Any other Social Darwinists on Jow Forums?
Give me one good reason why I should care about anyone’s wellbeing other than my own and those in my immediate circle
Any other Social Darwinists on Jow Forums?
Other urls found in this thread:
Because we all have souls.
>why I should care about anyone’s wellbeing other than my own and those in my immediate circle
Because it would benefit everyone including you if you didn't antagonize those that aren't in your immediate circle.
Pure libertarianism is a meme
this
>only the poorfag has a kid
That's not how darwinism is supposed to work
Nazis were social Darwinists
because whites have always worked together as a community you fucking nigger.
reminder this is literally what jews do
Picture a company with 10 hiring managers. 9 of them are white, and 1 of them is jewish
The whites hire everybody based on merit, but the jew only hires other jews.
Let's say 2% of the people hired by the 9 whites are jewish, and 100% of people hired by the jew are jewish.
Thus over time, the company gets more jewish.
And soon there are 2 jewish hiring managers instead of 1, and they only hire other jews. The rate of transformation of the company has accelerated.
Until finally, the company is totally dominate by jews.
This is the power of in-group strategy. It's how left wingers conquer institutions, and why right wingers lose out. It's how jews come to completely dominate certain industries, and why Indians own all the 7/11's. The failure to do this strategy is the reason that whites are getting systematically shafted across the entire society.
But let's think a little more here.
Let's say that I know jews have this nepotism, and jews have taken over very important institutions, such as Hollywood or certain powerful corporations. Thus I might hire a jew just so I can get an inside connection to those power players. Thus the value of every single jew has increased, making them a more desirable hire.
It's like, if I have the chance to hire the son of a Goldman Sacs executive, even if he's unqualified I would do it. Because it gives me access to some powerful people that is in my interest to impress.
The in-group nepotism strategy totally dominates. This is THE strategy. If you are some "everyone is equal" cuck, you are just fucking yourself over. Better group up
Would only work with a few hundred ppl on an island who are all on the same page.
If that cunt is a different colour, he shall pay the price
>The whites hire everybody based on merit, but the jew only hires other jews.
Indian hindus are also the same.
t. works at intel
Nothing wrong with being red or green or blue.
Anyone who believes in evolution is a Social Darwinist. You are deluding yourself otherwise. Humans aren't magical beings above biology.
Subhumans suckle off the teat of the State.
Because you have morality.
if too many members of society become abjectly poor, they will have nothing to lose and start killing rich people in a civil war. if you have an underclass they have to be adequately cared for to prevent societal collapse. to be wealthy and yet be forced to live in a concrete bunker to defend yourself against hordes of starving vagrants would not really be glamorous, you should want your community to be kind and cooperative so that you can enjoy the benefits of wealth to the greatest degree possible.
>morality is subsidizing cancerous individuals who drag down the entirety of society with them
Personal charity is fine; it's your loss not mine if you want to virtue signal. It's not fine when welfare comes out of my taxes.
because you do better in mutually cooperative relationships.
because its how your brain is supposed to be wired to behave. it's literally the sign of a healthy well functioning human being to care about his tribe which is now an extended tribe of a nation. failing to do so is unhealthy and undesirable.
What makes you think there exists a continuous "you" in the first place?
>implying
To a degree its fine, lest the system keep pumping out peoppe whose only usefulness is physical labor, who are usually a bunch of tards with no concept of delayed gratification or long-term goals.
Not giving a shit about someone is not the same as antagonizing them.