What the difference between these pics without mentioning race?

Attached: inCollage_20190810_174849731.jpg (1920x1920, 2.54M)

crusaders were asked by the Pope, who was asked by the byzantine Emperor if he could spare some guys to help get his land back

Men were fighting to carve out a culture, an empire. The niggers are literally just forming a flash mob to steal cheap merchandise.

3 of them are drawings

Attached: saracen moors attack a castle.jpg (623x440, 98K)

Three of them are actually badass, the bottom left one is utterly pathetic

Attached: Sam_hyde_exe.png (513x496, 532K)

Difference is we let those subhuman in with open arms.

WE

Only one is still niggering about in the current year.

another difference is that the bottom right's men aren't armed and killing each other but instead they're working together to do crime

Attached: Song of Roland.jpg (300x291, 24K)

Vikings had their own civilization and made their own weapons and ships, started whole countries, created kingdoms and became literal kings.

Attached: 57.jpg (1585x1527, 140K)

1st pic: Conventional Warfare with the goal of forming a new kingdom in the Holy Lands (Or maintaining it)
2nd pic: Viking Raiders raping and pillaging a more fertile place than their own homeland. Eventaully conquering parts of England
3rd Pic: Classical Piracy Combat
4th Pic: Negroes Chimping out and rioting

Very Different context to each violence presented...

All but one were encouraged by governments at the times

>1st pic: Conventional Warfare
user.......

Attached: Unknown Illuminator Grandes Chroniques de France France (c. A scene from the first Crusades, featuri (474x291, 40K)

Crusaders, Vikings and Pirates didn't smell so bad.

Pirates were commissioned by governments? I thought those were privateers?

Religion. They are fighting over resources with different ideologies or religion to justify the violence.
The young men in the last picture simply don't have ideology, so they don't realize they are lashing out against capital owners.

iq

The crusades set a bloody foundation for the satanic overlords Jow Forums pretends to hate. A lot of the victims of the crusades would have made the world a better place for us all.
The Vikings were pretty based but invaders and murderers none-the-less.
Piracy antics were just greedy men trying to exploit everything on the oceans and in distant lands.
Some blacks stealing stuff during a riot and looking quite pleased with their meager loot, no one is injured.

Attached: Saint George and Peter I of Aragon - Creu-Alcoraz-1524-Jeronimo-Martinez-Retablo-San-Jorge.Salvador- (794x1068, 189K)

Our most famous "privateer", Piet Hein, is most certainly considered a pirate by the Spanish.

The crusaders killed christians, does that not make them worthy of niggerty?

the modern criminals know full well that they what they are doing is wrong. they are reveling in their 'mischievousness', the dark pleasure of evil. the feudal warriors would be considered criminals by modern standards, but in their own time they had their own moral code and beliefs about reality that rationalized their actions. the pirates most likely even did.

They were all niggers nonetheless, the crusaders and Vikings killed christians, the pirates and niggers were just niggers niggering.

how much onions did you have to drink to believe this shit?

This. And none of the other three were fighting for boxes of Fruit Loops and grape drank.

The biggest niggers are the crusaders and the least are the common theives.

Attached: csm_Lempertz-1027-31-Old-Masters-and-19th-Century-Paintings-Italian-School-of-the-17th-century-Chris (2560x2048, 550K)

Future planning, abstract thinking, and delayed gratification