Are there any real serious arguments against evolution?

explain sensory organs.

explain observational quantum dynamics

Not really, it's just a bunch of people mocking people for believing what the evidence shows us, meanwhile they believe that God made the world 6k years ago over the course of 7 days because that's what a book written 2k years ago by goatfucking sandies.

This is just stupid...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recurrent_laryngeal_nerve

because that's what a book written 2k years ago by goatfucking sandies says**

What is stupid and why? Use your words, weegie.

Pretty much this.
There aren't any secular arguments against evolution, and the religious arguments are essentially just fear that the world is more complex than their favourite book says.

The nerve goes down through the heart and back to the throat for no other reason than evolution. I cant find any good explanation for this, it should have just gone straight to the throat.

Reasons are emotionalism

Oh, well there's all kinds of weird shit like that in the human body, like how our urethra passes through the prostate. It's not always totally intuitive why something is as it is in our body. It could be that some earlier ancestor to us had a body or organs configured in such a way that it made sense and it never really mattered enough to change.

Evolution is a social construct.

In the fossil record there are gaps where species just appear or disappear like horses

>MUH EVOLUUUUTION

Attached: i (80).jpg (300x266, 42K)

So? Are you implying that God has been creating and eliminating species at will over time?

But that's one good reason on why I view as not a perfect species. And people who claim supremacy as a joke because deep down I know how frail and frightened most people really are.

britannica.com/animal/horse/Evolution-of-the-horse

No I'm saying the main piece of evidence people use is flawed
Although that is what I would do

there will always have some gaps because you can't find every fossils of every organism that lived on earth, since it takes some very particular conditions to get fossilization of the bones.

This. They clearly are incapable of evolving.

The theory isn't dependent on unbroken lines of every single species. Even with gaps, we can still observe the process taking place across time in countless genetic lines.

The current thinking is that life, which is essentially self replicating organic chemistry, sprung out of organic molecule rich water at submarine hydrothermal vents.

I believe evolution, but seriously, weaver ants. With the way ants are a hive mind, how the fuck do they come to the conclusion that they don't want to live in the earth anymore and decide to squeeze out their larva like glue bottles to make their colony high in the trees?

Attached: weaverant.jpg (600x448, 54K)

Because muh Bible that was written by a bunch of kike middle easterners said so

Attached: ChristcuckBehaviour.jpg (640x960, 102K)

stop breathing gassoline subhuman

>how the fuck do they come to the conclusion that they don't want to live in the earth anymore

They're not doing any thinking. They're like stimulus-response machines that have been programmed just to do this stuff.

Whites come from adam and eve

Niggers and browns come from apes

Jews come from the devil

In genesis God created MAN (niggers and browns) before he created the Adamic Man (whites)

The bible and evolution fit perfectly if you understand the white mans identity.

I realize that, but the behavior just seems so complicated for a DNA change.

windows2universe.org/earth/Life/miller_urey.html

No, you.

Gentlemen, I present to you, the Christcuck

...

is there any real proof it exists except the notion of a 200 year old dead brit?

Most Yanks believe in creationism.
its a genuine mental disorder.

There are no arguments against evolution.

It would be too complex for just one change. Their behavior is the product of a shitload of changes over a shitload of time.

Yeah, you ever notice how we need new influenza vaccines all the time, for example? That's because viruses and bacteria reproduce faster and because of that, evolve faster across generations. Every time you hear something about one of the many strains or the discovery of a new one, there you go. There's your evolution taking place in real time.

Attached: 1565036293491.png (961x1912, 182K)

Here's some more of this boot licking pope.

Attached: 1564573870589.jpg (968x681, 50K)

He even calls migrants of warrior of hope, I guess we are the bad guys then...

Attached: 1564606031734.jpg (813x911, 203K)

>Whites come from adam and eve
That is a story based on desert dwelling Abrahamic religions, in other words not original European.

This is actually an amazing study if you've seen it. To dumb this down for your average American, the study managed to watch bacteria learn to eat something it couldn't eat before. It is kind of a rebuttal of retards who point to complex evolutions and organs and say "that's too complex for evolution!"

Only that evolution is the wrong term, as convergent evolution shows that it is change towards limits not change towards ideal.

Kent Hovind is a retard tho

You people are just virtue signalling rightwingers. Third position need to be instituted to fix this cancer so humanity can focus on accomplishing real shit, like going to the stars, instead of some 'who has the bigger moral high horse' crap that democracy and its drive for universal suffrage has given us.

Abraham -> Isaac -> Jacob

Jacob father of true Israelites.

Israelites turn from God and are taken into Assyrian captivity and deported/migrate to the new promised land Europe and ultimately regather in America.

Whites used to know where they came from. And the jews have stolen the identity and twisted it and perverted it to their advantage.

Read the Scottish Declaration of Independence by Robert De Bruce

Yes, my belief in a jewish rabbi who was circumsiced

Yes there are
youtu.be/noj4phMT9OE
Don’t trust any (((science))) that isn’t mathematically rigorous
Evolution is not a theory, it’s a religion for materialists, and it’s a poor religion

How many people in this thread mistakenly believe that atheism and science are related?
>hint: they have nothing to do with each other
youtu.be/0XIDykeZplU

The scientific method would be one argument against the theory of evolution. Richard Dawkins loves to point out that the creationist implore an almighty God with no mistake, but every new bit of evidence not fitting the theory gets explained away. The best example being the missing link. Evolutionists can always claim there is a missing link to be found that will explain everything.

Humans in itself are a refusal to Darwin's theory because he propositioned that once an altruistic species was found, the theory was no longer valid. Somehow I don't think the evolutionists would let that argument count though.

The genetic stuff seems to be another problem. With the gaps in the fossil records and the new formation of life in the following gaps, there are wildly varying cycles of evolution between the origin of the species in those fossils. Those get passed of as internal contradictions and historical records will help to adjust the cycles or phases or whatever they call the time of evolution. It just seems geneticists don't seem to agree.

Neo-Darwinians like Dawkins have strained the theory much to far from the original proposal of the origin of species. Now we even have evolutionary psychologists, despite nearly all human traits running counter to the Darwinian theory.

>Are there any real serious arguments against evolution?
Proof or the lack there of more specifically.

No, it's the only working theory that has any predictive power

The sheer probability of it all happening makes it impossible. That’s using the numbers the average evolutionist throws out.

It doesnt explain the origin of life, only its variety.

No. Evolution is real and god is not. Anyone that disagrees is entitled there own opinion.

Most people don't even believe in evolution anyways

You do realize 2/3 of the guests are Jews, right?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Berlinski#Views_on_religion
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gelernter

Good try, though.