Is it just a waste of land and wealth.
why have royal families at all?
they may have had purpose centuries ago but now they are an anachronism.?
What is the reason for "royalty"?
>they may have had purpose centuries ago but now they are an anachronism.?
yes
You have to go back
Royal families are good as long as your country has true monarchy and not this cucked constitutional kind
To where?
I can trace my line to the 6th century in these islands.
How much land and wealth does the Royal Family cost per person? Compare that with the amount of money per person spent on cultural preservation (traditional crafts, traditional clothing, etc) and it's honestly not that much of a difference.
>what if the royal family is degenerate
This is really the only problem with monarchy is that it's hard to clean them up if they fuck up. In Britain you may want to kick out those like prince Andrew, and replace the monarchy with a better family that can make a decent claim... but that's clearly not easy.
transgender when?
(((they))) fear monarchy
>tfw blue blood history
>god tier genetics to defeat almost anyone at anything
>cap IQ tests
>do well in sports
The reason for royalty is hierarchy where the most alpha lead the pack. The strength of the country reflects the power of the ruler. Any other system can be corrupted by outside forces to weaken one's country due to individual power being disconnected from his/her society.
All governing systems/bodies only function when faith of the people is placed in the system.
If people have faith that order and justice will be maintained, then they'll accept it.
fucking kick em out like the French
Some pyscho fuck is successful enough and gets to call himself god or summoned by god/gods and rules that apply to society do not apply to them, for without them, there is no society so you will receive god/gods punishement for daring to wrong them blaa blaa etc.
Repeat for a few generations and you have the elite, with associated parasitical sects that carve their own niche out and eventually become the actual elite.
Repeat until planet is a smouldering ruin.
Even if the king kills people for fun in his basement on the weekends he will still be overall beneficial for society. Would you rather have Saudi Arabia and Israel bribing your politicians to flood your country with 3,000,000 black people or a ruler that kills 1 person for fun every other week.
Based Hereditary Absolutist.
>completely bald before 35
What a freak of fucking nature. Should be neutered on birth.
>Even if the king kills people for fun in his basement on the weekends he will still be overall beneficial for society.
Mutt education
Because feral niggers need to be lead by a parental figure since their own abandon them.
Saesneg invader
why do they fear that which just stands by and watches the country go to shit
Oh look. A leaf has been triggered and is falling to the ground. Hey? How about that Doug Ford fella? Whores and Crack on tax payers dime. Or Your boy Justin? Evading the overseers yet again.
How will America ever recover from your pithy photo?
The Left Can't Meme.
Warrior kings are the only true kings. Everybody else is a silverspoon faggot.
This. If you can't kill you shouldn't rule.
that's retarded, kings should be allowed to select the very best from the breeding stock in their countries
He already looks gay.. So sad. Imagine how many times he has been raped already.
They never had a purpose, they were just the assholes who were hardest to overthrow.
It was literally just conquest and rule by fear. That's why they were always fighting rebels and why most of them ended up killed by the people they oppressed.
Cromwell should have finished the job.
People with religious views and backgrounds from other countries had a hard time overthrowing and/or corrupting kings. Woe is me; so terrible right.
Throw a number out there
True
(You)'re a faggot
You have no say in this matter, peasant.
I disagree, presidents are born kings whom you are deluded into thinking you elected.
>Cromwell should have finished the job.
He pretty much did. The problem was the heir he chose aka his son. He picked his own son to be "Lord Protector". Almost sounds like he was just trying to make himself a version of king.
Also the office of Lord Protector had more power than the actual king. Better add that part.
Originally being King meant that person kept order and kept civilization from collapsing. You gave him privilege in exchange for that. Its actually a really good thing if he can pull it off. Eventually the king starts to fail or expects to much and everything collapses.
Essentially the king is the person running a system of civilization that people are grateful enough for that they choose to follow him. Even if they wouldn't admit its a choice. If hes better then a full collapse they will follow for awhile at least.
The city of London is a separate land, it does not belong to the state.
The royal family and their possessions bring more wealth than mere commoners also.
I should also add that blood inheritance has advantages. One of the best is that because the leader expects the kingdom to be passed to his own children, usually his son, said leader will plan for its long term future. One of the reasons childless leaders might be a bad idea is they do not have direct skin in the game beyond their own life. They might make decisions that are good short term at the cost of the long term health of the kingdom. As a real life example allow me to offer the last days of former Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley. He sold the rights to the cities parking meters over x years for a third of what is was worth but he got it up front. This and other decisions like it allowed him to balance the budget on his way out the door. Fucked everyone who came after him though. And he didnt give a shit because its not his problem. A leader passing to his child will have to think about what they are doing to that child. Look at all the other pensions and unfunded liabilities we are allowing to build in the current day. This is a result of leaders not giving a shit beyond the term of their office. Essentially leaving shit for tomorrow instead of nipping it in the bud.
God is KING and a part of the human psyche echoes with eternity, where things like royalty and custom find their foundation.
By creating customs and royal families a country is able to establish itself, claiming its status as directed and blessed by God.
Unless they have the talent and vision of Adolf Hitler, the royals are just a waste of good air.
>Mentally unhinged.
>Will bleed when touched.
>Pampered.
>Out of touch with the governed.
You know, if you look at history you'll see European monarchies not do anything of note for a few generations, then when the shit hits the fan they come back to their full brilliance. I would think that a few years of prosperity isn't enough to claim the monarchy "anachronistic."
Brits are pedos. The royal family is their symbol of pedo pride.
This has gotta be the last generation of royals in the UK. Like nobody gives a shit after Elizabeth finally goes, right bongs?
royal families are the descendants of the nephilim and the humans that made pacts with the spirits of the nephilim after the flood
No they've had a procedure for when liz dies since like the 70s. Charles will be made king and then it'll probably die within a decade after that because no one truly will care after that.
Its their land and their wealth.
>Is it just a waste of land and wealth.
Communist, eh?
>Inbreeding
>Monarchist issue
Nigger, that's a general issue
Hapsburg brainlets deserve the rope for disrespecting their bloodline in neutering it.
>How much land and wealth does the Royal Family cost per person?
If we removed them and took the money, we could probably give each major city in the UK around £5,000,000 each to spend on their citizens.
They just disgust me really, not a communist.
Same reason billionaires exist. Because we let them.
yeah but even in the best case kinda revolution that would never happen. you'd just get a buncha bureaucrats and corporations to take their place.
>They just disgust me really
Enough for you to advocate communism.
Why stop there? You could just keep robbing the bourgeoisie until they were all dead. Then everyone would be equal like you want.
>what is the reason for "royalty"?
They're the "winners".
Without them we have to re-run the competition to win.
Looks like it'll be Emperor Bezos.
There seems to be a pretty strong dislike against monarchy in Britain. How come?
I think I’ve never met a Swedish person ever that have hated the Swedish monarchy. It’s like everyone, even the cucks, are proud over the history of Swedish kings.
Fuck the royals
Shitskins are told by jews the british monarchy oppressed their people long ago so they must hate.
(((they))) are the monarchy.
You deluded fuck.
Now that they have been blacked i think they are disgusting and detrimental to our countries health
they are a bunch of dirty paedophiles.
I don't want equality just end their corruption, how can you freely advocate for such people?
It’s called you are the slave and they are the master, but they don’t want to rub it in too bad. The only purpose is their enrichment at your expense, as one of their cattle.
The best cow meat is happy before slaughter.
>proud over the history
We literally ran out of royalty and had to send people down into Europe actual to find someone who wanted to be king in Sweden. Everyone said "fuck that noise" and in the end a fucking LIEUTENANT in the french army said "eh sure, why not?"
That's literally the history of our current royal family.
>How can you freely advocate for private citizens and inheritance, comrade? Don't you see my stupid insults?
Elisabeth ll really only “owns” two of the many castles and palaces she uses. Only Balmoral in Scotland and Sandringham house in Norfolk are hers personally, the rest are “owned” under crown occupancy meaning whoever is king/queen resides there. Most of the well know palaces/castles are owned by the National trust. Although they remain to this day some of the wealthiest land owners in the world.
Oh yes let's make the area that brings huge revenue into a nigger area.
Lol fuck royalty right.
Absolute rule properly works when heirs are designated and not destined by blood. Romans had a pretty good run with adopting and grooming promising men for leadership.
come to England and wave your little flag at them, then kowtow to them, while they sneer at you and take your money.
>brings huge revenue
they don't bring anything.
People visit Buck palace & they never actually see anyone there.
Nah, I'm good, pinko. No need for any of that. Least of all handing over money.
>they don't bring anything.
Crown Estate, retard. Profits from it amount to around £400m each year. Then a salary of ~£30m is given to Her Majesty in return to cover everyone.
the Crown Estate. It is NOT state owned. It is NOT government owned. It is owned by the monarch in right of the Crown as her public property, as opposed to her private property. It is managed by the Crown Estate Commissioners
>Crown Estate, retard. Profits from it amount to around £400m each year. Then a salary of ~£30m is given to Her Majesty in return to cover everyone.
for your enlightenment too.
the Crown Estate. It is NOT state owned. It is NOT government owned. It is owned by the monarch in right of the Crown as her public property, as opposed to her private property. It is managed by the Crown Estate Commissioners
royalty and nobility are just inter-generationally wealthy people who secure a monopoly on violence and successfully keep new blood from rising to prominence. They exist in every nation and hold back the human species to satisfy their narcissism.
Absolute monarchy is the natural system. The garbage system we live in now was spawned by jews
Retard
Monarchy has several advantages.
The king and family are liable for their debts and creditors can liquidate their assets. Future regimes arent able to go back on agreements unless said regime is there from overthrowing the monarchy
A monarch's options for acquiring land are
-war
-marriage
-trade
In democracy marriage is definitely off the table, and trade is harder to do because of the loss of liability among other reasons so much more emphasis is put on wars,
wars which are much more devastating because suddenly you supposedly voted for the war and its no longer just the business of the kong to be financed by the king. Now its a total war. Soldiers are both increadibly cheap and easy to pay for because of the extra money afforded to democracies.
The royal family basically owns the country so their incentive rather than expropriating as much as possible during their reign wether through taxation or regulation that is advantageous to them is actually to tax low and make the economy as productive as possible so that they can tax more in the future. The kind of france was once considered the debtir of justice.
You get rulers who were trained from birth for their role and because of the huge time period of their rule the country is incredibly stable.
better for one family to
have the power to tax than for every family to tax every other family. Funny that people considered royal taxation unfair, but since the widespread adoption od democracy the trend of wages rising and prices falling stopped, the gdps of some countries is straight up smaller than their debts, war is now total war, taxation is higher under democracy than ever thought possible, and the gold standard was removed which no king was ever able to get away with.
Monarchy is the best form of government. Monarchs are raised from birth to rule, and they own the land, they don't just rent it. A monarch won't take actions that give short term gain for long term loss, like say mass importing immigrants to boost the economy at the cost of the nation's culture. A monarch wants the country to be successful so he can pass it on to his son some day. He doesn't want to pass on a debt-ridden, war-torn mess; which is exactly what the western countries became after the masonic revolution and they dropped their monarchies for democracies.
I would unironically take Charles II over any democratically elected leader
well put.
how do you become king? you hire a bigger bunch of thugs than the opposition.
Same as how you become president or PM then.
Cheers for hoisting your own petard.
True of any government, or means of obtaining power.
Whats the reason for disney world?
Same thing.
why do ant colonies have a queen
>how do you become king? you hire a bigger bunch of thugs than the opposition.
Cry about it into a pillow you limp wristed faggot.
Would you rather be ruled by financers and politicians who sit in a safe room while a professional army of single digit IQ retards do anything that they tell them to do for money, or a warrior class of people trained all their lives for governance and combat who have a responsibility to fight and defend their country if it gets invaded?
In both cases, you're ruled over by elite classes of people.
If those nobility and royalty didn't exist you'd be fucking slaves like the children in Indonedia or Chinese sweatshops. Welcome to the real fucking world you goddamn retards. The earth is a zero sum game on multiple leaders.
Ants are capitalist and monarchist cucks obviously. Communist and anarchist ant colonies work it just hasn't been tried correctly yet! Hate those meanie elitist ant queens boooo uhhhh waaaaaa :*(*****
All worker and soldier ants are female as well, only male ants are drones who mate with queen until they die.
Legitimacy
Dunno in western
I want to kick that little faggot so bad.
Some posters in this thread:
Waaaa why are some people so selfish and violent in the world whyyyy-whyyyyy noooooo you can't do that why cant we all just love each other and dismantle our country's army waaa nooooooo
lmao
How do you people exist
calm down, muhammad
Habsburgs had shitty genes to start with.
Because expropriating them would set a dangerous precedent in our capitalistic society.
Kill all commies
Have you ever picked up a history book and do you know how a civilization works? Fucking retarded, should be banned for even making this thread.
There really isn't institution could be considered legitimate like that for population in most of west. The lack of proper justification makes return to monarchy in Europe impossible in my opinion, new absolute rulers could be just called fascists.
ARSE KISSER = yourself.
MM your majesty can I lick your anus even more?
I would agree with you if our Queen held some value and laid 100 eggs every day from her bloated abdomen.
THIS, amazing how many retarded people there is in the world. So naive and have zero understanding of the world.
If just everyone would speak the truth and not lie everything would be resolved in a few years and the solution would be KILL ALL FUCKING NIGGERS
Hey kid you can go move to a third world country and not have a monarch. Hell you can come here and get into seven figures of debt in a scarce job market. You must be like 12 years old to be typing the naive drivel you are.
Why are you people so ADDICTED to hierarchies?
Don't you ever think you can do things yourself
without a king or a boss or a committee telling you what to do.
even better hierarchy boy you can have our royal family, take them - all of them.
they will want a lot of money, the best housing, the best food & etc..
but you will not object to this will you..?
Every animal on the entire planet is ran by hierarchies you fucking mongloid, we are still animals that function the same. You think all our instincts etc changed 1980 when shit like internet came to light? Because before that this was the way people ran things.
My family has murdered one of your monarchs. I'd probably cut their nuts out and turn them into eunuch slaves in the basement of a hotel you ungrateful brat. Then your GDP will meteor down all the meanwhile when the economy around the crown estates become null. Then i can bribe your politicians while ass fucking your queen then roll in and burn down your house.