What went wrong

>be Immanuel Kant
>write about how people should start using their brain to think for themselfs
>write about how every authority should be questioned and how thinking is the highest thing one can do
>spark movement all across europe with people educating themselfs and calling out lies of the (((nobility and clergy)))
>die happily thinking you did it and the world is now a better place
Enter 2019
>thinking for yourself is looked down upon
>everything (((the science))) says is not to be questioned by simple people or academics who fell out of favor
>in the fight agsinst (((climatechange))) and (((white supremacy))) europeans basically suicide their culture and economy
>noone is allowed to question that or runs risk of loosing Job, friends, future opportunitys etc.

What went wrong?

Attached: b065ca5ee1e27d5e6bca0929aab48ca2.jpg (503x650, 43K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jP6n_dJGzUM
youtube.com/watch?v=ALZeO8VoqQ0
youtube.com/watch?v=RGtjeiWhrEc&feature=youtu.be&t=110
deirdremccloskey.com/docs/price.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

They didn't call him Immanuel Can

Jews did this

30 seconds after i post wtf

Critical thinking at universities is an oxymoron. You aren't allowed to think freely until you at least get a PhD.
It's just regurgitating socialist propaganda and criticising anything that isn't socialist.

Some people are just sociopaths

I think - therefore I shitpost

Attached: whynot.jpg (462x480, 76K)

Im thinking about going into economics
Will i have to suck keynes dick and preach climate garbage to pass?

What went wrong?

>people should start using their brain to think for themselfs
this
>every authority should be questioned and how thinking is the highest thing one can do
this
>>spark movement all across europe with people educating themselfs and calling out lies of the nobility and clergy
and this

He was probably the biggest brainlet in European history, virtually every single thing he ever wrote is farcically unbelievably stupid and wrong. The personification of that autistic kid who thinks he is the smartest person in the entire fucking world. They are so autistic that they can't understand that 99% of the population is not autistic and in Kant's case 99% of the population have lower IQs, 50% are functionally retarded, and women are not just soft men, so everything the autist thinks is entirely inappropriate for all but about 1% of the population, who usually have no children. Libertarians embody this archetype too. There's a damn good reason Nietzsche had such unkind things to say about Kant. Rationalists and their cousins the Idealists are the most delusional motherfuckers of all time.

>write about how people should start using their brain to think for themselfs

Why would you want billions of people with double digit IQs to think for themselves?

Philosophers always forget that they are radical exceptions to the general human rule. People need good ideas enforced upon them.

>nooooo you cant just make people use their mind like that. Whst if they stopp beliving in muh climate change and muh racism

Attached: images.jpeg-3.jpg (229x220, 8K)

Hah

Well said

>nooooo you cant just make people use their mind like that.

You can't predicate society on morons coming to reasonable conclusions entirely on their own.

>You can't predicate society on morons coming to reasonable conclusions entirely on their own.

Ofc not look at fucking africa. Im just saying that if we had his thinking a more central part of our culture things would have been radically different.
Also fuck Rousseau

MK ultra whipped the goyim into cattle.
Its quite simple really.
MK ultra turned you into cattle, too.

Shoulda stuck with astronomy.

based

Attached: D9ck-J8W4AEwjTJ.png (825x398, 254K)

His ethics

>Will i have to suck keynes dick and preach climate garbage to pass?
you will most likely learn paul samuelson econ in undergrad, where you will have to regurgitate formulas that the teachers themselves will do a terrible job explaining.
then hopefully you will experience true econ in a masters program. where you are hopefully taught that you should be able to translate each and every step of reasoning into common, everyday English. and if it doesn't make sense for the economic system you are studying, then you have to throw it out and start over again.

its a 50/50 shot, user. econ is more complex than the simple formulas you learn in undergraduate school.

i recommend reading Economic Organization by Frank Knight, then look into other works by the guy. He is CONSTANTLY self-criticizing his ideas. He even entertains (but does not subscribe, in fact hates it) to the ideas of communism. He did a talk about "the argument for communism."
His major view was that economic trade is organic, darwinistic, not paul samuelson (keynes-esque) hyper rationalist and mechanistic.

His major paper was on risk, uncertainty, and profit; it's on how you might find profit in a perfectly competitive market. yet he has a TON of social philosophical papers out there - the most notable one is the ethics of competition.

this
youtube.com/watch?v=jP6n_dJGzUM

>you will most likely learn paul samuelson econ in undergrad, where you will have to regurgitate formulas that the teachers themselves will do a terrible job explaining.

I never met anyone who can explain something left of the Chicago school in a way that makes sense. It might just be the theorys to begin with to be honest

>His major view was that economic trade is organic, darwinistic, not paul samuelson (keynes-esque) hyper rationalist and mechanistic.

Sounds pretty based i will read into it

fuck I give in, this swedish rap shit is epic
youtube.com/watch?v=ALZeO8VoqQ0

>Im just saying that if we had his thinking a more central part of our culture things would have been radically different.

If "think for yourself" is a central part of the culture, then the society will be fucking chaos. Do you want people running around acting out their 95 IQ ideas?

Most people shouldn't think.

rÄhynol...
(rohypnol) really aki? that has been away since forever. they don't make that anymore

is rivotril now

Well they arent atm and look where we are heading.

After that look at the time following the french revolution up until WW1

Its not that hard to see cmon

youtube.com/watch?v=RGtjeiWhrEc&feature=youtu.be&t=110

I am sorry but now I am listening to sven rap again

The German Enlightenment was reversed and weaponized by Marxist frauds against Europe.

fuuck...

>I never met anyone who can explain something left of the Chicago school in a way that makes sense. It might just be the theorys to begin with to be honest
for the basics, i also recommend looking here:

deirdremccloskey.com/docs/price.pdf