

Attached: 42e.jpg (472x621, 114K)

Attached: IMG_3986.jpg (720x900, 236K)

Because we need our amerigolems to practice killing and dying for thier chosen masters. They are the combat breed goyim

Let the blacks be armed.
Let the whites be armed.
Let the latinos be armed.
Let the liberals be armed.
Let the conservatives be armed.
Let everyone in America be armed.

It will work, you just have to BELIEVE

pic related

Attached: yo dwag.jpg (500x335, 88K)

it hasn't "worked" in other countries. The only thing that worked is that europeans are enslaved to their politicians now

Touch guns, you die.

Criminals don’t follow or care about laws.

niggers

Some communities have extremely slow police response times (i.e., agrarian towns within fly-over states). Firefights are usually extremely quick and you can't gamble on how much time you have when mere seconds could mean life or death.

Attached: he means it.png (508x397, 170K)

Heroin.

It flows across our southern border like a wetback whore about to shit out her 18th kid. All this despite being illegal on every inch of America soil.

What kind of retard thinks that we could actually get rid of guns or gun violence?

america is too diverse. countries where it has happened are 80-90% homogenous so everyone trusts one another and looks out for the common good. in diverse societies no one gives a damn about each other. also, your diversity has a lot of violent populations within it whereas the europeans based countries are filled with populations that aren't generally violent.

First, tell me how you plan to disarm criminals.

Because confiscators get the bullet, you dumbshit.

>like it has
It hasn’t, they still have shootings, televising it means that it happens and we can’t have that now can we?

It doesn't work in other countries, either.

its not just race. its diversity. diversity decreases common social bonds and people caring about the collective/commonwealth. there's countless studies that show this

web.archive.org/web/20190330220142/https://heartiste.wordpress.com/diversity-proximity-war-the-reference-list/

>why gun control won’t work in america like it has in other countries
yes because stabbing each other to death is such a huge success...

>Liberals ban all legal purchases
>Cartel hears the news
>They already have suppliers
>Hide gun parts in the thousands of trucks and vehicles they use to smuggle metric tons of methamphetamine and heroin into the US
>Can't stop and search every single vehicle
>Assemble guns on the other side
>Sell guns on the black market using same distribution networks as their drugs
>Profit
>Gun control BTFO

Attached: 1549640634143.jpg (392x331, 23K)

there are too many guns to simply ban them and we have several cartels at our southern border that would love to profit from gun laws
the fact is, american crimi als are always going to have access to the guns.
ecen after a hypothetical ban, the ultra rich will still be protected by armed security and politicians will still be protected by armed secret service agents. why should wealth and status be the barrier for protecting your family from feral addicts

It wont work cause there are too many JEWS in the US.
>jews=fascism

You can take away the guns but that won't take away the reasons people have for wanting to kill others will it
I'm not against banning guns I really don't even care because that's not the problem in the first place
It's not like people had any trouble killing each other before guns existed

As it should be!
All gentile races should be enslaved under the mighty Jewish state-god!

They're censoring speech, closing people's bank accounts for their opinions, demonizing the majority of the country, and want whites, Christians, and males dead. Now imagine if you give your guns away.

Detroit

Here is a city that has strict gun laws. They had 2 mass shootings in the same neighborhood in the same day.


Almost every Democrat majority minority inner city in America has similar issues and violence.

If gun control hasn't worked in many of the big inner cities of America why would gun control work on the federal level?

Who commits the majority of gun violence in America?

Attached: shooting_trend_080519.png (625x275, 9K)

Because the American Revolution started at Concord and Lexington over gun control. Gun ownership is the final piece of the checks and balance system guaranteeing the government serves its people and not the other way around.

people have had weapons from swords to guns. and even before that stick type weapons and ones that had rocks on them to as well. people have always had a way to defend themselves for the most part and/or fight off someone else.

but you should give up your guns so criminal blacks / criminal hispanics / criminal types that seek to harm you can do just so.

ill be over here cuckeling for a few moments while I think upon this one further.

Never forgetti, the ATF "accidentally" sold more guns to Mexico than it has confiscated from them.
They literally sell guns in stings and then lose them.

It's really simple. If you remember what Richard Nixon did back in the 60s, you would understand why War on Drugs would be as much as devestating as it gun control would be in the future. Those are just some facts.

It worked in Singapore, so why not America

EZ
It didn't work in other countries. Murder/suicide/assault with a deadly weapon/etc. rates didn't change AT ALL in Australia after we "banned" guns. They just continued on the exact same downward trajectory that they were already on. The only difference is that people started using things that weren't guns to achieve the same things.

If you look at the rates of murder via use of a knife / bare hands / etc. It's a fuck load higher in America than other countries too. Guns aren't the problem in America, it's just that Americans are a violent people. You take away the guns, they'll still keep killing each other, just like they did in other countries.

tl;dr - Fuck off retard.

>like it has in other countries
Where? When?

Attached: AUS_USA.jpg (1138x924, 43K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2012-12-22 at Saturday, December 22, 9.26 PM.png (632x472, 45K)

It didn't work in other countries.

melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/downloads/working_paper_series/wp2008n17.pdf

Attached: gunbuyback.png (645x545, 64K)

1. American citizens posses more guns than the rest of the world combined. How are you going make them magically disappear?

2. "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" is literally the second amendment that makes up the bill of rights in the U.S. constitution. The country was founded with the right to bear arms as the second most important right besides free speech.

3. Multicultural countries have much higher crime and less trust than homogeneous white countries like Nordic countries, which are the few places that gun control actually lead to decreased violent crime and homicides. Since America is only 56% white and falling, the same results would not be repeated here, much like socialism won't work here for the same reason.

4. Shall not be infringed nigger

Favorite aspects of the "b-but they had muskets at the time" argument is that they had a pseudo-gatling gun at the time (the pucker gun), you could own a fucking cannon, and the founding fathers never ever thought that you might be able to shoot more than one literal musket ball a minute.

Attached: 9b4dbfa6d68aa5cf22683933e1dab0a7dbeeb228a94f4c8e3a6d198b0bedf580.jpg (750x738, 55K)

The US is in its last stages of capitalism. Hopefully they'll all kill each other soon.

500 million guns
even getting 50% which they wouldn't get even close leaves 250 million guns
based gun manufacturers flooding the market with $400 ARs

The sheer state of stings