Who's The Man Behind The Curtain?

All the facts say liberals are right about pretty much every debate and talking point. When conservatives are presented with the facts, conservatives always say the facts are just liberal bias. In their mind, every economist, every climate scientist, every biologist, every medical professional, every psychologist, every social scientist, and all fields of science are deliberately cooking the books.

If conservatives are the party of the truth, fact, and logic, then where are all the conservative scientist providing counter research with replication and consensus? Excluding the ones that are paid by lobbying groups and corporate interests.

I hear another theory that professional scientists will deliberately publish bullshit because they don't want the all-powerful media to represent them. If that is true, then how did the left-wing media become so much more powerful and influential than the right? Who is secretly pulling the strings of our reality and how did they get in this position of power!?

Attached: 51G3hTAuN2L._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (324x499, 37K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/o1hhKKhIOqE
bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=33
princeton.edu/news/2013/08/29/poor-concentration-poverty-reduces-brainpower-needed-navigating-other-areas-life
metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/32.143.2/
en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Hebrew_Roots/Neglected_Commandments/Idolatry/Sunday
blackhistoryinthebible.com/the-hamites/nimrod-the-first-world-leader/
bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-46811397
youtube.com/channel/UCSPIlecpH1Hf7mnyqkB3oSw/playlists
forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/02/16/the-u-s-states-with-the-highest-rates-of-burglary-infographic/#4eeee9512d45
safearound.com/asia/china/
heavy.com/news/2019/06/alaskas-permanent-income/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States
chicagotribune.com/investigations/ct-lead-poisoning-science-met-20150605-story.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

great cthulhu

Attached: agent johnny huwhite18.jpg (660x486, 80K)

What facts? Anytime a liberal or anyone on the left is confronted with hard evidence they crumble. Their 'facts' and 'statistics' have been debunked numerous times. Things like gender pay gap, social justice and poverty. In general conservatives are more independent and don't rely on politics to live their lives. Where as a liberal is more likely to work in fields that are funded by the government. The big tech companies are full of silicon valley journalists who learned their education through Marxists professors. They are censoring free speech and demonizing anyone with right wing political views. There is a reason they are trying to limit and control speech. It's because they know their ideologies will be exposed.

It's possible that society is fair and those who succeed do so because they earned their wealth and prosperity and everyone else is just lazy. But the liberals get tons and tons of money by telling lazy people what they want to hear so all that money is used to influence the all-powerful liberal media who divides us more so they can make even more money! No scientist wants to fuck with media money! Is it also strange that most people running the media are Jewish? How did that happen!?

Give me an example so I can correct you

What example? Be more specific?

You be more specific. You haven't "debunked" nothing.

Lots of libreal 'facts' and statistics have been debunked. Example. Do you believe the liberal facts that poverty creates crime?

i can tell you

Attached: 1520015345279.jpg (800x400, 185K)

The liberal media is blackmailing us out of REALITY!! Now that takes some real POWER!! AWESOME FUCKING POWER OHHH YEAH!!

youtu.be/o1hhKKhIOqE

Attached: BelovedAccomplishedCrab-poster.jpg (1920x1080, 88K)

>illuminati
ofc not everything is made public, but it would be retarded to think that you can find the truth online on some websites written by schizophrenic rednecks

Attached: 1233C4A2-095D-4F28-8AD6-45933ABADEC6.jpg (1280x720, 131K)

Yes. We know this to be true because poor people do better when their environment changes.

The red hebrew edomite

Job 9:24 The earth is given into the hand of the wicked: he covereth the faces of the judges thereof; if not, where, and who is he?

Attached: DuOVYf8UUAIkwlt.jpg (300x400, 16K)

>Job 9:24 The earth is given into the hand of the wicked: he covereth the faces of the judges thereof; if not, where, and who is he?

And he who provideth thy facts has thou established thy credibility my child.

Well it's absolutely false and poverty has nothing got to do with crime. The liberals use these fake statistics to push for social justice to maintain their political power.

Let me explain. Crime is down to morality and not social class. Poor area's that have morality crime is relativity low. This is down to religion being a social construct or an authoritarian form of government. But poor area's where crime is high there is little to none morality. Usually libreal urban area's.

Crime still exists in the upper class but the difference is it usually goes undetected or is on the side of the law. The rich do far more serious crimes and make everyone look at the poor man for robbing bread to feed his family. They're usually the one's who create law's.

So it's a false narrative to suggest that crime is linked to poverty or wealth. It's down to morality.

I love how you posted absolutley no facts to prove this. You are just reciting conservitive tlalking points. Show me the liberal statistics that are lying, then show me the data you have to refute this.

Waiting for conservatives to refute replicated research like...

Attached: 1.jpg (852x480, 36K)

I'm not him, but I think you need to show the "liberal" statistics you are basing your argument on before your argument can be refuted. I'll be waiting...

Give me a moment. Please explain to me why crime is lower in certain poor areas and is higher in other poor areas?

I don't think he is gonna respond. This thread will fall off and these shills will just start a new one.

>Who is secretly pulling the strings of our reality and how did they get in this position of power
world wide centralized banking industry that places it's roots in every single nation. You say every and all far too much. It makes you sound just as retarded because you refuse to admit "some" is possible. A good portion of conservatives focus on "some" a bit too much but, that doesn't change the fact. You can pay off anyone to lie for you just ask rating companies that gave high rating to trash investments which caused a global economic crisis in 2008.

The kikes own all the media, who do you think retard?

Nimrod / Orion / Osiris / Baal.

Attached: noahide_nimrod.jpg (650x1300, 225K)

Here. If crime is lower when people's environment changes then why do we have white collar crime on the rise? The left always use street crime and try link it to poverty to support their agendas. But avoid upper class crime all the time because it debunks their claims. Crime is about morality.
bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=33

Osiris = Orion = Nimrod

Attached: kalergi_egypt_nimrod.jpg (2200x2197, 1.52M)

"A" with 3 stars for Apollo? More like Asar / Ashur.
Also known as Orion
Also known as...

Attached: apollo_patch.png (1024x1024, 2.34M)

You'll never find out, buddy.

Why do the banks want a liberal perspective

Orion, the mighty hunter with a bow!
Wait...who else was a mighty hunter?
Nimrod.

Attached: orion_search_group_logo.png (1920x1200, 46K)

Now, I want you to rephrase this in your own words BEFORE you argue against it? Do you think you can comprehend information at a 5th-grade reading level? I BELEIVE IN YOU!!

princeton.edu/news/2013/08/29/poor-concentration-poverty-reduces-brainpower-needed-navigating-other-areas-life

Stick to the topic.

United States Forces: Iraq
Hmm...who is that lion dude?
Is that...
metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/32.143.2/
>The great Assyrian king Ashurnasirpal II (r. 883–859 B.C.), undertook a vast building program at Nimrud
Oh no.

Attached: usf_iraq.png (1058x1048, 917K)

>bull, not lion, sorry, working quickly

What's the new program at NASA called?
Orion.
Also known as Nimrod.

Attached: orion_nasa.jpg (400x400, 24K)

EU parliament looks like the Tower of Babel.
Who built that: Nimrod

Attached: babel_vs_parliament.jpg (640x480, 78K)

kinda, but no - society is not fair. That's ok though, you play the hands your dealt. as my father always told me: "Lifes not fair."

I'M HIGH AF AND IMMU RAP!!

I run the media.

I run entertainment.

communist enslavement.

Restricting the freedom of natural selection.

Structuring authority with government subsidizes and debt collection.

Freedom collapses like thermite demolitions.

I'm the most gangsta

love it or leave

Or call me your socialist slave master

Attached: e552c11b106ba8cb683bf1762d1d6928.jpg (608x550, 31K)

16 pointed masonic sun.
Was there a famous character that worshipped the sun?
en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Hebrew_Roots/Neglected_Commandments/Idolatry/Sunday
>Sun worship originated in Babylon with the Bible character known as Nimrod
Oh.

Attached: tears_for_fears_tears_roll_down.jpg (599x596, 243K)

And avoid questions....

You literally just argued that poverty does not cause crime. The premise for your argument is that it had to do with character. This article refutes the idea that someone environment has no effect on their propensity to act in ways people normally do while in poverty. It's not a character problem. It's literally a cash problem.

Crime is only link to poverty right?

Attached: Funny-but-so-true-cartoon-2cyto09.jpg (480x368, 33K)

Liberals keep trying to make life more fair but that's just not fair. An unfair life is more fair than a fair life.

I never said a character problem? I said it's down to the social construct that creates morality. Please tell me why crime is low in places like china where they live in absolute poverty in the past and those who live in relative poverty have higher crime rates?

>Literally shows you evidence
>Does not read the article
>Refutes it by saying "Right"

Did you know that Princeton is funded by the Facebook and Google? They want a left wing world so they can justify locking down the internet and becoming the new arbiters of information control.

>It's literally a cash problem.
No, it's a Cush problem.
See, Nimrod was the son of Cush, the son of Ham, the grandson of Noah.
blackhistoryinthebible.com/the-hamites/nimrod-the-first-world-leader/

Lol you trust statistics about China provided by China's government when China's government is known for silencing decent. I bet you trust the Russian media telling you how succesful Russia is. 2 second Google search later the facts come up.

WOMP WOMP

bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-46811397

An arctile isn't evidence. It's an opinion. Professors and intellectuals always avoid debates about their statistics. Claiming things are factual yet a few simple words debunks their 'facts' and they avoid questions. Why can't simple questions be answered if people claim to be so intelligent and know the facts?

So you don't trust statistics from other countries or political ideologies but when it comes to western Marxists professors and intellectuals you trust them? How can you have the cheek to criticise conservatives for doing the same thing?

youtube.com/channel/UCSPIlecpH1Hf7mnyqkB3oSw/playlists

Who said I trusted them on blind faith?

I actually READ what they wrote!! So I evaluated what they said rather than just "believing" them

Attached: bmnctjmwbov11.jpg (750x1290, 101K)

>all the facts say liberals are pretty much right about every debate and talking point.

>who said i trusted them on blind faith?

You can't even answer simple questions
with your own opinion without diverting the conversation into 'show me an arctile that some leftist wrote' and try use it as evidence. I know your kind. When evidence is presented, you divert to blaming corporations funding right wing or it's not legit. There is never a logical or rational argument.

LOL, is this bait or are you completely fucking stupid? I'm not even cuckservative.

>You never asked me a question.

Your question isn't even valid. Some parts of China are wealthier than others. So you can't say "China is more poor but has less crime per capita." What you need to do is pull crime statistics from wealthy areas vs impoverished areas and see how they compare.

Comparing China poverty/crime ratios to America is fallacious as hell because it's a FUNDAMENTALLY different country

Maybe you are too retarded to understand this, but whoever controls the money, communication and information, controls everything.
People parrot whatever they hear/read/see most frequently so it's easy to manipulate everybody. And money, it's self-explanatory.

So the people who have the money are all liberals? Why does all the science always side with the liberal perspective if the people with money control all the science institutions?

Oh, here is something I found. Burglary in the US is 8 times higher than China per capita. Burglary is higher in the US because people leave their houses more often. Why? Winter. Literally an environment based factor. most burglary in the US is in poverty areas. Statistical evidence and timeframes included.

forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/02/16/the-u-s-states-with-the-highest-rates-of-burglary-infographic/#4eeee9512d45

Some parts of China are wealthier than others. So you can't say "China is more poor but has less crime per capita." What you need to do is pull crime statistics from wealthy areas vs impoverished areas and see how they compare.

Wealthy area's rarely do street crime. Instead they do white collar crime. And alot of them go unreported. But according to leftists statistics crime only happens in poverty. And they get richer the 'street crime' goes. But they leave out other forms of crime and aren't included in their statistics.

>Comparing China poverty/crime ratios to America is fallacious as hell because it's a FUNDAMENTALLY different country

So you're partly agreeing it's down to social construct? Because fundamentals play a big part? Even leaving out china and picking europe. A western democracy. In the past people where poorer but did less crime. 1920s-1970s as example. That was down to Christianity being a social construct. Nowadays people are wealthier but crime is higher. Mostly down to less of a moral construct.

Hey look, more information. China is NOT safe. You won't die (prolly cuz they banned guns) BUT you will get robbed if you ain't careful.

safearound.com/asia/china/

No one

You need to realize it's just one big mess of people flowing like a river.

It's nice to think there's some big leader that controls it all, and hence, can be replaced easily, but that's not how it works.

It's about retarded intellectual masturbation like all your political ideologies while zero practical actions are done to stop indiscriminate money printing, mountains of debt, massive frauds and scandals, the government shoving money in its asshole, stupid eternal wars, shitty technology, pointless institutions, retarded practices and procedures...
It's theater for idiots literally disconnected from reality.

So you are admitting that there is no conspiracy and the liberals are right about everything. But you still don't like liberals because they do not act?

False. The reason for people having no morality in poorer areas is always down to liberal policies like welfare. The people who are doing the burglar will be on welfare. Suggesting that it's down to cold weather is delusional and laughable. Next you'll be telling me there is more than 2 genders? Lol. Oh wait?......

I bet you've got a study to prove that too pmsl.

No, I didn't say this bullshit. I think you are just being annoying on purpose (or you are brain damaged).
Anything people should know, learn or discuss for real is buried in a pile of 3000 repetitive comments or in some obscure channel/blog/site nobody visits. Normies like you became a hivemind of schizophrenic morons.

When you live in a republic or a democratic representative who do people turn too for information? They turn to intellectuals and professors in university's. The vast majority happen to be liberal. They in return teach students what they believe is right. Them students then go to work in other fields like science, economics, journalist, computer programming etc etc.

The Bible belt has the most theft but the weakest welfare policies. Weak welfare is intentional due to their mythologized bootstrap culture and fear of dependency. If welfare caused crime, California would have exponentially more theft than everyone else.

Alaska is also HUGE on Welfare and their crime rates dropped like a rock.

heavy.com/news/2019/06/alaskas-permanent-income/

Could it be that most intellectuals are liberal because they are smarter and actually know what's going on and know how to solve our problems? Or is there some huge conspiracy from the height of culture?

Ah Jow Forums. I love being super smart and good at political research. It's like hitting max level on an RPG and going back to lower level areas just to look all the nooks and crannies.

Attached: f8ww0nuuffzz.png (336x265, 99K)

You're completely ignoring my points. Welfare creates anti social behaviour and destroys families. People are dependent on the government. California has been the highest and is globally known for it's crimes in south central LA.

The most evil people in this world have been smart. Being smart means people can set up a system for themselves to enslave the rest. That was seen with the financial system. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Communists leaders thought they were smart but starved millions to death. It's all down to what works best for people. Liberty ideologies have been proven to be the best. Something liberal's use to represent until they were hijacked by leftists.

You're completely ignoring my points. Alaska literally gives it's people $1000/yr ON TOP of welfare and they say a reduction in crime and poverty. You can not draw any correlation between welfare and crime.

Poverty causes crime. NOT welfare. Proof below

The Bible Belt has
high poverty
low welfare

California has
high poverty
high welfare

States with higher crime have higher poverty but variable welfare.

Attached: 44-1483714907.png (940x565, 340K)

Here is ALL crime. Yeah it's Wikipedia but you can literally just check the URC and verify it for yourself.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States

Seriously? People in Alaska spend most of their time indoors throughout the year. It's a tiny population with little social life.

This is unbelievable delusional. You're ignoring all the facts. Oakland California is one of the highest crime rate cities and then you say crime is low in California lol?

Any area's in a city where people live on welfare is full of crime and you're ignoring these basic facts. The bible belt are not low in welfare.

Facts? Libtards dont even know what facts is...They think it's a type of a drug probably.

You are taking 1 city and saying it represents the whole state. California has welfare widespread. But crime in that state as a whole is significantly lower than the weak-welfare states I mentioned.

Let's return to my original point shall we? What does the RESEARCH say? The research says crime is a poverty problem not a character or morale problem. The specific ASPECT of poverty that accelerates crime (other than the obvious) is lead paint. Lead LITERALLY poisons people's brains. It became such a problem that the US government outlawed it. This has been researched to death and lead paint is the DIRECT CAUSE AND EFFECT relationship to crime. it LITERALLY poisons the brain and causes "bad morales."

chicagotribune.com/investigations/ct-lead-poisoning-science-met-20150605-story.html

Crime is not lower? Where did you come up with that? And where did you come up with the low welfare?

>All the facts say liberals are right about pretty much every debate and talking point.

Attached: LowEnergyBait.jpg (600x600, 32K)

I literally linked an infographic and a full article showing you the exact factual figures that crime is lower in California than all the Bible Belt states. I have the facts. All you have is the mental image of them darn tootin niggers, bustin' a cap in eachothers assholes because of all them deadbeat dads and rap music and 40oz cobra liquor.

Why did a Violent Leftist Terrorist get a cushy position as a college professor at U-Chicago?

>California has 50% of the Police positions filled
>California became a sanctuary state because so many illegals were not reporting crimes against them to the police
>California is known to manipulate uncomfortable statistics
>California lets criminals who were caught on camera committing multiple violent and potentially lethal assaults go with a plea deal for a misdemeanor
>California lets Niggers chimp out and gives them room to destroy but arrests people for defending their own property from said niggers.
Nigger, I know your professors said a thing to you, but why do you just take it on blind faith?

>tfw you are closer to God when shit posting in slide threads than monks in monasteries

Attached: download_20190806_211421.jpg (512x246, 35K)

The same reason Breitbart got cushy with neo nazis? What's your point?

Nothing you said has anything to do with the cause and effect relationship of crime in the US.

I also love beating off to how smart I am. I have a huge mirror in my room just so I can whack it to myself after I smoke a joint and dominate plebs.

elite pedophiles that serve a powerful, evil and disembodied intellect.

they feed on horror and despair. soon they will be brought to justice by Almighty God.

>Whataboutism that doesn't even address the fucking question
Everything I said demonstrates why your statistics are wrong.
>I'm so smart
>>Smokes Joint
Fucking retard.

>soon they will be brought to justice by Almighty God.

My God obviously. Not yours.

THE God.

also for any lurkers out there who still haven't heard of the finders cult. get ready for a wild mind fuck.

Attached: finders.jpg (1263x2907, 1.78M)

>Whataboutism that doesn't even address the fucking question
Your question is invalid because it makes no point.
>Everything I said demonstrates why your statistics are wrong.
You cited 3 or 4 unverifiable instances in a state that has a population of 39 million people. Your cherry-pickings can fuck right off.
>Smokes Joint
AND STILL WHOOPIN YO ASS LIKE AOC AFTER SHE UNLEASHED HER PROFESSIONALY REPRESSED RAGE ON DONALD J NIGGA!! WOOF WOOF!! :3

and dat ain't a joint. It's a FUCKING BLUNT BRO!

In conclusion, the world's scientists are authentic and the people doubting all the world's science and research have just drawn the wrong conclusion and can't admit their wrong due to entitlements and God complexes. Which should have been an obvious conclusion to begin with. It's been fun. Let's do this again sometime.

The original meme needs to updated with the evil inter-dimensional AI deity behind the reptilian, holding...I dunno.

Kikes and their shabbos goy.
But the niggers at the top don't even believe in anything.
The kikes are locked in a supremacist world view that is actually a bait by their elites to scapegoat the useless fuckers.
kek,WW3 would end in the extermination of the jews.
OY VEY YOUR MASTERS ARE REALLY OUT TO BETRAY YOU.

And what will they do upon the day the golems turn against?
United we stand.

Attached: 9b23da128e3237263970bff3c0fb961540857eb6b38e98654d6a03384d2568ae242.jpg (1366x768, 124K)