Is this how "normal" people actually think?

>(((progressing society forwards)))

Such progress.

Attached: ff.jpg (720x692, 40K)

A handful of autist spammers on /qa/ don't equal /qa/, does Jow Forums like nigger penises because of a handful of spammed nigger penis threads?

this are the nigger-tier indians that poo in the loo, Jow Forums

*that don't poo in the loo

Supplanting liberty and freedom? No one right of center ever called me a bigot or told me how to behave.

>handful of spammers

Okay man you can have your opinions of /qa/ and I'll have mine. I dont think the groups of nigger spammers compare to the sheer amount of people on /qa/ who call for these things but its not like I can quantify it.

To me its more accurate to compare to the nigger span and shilling on /gif/

Progressive to where exactly?

>Pedophilia" was pretty normal throughout most of time sans the past hundred years.
>(((They))) dont want this to be known or for this to be widely understood. Men still are filled with pedos its just repression and brainwashing keeps it down
Kill yourself pedo.

*Progressing

Thats not an argument. If you want to sperg like a boomer please leave this thread and go somewhere else. You are just reacting with your ingrained feminist programming like a good bot.

To differing shades of Brazil.

No less that 8% of the western population think this way.

everyone has a degree of paedophilia within then. just like everyone is capable of murder. but that doesn't make it ok.

>actually screencapping a ">Jow Forums is one person" post

Attached: 6f20c012130e600317ed27b384a602f96668442794e917fd26637e1f659dfbe3.gif (200x200, 3.89M)

>surplantanting

Attached: 1565020150608.gif (330x190, 2.85M)

No, everyone else on Jow Forums hates you. You all need to fuck off to Stormfront.

/qa/ is small and unlisted; people who find their way there to press social crusades for the staff are not there for the micro culture that spurred up.
It's like saying q boomers on Jow Forums, here for their off-topic tripfag worship, are among the cultural thesis of /pol,.
Please understand.

Attached: 1538222077699.jpg (650x650, 126K)

It’s an example of your mind on community college language and history.

Protip: using bigger words than unnecessary makes you look like a complete child. Shorter and to the point, faggots.

I'll take the entirety of human history where pedophilia was okay and also where females hit puberty far later over the modernistic conjecture that its always bad.

Romans married at 12 usually as one example, as did many many cultures and societies. This is coupled with average age of puberty being far later than the 11 or 12 it is today for females.

"ok"

Attached: 1554605825449.jpg (306x306, 24K)

Ok. I do like the anime posting, so I'll at least give you the benefit of doubt.

Attached: ff.jpg (850x1201, 237K)

This person isn’t white, and we all know it.

Jow Forums is a board of peace, also top cringe to the newfag in OP's pic

Why do people who supposedly care about progress so obsessed with trying to pretend niggers are smart and bitching about LGBT “rights” (as if they’re denied rights)?
The China model IS the progress model. We’ve wasted so much time bitching about irreconcilable ideological differences that China is going to own the world within a generation or two. Our politics in the moment are completely meaningless at this point because we’ve already lost.

KYS pedo scum. Pedos used to get thrown in bogs.

Jow Forums is actually one of many reflections of the pained gasps of a biological civilization that has become too cumbersome and divided to be effectively governed by easily corrupted, limited, and arrogant humans - the blind frustration, inclinations to believe fantastical conspiracies in place of uncomfortable and mundane realities, ever inward spiral of intellectual dishonesty, and general unfocused asspain are found all across social media subcultures regardless of political bent. We refuse to acknowledge that social media and the information age are unironically a disaster when you add human psychology to the mix - we are inherently emotionally driven egotists prone to favoring ideology over data and prefer simplistic answers to staggeringly complex problems.

The rise of machine intelligence will revolutionize everything. The same people unable to process gender transitioning will be completely unable to navigate a world where your mind can be copied and you can populate an entire village with the same person, exist within a completely interconnected hive structure with no barriers of self vs other, exist within different forms on different days, or even uploaded into another person to either supplant or augment or momentarily visit their mind. Catgirls and men in dresses are pathetic attempts to understand how fundamentally civilization will need to change to adapt to these possibilities. Even basic cultural notions such as self and free will and justice will become staggeringly confusing to define.

Attached: 1561630419608.jpg (850x1204, 1.01M)

marriage doesn't automatically include sex though. marriage simply used to be a man's ownership of a woman, and sex would begin when the woman was ready, 12 is not typically when a woman or a girl is ready, its usually around 14-16. and if sex occurs then it's not paedophilia.

Jewish lies.

>go back to rape, naturalism, and low populations in lands of plenty
sounds pretty based desu

This.

Oh my. If anything, this past week has proven to me most Americans don't care a single bit about freedom and are content having all their choices made for them.

Attached: 1565193071790.jpg (1024x683, 102K)

No, retards. Men are naturally attracted to visual sexual cues that signal fertility. It has nothing to do with age. Youth is one of those cues. So yes, men historically have been attracted to (and still are) girls that are just going through puberty, which of course is under 18. But they aren't children, since biologically a child is a prepubescent (has nothing to do with age). A pedophile is attracted to children, i.e. no sexual cues of fertility, which is abnormal.

And yes, men were wed to prepubescent girls sometimes farther back in history, but that was not because they wanted to fuck them. Rather it was because marriage was used to tie families together. An older man would wed a young girl in order to take her from her father that couldn't take care of her in the case of peasants, or would offer land and such in exchange in the case of nobility. The older husband would care for the girl until she became fertile, and then fuck her so they could have children.

Marriage back then was NOT about love OR about sex. Quit applying modern standards to ancient peoples and cultures. And please open a fucking history book.

he sounds like he just wants to fuck kids and is looking for a justification.

as far as I'm aware marriage would typically happen long before sex ever occured. the primary objective of the relationship would to be to forge a bond between man and wife and establish and equilibrium between the two, especially within the home where the woman would spend the majority of her time. and when the two were as bonded as they could be, and the woman in question was at an acceptable level of maturation, then sex would begin. and it wouldn't be about getting off, or recreation, it'd primarily be about having children.

the other user just sounds like he wants it to all be about sex.

Just leave if all you are capable of is posting this programmed bullshit. You pathetic faggots don't belong.

Except they did frequently at that age. To say it never happened or was really rare is strong conjecture requiring a lot of proof I dont think you can provide. I'm no christfag but even marry biblically had jesus at 13 or so.

Sex was not infrequent at all pre puberty, since puberty was often started at 15 or so back then.

Even if you think what you just said it is argument for age of consent being 13 or so. Not what it is now.

Attached: ff.jpg (3370x290, 200K)

Disgusting.
I hate the way these people use the word progress to refer to socialism.
It is the Marxist presumption that communism is inevitable and so any resistance to socialization is seen as regressive.
Marxism itself is regressive.
The ideology is over 150 years old.
Socialism and communism have been implemented in varying ways in dozens of countries.
None of it has worked successfully.
I am prepared to accept that the modern paradigm will not last forever.
The nature of man is to seek constant improvement.
That said it is time to acknowledge marxist ideology for the historical relic that it is and instead seek a different future

If someone posted that in one of my threads i'd call them shill to be sure

Attached: GenPatten.jpg (580x584, 114K)

you seem to be inferring a lot onto what I said. because nothing you've said connects to anything I've said as of yet. I actually agree with everything you just said though, ironically.

Just get out of here. Youre an idiot.

25 percent of men are attracted to less fertile candidates though, this is a low ball estimate for how many men are pedophiles.

Cute

Attached: ff.jpg (752x1062, 440K)

this is what being brainwashed looks like

Yeah I was really responding to the other guy (the pedo) and looped you into it instead of another one of his posts. Got mixed up. My mistake.

Its funny because the staff doesnt actually monitor /QA/.
It has basically become a /JP/ colony.
/mlpol/ occupied the board for weeks and nobody did anything

I absolutely cannot believe how many femcucks are here now. If you told me the majority of this site would be filled with people having the same opinions as feminist boomer women 10 years ago I'd have laughed at you.

I hate what this place has become

Attached: ff.jpg (1200x800, 160K)

2-12 is a tad low but between 13 and 16 is probably ideal in most cases.

no its the mentally retarded left.

normies get told what to "think"
no realy they rather feel they do not think.

age of consent wasn't just about sex. age of consent was about overall consent, the ability to make life-changing decisions. and lets not forget that life expectancy was much lower back then so you really couldn't afford to wait another six to eight years to make your decision on marriage. it had to happen as soon as possible and they decided that the age of ten was the earliest where these decisions should be presented to the children in question. not that children should simply be able to have sex at that age. that's your own mindset inferring your own desires onto that decision.

I personally don't believe the women should have any say in the matter, I think the families should have complete autonomy over the marriage of their children, and complete oversight too. but I don't believe having sex with someone 13+ should be criminal within the bounds of marriage. I do believe however that preferably, sex outside of marriage all round should be taboo at best, criminalised at worst. so to me age of consent laws are unnecessary. children, and women in general shouldn't be given that level of autonomy, it should be a collective choice on the part of the family. and science too of course. as in, the level of actual maturity both physically and mentally should have massive impact on the choices the family makes for the child.

>2-12 is a tad low

Not the point. Its just what the study found they responded to. I think they shouldve used 6-12 and I bet if they did the rate would be much higher.

>13-16 is ideal in most cases

Yes would be more ideal to more people but the point is the level pre 12 is much higher than anyone will want to acknowledge, and thats why you dont see a lot of the studies like I linked.

Again. If used 6-12 or 8-12 the rates would be much higher. 2-4 is not developed much at all.

It's stupid to think that Jow Forums has one ideology. Jow Forums is just a forum, and it changes to whatever the users are posting at that moment. It's not left, right, up, or down. There are a lot of different kinds of people with different views on here.

all good mate, it happens.

>liberty and freedom
I thought these two were the same thing.

>
>Just get out of here. Youre an idiot.
>
> (You)
>25 percent of men are attracted to less fertile candidates though

Men don't actually know who is fertile on an instinctual level. We just go by visual sex markers. But youth is also a marker because it was common for women to miscarry or children to die in infancy or shortly thereafter. So men that wanted to ensure they had offspring started a woman young to have plenty of chances.

But again, it was always about offspring on an instinctual level. A young girl with zero signs of fertility (as in a prepubescent) would not be found attractive by a man. Pedophiles are a very small portion of the population. It is a sexual deviancy, similar to homos.

Women didnt make most of the decisions so that doesnt seem very relevant, and the law was the law. You can try to justify it however you want but the fact stands only with women empowerment did you see current modern laws that fly in the face of the rest of history.

>very small

This is conjecture. Low ball it seems to be 25, and likely higher. That isnt "small". Transgenders are a " small" part of the population.

if by normal you mean liberals and trannies then yes

Yes. The ones who do not change when violence becomes the norm will be nothing but fodder for xp. Good for farming.

Attached: 18df648bb1bea478dbabad406416e246ad27bbeccdf4390258656e459d0ca2ad.png (573x764, 220K)

Translation:KILL WHITE PEOPLE!

AoC is because men want young teen virgins not used up hags.

normal people to me are weird, like how can you accept men castrating themselves and pretending to be women and canadians sucking off dogs

i don't want to be normal, i'd rather Hitler was ressurected

Yes, and women dont like that.

Normal people don't give a fuck about politics as long as politicians aren't fucking them over, so, no? Where the fuck did the Russia/China thing come from, anyway? Perhaps they are conflating the two countries hardline position on homosexuality and ignoring the commie bullshit along side/former commie bullshit alongside?

Attached: 1565279979741.jpg (560x740, 111K)

He's been told his whole life that any change that (((they))) want is progress. So it's no wonder when exposed to ideas to the contrary that he immediately assumes they must be a regression or impediment to progress.

Like most lefties, he probably lives a comfortable insulated middle class lifestyle. He hasn't had to live with nogs or (((refugees))). He doesn't have to interact with the working classes, except briefly when he is wasting his money on things he doesn't need. He'll never know what they truly think as such people aren't able to speak their mind to him, because their livelihood depends on it.

For him, it's entirely possible that the African space program is any day now. If only whitey would stop holding them back with racism. It is only possible to hold this view if all you have to go by is (((movies))).

I know what you mean and I agree.

Yes. The average retard has been carefully conditioned all his life to accept and embrace their planned Brave New World

Attached: 1536323621226119.jpg (480x360, 14K)

Glad to hear!

Attached: ff.png (1646x1619, 1.3M)

sophistry

Reminder that teen preganacy is what teeters replacement rates for white people back and forth.

NOOOO user. We need more women only getting in a relationship after going through state "education" and being on the cock carousel.

Attached: ff.jpg (1355x858, 291K)

Jow Forums used to be aware of the AoC issue, and its modern role inspired by jews and early christian feminists.
But a lot of the newfriends would rather be led by their implanted morals instead of being pragmatic.

Attached: Screenshot_20190808-125356__01.jpg (1046x773, 202K)

Actually qa user ITT, sorry, your board is pretty shit.

Attached: ff.jpg (1344x1396, 532K)

>The essence of anonymous imageboards has always been center left.

HAHAHA

Yeah okay this place was further right in the past with massive amounts of gore and cp posted constantly. The reality is whining about free speech is a fairly recent agenda as we used to even call each other obscene slurs in online games as well. The internet has gone soft thanks to all the normie phone posters and generally speaking normies into computers as well.

this is just leftist cope
their fetishization of cultural/ethnic plurality is blowing up in their face and giving rise to tribalist politics which, in a grand stroke of irony, threatens the leftists’ political goals
to any normal person this was the most expected outcome of such nonsense migration policies, but the leftist is not a normal person. it is a husk of a person, a narcissist hellbent on achieving some kind of transformative societal change for the purpose of declaring themselves our moral and intellectual superiors while perceiving themselves as “on the right side of history”
therefore the fact that this strategy hasn’t actually worked out as planned is, to the leftist, not evidence that his strategy was flawed, rather it is indicative that he is right and society must continue to be transformed
leftism is a mental illness

Attached: EF8932FC-7E5A-4A16-9DCC-2AA442EB0246.jpg (400x400, 30K)

I miss the cp and gore. Kept retards out.

Youre not wrong. Online games I could be more vile than I could here now if I wished

Heres another red pill on the age of consent matter. The attraction to pubescent girls is entirely reproductive(not sexual) as they lack all sexual features at that age. Men are altered to fertility in girls as this is hard coded in the DNA for the survival of the human race.

Pay no mind to goons. They're unreasonable and paranoid.

I posted about it for years here. It does seem like more and more people now just tow the typical feminist lines.

Attached: ff.jpg (2048x1259, 473K)

Qualifying "reactions" is baseless nonesense. Normal men dont want to fuck kids anymore than they want to fuck a blender. Sure, theres 5 million years of evolution that hardwires our brain to send impulses along our gray matter to our dicks saying "fuck that, fuck that now." Its just chemicals, and it takes a nano second to get turned off, because we'll change our behavior in order to have big fat sloppy vaginas cumming on our cocks.

That, and harming kids rightfully gets you put up against a wall and shot. Kys before you get found out pedos.

Looks like a dilating tranny

Your statement flies in the face of data posted. Conjecture is meaningless.

>kys

A redditor. What a surprise.

Attached: ff.jpg (752x1062, 74K)

yet here you are shill

I come here because this place is the second largest retard exhibit in the history of mankind.
The largest is the U.S. government.

White people: All Asians look the same.
Also White people: (pic related)

They look distinct to me. But maybe it is because I'm white.

It's also different clothes and lighting.
If it was just their heads on a white background with the same lighting and from the same angle, you'd barely be able to tell them apart.

First off are you ~INTP.(in new to this personality letter crap), cuz i am and i can get what you mean.
That being said, I think your first paragraph hinges on the assumption of Jow Forums and thus expanding to the greater scope of humanity, won't change. In other words it basically expanded the notion of Jow Forums is one person to Jow Forums is this board within this specific timeframe. Then guess you generalized the shit outta humanity and skipped the egg. E.g. this technology wouldn't have been created and developed without humans. Where the vast majority aren't in the same plane as those whom invented technology either.

I'd agree machine intelligence will change everything but that hasn't happened yet. It prob won't change until consumers or the general populace has access to id wager this technology but miniaturized. By then I hope culture, education and health are improved greatly which is probably doubtful right now. Anywho, right now is probably the time when humans start to delve into interfacing themselves with artificial means. This probably will appear really primitive to you but I'd wager if ur a neet or related that your talents would be well received in current developments into whatever you think the future will bring.

I refuse to believe that reddit cancer like that came from this fucking site It has to be a fucking visiting nu male

>glowing intensifies

>"Pedophilia" was pretty normal throughout most of time sans the past hundred years.

>(((They))) dont want this to be known or for this to be widely understood. Men still are filled with pedos its just repression and brainwashing keeps it down

Sir, could you please fuck off?

Attached: clown.png (500x488, 206K)

pic related, "heritage"

Attached: 06_21_2013_periodic-table.jpg (1891x1131, 332K)

Kill yourself pedo

LCH? Who knew Mike “Savage” Weiner was so popular here.