¥chan owner summoned

He could just not come pretty sure that's not against the law is it? He hasn't done anything

They'll be able interviewing Watkins. Someone should give him some crack so he doesn't know put us all to sleep

>Why wasn't Instagram shut down? That's where the manifesto was first published.

the manifesto might be hoax, the FBI haven't confirmed it to be real yet.

the shooting might not have been political at all and whoever faked the manifesto set off the antifa shooter and got 9 people killed.

Has this board improved since infinity got shut down?
I still can't believe they actually did it, especially under such bogus claims.

yeah on paper he has rights and doesn't have to come. however, the problem these days is your rights ONLY exist on paper. they'll make his life hell if he doesn't. but he could still just not show up, and if they do infringe his rights, he is justified to go full shooter mode himself. godspeed against this kike infested government.

Yeah but the point is to flood cripplechan with normies. It won't work because normies can't interact with anything that doesn't have big colourful cartoon GUI made for retards.

The chans are easy targets. This is a textbook tactic to attack against civil liberties: target the most disgusting and morally reprehensible individual/organization, so that no-one dares to defend it, and then ram through legislation that not only takes out the target but severely limits / takes away rights from everyone else as well.

>Implying the FBI would discard a good situation to demonize the right
Yea, nah

maybe but they've been silent on the manifesto and his motives so far.

The media is incredibly inaccurate and often let screeching twitter users dictate their content, only an idiot would buy into their narratives without further support.

(example see CBS claiming it was Jow Forums where the manifesto was posted.)

>The document was shared on Jow Forums, an online forum where users can post anonymously. In it, the suspect denounces Hispanic people in Texas, cites concerns about losing American jobs to automation and criticizes both political parties. The text includes a reference to the Christchurch mosque shootings in New Zealand, which left 51 people dead.

cbsnews.com/news/el-paso-texas-shooting-suspect-patrick-crusius-what-we-know/

>be me
>browsing instagram
>friend posts long document about the white race
>haha nice
>cross post on cripplechan with a joke about shooting
>cripplechan shuts down
mfw

Attached: file.png (3072x3118, 3.39M)

Because they like to subpoena people instead lawmaking so they can virtue signal on C-SPAN and pretend like they're doing something when in reality congress has near single digit approval ratings.

>congress has near single-digit approval ratings
That can't be true

Peaked in '01 at 84% and bottomed out at 9% in '14. Sounds like we need another Big Event.

news.gallup.com/poll/1600/congress-public.aspx
cnn.com/2019/06/01/politics/poll-of-the-week-congress-approval-rating/index.html

Then maybe we can pass PATRIOT ACT pt. 2!

Not trying to defend the msm but
>The document was shared on Jow Forums
Is true

This should be funny at least. I hope he brings up this He could turn this into his own grandstanding opportunity and make the worlds collide.

Attached: 4B9E3867-E272-44FC-86AE-ADAF115DE388.png (450x449, 317K)

Who are and where are these pollsters?

This is going to backfire on the dems horribly

If he comes he's a turbocuck

This is the battle for the 1st amendment. Recognize it.

And Instagram, and infinity chan. At least they know Jow Forums is a website.

>Who and where are these pollsters
Gallup Polling. Usually call random peoples' phones. Sometimes they do it in the field.

Attached: Hacker4ChanStrikesAgain.gif (250x333, 1004K)

he has your IP and will show it to congress.

>Free speech.
>Except you can't talk about White Supremecism.
USA USA USA.

The kikes are overplaying their hand.

Has Zuckerberg ever been called to appear for the crimes which are live streamed over facebook? How about Dorsey for all the incitement of violence on Twitter? They won't because they're kosher.

Zionist Occupied Government, it's all just a distraction while they rob you blind and turn your country into a communist police state.

>Supremacy
ftfy

But you're right, Trump said in his tweet that hate speech will be prosecuted by the death penalty through "swift due process."

Zuck and Jack were called in to talk about, uh...what even was that about? I don't remember, must have been nothing important.

Yeah, I'm still not convinced that the manifesto is legit. It's 4 pages of rambling, doesn't mention a specific target like Tarrants did. Just doesn't feel right. It'd be pretty easy to just have manifestos ready for when a shooting takes place especially if the shooter didn't have much social media activity that might contradict the manifesto.

Doesn't he live overseas?
Good luck getting him to comply.

If they can find him

Attached: Screenshot_20190807-095810.png (1440x2960, 1.51M)

he said he would testify in that vid, based.
thinking we fall for NWO false flags in 2019, get real.

>Niggers shoot up everything every other day.
>It's only a problem when questionably white people do it.
USA USA USA!

It's not a summon, Jesus Christ, you illiterate fucks. It's just bleating.

>Trump said in his tweet that hate speech will be prosecuted by the death penalty
No he didn't. He said he wanted the legislators to allow the death penalty for hate CRIMES. "Hate speech" isn't even a fucking thing.

washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-there-is-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/?noredirect=on

This. They will set up a right-wing 9/11 to annihilate freedom of expression and gun laws.
Lately, the narrative being push is that right-wing attacks killed more people than Islamic ones. But they always ommit 9/11.
My guess is that they will try something even bigger than 9/11

His recent video is awesome, he will single-handedly destroy the deep state.

>Called before.
>Not a summon.
He can't reject it so it's a summon.

>Zuck and Jack were called in to talk about, uh...what even was that about?
They were only called in for political bias/censorship as far as I know, which was a complete fucking shitshow since they blatantly lied to congress about it and nothing ever came of it.

I don't think they've ever been called to appear for streamed violence or incitement posted or anything else. And they've been a publisher for years now, since editorially censoring content for opinion invalidates the platform protections they had (same protections given to phone companies so they're not held accountable for crimes planned over phones, etc).

That's pretty bad anyways. Imagine that you get into a scuffle with a nigger and the cops show up. You coukd be in a world of shit if he claims you called him a nigger.

there's also been what looks like an obviously fake twitter account going around.

for some reason Andrew Anglin keeps making Daily Stormer articles about it as though it were real when it's clearly bogus

Attached: Screen-Shot-2019-08-04-at-1.19.22-AM.png (433x763, 194K)

>You coukd be in a world of shit if he claims you called him a nigger.
Not from the government you wouldn't. Read the fucking article I linked. There are NO LAWS prohibiting you from calling a nigger a nigger. None. It's unconstitutional to create such a law.

Unconstitutional until unpatriot act

>Some statute overrides the constitution
>Flag
No wonder.

I meant hate crimes, not hate speech. His tweet did not clarify if every hate crime would be punished by death or just those that are murders.

This one bitch cop thought she could arrest someone for calling someone a nigger. Quite a lot of people (not getting the polling but it's out there) think hate speech should be a crime. Do you think it will always go unpunished? (Yes, I know it would be unconsitutional.)
bitchute.com/video/ArVkge8d9cJJ/

It's real folks! A cripple just flew over my house.

Nowadays any hobo can be summoned before US congress it seems.

>His tweet did not clarify if every hate crime would be punished by death or just those that are murders.
You do understand that twitter has a character limit per tweet.. don't you? You do realize that nearly ALL crimes can have a "hate crime" label slapped on them.. don't you?
>This one bitch cop thought she could arrest someone for calling someone a nigger.
>This one bitch
>No name
>No information so anyone, anywhere, could identify "this one bitch"
Yeah fuck off with your "because I said so" bullshit.
>Quite a lot of people (not getting the polling but it's out there) think hate speech should be a crime.
AKA: "Twitter says it, so it must be true"
>Do you think it will always go unpunished?
There is not a single state in this nation that would ratify an amendment which voids the 1st. It takes 38. You've heard the phrase "the 2nd protects the 1st", right? So the answer to your question is: it's not something to consider. It will ALWAYS be allowed.

I'd tell you to stop being a retarded nigger.. but you can't; it's in your genes.

Attached: 1544983474970.png (150x150, 47K)

>He said he wanted the legislators to allow the death penalty for hate CRIMES
Have you read 1984 ?
>This one bitch cop
Weiner circle incident that happened 3 days ago you fucking queer.

As I said in they will probably set up something huge to have a psychological impact big enough so that the majority does not care about constitution.
Pearl Harbor, 9/11, that kind of shit.

>You do understand that twitter has a character limit per tweet.. don't you?
Yes, and that's why the fucking president should stop shitposting on it every day.

>Yeah fuck off with your "because I said so" bullshit.
>AKA: Twitter says so...
It's not "because I said so," a law enforcement officer said so. That's why she's a dumb bitch. It's not "Twitter says so", actual people say so: Half of all Democrats think hate speech should be punished. White people are the only group where the majority still thinks otherwise. You can do your own research or continuing covering your ears and pretending everybody still cares about the constitution.

>There is not a single state in this nation that would ratify an amendment which voids the 1st
>not a single state
What century are you living in?
I'm not saying it will be anytime soon. But when whites are replaced, that's when it would happen. It could be civil war with Dixie land types like you trying to resist and getting your asses massacred or a balkanization process. But you're delusional if you think the good old US of A will stay as it is forever and ever, (AMEN) because people will revolt and put a stop to it.

Get your head out of your ass. Not everybody has the Spirit of 1776 flowing through their veins.

>it's a "clueless boomers question an image board admin" episode

Attached: 6.jpg (636x270, 19K)

Hes in Thailand.

Brief history of chans.

A rumor that Jim Watkins was very close to Edward Snowden when he was residing near the US Yokota air base.

Attached: provide information.png (1166x756, 1.24M)

This.
Idk why Americans think they are immune to this shit. American exceptionalism truly is a mental illness. Fact is, most people will give up their guns without a fight if the gov bans them.

i would love that, a chance to drop televised redpills so hard. EVERY question would get a truthbomb response

>Weiner circle
Holy fuck. Just TWO FUCKING WORDS and .. gosh, now people can know what the fuck you're talking about! So fucking difficult.
There are NO news stories (local or national) indicating that he was taken to jail. There is NO indication that he apologized. I'd bet what happened was a male stepped in and said "you can't take him to jail for that".
>B-b-but.. police can't falsely threaten to arrest you!
They fucking can. They do it in murder investigations all the fucking time. The only form of lying disallowed by police is that which falls under entrampment. THis ain't it, nigger.

>Have you read 1984 ?
You have no fucking idea what you're talking about, do you?
>"Lets have a penalty for a crime' is equal to 1984!
.. fucking retard.

>so that the majority does not care about constitution
That's when those of us who do will use our "pew pew sticks". Did I dumb it down enough for you to grasp it, nigger?

>THE PRESIDENT SHOULD DO WHAT I WANT! NOT WHAT HE WANTS! WHAT GIVES HIM SUCH AUTHORITY.
Holy fuck you're retarded. I stopped reading there because.. you're a fucking retarded nigger and I don't care to read the rest of your chimpout.

Confirmed Retard.

>Nigger see, nigger do.
Yeah, I've already called you a retard. In the exact post that you're responding to. Good job.

Projection. You're the one chimping out ITT, calling people niggers when they present information. I bet you think you're so smart, too.

>He hasn't read 1984
Thoughtcrimes, faggot. Stop playing dumb
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime

>Continues to use the words of others as if they're his.
You niggers don't have a single creative bone in your bodies, do you?

>Hate CRIMES are thought crimes!
You don't know what thought crimes are. He wasn't talking about THINKING about shit. He was talking about crimes that are already in the books which can have the label "hate crime" slapped on them. For example, murder.

Yeah bro, I'm a nigger. And a retard. Sure thing bud. Got it the first time. And all times after that. Great arguments.

Attached: meltdown.png (678x492, 620K)

Imagine being such a retarded nigger that .. this .. response is the best you can do.

Even if he does go it's not like they can do anything to him.
This is just for approval ratings so boomers and dems can write "omg racist" on jewtube and media can write 50 articles about whoever Serator who "SLAMMED THE EVIL RACIT WITH FACTS".
They'll ask him a bunch unrelated and unimportant questions, where Jim like the autist he is will put people to sleep

Attached: 1565080774555.jpg (640x797, 79K)

You linked an article earlier contradicting yourself. Here's the headline : "Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment"

America is under attack and Trump appears to enjoy it.

The topic of this thread is about Jim Watkins summoned before congress. Lets get back on topic.

>Doesn't understand one of the following:
>1st Amendment PROTECTS speech
>"Exception" means "to exclude"
By saying "there is no exclusion for 'hate speech'" the Supreme Court is effectively saying "there is no such thing as hate speech - it's all protected speech".

it wasnt the shooter who posted it, but the site hosted the manifesto regardless

but anyway correct me if im wrong, but i dont think the manifesto is illegal content AND the website isnt liable for what their users post
this is just ami law & order in action kino

This. Normies love to quote pic related but they’re amazingly blind when it happens in front of them. It never occurs to them that socialists/trade unionists/Jews were as despised back then as the Chan autists are today.

Attached: 74309F10-6865-4DBC-BBA1-6C004CCAD42F.jpg (700x466, 39K)

It has. Cripplechan has better threads but traffic is so slow, now we have a combination of the both and it’s pretty alright.

There has been a target on the Chans for years. We are the epicenter for wrong-thing to the alt left. Anonymous (no identity to politicize) + uncensored (no lame ideas from the left getting propped up from propagandists) + prone to dissent = everything the alt left fears most.

Attached: This_agin.png (1264x940, 380K)

>mfw the same boomers that cant figure out how to post pictures to facebook will be asking infinity to turn over the account info of his users and their posting histories

I'm not too versed on cripplechan (I've only visited a handful of times in recent history). Two pros that I'd love to see here:
- 1 captcha per day
- user owned boards (or at the very least, more fucking boards)

>not calling me a nigger after sperging NIGGER for 12 posts
I was wrong, see ? Let's get back on topic. What's your thoughts on this pic ? I think Fredrick deserves more respect.

Attached: hotwheels.jpg (1009x4812, 1.83M)

I'm a retarded nigger; I can't do any better. I can't even imagine what it would be like to be as smart as you. You must be able to detect retards and niggers from a 50 mile radius.

Of course the politicians on both sides play these moral panics to their favor. But whatever will get them more votes is what they do. Unfortunately they don't stand by their own principles or those of the constitution like my retard-nigger detecting compatriot does. As the retard-nigger detector mentions, the Supreme Court still stands by the constitution, but not before the dog and pony show of politicians and states suggesting and possibly making laws which make their rounds and eventually get struck down.

>Pretends I give enough of a fuck to look at who I'm responding to on red-herrings

>I'm a retarded nigger

Attached: 1537783026431.jpg (599x730, 43K)

i want to make my own chan where the only boards are Jow Forums and /leftypol/ and its set up like a game where we constantly infiltrate and attack each other. and we get to see the difference in how the boards are moderated, /leftypol/ jannies will be banning people left and right for wrongthink while Jow Forums jannies value freedom.

can integrate a little html5 multiplayer game into the site where people from both boards fight each other for their side to gain real life control of certain options on the website.

So transparently obvious, normies truly aren't human

when one side wins the html5 game round they get to nuke the enemy board, it deletes all content and bans them for 5 hours.

Do (((they))) WANT everyone and their dog to end up here?

Because broadcasting the chans in front of congress will just send about 50 million curious normies here. I guess it's time to drop redpills nonstop.

Attached: ((((((The Media))))))).jpg (4652x2692, 3.72M)

Digits.
>Good work in here. I'd subscribe to your newsletter.

>but the site hosted the manifesto
You mean someone reposted it there? Well, then Jow Forums is fucked. As is Facebook, Twitter, and probably every platform that allows images to be posted in some form.

This is a really good idea user. I hope you figure this all out.

I hope you also figure out how to better protect from bots--capcha isn't enough. You need chat-bots working in reverse to spot bots instead of posting.

this.

inb4 frazzled.rip

Attached: 700d32394e1c2c90a7fff872b0b82cda1da2722adff22e200550203f9dd3f014.png (542x700, 949K)

This needs to be broken up into smaller chunks--the names on the product are illegible.

>implying the congress has ever done anything
He should say dat he didn't believe his users were actually human individuals but bots from 3 letter agencies

Attached: C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_1565003297594.jpg (1424x1414, 834K)

because jannies on 8ch don't delete calls to violence and other stupid fedposts