I’m not a fan of Red Flag Laws and other Gun Control bullshit but I have a question for anyone who wants Trump out in 2020: Are any of the Democratic candidates more relaxed on guns? Honest question, is there a Democratic candidate opposed to red flag laws or even any who doesn’t support even more extreme gun control measures? Because I am definitely still going to vote for either Trump or the dem, so if there is one who has a better record I would truly love to hear it
Anthony Bailey
>304 You had a pass last thread but the Guild will hear about this this one.
Gabriel Roberts
If I am able to explain to my mom what (((red flag laws))) are and why they utterly awful, get her to agree to me that current gun laws don't work and more would only hurt innocent people then you ought to do it too. I don't agree with her saying Puerto Ricans look black, but I do agree with her on that mixed race children aren't accepted by either of their halves.
Call your or other people's representatives and senators at federal and state level you niggers. Email them, write letters like the boomers do which apparently works, and screech at their offices autistically. I don't think anything will come out of this, but it's better to be safe than sorry now isn't it. It makes no sense for you to come down here and whine impotently like how jews do about how one faggoty failed Austrian painter supposedly killing millions of their kind. Also read this amp.usatoday.com/amp/1916451001 Mitch McConnell has repeatedly blocked gun control legislation in the senate because he's smart enough to realize how stupid that would be.
Also, please do the same to the White House. Trump more or less likely has interns here watching us, but fill up the lines. Let him know how you feel about this pretty bad idea. >The fact people fail to understand that, considering the people manning the federal government (the blokes answering phones, for instance) are the same as 40 years ago and trained by the same as 80 years ago, no wonder that > THEY DON’T GIVE A FUCK FOR INTERNET OUTRAGE
Everything? No But massive events that are then seized by the media/DNC apparatus in order to try and form policy? You'd be naive to not question everything based on the last 60 years
CHIMP OUT ALERT THIS WEEKEND: Friday marks the 5th year anniversary of the lawful and justified shooting of mike brown. There are events planned this weekend.
> Chinkaro Insectoloids user, that's racist. The proper nomenclature is "British Columbian."
Austin Myers
Shut up and turn in your guns racist we have evidence that your skin is white
>t. DJT
Gavin James
It's worse than that, denying a man the right to face his accusers in a court of law is directly antithetical to western society
Brody Wood
Reminder to do as the GOA and called write letters (since federal workers are boomers) white house and to your congressnigger.
Not only so they know that people are mad at this, but also so Trump might see that there is another gun rights organization and not the boomer (and already dying) NRA
also for a better chance send it to DonJr and Erick so they might get attracted since everyone that isn't a boomer hates the NRA and there is a better chance on succeding
Tulsi is single handedly torpedoing kama-poo's campaign
Jack Richardson
Honestly, I saw this coming the second I heard that the shooting took place in Ohio. DeWine has been playing the 'I don't want to appear too partisan' card ever since he was elected and was therefore very susceptible to folding when put under enough pressure. The red flag bullshit was par for the course since he was open to that idea from the beginning, but this one step beneath universal background checks proposal is a new one and definitely has me worried about what other ideas he's open to. Also, as of right now, I consider the chances of constitutional carry getting passed in this state to be dead in the water if he's bending over backwards to propose terrible policies like this. My only hope is that our state representatives will tell him no and our local gun groups will be able to whip any fence sitters into shape.
Nobody here, not the shills, not the oldfags, NONE OF US actually believe that the people attacking Trump in this thread aren't just operatives for the Dems.
>all animals survived >everyone stopped talking about the crash >truck decides fuck it and kills three people
Michael Wright
Anyone who argues in bad faith, who resorts to spamming the same thing thread after thread is better off being filtered.
Josiah Sanchez
They will listen to Onigger. But while his statement isn’t all that surprising. It is the article he posted in response that should really raise some eyebrows.
Obama posted an article from the far-left website Vox, where an author gives some suggestions to “stop gun violence.” The article claims that Democrats should go further than they currently are with their proposals, citing ideas like “universal background checks,” and “assault weapons bans” as not being enough.
Instead, the author says that Democrats should go all-out, citing the gun confiscation plan of former Presidential candidate Eric Swalwell as an example.
The Vox article reads:
“To change the status quo, Democrats should go big. They need to focus on the abundance of guns in the US and develop a suite of policies that directly tackle that issue, from licensing to confiscation to more aggressive bans of certain kinds of firearms (including, perhaps, all semiautomatic weapons or at least some types of handguns).”
While that drivel is unsurprising when coming from the “intellectual elites” at Vox. It is surprising that it is being shared approvingly by a former President, and especially from Obama, who still has a significant role in the Democrat Party.
Austin Nguyen
>red fag laws wtf is this shit that suddenly appeared out of nowhere as if by (((((cohencidence)))))?
>Tulsi is single handedly torpedoing kama-poo's campaign And can't break 1%. DNC is suppressing her desufam.
Gavin Martinez
Not as hard as that lock. It wasn't latched.
Andrew Russell
It is good to be critical of his speech, that was really bad for his optics when it came to his supporters But if anyone actually thinks that these laws would actually pass the senate just don't know their histpry, or the history of the senate when it came to gun control
I'm just waiting and seeing, but NRA support for red flag laws does not bode well.
Evan Jenkins
Granted, some of them are more extreme than others. But the basic stuff from "assault weapons" bans to universal background checks, they're all on the same page.
> you can't win without an F15 Vietnam and Afghanistan.
Connor Bailey
It's not just doggos. Your teeth are also extremely hard. Same as your bones. That shit is fucking hard man. Unless you're a woman and you go through menopause. Seriously, the hardness of teeth and bones often goes under appreciated. It's like the hardest metal in the animal kingdom next to diamonds. i.4cdn.org/wsg/1564262625441.webm
My problem with trump is he keeps teasing the democrats with this bait sooner like this sooner or later they are going to bit down. He is just lucky that they are fucking stupid.
Ayden Foster
The downside of publicizing the identity of a shooter means someone will want to copy them. The upside is that they have to work much harder to explain how a leftist hispanic is a white supremacist.
>a leftist hispanic is a white supremacist. based taconigger wants to be white
Jacob Long
They always bite down user, it's just that when you try to give an inch, they want a mile, and trump gets mad his original idea gets snubbed, and won't offer anything else in the future
>He is just lucky that they are fucking stupid. So roll with it. Doesn't matter what Trump 'teases', it's funny to watch how e manipulates them all anyway.
Joshua Nguyen
You will. I'm seeing the signs everywhere. Whites have about had enough of this shit.
