Redpill me on Hindu Nationalism

Exceptions exists every what but In my general observation, Hindus are much peaceful.

Lol you just explained yourself cuck

And yes it is a hindu nationalist group

I think it represents India.

It does not

>t. Dravidian christcuck

Attached: 1554488107777.png (1252x1572, 1.48M)

Now the real question: who is better at cricket?

For Western perspective, just know this.
Hindu nationalists are for greater cooperation with the West against rising China.

And Hindu nationalists also despise global liberal agenda being pushed by the (((globalists))) through Hollywood (which is hugely popular in India).

They are conservatives. And they hate Muslims.

Obviously us

A person who doesn't accept and respect his culture is a wasted man, disgrace to his ancestors.

Attached: Screenshot_20190811-193953.png (720x1280, 767K)

Where is the part about overthrowing the bourgeoisie and seizing the means of production?

>Why isn't it never talked about?
Why would it? They aren't white so they are allowed to be nationalistic. It doesn't follow (((their))) narrative. Guess they have no choice either with the muzzies wanting to blow them up and China looking dangerous.

Hindu nationalism allies itself with jewish nationalism. Whito piggu can go die.

Hindu nationalism is degenerate. It is like how people are proud because they never wash their hands when using the toilet.

The worst thing muslims ever did was to tolerate Hindus and let Hindus make their own laws. But they are paying for that now.

There whites in india too there known as indo aryans

No, you may have white genes from Aryan invaders but that's been diluted now. Can you and the pakis stop saying we are white? You both are so insecure...

I never said we are white

What's with this flood of Paki slide threads, glowniggers?

>There whites in india
What is this then?

Reveal your true flag Porkistani

t.southee blackie

Trying to shill Kashmiris are white or something and we should save them from poos. To me they are both shitskins but guess it's their double digit IQ kicking in again.

But they lynch Muslims on regular basis

Based

The bigger question is now Indian hindu can now buy pakistani women at cheap prices

Israel and hindu bhai bhai kill muslims

All of them are overweight, this is pathetic.

They are the real grassroot movement of people of India, the Hindus. Only Muslims, Christians and Liberals hate them. Kind of same situation as West where rights of majority are trampled by a coalition of minorities and useful idiots.

Dravidian Abo Christians posting under Indian flag might tell you otherwise. Since Hindu nationalists oppose Christian evangelical conversion of the poorest by offering them money.
Western Liberal media is frothing at mouth, seeing how special status of minorities is being set aside for real equality in India. This can be found in op-ed pieces of WaPo, NYT and BBC.

All this being brought on by huge surge in Right Wing support, where public is very far right wing than the ruling party is.

When (((media))) does look at Indian nationalism, they deride it. Because its against one of their protected class: Muslims.

They're just butt hurt that they're only topic on international forum regarding Kashmir has been BTFO by our based nationalist leader

Based

Scandinavians just have to be cucked to Muslims. Siding with minorities raping through their country. Get fucked nigger, Achmed is going to take your sister tonight.

First try to save yourself from them.

>Western Liberal media
Ah I don't read the news. I mean I don't really care what happens in your part of the world desu. But far right and nationalism is something I agree with so keep it up I guess.

>Worst thing Muslims did.....

Truth is all these muslim are descendents of cowards who chose Islam over death/fight.

hindus are based in a good way

>thumbnail
if you're going to be a memeflaggot atleast do it properly

That is nonsense, muslims are the people who didn't want to shit on the street and weren't afraid of toilet witches.

Look at the popularity of toilets in India and the religious demographic and it is exactly similar to each other i with muslims preferring to use toilets and was their hands with water and hindus shitting on the street and washing their hands in cow dung.

I believe that people who became Muslim were people who liked hygiene and people who are genuinely moved by the religion. Same as the people who become Muslim today.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-08-11-16-23-08-549_com.twitter.android.jpg (1080x683, 151K)

Its always hillarious when obvious curry niggers with meme and anglo flags try hard to fit into Jow Forums and shill themself as "based fellow white aryan bros"

Attached: 1561036731513.jpg (700x500, 118K)

Indian far right understands the gross social experiment that the (((elites))) have perpetrated on the modern West. But since doubting the Jew is popular with Muslims, they haven't gotten to that level yet. But Hindu Jow Forumsacks are learning and spreading the word.

Hindu nationalists at Jow Forums are completely okay with white nationalism. In truth, they see it what could become of us in the future if we don't act now to protect our demographics and culture while we still can.

Raand ki aulaad...teri aukaat kya hai RSS ke saamne? Tu unki pairon ki dhul chatne ke layak nahi hai samjha kya nalayak bhosdike

Simmerdown bhenchode my lulla in your mums vagine fucked at night? Hippyti hopatus

As much as i hate Hinduism the RSS plays an important rule in keeping the Muzzies in check.

Motheryucker dothead, hindu piss gargler stop eating your own poop bhenchode yar. no free pussy for you Pajeet.

Attached: 1556522872935.png (392x610, 306K)

They're all Hindus though. It's the last remnant of ancient Indo-European religion and identity.

You have a very good understanding of the situation here ,are you a indian by any chance or just someone involved?

You know how China was controlled by the Qing who were Manchus? Well India before the British was controlled by the Mughals, who were Muslim. Hindu Nationalists recognize colonialism as not starting with the British, but with the Mughals and Delhi Sultanate or whatever.

If you imagine the situation in Zanzibar where the Arabs were killed when the British left from Africa Addio, you can understand part of what is going on with double colonialism

21st century nationalism is coming in a wave similar to how the 20th century nationalism (balkans, ww1, ww2, de-colonization) and 19th century nationalism (Greece, Germany, Italy unification) did

We see similar situations going on in Algeria where the Beber nationality is begining to shine through as they argue against the double colonialism of the Arabs

made it better

Attached: IMG-20190625-WA0008.jpg (720x1280, 60K)

Its religious nationalism. The thing about Hinduism is that it actually isn't a defined religion in a lot of ways, and in reality it is just the amalgamation of the pagan beliefs of the subcontinent, and thus it is an indigenousist nationalism against what it perceives to be foreign. You can imagine it as the nationalism of the decolonization movement finally coming to its logical conclusion. What argument could be made against the British that could not be made against the Muslims?

Every sort of Nationalism is better than Communism as long as they are not Nationalist Communists, then they can just die in hell.

Imagine the smell

Most of the hostility to it on the part of White nationalists (I'm going to forego why mudskins hate it because the reasons for it should be obvious), comes from them being hooked on christianity.
They were raised christian and are tremendously invested in it. But when presented with the options, they can't deny that opting for Aryan traditionalism over philosemitism is the right choice. And knowing that terrifies them. It means that the semitic cult they grew up participating it, all its philosophy, all the biblical lines they read up and down, are meaningless. In fact, they are worse than meaningless, they are harmful to them, because they lead them towards self-destruction. Among the White nationalists that hate Hindu nationalism, their grievances are entirely of a religious nature.
And their opposition to it has the same emotional reasons as a normalfag's opposition to redpills has. It's a deep-seeded fear of the idea that everything they believed in, everything that they attach to what makes them who they are, is hollow and meaningless. So most, out of fear of accepting the hollow nature of their self-loathing cult, continue partaking it, rather than taking up something with meaning and more positive prospects.

The worst thing hindus ever did was to tolerate muslims on their lands

hindu nationalism is cope like white nationalism. for most of history, Hindus were never united, and most Hindus were busy killing each other. India was divided into several empires and states, each having different official languages. The only thing they agreed to was religion, but even then they fought over the holy land in Northern India. Honestly, these fucks need to study history. And yes, before some retard Indian chimps start calling me abd00l, muzzie etc. yes, I'm a Muslim and I'm Indian. Shut the fuck up faggots.

>by the Mughals
Oh no no no he actually fell for our liberal crypto abdools

Attached: DAbTiZdXYAECy01.jpg (1080x545, 67K)

> cannot understand a simple idea.

Fuck Pussy, get Satisfied Now focus on your work.

If you're satisfied, then you're in state of 'Moksha', where you don't have desires cuz you've attained the very thing that keeps you binded to desire.

So have sex, attain Moksha.

Attached: 1556043387535.gif (300x300, 143K)

Attached: DAbUQX8XoAA4uEg (1).jpg (1080x577, 72K)

why you gotta bad mouth us abd00l? we literally created not one, but TWO containment zones for you. why you gotta stay here and tolerate the Hindus? just walk across the border and unite with your muslim brothers, bro.

map for you

Attached: muzzie_containment_zone.jpg (569x554, 122K)

They have recently, but old hippies who believe in peaceful Hinduism don't want their nostalgic memories tarnished and related Goa party culture losing it's "grace" in the eyes of "liberals"

rarerarerarerarerarerarerarerare

That's retarded
> stop uniting! Don't you know you were divided once? That means you have to stay divided for all eternity or else it's a cope
To be honest it sounds like plain and simple intra-Indian d&c.

Bascially what you can imagine is that any contradiction that existed in the way things worked out as a result of the cold war that people thought would stay dead because "muh end of history" is finally bubbling up to surface across the planet

based momos

> containment zones
there's your problem lol

Attached: lulz.jpg (471x388, 24K)

North Indian Brahmin from Uttar Pradesh. Currently abroad.

Attached: poochorusline.jpg (624x351, 44K)

My general point was that Hindu nationalists reject the left-wing interpretation of colonialism being foreign invasion + privilege or whatever the fuck where invasions are only invasions if the people are white, and instead you just recognize foreign invasions for what they are

Muzzie removal forces

youtu.be/QN41DJLQmPk?t=507

here, take a (You) newfag

Attached: 1550352666703.webm (240x320, 1.45M)

the left wing interpretation usually sides with whatever favours the muslims at the time

That's a good insight. For Indian Leftists, invaders are only the white Europeans. But for Hindu nationalist/Indian right wing.. They just see invasions as invasions. They don't hate British colonialism as much they hate waves of Muslim invasions over a 400 year period from 1200-1600.

They hate Muslim invasions since it planted the seeds for what became a sizable pain in the ass Muslim minority which can't stop drawing attention to itself. They show zero integration, and have actually regressed on that issue. Burqa was never seen in Medieval India within Muslims is now the new normal among them.

pic related are the niggas who finna steal yo girl, whiteboi

muzzies cucked
anglos cucked
chinkies KEKED

hindu rashta mahabharata tata ratatata rises.........

Attached: 05rss.jpg (670x552, 77K)

Can you explain why Uttar Pradesh is the least developed part of india?

I have a theory that explains economic development as beign inversely proportionl to rural population density, in that having a lot of people spread out evenly across the landscape in villages dotted everywhere makes development notoriously difficult. Firstly because any amount of natural resource wealth will be split between way more people, and second of all development that relies on urbanism is difficult because if people are spread out evenly, you can't exactly build infrastructure in key locations because virtually the entire landscape is a "key location" (AKA you can build a railway between Delhi and Mumbai, but there is no point in building a railway between 1000 person village #567 and 1000 person village #879

For this reason, the conditions which produced a wealthy region in the past, like Egypt, Yemen, Ganges plain, result in a relatively poor region in the modern era.

The population density of Yemen is enourmous in comparison to its neighbours, and thus any oil wealth is split to the point that it doesn't matter, same goes with Egypt, which was historically wealthy, but not really today in comparison to the gulf arabs

Urbanization is well known to be a key factor of the Third and Fourth Industrial Revolution

However

Quality of life is highest among certain freedom-oriented peoples such as Swiss cantons, Greek citystates, Japanese daidios, and ScotsIrish hill clans.

So the Second Amendment is incompatible with a centralized, technocratic police state.

the major reason why HNs hate Muslim invasions is because Islamic invasion was what eventually lead to colonialism, India being divided and scattered apart, the Muslim states in India were not as strong as most like to claim. They had a weak foundation because the majority of the population did not agree with them. And the Mughals could not control such a vast territory properly.

My hometown has a massive Krishna temple on a hill, it was created in 1691, when the Mughal Emperor was Aurangzeb. The Mughals sent forces to demolish the newly constructed temple but the local Hindus easily defended the temple mount from the Islamic forces.

That was how weak Muslim rule actually was outside of Delhi. Once the Maratha Empire expanded followed by Persians defeating the Mughals, India basically lost control of itself.

Allah Lulla ham ayenge masjid Wahi banayenge

Based

Aurangzeb died within 100 Kms of the Maratha capital. His entire army was focused on that small region which allowed push back of muzzies and expand.

He had executed Sambaji (Shivaji's son) and the entire Maratha empire was enraged and motivated since despite being slowly tortured to death he refused to convert to islam.

In his deathbed Aurangzeb explained his regrets in torture-executing Sambaji which led to his entire empire collapsing.

Agreed, they sell it to chinks on easier prices
youtube.com/watch?v=jipx9p821vg&t=76s

So based post
Har har mahadev

Freight equalisation policy was adopted by the government of India to facilitate the equal growth of industry all over the country. This meant a factory could be set up anywhere in India and the transportation of minerals would be subsidised by the central government. The policy was introduced in 1952, and remained in force until 1993.

The policy hurt the economic prospects of the mineral-rich states like Bihar (including present-day Jharkhand), West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh (including present-day Chhattisgarh) and Odisha, since it weakened the incentives for private capital to establish production facilities in these areas. As a result of the policy, businesses preferred setting up industrial locations closer to the coastal trade hubs and markets in other parts of the country.

These states lost their competitive advantage of holding the minerals, as the factories could now be set up anywhere in India.

India was starting from practically zero in 1947 at independence. And once industrial heart was set up in coastal regions, development snowballed in those regions. Capital and investment moved away from the heart of the country in Uttar Pradesh to coastal parts. All at government subsidy. First few decades of India were wasted dabbling in Socialist ideas and planned economy. And they had planned for Uttar Pradesh to be an agricultural economy due to it's alluvial plains and rich yield. And this in time when crop production's share in world economy was shrinking year by year as the world became more industrialised.

>Liked Hygiene
Literally never brushes teeth in their lives and fucks their first cousin

Mughals were dismantled by marathas and sikhs, then came british whyties

aurangzeb was too soft on the marathi that's why

they needed the old boy tamerlane but got a baby who couldn't even commit mass genocide properly and was in fact not as bad as hindus make him out to be, though, he should have been worse than what hindus make him out to be

What do the hindu nationalists think about this video that argues British colonial rule was actually good for india?

youtube.com/watch?v=QAXPIhnQocM

UP is a state not for softies. More the development, more the degeneracy. Let that state be the way it is. Literally some police force open fired on muslims and nobody took any action against it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashimpura_massacre

I actually think the famine of bengal by british was pretty based. Most bengal converted and only the upper class, which were mostly hindus, survived. So it was just mudslimes

What do you think of Pakistan's 1971 Bangladesh Genocide?

not to mention for some weird they only bath on fridays

yeah but there is more degeneracy and they make places living hell wherever they go, they are worse as muzzies