A thread with pic related just got archived after one post. What does it mean?
It means it was a low IQ thread like this. delete
It means your thread fucking sucks and you are paranoid, go take you stupid schizo pills boomer
Look man, if you have some theory or prediction as to what may happen in the near future, write up a bit of that and post it with this image. Low quality/info threads may get deleted and possibly earn you a ban. It's not that our jannies get marching orders from on high to protect the upcoming FEMA Wal-Mart concentration camps from discovery, it's that your thread was shit. I've seen plenty of shit threads stay up, of course, but usually that has to either be because there was no Jow Forums janitor online at the time or it was discovered when it already had over a hundred posts and turned into decent conversation. Good luck with your next thread user.
The original thread had something to do with the recent Walmart shooting and how things didn't add up. Multiple eyewitnesses described 3-4 shooters clad in black and covered in armor and then the media narrative became one shooter who's a white racist.
I wouldn't think much of it user, my guess would be it was a mistake or a duplicate thread issue. You have to remember that eyewitness testimony is shit. These kind of things happen after literally every mass shooting. I do find it suspicious just because of the shift in media focus. We went from almost discussing Epstein's connections even in the MSM to the usual "white people are racist and evil" and "guns are bad". Also, was the thread archived or "pruned or deleted" message? Archived is just bad luck in the thread not getting enough attention and slipping off page ten before getting the attention it deserves. pruned or deleted is either OP deleted it or a janitor.
Adriana Quezada, 39, said she was in the women's clothing section of Walmart with her two children when she "heard shots."
She said she saw four men, dressed in black, moving together firing guns indiscriminately. Police later said they believed the suspect was the "sole shooter" but were continuing to investigate reports that others were involved.
There are cases like that with almost every mass shooting. While I don't discount the idea of the typical view of a false flag attack and setting up some loner as a patsy, it happens too often for it to always be the case that it was a team of professional killers. Plus with that eyewitness, doesn't make sense. If you send a team in to do the killing, you have them split up so the survivors can't say they saw a group of shooters at the same time. I know it seems comedically ridiculous, but yes: eyewitness accounts are often that wrong, especially in traumatic events like a mass shooting. Also, I don't think they'd want the lone wolf shooter being the narrative if they'd sent a team. Think about how much worse the restriction on rights would be right now and calls against both the right wing and the 2nd Amendment if the story was "organized group of racist terrorist cell storm a Wal-Mart and murder dozens of innocents." Now if there is another mass shooting that's what I just described, dig like a motherfucker into every possible aspect of that. There's stuff to look into with the El Paso shooting, but in my view that's more to do with the manifesto and the closing of the other chan.
Look man, if you have some theory or prediction as to what may happen in the near future, write up a bit of that and post it with this image. Low quality/info threads may get deleted and possibly earn you a ban. It's not that our jannies get marching orders from on high to protect the upcoming FEMA Wal-Mart concentration camps from discovery, it's that your thread was shit. I've seen plenty of shit threads stay up, of course, but usually that has to either be because there was no Jow Forums janitor online at the time or it was discovered when it already had over a hundred posts and turned into decent conversation. Good luck with your next thread user. I wouldn't think much of it user, my guess would be it was a mistake or a duplicate thread issue. You have to remember that eyewitness testimony is shit. These kind of things happen after literally every mass shooting. I do find it suspicious just because of the shift in media focus. We went from almost discussing Epstein's connections even in the MSM to the usual "white people are racist and evil" and "guns are bad". Also, was the thread archived or "pruned or deleted" message? Archived is just bad luck in the thread not getting enough attention and slipping off page ten before getting the attention it deserves. pruned or deleted is either OP deleted it or a janitor. There are cases like that with almost every mass shooting. While I don't discount the idea of the typical view of a false flag attack and setting up some loner as a patsy, it happens too often for it to always be the case that it was a team of professional killers. Plus with that eyewitness, doesn't make sense. If you send a team in to do the killing, you have them split up so the survivors can't say they saw a group of shooters at the same time. I know it seems comedically ridiculous, but yes: eyewitness accounts are often that wrong, especially in traumatic events like a mass shooting. Also, I don't think they'd want the lone wolf shooter being the narrative
What about the picture and video both depicting 2 shooters at the walmart that seem to be ignored by any official entity
if they'd sent a team. Think about how much worse the restriction on rights would be right now and calls against both the right wing and the 2nd Amendment if the story was "organized group of racist terrorist cell storm a Wal-Mart and murder dozens of innocents." Now if there is another mass shooting that's what I just described, dig like a motherfucker into every possible aspect of that. There's stuff to look into with the El Paso shooting, but in my view that's more to do with the manifesto and the closing of the other chan.
Saib txiv neej, yog tias koj muaj qee qhov kev tshawb xav lossis kev twv ua ntej tias yuav muaj dab tsi tshwm sim rau yav tom ntej, sau me ntsis ntawm qhov ntawd thiab tshaj tawm nrog cov duab no. Qes zoo / ntaub ntawv xov yuav raug tshem tawm thiab tejzaum nws khwv tau koj qhov txiav npluav. Nws tsis yog tias peb cov neeg txiav txim siab tau taug kev xaj los ntawm nyob siab kom tiv thaiv FEMA Wal-Mart cov chaw pw tom ntej los ntawm kev tshawb pom, nws yog tias koj cov xov tau quav. Kuv tau pom ntau cov quav xov kaw tau, ntawm qhov tseeb, tab sis feem ntau uas yuav tsum yog vim tias tsis muaj / pol / tus tu tsev online thaum lub sijhawm lossis nws tau tshawb pom thaum nws twb tau dhau ib puas qhov xov xwm thiab tig mus ua kev sib tham zoo me me. Cov. Hmoov zoo nrog koj cov xov tom ntej no. Kuv tsis xav ntau nws user, kuv twv yuav yog tias nws yog qhov yuam kev lossis theej xov qhov teeb meem. Koj yuav tsum nco ntsoov tias cov neeg tim khawv teev lus tim khawv tso quav. Tej yam zoo li no tshwm sim tom qab txhua qhov kev tua neeg. Kuv pom nws qhov tsis txaus ntseeg vim yog hloov ntawm cov xov xwm kom pom tseeb. Peb tau mus los ntawm yuav luag sib tham txog Epstein cov kev sib txuas txawm nyob hauv MSM rau ib txwm li "cov neeg tawv dawb yog neeg ntxub lwm haiv neeg thiab kev phem" thiab "phom tsis zoo". Ntxiv thiab, cov xov puas archived lossis "pruned lossis deleted" cov lus? Archived tsuas yog hmoov phem nyob rau hauv cov xov tsis tau txaus saib xyuas thiab nqis nplooj ntawv kaum ua ntej tau txais kev saib xyuas nws tsim nyog. pruned lossis deleted yog tog twg OP tshem nws los yog tus tu tsev. Muaj cov xwm txheej zoo li ntawd nrog yuav luag txhua qhov phom loj. Thaum kuv tsis txo lub tswv yim ntawm qhov pom ntawm qhov tsis muaj tseeb chij nres thiab teeb tsa qee lub loner li patsy, nws tshwm sim ntau dhau rau nws ib txwm yog rooj plaub uas nws yog pab pawg ntawm cov neeg tua neeg. Ntxiv nrog tus neeg tim khawv pom ntawd, tsis raug dab tsi.
That's a lot of copy and pasting when you could have just told us you're a faggot.
gu na daoine àbhaisteach“ tha daoine geal gràin-cinnidh agus olc ”agus“ tha gunnaichean dona ”. Cuideachd, an deach an snàithlean a thasgadh no teachdaireachd "pruned or deleted"? Is e dìreach droch fhortan a th ’ann an tasglann gun a bhith a’ faighinn aire gu leòr agus a ’sleamhnachadh far duilleag deich mus faigh thu an aire air a bheil e airidh. tha pruned no air a dhubhadh às an dara cuid OP air a dhubhadh às no dorsair. Tha cùisean mar sin ann le cha mhòr a h-uile mòr-losgadh. Ged nach toir mi lasachadh air a ’bheachd air an t-sealladh àbhaisteach de ionnsaigh bratach meallta agus a bhith a’ stèidheachadh beagan loner mar patsy, bidh e a ’tachairt ro thric airson gum biodh e an-còmhnaidh mar sgioba de luchd-marbhadh proifeasanta. A bharrachd air an neach-fianais sin, chan eil e a ’dèanamh ciall. Ma chuireas tu sgioba a-steach airson am marbhadh a dhèanamh, tha iad air an sgaradh gus nach urrainn don fheadhainn a thàinig beò a ràdh gum faca iad buidheann de luchd-seilg aig an aon àm. Tha fios agam gu bheil e a ’coimhead èibhinn èibhinn, ach tha: gu tric tha cunntasan fianais-sùla ceàrr, gu h-àraidh ann an tachartasan duilich mar losgadh mòr. Cuideachd, chan eil mi a ’smaoineachadh gum biodh iad airson gum biodh an neach-seilg madadh-allaidh singilte mar an aithris nan cuireadh iad sgioba. Smaoinich mu cho dona ‘s a bhiodh an cuingealachadh air còraichean an-dràsta agus gairm an-aghaidh an dà chuid an sgiath dheis
molts fils de merda es mantenen a l’altura, per descomptat, però normalment, ha de ser perquè no hi havia / pol / conseller en línia en aquell moment o es va descobrir quan ja tenia més d’un centenar de publicacions i es va convertir en conversa decent. . Molta sort amb el vostre pròxim anònim de fil. No m’ho pensaria gaire, però, suposo que seria un error o un problema de fil duplicat. Heu de recordar que el testimoni de la vista és merda. Aquest tipus de coses succeeixen després de tots els trets massius. Crec que és sospitós només pel canvi de focus mediàtic. Vam passar de gairebé discutir les connexions d'Epstein fins i tot a la MSM a les habituals "les persones blanques són racistes i malvades" i "les armes són dolentes". També es va arxivar el fil o es va eliminar el missatge "podat o eliminat"? Arxivat és només una mala sort al fil no tenir prou atenció i deixar fora de la pàgina deu abans d’aconseguir l’atenció que mereix. poda o suprimida, o bé se l'ha suprimit OP o bé un conseller. Hi ha casos com aquest amb gairebé tots els rodatges massius. Tot i que no descarto la idea de la visió típica d’un fals atac de bandera i de configurar-ne una mica més solitari com a patsy, sovint passa sempre que es tracta d’un equip de professionals assassins. A més amb aquest testimoni visual, no té sentit. Si envieu un equip per fer la matança, els heu dividit perquè els supervivents no puguin dir que van veure un grup de trets al mateix temps. Sé que sembla còmicament ridícul, però sí: els relats dels testimonis oculars solen equivocar-se, sobretot en esdeveniments traumàtics com un rodatge en massa. A més, no crec que voldrien que el tirador solitari del llop fos la narració si haguessin enviat un equip. Penseu sobre com seria pitjor la restricció als drets en aquest moment i crideu tant contra l'ala dreta com
Huh. Weird, so far I agree with everything the memeflag fag has said so far.
dude, please get help
Wtf is with the posters in this thread?
Hoewol ik it idee fan 'e typyske werjefte fan in falske flagge-oanfal net fertsjinje en wat iensumens as patsy ynstelle, bart it te faak dat it altyd it gefal is dat it in team wie fan profesjonele killers. Plus mei dat eachwille, makket it gjin sin. As jo in team stjoere om de moard te dwaan, hawwe jo se ferdield, sadat de oerlibbenen net kinne sizze dat se tagelyk in groep shooters seagen. Ik wit dat it comedysk ridlik liket, mar ja: akkounts foar eagen tsjûgen binne faaks dat ferkeard, foaral yn traumatyske eveneminten lykas in massa sjitterij. Ik tink ek net dat se wolle dat de iensume wolfskutter it ferhaal is as se in team stjoerd hiene. Tink oan hoefolle slimmer de beheining op rjochten no soe wêze en ropt tsjin sawol de rjochterfleugel as it 2e amendemint as it ferhaal wie "organisearre groep rasistyske terroristyske sellen stoarmje in Wal-Mart en deadzje tsientallen ûnskuldigen." No as d'r in oare massa sjitterij is dat is wat ik krekt beskreau, graw dan as in moederfucker yn alle mooglike aspekten fan dat. D'r is guod
Wtf- ն այս թեմայի պաստառների հետ է:
Ech unhuelen Dir kënnt dës Hispanics kommentéieren déi meeschtens europäesch an Ofstamung sinn, wéi Kubaner, funktionell Gesellschaften opbauen. Awer wann ech all Kéier attackéiert sinn wann ech ernimmt hunn datt net all Bounen routgeschnidde Savages aus den Dschungelen sinn ech loosen ze weisen datt d'Vermëschung tëscht Kolonisten an Naturvölker haaptsächlech net optrieden ausser an den initialen 50 oder esou Joeren wou wäiss Fraen knapp waren, a post-1500 Mitochondrial Dna vu "wäiss" Hispanics beweist datt si meeschtens aus spuenesche Frae stamen anstatt Naturvölker.
lol
Ҳa ҳa ҳa
Actually this image is wrong, the border has guards, but they're there to make sure nobody leaves by accident.
it means you're a fucking stupid god damn newfag and you should lurk more
Ina hoki he he tenei ahua, he kaitiaki nga rohe, engari kei konaa kei reira kia kore tetahi e mate ma te ohorere.
ISweden nakanjani ilahlekile, inani labantu abangama-muslim lapho likhulu ngesilinganiso samaphesenti e-EU. futhi lukhula minyaka yonke, enye ingxenye yabantu abakholelwa kwabesifazane njengabokufika futhi amadoda e-Holy anozwela futhi athambile. Futhi ababusi babo bezentando yeningi bayinhlangano yamacala wobushiqela, futhi ngeke bavumele noma ngubani ukuba angenelele, njengoba kwenzeka ngeSweden Democrats, ethola amavoti angama-21%. Kunoma yiliphi iqembu lamahhala lezwe elinama-21% lizoba sesilinganisweni.
Wow this thread garnered some interesting responses so far.
Di dema ceribandina motorek xwedan deqê ya ku di encama ceribandina tîrêjê ya dorpêçkirî ya li dora malpera ceribandina leşkerî de pêk hat de 5 karmendên pargîdaniya navokî ya Rusya Rosatom hat kuştin û sê jî bi şewitandina ciddî ketin.
Tîmên endezyar û teknîkî Rosatom roja pêncşemê li ser "çavkaniya hêza isotopê" dixebitin, dema ku qezayê çêbû. Teqîn di encama teqîna tîrêjê de, ya ku zû zû vegeriya rewşa normal.
"Di encama qezayekê de li devera agirkujiya leşkerî ya li herêma Arkhangelsk di dema ceribandinên pergala reaksiyonê ya rewa de, pênc karmendên pargîdaniya dewletê Rosatom hat kuştin," şirketê got. Threeavkaniyek di karûbarên acîl ên herêmê de got, sê pisporên leşkerî û sivîl di rewşek cidî de dimînin, lê birîndarên wan "xeterna jiyanê nine".
Maayo kini nga hilo nakakuha og pipila nga makapaikag nga mga tubag sa karon.
Just leafs being faggots for the most part. Not new or interesting.
Зүгээp л нaвчнyyд нь ихэнхдээ хyypaмч зүйл юм. Шинэ эcвэл coниpхoлтoй биш.
ہاں پر کوئی اور حامی ٹرافی شکار ہے؟ مجھے واقعی ان لوگوں کے لئے افسوس ہے جن کو پہلے کبھی کسی جاندار کو مارنے کا موقع نہیں ملا تھا۔ یہ کرہ ارض کے سب سے پُرجوش جذبات میں سے ایک ہے۔ کسی غیر ملکی درندے کے ساتھ ایسا کرنا جو آپ کا قتل ہوسکتا ہے اگر آپ کو ننگے ہاتھ کر دیا گیا تو سیارے کی کسی بھی چیز سے زیادہ طاقت ور محسوس ہوتا ہے۔ کنگز اور انتہائی امیروں نے ہزاروں سالوں سے یہ کام کرنے کی ایک وجہ ہے۔
ظاہر ہے کہ میں نہیں سوچتا کہ ہمیں البتہ خطرے سے دوچار نسلوں کا شکار کرنا چاہئے۔
good art