Not being religious, and for the most part, feeling everything to be subjective anyway, how can they feel to have a say in morality based problems?
What is wrong with oppressing certain groups of people?
What is wrong with discrimination on the basis of race?
What is wrong with men and women not having equal rights?
What is wrong with intolerance towards sexual deviants?
How can one assume these things to be wrong without a believe in objective morality?
Other urls found in this thread:
Hollywood, a proxy of the jewish elite.
Marxism is rooted in occidental philosophy.
Name a moral system that allows the discrimination of races.
First explain to me what's immoral about racism.
>What is wrong with oppressing certain groups of people?
What is wrong with oppressing white scumbags?
>What is wrong with discrimination on the basis of race?
What is wrong on the discrimination on the basis of intolerance?
>What is wrong with men and women not having equal rights?
What is wrong with men doing all the work while women sit at home doing absolutely nothing?
>What is wrong with intolerance towards sexual deviants?
What is wrong with intolerance towards the intolerant?
>How can one assume these things to be wrong without a believe in objective morality?
How can one assume these things to be wrong without a shred of respect for others?
>respect for others
Why is "respecting others" an objectively moral stance?
>What is wrong with oppressing white scumbags?
I would say that speaking out against racism against one group, but supporting it for another is not necessarily wrong, but it is hypocritical. Wether conscious hypocrisy is immoral or not is difficult to decide, but it's certainly a topic worthy of discussion.
>What is wrong on the discrimination on the basis of intolerance?
I didn't say it was, however, because intolerance always trumps over tolerance it will always lead to more economically stable and morally consistent societies. Intolerant societies have less diversity which equals less social, cultural and moral frictions. This will make it easier for people to have a identity and give a clear meaning to life that's in accordance with their ideals without these being constantly undermined by the interests of minorities who feel their own culture, naturally, to be superior over theirs.
>What is wrong with intolerance towards sexual deviants?
Already went over this.
>How can one assume these things to be wrong without a shred of respect for others?
Why do i need to respect other people?
Those who want respect give respect
Consider this:
Being a conservative inherently entails a mentality of COPE. We live together and have to make it work.
Leftist/Radicals don't live like that. They consider only their internal states and wants as valid.