He's right you know

He's right you know.

Attached: definition.png (406x248, 24K)

fuck your fucc

Attached: stalwarts.png (1649x2042, 382K)

Anything can be considered an assault weapon if you assault someone with a weapon.

Explain why I don't need one, cars are deadly weapons, you don't need one, just walk.

Source on this, or is it yet another false flag?

an assault weapon is a weapon that has automatic fire

the right wing like AOC

If it were up to me I'd ban cars too. Car culture is incompatible with the zero emissions future needed for a habitable planet.

Every day I come here and hear about the goings on in the UK, and KNOW I need one.
I'm a citizen, not a subject. I have rights, you dont.

I am a free man and a citizen of my country, unlike you who are a subject and a serf, and I alone will determine what I "need".

Mind your own business, you have enough to worry about on your side of the pond.

Attached: brits-gave-their-guns.jpg (749x562, 126K)

No he is not i need a full automatic assualt rifle for any reason i deem i want it for, shall not be infringed

"Assault weapons" are already regulated to hell, this retard doesn't know what he's talking about.qq

Not about need

there is no such thing as an assault weapon
its a term coined by anti A2 to describe something they don't understand
literally change you mind faggot

Attached: 1553872271431.png (640x274, 109K)

>Don’t you dare argue what weapons we randomly pick to ban because they’re scary
I hope this person does an Epstein and saves us the trouble.

Attached: 91C2B1A7-2A0C-4D68-9724-8B498BF7222C.jpg (2048x1152, 480K)

The future leader of the Green Party ladies and gentlemen.

If you are going to write a law you actually need a definition.

the only reason they want to take them away is because they think everyone who owns one will spontaneously start killing random people someday, which is absurd.

Wrong. The last US federal assault weapons ban was allowed to expire in 2004.

Here's the legal definition:

Assault weapons are:

Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
>Folding or telescoping stock
>Pistol grip
>Bayonet mount
>Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
>Grenade launcher mount

Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
>Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip
>Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or suppressor
>Barrel shroud safety feature that prevents burns to the operator
>Unloaded weight of 50 oz (1.4 kg) or more
>A semi-automatic version of a fully automatic firearm.

Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following:
>Folding or telescoping stock
>Pistol grip
>Detachable magazine

Attached: 1563633269168.jpg (1024x498, 84K)

>the (((legal))) definition
Consider suicide.

>assault weapons ban
Bin that attitude, brit. That ban is for scary semi-auto AR15s. That other user meant fully auto machine guns are regulated to hell.

If the government is willing to kill me to take it, that's proof I need it.

This is your mind on MSNPC and The BBC

Who said anything about machine guns? Assault weapons, are, by definition semi-automatic. See

"Assualt weapon" was a military term that meant automatic weapons, which is fucking impossible to own legally. The liberals took that and ran with it like the fucking morons they are. Kill yourself.

Semi automatic is still automatic. For example, the M1911 was commonly called the "Colt automatic" for short.

Another example is the Browning Auto-5. It was only semi-auto but it was referred to as an automatic weapon.

it was literally impossible to conceive of airplanes
>kites didn't exist, shutup

Assault weapons should not be banned so the definition is irrelevant.

Attached: IMG_4406.png (640x631, 401K)

Attached: o0kMpEc.jpg (1024x602, 135K)

>Semi Automatic is still automatic
You're too stupid to fucking debate with, you probably don't know what the difference between a magazine and a clip is faggot.

what about a "Personal defense weapon" aka PDW.

I've got an honest question. I there some sort of Jow Forums program where they pay Britbongs to flood threads with people who act retarded or are you guys here on your own and legit retarded? Because every thread there's atleast one of you sperging out and saying shit that's so fucking stupid i'm finding it hard to believe you're not being paid to do it on purpose.

>Rangel admits their all crooks
lol

Attached: 1486327345084.jpg (600x790, 63K)

>you know what an assault weapon is
oh i do?
not an argument

>Personal defense weapon
literally any weapon ever. even an IED

the "Assault" part of assault rifle means it can be used to lay down covering fire to suppress your enemy.

>Avi
EVERY
FUCKING
TIME

I'd love to have a PDW by my bed for quick home defense.

Attached: 7-MP7-helio-RIGHT.jpg (1631x1152, 287K)

>If you're on here arguing the definition of "fhsdjahjdhsabc weapon" today you are part of the problem. You know what a fhsdjahjdhsabc weapon is and you know you don't need one.

>no one needs that

Has to be the lamest attempt at an argument in their book. How about you let me decide what I need and what I don’t need, Harry!

It isn’t the bill of needs, sweaty

as a free man I should be able to line my property with landmines. don't trepsass on my property if you don't want to explode.

Attached: al.png (500x375, 115K)

Try to take it i'll shoot you to death, please come try

Assault weapon is a made up term by leftist faggots.
It means everything they don't want you to have.

Landmines should be banned globally even from government use. But feel free to set up robot turrets and patrol drones.

So what the fuck does that leave you with exactly? An array of weapons that could still be used for mass murder but are of no use when it comes to resisting tyranny.

Am I supposed to know who this is?

>Avi
Every fucking time

My katana is an assault weapon.
Don't come to weebville tomorrow.

If definitions do not matter in arguments then there's no point in arguing anything.

>you know what a assault weapon is
I actually don't, because it's a bullshit term made up to scare old women.

If your're on here arguing the definition of "assult technology" today you are part of the problem. You know what an assault technology is, and you know you don't need one.

Attached: 1565148384170.jpg (1200x1200, 214K)

>But feel free to set up robot turrets and patrol drones.
so you don't want poor people to defend themselves. you must be a Liberal

If somebody is telling me I don't need to protect myself, then I think I definitely need to protect myself.

Attached: fuck_your_gun_control.jpg (727x1024, 261K)

>Semi-automatic
>Detachable magazine
>Folding or telescoping stock
>Pistol grip
>Bayonet mount
I need all of that. He's there for wrong.

Landmines aren't exactly cheap.

Anyone who says “you are part of the problem” should be instantly gassed

I think people should learn how to use a gun and carry it on them when they leave their home. if they are afraid of violence, then it's their own responsibility to arm themselves and defend themselves.

Attached: SandlerGun.jpg (397x525, 43K)

yes they are. you must not know how to make landmines.

dilate.

>twatter screenshot
NOBODY CARES
sage

So my M1A1 isn't considered an assault weapon?
We good.

He is right, I do not need one... I need THREE!

Niggers smell and fagots deserve what mudslimes are bring to the west

OP wants the government to do everything like in Bongland.

shitty thread jannies pls delete

A select fire, closed bolt rifle that fires an intermediate round?

Only the people who were supposed to be watching Epstein should be trusted with guns.

>jannies
trannies*

Any weapon used to assault is an assault weapon. Knife, broken bottle, rock, gun, taser.

Self defense is merely assault-in-return.

What kind of fucked up logic is this? I am an incel and I don't need my testicles, but that doesn't mean I want to keep them.

As a free man who shares a property line with you, I should be able to fire missles at your house if a deer sets off one of those landmines and the resulting explosion propels dirt at my property

ok, then i guess you and your family will be murdered because you are a crybaby

SELECTIVE fire, user.
Fully automatic is a machine gun.

Or you could just place the landmine far enough on your property to not violet the NAP you godless commie

how you retards cut up your food since you've banned knives?

Attached: Screenshot_20190810-152732_Mimi.jpg (1080x966, 107K)

"Assault weapons" are semi-automatic firearms with various features such as barrel shrouds, detachable magazines, and pistol grips. Fully automatic firearms, including assault rifles, are hard enough to obtain legally that there's no reason to consider any of them assault weapons.

Consider the following: We don't need it here in the UK.
Consider the following: You do need one in America.

>He's right you know.

Attached: real 2a 2.jpg (580x435, 66K)

Country music fag. Definitely a fag; pretty whiny music.

Attached: 1564945467542.png (632x472, 45K)

So, as proven by that graph that needs to be 3x exaggerate, it really doesn't affect anything, and since people are more anti-gun over here people would feel more comfortable knowing that if they saw a gun they could just tell the police rather than feeling threatened.

America has a different history with guns and would have a harder time dealing with the smuggling of weapons from Mexico or whereever the fuck and there are hicks that like to shoot at coyotes so it's fine to let the Americans have the guns in their own country.

Attached: 1560619808186.jpg (327x317, 39K)

Assault weapon was never a term. It was assault rifle, and the liberals had to change it to "assault weapon" so they could lump various shotguns and handguns into it, and they created a legal definition to it. There is no such thing as an assault weapon other than a legal definition created by gun grabbers.

The source is some cunts harddrive. This is obviously a bullshit meme otherwise the misinformation spreading faggot would have posted a source. People like him are really such an NPC that they expect other NPCs to just accept forum memes as fucking fact with no source or citation to actually give it credibility and substance. It's a joke that dumb fucks take seriously and again accept as fact before actually verifying it, like good NPCs do.

He's right though, I don't need an assault weapon. I really need artillery, SAWS, and other crew served weapons. We'll use our rifles to get our hands on those though.

They're talking about ar-15s and other semi-auto rifles. Don't be dense. Learn what colloquial means

this should be posted in every single one of these threads

Attached: aussie gun ban.png (1200x974, 177K)

Attached: post this in every gun thread.png (626x691, 347K)

You don't want pic related?

Attached: GUNS-AND-CRIME-PREVENTION-Defensive-Gun-Use-DGU-vs-Firearm-Violent-Crime.png (1293x1040, 447K)

I agree with banning cars, but would want absolute freedom on guns in my perfect state.
What do?

I need an assault weapon to kill the socialists
they're a violent pest
I actually do need one

OP, pic related.

Attached: 1561861852562.png (500x490, 95K)

Shall not be infringed.

Not really, no. I'm not disabled or elderly or a woman yet and unless the criminals have a gun themselves I don't see that I should have any need for a gun, and if the criminals also have guns then it would be a pain to have to buy a gun.

Attached: bb.gif (175x215, 745K)

Based

>Doesn't want the right to self defense
Well your PM making immigration easier for niggers might convince you.